arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 28 Dec 2008

arXiv:0812.4201v2 [hep-th] 28 Dec 2008

Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION

Type I Supergravity Effective Action from Pure Spinor Formalism

Geov´a Alencar^a

aInstituto de f´ısica te´orica, Universidade Estadual Paulista Rua Pamplona 145, 01405-900, S˜ao Paulo, SP, Brasil

Abstract: Using the pure spinor formalism, we compute the tree-level correlation func- tions for three strings, one closed and two open, in N = 1 D = 10 superspace. Expanding the superfields in components, the respective terms of the effective action for the type I supergravity are obtained. All terms found agree with the effective action known in the literature. This result gives one more consistency test for the pure spinor formalism.

Keywords: Superstring, Pure Spinor, Effective Action, Supergravity.

Contents

1. Introduction 1

2. Type I supergravity effective action 3

3. The tree-level correlation function for one closed and two open massless

strings in the pure spinor formalism 5

4. Correlation functions in components 9

4.1 One graviton/dilaton and two photons 9

4.2 One graviton/dilaton and two photinos 11

4.3 One gravitino/dilatino, one photon and one photino 13

4.4 Kalb-Ramond and two photons 15

4.5 Kalb-Ramond and two photinos 16

5. Conclusions 17

6. Appendix A: Some important identities 17

7. Appendix B: Gauge invariance 18

8. Appendix C: The one graviton two photons correlation function in Ramond-

Neveu-Schwarz formalism 19

9. Appendix D: One gravitino one photon one photonino 22

1. Introduction

The covariant quantization of superstring theory has been an unresolved problem for a long time. The covariant quantization, besides having manifest supersymmetry, makes the computation of scattering amplitudes easier. This is important for understanding the low energy limit of superstrings, through the construction of effective actions corresponding to such amplitudes. In order to solve the problem of manifest covariant quantization, a new formalism, known as pure spinors formalism, was proposed [1]. This new formalism keeps all the good properties of Ramond-Neveu-Schwarz and Green-Schwarz and does not have its undesired characteristics. In the Ramond-Neveu-Schwarz formalism, when the number of loops in computations of scattering amplitudes are increased, more and more spin structures have to be considered which makes the computations very long. On the other hand, in the Green-Schwarz formalism the quantization is only possible in the light-cone gauge and the amplitude computations involve non-covariant operators at the interaction points.

The complete equivalence between the pure spinor formalism and other formalisms is missing. Until this point is reached, the formalism needs to pass many consistency tests. One of these tests consists of computing scattering amplitudes and comparing the results with those coming from other formalisms. These tests have been carried out for amplitudes involving closed superstrings at one loop [2] and two loops [3], among others.

Interestingly, amplitudes involving mixed superstrings have not been considered in the literature. One important point is the fact that in pure spinor formalism the amplitudes have explicit super-Poincar´e symmetry, making the results automatically supersymmetric since the beginning.

From the viewpoint of field theory, the effective action for the type I supergravity is obtained from the global super Yang-Mills action by imposing local supersymmetry, which originates many compensation terms [4] that are interpreted as interaction terms.

From the viewpoint of superstrings, all these interaction terms must come out naturally from amplitude computations. The interaction terms of the type I supergravity effective action have some interesting properties. A very peculiar one is the fact that there is a coupling between the Kalb-Ramond and two photons. This term is needed to obtain local supersymmetry. In order to keep gauge invariance, the Kalb-Ramond field must have a unusual transformation under U(1) symmetry. This coupling will become very important for the mixed anomaly cancelation in the SO(32) theory.

As pointed above, all these terms must come naturally from superstring theory. How- ever, as they involve gravitational and Yang-Mills fields, amplitudes with open and closed strings have to be considered. In this work, we will show that these terms can be obtained from the pure spinor formalism. In string theory, the effective action can be obtained considering the scattering amplitudes or correlation functions of three points given by

A = hV1V₂V₃i,

where the Vs above represent the physical states and are called vertex operators. For the mixed scatterings, we must use the upper-half complex plane. The closed string is represented by a point in the interior of the plane, while the open strings, by points in the real axis. The number of conformal Killing vectors in this case is three, and the number of moduli is zero. This makes it possible to fix the positions of the closed string and of one of the open strings, obtaining

A = hV1V₂ Z

U₃i.

