Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive
Melville Rodrigues
21 July 2010
Real Estate Funds: Practical Implications
Real Estate Funds: Practical Implications
Opportunities for Competitive Advantage
Opportunities for Competitive Advantage
Issues Issues
1. Implementation 2. Scope
3. Authorisation
4. Key Benefit: Passporting 5. Operational Aspects
6. Third Country Matters
Implementation Implementation
Trialogue: negotiations between Council and Parliament, and involving the
Commission - Parliament plenary vote in September or
October
Level 2 measures to be adopted
2011 2012
Directive likely to take effect, i.e. to be
transposed into national legislation
z Level 2 measures = Detailed provisions adopted by the Commission and endorsed by a qualified majority of Member States
z Level 3 guidance = Guidance issued by European Securities and Markets Authority:
harmonisation by national regulators
Level 3 guidance to be issued
Scope Scope
z Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) means:
– any collective investment undertaking
– which raises capital from a number of investors
– with a view to investing in accordance with a defined investment policy – non-UCITS funds
§ closed-ended and open-ended
§ EU and non-EU
z Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) means:
– any legal person
– whose regular business is managing one or more AIF – internal or external
z Managing AIF means providing investment management services
– portfolio management – risk management
Scope
Scope
z Exemptions
– AIFM: pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and (assets held on own account) insurers and credit institutions
– Council draft:
– Holding companies if main purpose is to carry on a business strategy by producing and selling goods and/or providing services
– Member States may exempt AIFM of:
– funds of less than €100m; and
– unleveraged funds of less than €500m with minimum 5 year term
– Parliament draft:
– unleveraged funds of less than €250m with minimum 5 year term (no depositary, valuation, delegation or third-country requirements)
Authorisation Authorisation
z Practical implications
– Each AIFM will require specific authorisation as an AIFM
– In UK, competent authority likely to be Prudential Regulatory Authority – Information to be provided includes:
– managers, shareholders or members of the AIFM
– programme of activity & organisational structure of the AIFM;
– investment strategies, risk profiles and other characteristics of the AIF – fund rules and constitutional documents
– delegation and custodial arrangements
– Authorisation conditional: demonstrating compliance with the Directive
z Capital adequacy requirements
– External AIFM to have capital of at least €125,000 – Internal AIFM to have capital of at least €300,000
– AIFM managing funds exceeding €250m = 0.02% of the excess amount
– 50% of own funds: may take the form of a bank/insurance company guarantee – In all cases, total capital requirement cap = €10m
– Under Council draft, AIFM managing unleveraged funds of less than €500m with minimum 5 years term that do not make regular divestments: only required to hold €50,000 in capital
Key Benefit:
Key Benefit: Passporting Passporting
z Management passport
– AIFM authorised in a Member State may provide management services throughout the EU on a cross-border basis or through a local branch
z Marketing passport
– AIFM authorised in a Member State may market AIF EU-wide to professional investors – Member States have option to allow marketing to retail investors by EU AIFM on
a non-discriminatory basis
z Single market dynamics
– Pan European brand development
z Depositary
– For EU AIF, independent depositary based in home Member State required
– Credit institution or investment firm, but cannot be the AIFM itself
– Under the Council draft, the depositary is strictly liable for losses caused by a sub-custodian, except where the depositary has contracted out of liability reasonably after conducting due diligence into the sub-custodian
– However, under the Parliament draft, no depositary is required for real estate funds
Operational Aspects
Operational Aspects
z Delegate
– reputable and experienced - and Parliament draft: creditworthy
– AIFM able to demonstrate that the delegate is qualified and capable, selected with due care - capable of being monitored
– AIFM remain liable for delegated activities
– Parliament draft: the AIFM must inform investors of delegated functions
– Parliament draft: the AIFM must also notify its regulator, which has one month to reject any act of delegation
– Delegation of portfolio and risk management:
– Council draft: generally only possible to delegates authorised or registered for the purpose of asset management and subject to
regulatory supervision. But this is not required for AIFM of real estate funds - only prior authorisation from the AIFM's home regulator required – Council draft: delegation to third-country entities is only possible if
appropriate cooperation arrangements are in place between the AIFM home regulator and third-country regulator
– Parliament draft: only possible to delegates that are authorised as an AIFM to manage an AIF of the same type
z Transparency
– Investment strategy, structure of AIFM and AIFs, delegation, valuation and custodial arrangements, fees and other information to be disclosed to investors prior to investment
– Preferential treatment of specific investors also to be disclosed
– Competent authorities and investors to be informed periodically about AIF liquidity and risk management
z Risk management
– Risk management and portfolio management must be separate – Risk in each AIF to be regularly assessed
– Under Parliament draft, arrangements with prime brokers must be appropriately documented
z Valuation
– AIF valuation must be independent, even where performed by the AIFM – Council draft: exempts AIFM of closed-ended AIF whose shares are
traded on a regulated market
– Parliament draft: periodic valuation optional for AIFM of real estate funds
Third Country Issues Third Country Issues
z Marketing of third-country AIF
Council draft and Parliament draft take different approaches
– Council draft: national private placement regimes for third country funds managed by:-
§ AIFMs subject to 1. regulator co-operation agreement but 2. reduced depository requirements
§ third country managers subject to 1. regulator co-operation
agreement and 2. managers comply with limited aspects of Directive (disclosure/reporting)
– Parliament draft:
§ third country funds must satisfy 1. regulator co-operation agreement 2. compliance re ML & terrorism 3. OECD compliance tax information 4. reciprocal market access 5. reciprocal enforcement of judgments.
§ In addition, third country managers must “opt in” i.e. comply with the Directive and five criteria, and third country regulator must agree with ESMA to supervise compliance with Directive by Manager
Opportunity, Opportunity, Opportunity!
Opportunity, Opportunity, Opportunity!
z Wait and see z Investors
z Managers
z Competitive advantages
Melville Rodrigues Partner
CMS Cameron McKenna LLP Mitre House
160 Aldersgate Street London EC1A 4DD
melville.rodrigues@cms-cmck.com D: +44 (0) 20 7367 3137
M: +44 (0) 7899 910641 S: +44(0) 20 7367 3000 F: +44(0) 20 7367 2000