• No results found

Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials : a consensus study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials : a consensus study"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Table 1 Methodological criteria and rationale
Table 1 Methodological criteria and rationale (Continued)
Table 2 Median, 30th centile, 70th centile, appropriateness, and disagreement index, by item
Figure 1 The study process.
+4

References

Related documents

A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone with observation to treat vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to central

Full-time master’s degree students in all sectors and research doctoral students enrolled at for-profit institutions cover most of their tuition and living expenses with

board promoted an extensive reduction of the swelling ratio and satisfied good dimensional stability whose values were at least 50%-60%, as antiswelling efficiency

Spectrophotometric color analysis of the wines produced from fresh grapes on the 80 kg and 500 kg scale, revealed significantly higher concentrations of total

Anti-inflammatory effects of the preparation were studied according to the below methods: S.Salamon– burn induced inflammation of the skin, caused by hot water (80 0 C) in white

production or differentiation of IL-25-elicited MPP type2 cells. When cultured in the presence of TSLP and IL-33, increased cell survival/recovery along. with the generation of