In the last equation, V1 represents the fixed closed string, V2 represents the fixed open string and U₃, the integrated open string.

In the second section of this paper, we give the expression for the type I supergravity effective action and its respective linearized action. This will be compared with the ex- pression obtained from the pure spinor formalism. In the third section, the prescription for amplitudes in pure spinor formalism will be briefly summarized, and an expression for the computation of one closed and two open strings will be given. Using superspace identities,

a simple expression will be found following identical steps of [5]. This expression is given by

A = go^′2g_c^′πiα^′Dh A¹_m

λ ˜A¹

+ ˜A¹_m λA¹
i λA²

λγ^mW³
E ,

where the superfields in the closed string vertex operator V¹ have been written as the product of two open string superfields.

It is important to note that this expression is manifestly super-Poincar´e covariant and that all the amplitudes involving one closed and two open massless strings are contained in it. This shows one of the advantages of the pure spinor formalism. It will be also shown, in appendix B, that this expression has all the gauge invariances.

In the fourth section, with this simple expression, the superfields will be expanded in components, and explicit results will be given for all the correlation functions from which the effective action can be obtained. All cases will be considered with some details, except the case of one gravitino, one photon and one photino, which will be left for appendix D.

In appendix A, some useful identities will be given, and in appendix C, the correla- tion function for graviton-photon-photon will be considered in the Ramond-Neveu-Schwarz formalism for matter of comparison with pure spinor formalism.

2. Type I supergravity effective action

As said before, the Type I effective action can be obtained by imposing local supersymmetry in the Super-Maxwell action and is given by[4]

√1

−G L = − 1

2κ^′R −˜ 9 16κ^′2

∂_Mφ φ

2

−1

4φ^−3/4(F_{M N})²−3

4φ^−3/2H_{M N P}²

−1

2ψ_Mγ^{M N P}D_Nψ_P −1

2λγ^MD_Mλ − 1

2χγ^MD_Mχ

−1

4κ^′φ^−3/8χγ^Mγ^{N P}F_{N P} ψ_M +

√2 12γ_Mλ

!

+

√2

16κ^′φ^−3/4χγ^{M N P}χH_{M N P} −3√ 2

8 ψ_Mγ^Nγ^Mλ

∂_Nφ φ



+

√2κ^′

16 φ^−3/4H_{N P Q}(ψ_Mγ^{M N P QR}ψ_R+ 6ψ^Nγ^Pψ^Q

−√

2ψMγ^{N P Q}γ^Mλ) + (F ermi)⁴.

In order to go to the String Frame, we make the field redefinitions G˜_{M N} = e^2ωG_{M N}, φ = e^8ω/3, ψ_M = 1

κ^′e^ω/2ψ_M^′ , χ = 1

g^′e^−5ω/2ξ λ = 1

κ^′e^−ω/2λ^′, A_M = 1

g^′A^′_M, B_{M N} = κ^′ 3√

2g^′2B_{M N}^′ , η = e^ω/2η^′, where ω = (Φ₀− Φ)/4. We obtain the following Lagrangian

L =

√−G 2κ² e^−2Φ

R + 4∂MΦ∂^MΦ

−

√−G

4κ² e^−ΦF_{M O}² − 1 24κ²

√−GHM N P^′2

− 1 2κ²

√−Ge^−2Φψ_Mγ^{M N P}D_Nψ_P − 1 κ²

√−Ge^−2Φλγ^MD_Mλ

− 1 2κ²

√−Ge^−Φξγ^MD_Mξ − 1 4κ²

√−Ge^−Φξγ^Mγ^{N P}F_{N P}



ψ_M +1 6γ_Mλ



+ 1 48

1 κ²

√−Gξγ^{M N P}ξH_{M N P}^′ − 2 κ²

√−Ge^−2Φψ_Mγ^Nγ^Mλ∂_NΦ

+ 3 8κ²

√−Ge^−ΦH_{N P Q}^′ (ψ_Mγ^{M N P QR}ψ_R+ 6ψ^Nγ^Pψ^Q− 2ψMγ^BCDγ^Aλ).

In the last equation, ψ is the gravitino, λ is the dilatino, ξ is the photino and we use the standard notation for the bosonic fields. The coupling between the Kalb-Ramond field and the photon comes from H^{′M N P}, which is defined as

H^′ = dB + 3AdA.

In the low energy limit, we need only the linearized Lagrangian. The usual procedure is to make

G^{M N} = η^{M N} + h^{M N}. In order to simplify some terms, we use the identities

γ^Mγ^{N O}− γ^{N O}γ^M = −2G^{M O}γ^N+ 2G^{M N}γ^O and

γ^Mγ_{N P}γ_M = 6γ_{N P}.

Regarding only the terms related to the two open and one closed string amplitudes, we obtain

L = − 1

2κ²h^M_NF_{M O}F^{N O}− Φ

4κ²F_{M O}² − 1

8κ²H_{M N P}A^MF^{N P}

− 1

2κ²h_g1g2ξγ^g1∂^g2ξ + 1 48

1

κ²ξγ^{M N P}ξH_{M N P} (2.1)

− 1

κ²ξγ_Pψ_MF^{M P} − 1

4κ²ξγ^{N P}λF_{N P}.

The indices here are raised with η. Attention is required in considering the dilaton contribution coming from the expansion of the metric determinant, because

√−G = 1 +1 2h^m_m and the trace of h_mn is related to the dilaton.

3. The tree-level correlation function for one closed and two open massless strings in the pure spinor formalism

As discussed in the introduction, from the viewpoint of string theory, the graviton is represented by a closed string and the photon by an open string. In pure spinor formalism, the fixed operator for the open string is given by [1]

V = g_o^′λ^αAα, where λ is a pure spinor satisfying

λγ^mλ = 0. (3.1)

The BRST operator is given by

Q = λ^αd_α with

d_α = α^′ 2 p_α−1

2θγ^m˙x_m−1

8γ_αβ^mγ_mδηθ^βθ^δ∂θ^η. The physical state condition gives us the equations of motion

DαA_β+ D_βAα = γ_αβ^mAm, (3.2) where

D_α= α^′

2∂_α+ θγ^m∂_m

and A_m is a vector superfield. The integrated vertex operator for the open string is g_o^′

Z dy₃



∂θ^αA_α+ A_mΠ^m+ d_αW^α+1

2N^nmFnm

 ,

where A_α, A_m and d_α are defined above and W^α and F_mn are field strengths given by W^α= 1

10γ_m^αβD_βA^m, Fmn = 2∂_[mA_n], being N^mn the Lorentz generators for the ghosts λ, given by

N^nm = α^′(λγ^mnω)

4 .

When necessary, the superfields will be expanded in components. The vertex operator for the closed string is given by the product of two open string operators (λ^αA_α) ¯λ^αA¯_α

. Then, we have for the amplitude[1]

A =

 V_gV_h

Z U_h

= g^′_o²g^′_c Z

dy₃

λ^αA¹_α(z)
¯λ^αA¯¹_α(¯z)


λA²(y₂)

U_h(y₃)

= g_o^′2g_c^′ Z

dy₃h

λ^αA¹_α(z)
¯λ^αA¯¹_α(¯z)


λA²(y₂)

× (3.3)



∂θ^αA³_α+ A³_mΠ^m+ dαW₃^α+1

2N^nmFnm³

 i.

A way to simplify an expression similar to this is given in ([5]). We must show here that the same expression is valid in the case of mixed string amplitudes following the same steps. First of all we must note that the first term of the integrated operator has null OPE with the other vertex operators. After this, we get

A = go^′2g_c^′ Z

dy₃h

λ^αA¹_α(z)
¯λ^αA¯¹_α(¯z)


λA²(y₂)

× (3.4)



A³_mΠ^m+ d_αW₃^α+1

2N^nmFnm³

 i.

We also have that the OPE of any vertex operator with A²(y2) will have null result by fixing y₂⇀ ∞ . For the next term, we need the standard OPE

: Π^m(y₃) e^ik·x(z) :∼ ik^m1 α′

 1 z − y3

+ 1

z − y¯ 3



e^ik·x(z) to obtain

iα^′ Z

dy₃k^m₁ α′

 1

z − y³ + 1 z − y¯ ³



λ^αA¹_α(z)
¯λ^αA¯¹_α(¯z)


λA²(y₂)
A³_m

. (3.5) Now fixing

Im(z) = ia, Re(z) = 0 the term in eq. (3.5) is also null

iα^′ Z

dy₃k^m₁ α′

 1 z − y3

+ 1

z − y¯ 3



λ^αA¹_α(z)
¯λ^αA¯¹_α(¯z)


λA²(y₂)
A³_m

= 0, and only the two last terms contribute

A = g^′o²g_c^′ Z

dy₃



λ^αA¹_α(z)
¯λ^αA¯¹_α(¯z)


λA²(y₂)


d_αW₃^α+1

2N^nmFnm³



. For the next term, we must use the OPE

d_α(z_i) V (z_j) ∼ −α^′ 2

D_αV zj− zⁱ −α^′

2 D¯_αV

¯ zj− zⁱ

and we arrive in

A¹ = g_o^′2g_c^′α^′ 2

Z dy₃ z − y3

D

Dα λA¹(z)


λA¹(¯z) λA²

W₃^αE

−go^′2g^′_cα^′ 2

Z dy3

z − y¯ 3

DD¯α λA¹(z)


λA¹(¯z) λA²

W₃^αE . Fixing z = ia in the last equation and solving the integrals we get A1 = +g^′_o²g_c^′πiα^′D

D_α λA¹
 λA¹

λA²
W₃^αE

+ g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′D

λA¹
¯D_α λA¹

λA²
W₃^αE

. After solving the OPEs, we just have zero modes and there is no difference between holomorphic and antiholomorphic terms, i.e.,

A1 = +g^′_o²g_c^′πiα^′D

D_α λA¹
 λ ˜A¹

λA²
W₃^αE

+ g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′D λA¹

D_α λ ˜A¹

λA²
W₃^αE

, where the symbol ∼ above of A¹ is to emphasize that the momenta are equal but the polarizations are different. Now, using the equations of motion (3.2)

D_α(λA) = − (Q) Aα+ (λγ^m)_αA_m, we obtain

A1 = +g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′D

D_α λA¹
 λ ˜A¹

λA²
W^αE

+ g^′_o²g^′_cπiα^′D λA¹

D_α λ ˜A¹

λA²
W₃^αE

= +g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′D

− (Q) A¹α+ (λγ^m)_αA¹_m  λ ˜A¹

λA²
W₃^αE +g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′D

λA¹
h

− (Q) ˜A¹_α+ (λγ^m)_αA˜¹_mi λA²

W₃^αE . Using the fact that an exact BRST term decouples, we obtain

A1 = +g^′_o²g^′_cπiα^′D A¹_m

λ ˜A¹ λA²

λγ^mW³
E +g^′_o²g^′_cπiα^′D

A˜¹_m λA¹
λA²

λγ^mW³
E

−g^′o²g^′_cπiα^′D A¹_α

λ ˜A¹ λA²

QW₃^αE +g^′_o²g^′_cπiα^′D

λA¹
˜A¹_α λA²

QW₃^αE , and using

QW^α= 1

4(λγ^mn)^αFmn

we arrive in

A1 = +g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′D A¹_m

λ ˜A¹ λA²

λγ^mW³
E +g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′D

A˜¹_m λA¹
λA²

λγ^mW³
E

−go^′2g_c^′πiα^′ 4

D

λγ^mnA¹
 λ ˜A¹

λA²
Fmn³

E

+g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′ 4

D

λA¹


λγ^mnA˜¹ λA²

Fmn³

E . For the last term of the expression (3.4), we have

A2 = g^′_o²g_c^′ Z

dy₃

λA¹
¯λ ¯A¹

λA²
1

2N^mnF_mn³

(3.6)

= g^′_o²g_c^′ Z

dy₃ α^′ 8 (z − y3)

λγ^mnA¹
¯λ ¯A¹
λA²

F_mn³  +g^′_o²g^′_c

Z

dy₃ α^′ 8 (¯z − y³)

λA¹
¯λγ^mnA¯¹
λA²

F_mn³  +g^′_o²g^′_c

Z

dy₃ α^′ 8 (y2− y³)

λA¹
¯λ ¯A¹

λγ^mnA²
F_mn³ 

, where we have used the OPE

N^mn(y₃) λ^α(z) = α^′

4 (z − y3)(λγ^mn)^α. Fixing above y₂ = ∞ and z = ia, we get

A2 = g^′_o²g_c^′πiα^′ 4

λγ^mnA¹
¯λ ¯A¹
λA²

F_mn³ 

(3.7)

−go^′2g_c^′πiα^′ 4

λA¹
¯λγ^mnA¯¹
λA²

F_mn³  . Adding the results (3.6) and (3.7), we finally obtain

A = g^′o²g_c^′πiα^′D A_m

λ ˜A¹ λA²

λγ^mW³
E

+ g_o^′2g^′_cπiα^′D

A˜_m λA¹
λA²

λγ^mW³
E

= g^′_o²g_c^′πiα^′Dh A¹_m

λ ˜A¹

+ ˜A¹_m λA¹
i λA²

λγ^mW³
E

. (3.8)

Although the starting expression (3.3) has gauge invariance, we left the proof to ap- pendix B. At this point, we must expand the superfields in components and use the measure

h(λγ^aθ) λγ^bθ

(λγ^cθ) (θγ_abcθ) = 1 (3.9) in order to find the contribution of each component. The superfield expansion is given by

λA = 1 2a_f

λγ^fθ

−1

3(ξγ_mθ) (λγ^mθ) − 1

32F_mn(λγ_pθ) (θγ^mnpθ) + 1

60(λγ_mθ)_α(θγ^mnpθ) (∂_nξγ_pθ) ...

A_m = a_m− (ξγmθ) − 1

8(θγ_mγ^pqθ) F_pq+ 1

12(θγ_mγ^pqθ) (∂_pξγ_qθ) ... (3.10) λγ^sW = λγ^sξ −1

4(λγ^sγ^mnθ) F_mn+1

4(λγ^sγ^mnθ) ∂_mξγ_nθ + 1

48(λγ^sγ^mnθ) (θγ_nγ^pqθ) ∂_mF_pq...

These expressions will be used in computations in the next section.

4. Correlation functions in components 4.1 One graviton/dilaton and two photons

As explained in the previous section, the vertex operator for closed strings can be written as the product of the vertex operators of open strings. First of all, we need to identify the NS-NS contribution in this product. From our final expression (3.8), the closed string contribution is given by

h A¹_m

λ ˜A¹

+ ˜A¹_m λA¹
i .

Using the superfield expansion, we have the following result for the NS-NS contribution



h_g1 −1

4∂_m1h_h1η_g1t2

θγ^t2γ^m1h1θ

×

1

2˜h_g2(λγ^g2θ) − 1

16∂_m1˜h_g2η_t1t2 λγ^t1θ

θγ^m1g2t2θ
 +



˜h_g1 −1

4∂_m1˜h_h1η_g1t2

θγ^t2γ^m1h1θ

×

1

2hg2(λγ^g2θ) − 1

16∂m1hg2ηt1t2 λγ^t1θ

θγ^m1g2t2θ


= [1 2



hg1˜hg2 + ˜hg1hg2



(λγ^g2θ) − 1 16



hg1∂m1˜hg2+ ˜hg1∂m1hg2



ηt1t2 λγ^t1θ

θγ^m1g2t2θ

−1 8

h˜g2∂m1h_h1 + hg2∂m1˜h_h1 ηg1t2



θγ^t2γ^m1h1θ

(λγ^g2θ)]. (4.1)

We must be careful here to identify the NS-NS field, for when we write the closed string as the product of two open strings, each part must carry half of the momentum. For example



h_g1∂_m1h˜_g2+ ˜h_g1∂_m1h_g2

=

 ik¹_m1

2 h_g1˜h_g2 + ik¹_m1 2 ˜h_g1h_g2



= 1 2∂_m1

h_g1˜h_g2 + ˜h_g1h_g2 .

From this, we can see that, like in Ramond-Neveu-Schwarz, only the symmetric part of the NS-NS sector contributes. Its traceless part is identified with the graviton. We will see later how the two form will come from the RR sector. Now, making the identification

h_g1˜h_g2 + ˜h_g1h_g2 = 2h_g1g2 we obtain the graviton contribution

[h_g1g2(λγ^g2θ) − 1

16∂_m1h_g2g1η_t1t2 λγ^t1θ

θγ^m1g2t2θ

(4.2)

−1

8∂_m1h_h1g2η_g1t2

θγ^t2γ^m1h1θ

(λγ^g2θ)].

After the identification of the NS-NS contribution, we must go back to the expression (3.8) and consider only the photon contribution from (3.10) to obtain

A = go^′2g_c^′πiα^′h[hg1g2(λγ^g2θ) − 1

16∂_m1h_g2g1η_t1t2 λγ^t1θ

θγ^m1g2t2θ

−1

8∂_m1h_h1g2η_g1t2

θγ^t2γ^m1h1θ

(λγ^g2θ)]

1 2a²_f2

λγ^f2θ

− 1

32F_m²_2f2(λγ_pθ)

θγ^m2f2pθ



−1 4



λγ^g1γ^m3f3θ

F_m³_3f3 + 1

48(λγ^g1γ^m3nθ)

θγnγ^n3f3θ

∂m3F_n³_3f3

 i.

As we know from eq. (3.9), only terms with five thetas contribute to the amplitude.

Then, we have

A = go^′2g_c^′πiα^′

96 hhg1g2a²_f2∂_m3F_n³_3f3(λγ^g1γ^m3nθ) (λγ^g2θ)

λγ^f2θ 

θγ_nγ^n3f3θ i +g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′

128hh^g1g2F_m²_2f2F_m³_3f3

λγ^g1γ^m3f3θ

(λγ^g2θ) (λγpθ)

θγ^m2f2pθ i +g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′

128ha²f2∂_m1˜h_g2g1F_m³_3f3η_t1t2

λγ^g1γ^m3f3θ

λγ^t1θ
 λγ^f2θ

θγ^m1g2t2θ
i +g_o^′2g_c^′πiα^′

64 ha²f2∂_m1h_g1g2η_t1t2F_m³_3f3

λγ^t1γ^m3f3θ

(λγ^g2θ) λγ^f2θ

θγ^t2γ^m1g1θ
i.

In order to solve the above expression, we need to use the identity (6.4) and successive times the identities (6.1) and (6.2) described in appendix A. Solving term by term with the help of the GAMMA package [8] we obtain

A1 = πiα^′(− 1

17280h^g1g2a^f₂²∂^g2F_f³_2g1 − 7

34560h_g1g2a²_f2∂^g1F_f³_2g2)

= −πiα^′

3840h^g1g2a^f₂²∂^g2F_f³_2g1 = πiα^′

3840h^g1g2∂^g2a^f₂²F_f³_2g1. In a similar way, we can obtain the second term

A2 = −πiα^′

2304h^g_g²₁F_f²_3g2F₃^f3g1− πiα^′

23040h^g_g¹₁F_f²_3g1F₃^f3g1. The third one is given by

A3 = −πiα^′

7680a²_f2∂^m1h^f2g1F_g³_1m1 + πiα^′

23040∂^m1h^g_g¹₁a^g₂¹F_g³_1m1

= πiα^′

7680∂^m1a²_f2h^f2g1F_g³_1m1 − πiα^′

23040h^g_g¹₁∂^m1a^g₂¹F_g³_1m1

= πiα^′

7680h^f2g1∂^m1a²_f2F_g³_1m1 + πiα^′

46080h^g_g¹₁F₂^g1m1F_g³_1m1, and the fourth is

A⁴ = −g^′o²g^′_c 1

7680a²_f2∂^m1h^f2g2F_g³_2m1

= g^′_o²g^′_c 1

7680h^f2g2∂^m1a²_f2F_g³_2m1. Adding all terms, we obtain

A = g^′o²g^′_cπiα^′( 1

3840h^g1g2∂^g2a^f₂²F_f³_2g1 − 1

2304h^g_g²₁F_f²_3g2F₃^f3g1 + 1

7680h^f2g1∂^m1a²_f2F_g³_1m1+ 1

7680h^f2g2∂^m1a²_f2F_g³_2m1) +

− πiα^′

11520h^g_g¹₁F_f²_2m1F₃^f2m1

= g^′_o²g^′_cπiα^′( 1

3840h^g1g2F₂^g2f2F_f³_2g1− 1

2304h^g_g²₁F_f²_3g2F₃^f3g1)

= −g^′o²g^′_cπiα^′

1440h^g_g¹₂F₂^g2f2F_f³_2g1− πiα^′

11520h^g_g¹₁F_f²_2m1F₃^f2m1.

In the gauge k^mh_mn= 0, the relation h^gg¹1 = 4Φ is valid [6], and we finally get

A = πiα^′ 720 g^′_o²g_c^′



−πiα^′

2 h^g_g¹₂F₂^g2f2F_f³_2g1−πiα^′

4 ΦF_f²_2m1F₃^f2m1



. (4.3)

Comparing this last expression with (2.1), we see that up to a overall factor we have the right result.

4.2 One graviton/dilaton and two photinos

From the pure spinor viewpoint, we need the graviton and the photino contribution to the vertex operators which are respectively given by (4.2) and (3.10). We then obtain

A = g^′o²g^′_cπiα^′h[h^g1g2(λγ^g2θ) − 1

16∂m1hg2g1ηt1t2 λγ^t1θ

θγ^m1g2t2θ

−1

8∂_m1h_h1g2η_g1t2

θγ^t2γ^m1h1θ

(λγ^g2θ)]



−1

3 ξ²γ_rθ

(λγ^rθ) + 1

60(λγ_rθ) θγ^rstθ

∂_sξ²γ_tθ




λγ^mξ³+1

4(λγ^mγ^pqθ) ∂pξ³γqθ



i. (4.4)

In the expression above, we have four terms with five thetas given by

A = 2go^′2g_c^′πiα^′h 1

24h_mg2

λγ^mγ^m3f3θ

(λγ^g2θ) λγ^f2θ

θγ_f2ξ²

∂_m3ξ³γ_f3θi (4.5) +2πiα^′h 1

120h_mg2 λγ^mξ³

∂_m2ξ²γ_f2θ

(λγ^g2θ) (λγ_rθ)

θγ^rm2f2θ i +2πiα^′h 1

96∂_m1h_g1g2 λγ^g1ξ³

ξ²γ_f2θ

(λγ_pθ) λγ^f2θ

(θγ^m1g2pθ)i 2πiα^′h 1

48∂m1hg1g2 λγmξ³

ξ²γ_f2θ

(λγ^g2θ)

λγ^f2θ

(θγ^mm1g1θ)i.

Using now the identity ξ^α₂ξ^β₃ = 1

16(γ_a)^αβ(f^a) + 1

96(γ_abc)^αβ f^abc

+ 1

3840(γ_abcde)^αβ

f^abcde

, (4.6) where

f^a...= ξ¹γ^a...ξ², we have

ξ^α₂∂_m3ξ₃^β = 1

16(γ_a)^αβ f_1m^a ₃
+ 1

96(γ_abc)^αβ f_1m^abc₃

+ 1

3840 (γ_abcde)^αβ f_1m^abcde₃ 

. Therefore the first term gives

A1 = g^′_o²g^′_c2πiα^′h 1

24h_g1g2

λγ^g1γ^m3f3θ

(λγ^g2θ) λγ^f2θ

 1

16(θγ_f2γ_aγ_f3θ) f_1m^a ₃
+ 1

96(θγ_f2γ_abcγ_f3θ) f_1m^abc₃

+ 1

3840(θγ_f2γ_abcdeγ_f3θ)

f_1m^abcde₃ 

i.

Using now the identities (6.5),(6.6) ,(6.7) and successive times the identities (6.1), (6.2) and (6.3), we obtain that only the first term contributes

A1 = g^′_o²g^′_c2πiα^′



− 1

17280h_g1g2ξ²γ^g1∂^g2ξ³− 1

4320h_g1g2ξ₂γ^g2∂^g1ξ₃



= −go^′2g_c^′2πiα^′

3456 h_g1g2ξ₂γ^g1∂^g2ξ₃.