• No results found

Subordination by convex functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Subordination by convex functions"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ROSIHAN M. ALI, V. RAVICHANDRAN, AND N. SEENIVASAGAN

Received 30 July 2006; Accepted 12 November 2006

For a fixed analytic function g(z)=z+∞n=2gnzn defined on the open unit disk and

γ <1, letTg(γ) denote the class of all analytic functions f(z)=z+∞n=2anznsatisfying

n=2|angn| ≤1−γ. For functions inTg(γ), a subordination result is derived involving

the convolution with a normalized convex function. Our result includes as special cases several earlier works.

Copyright © 2006 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

LetᏭbe the class of all normalized analytic functions of the form

f(z)=z+

n=2

anzn zΔ:=zC:|z|<1. (1.1)

LetS∗(α) andC(α) be the usual classes of normalized starlike and convex functions of orderα, respectively, and letC:=C(0). For f(z) given by (1.1) andg(z) by

g(z)=z+

n=2

gnzn, (1.2)

the convolution (or Hadamard product) of f andg, denoted by f∗g, is defined by

(f ∗g)(z) :=z+

n=2

angnzn. (1.3)

The function f(z) is subordinate to the functiong(z), written as f(z)≺g(z), if there is an analytic functionw(z) defined onΔwithw(0)=0 and|w(z)|<1 such that f(z)= g(w(z)).

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Volume 2006, Article ID 62548, Pages1–6

(2)

Letg(z) given by (1.2) be a fixed function, withgn≥g2>0 (n≥2),γ <1, and let

Tg(γ) :=

f(z)Ꮽ:

n=2

angn 1γ. (1.4)

The classTg(γ) includes as its special cases various other classes that were considered in several earlier works. In particular, forγ=αandgn=n−α, we obtain the classTS∗(α) := Tg(γ) that was introduced by Silverman [6]. Putting γ=αand gn=n(n−α), we get TC(α) :=Tg(γ). For these classes, Silverman [6] proved thatTS∗(α)⊆S∗(α) andTC(α) ⊆C(α).

By using convolution, Ruscheweyh [5] defined the operator

f(z) := z

(1−z)α+1∗f(z) (α >−1). (1.5)

Let(β) denote the class of functions f(z) inᏭthat satisfies the inequality +1f(z)

f(z) > α+ 2β

2(α+ 1) (α≥0, 0≤β <1,z∈Δ). (1.6) Al-Amiri [1] called functions in this class as prestarlike functions of orderαand typeβ. Let(β) denote the class of functions f(z) given by (1.1) whose coefficients satisfy the condition

n=2

(2n+α−2β)C(α,n) an 2 +α−2β (α≥0, 0≤β <1), (1.7)

where

C(α,n) := n

k=2

(k+α−1)

(n−1)! (n=2, 3,...). (1.8)

Al-Amiri [1] proved that (β)⊆Rα(β). By takinggn=(2n+α−2β)C(α,n) and γ= 2β−1−α, we see that(β) :=Tg(γ).

For functions in the class(β), Attiya [2] proved the following. Theorem 1.1 [2, Theorem 2.1, page 3]. If f(z)∈Hα(β) andh(z)Ꮿ, then

(4 +α−2β)(1 +α)

2α+ (2 +α)(3 +α−2β)(f∗h)(z)≺h(z), (1.9)

f(z)>−α+ (2 +α)(3 +α−2β)

(4 +α−2β)(1 +α) . (1.10)

The constant factor

(4 +α−2β)(1 +α)

2α+ (2 +α)(3 +α−2β) (1.11)

(3)

Owa and Srivastava [4] as well as Owa and Nishiwaki [3] studied the subclassesᏹ(α) andᏺ(α) consisting of functions f Ꮽsatisfying

n=2

n

−λ+|n+λ−2α| an 2(α−1) (α >1, 0≤λ≤1),

n=2

nn−λ+|n+λ−2α| an 2(α−1) (α >1, 0≤λ≤1),

(1.12)

respectively. These are special cases ofTg(γ), withgn=n−λ+|n+λ−2α|,γ=32α, andgn=n(n−λ+|n+λ−2α|),γ=32α, respectively. For the classᏹ(α), Srivastava and Attiya [8] proved the following.

Theorem 1.2 [8, Theorem 1, page 3]. Let f(z)(α). Then for any functionh(z)C

andz∈Δ,

2−λ+|2 +λ−2α|

22α−λ+|2 +λ−2α|(f∗h)(z)≺h(z), (1.13)

f(z)>−2α−λ+|2 +λ−2α|

(2−λ) +|2 +λ−2α|. (1.14)

The constant factor

2−λ+|2 +λ−2α|

22α−λ+|2 +λ−2α| (1.15)

in the subordination result (1.13) cannot be replaced by a larger number.

A similar result [8, Theorem 2, page 5] forᏺ(α) was also obtained.

In this article, Theorems1.1and1.2are unified for the classTg(γ). Relevant connec-tions of our results with several earlier investigaconnec-tions are also indicated.

We need the following result on subordinating factor sequence to obtain our main result. Recall that a sequence (bn)1 of complex numbers is said to be a subordinating

factor sequence, if for every convex univalent function f(z) given by (1.1), then

n=1

anbnzn f(z). (1.16)

Theorem 1.3 [9, Theorem 2, page 690]. A sequence (bn)1 of complex numbers is a

subor-dinating factor sequence if and only if

1 + 2

n=1

bnzn

(4)

2. Subordination with convex functions

We begin with the following subordination result. Theorem 2.1. If f(z)∈Tg(γ) andh(z)∈C, then

g2

2g2+ 1−γ(f ∗h)(z)≺h(z), (2.1)

f(z)>−g2+ 1−γ

g2

(z∈Δ). (2.2)

The constant factor

g2

2g2+ 1−γ

(2.3)

in the subordination result (2.1) cannot be replaced by a larger number.

Proof. LetG(z)=z+∞n=2g2zn. SinceTg(γ)⊆TG(γ), our result follows if we prove the

result for the classTG(γ). Let f(z)∈TG(γ) and suppose that

h(z)=z+

n=2

cnznC. (2.4)

In this case,

g2

2g2+ 1−γ

(f ∗h)(z)= g2 2g2+ 1−γ

z+

n=2

cnanzn

. (2.5)

Observe that the subordination result (2.1) holds true if

g2

2g2+ 1−γ

an

1

(2.6)

is a subordinating factor sequence (with of course,a1=1). In view ofTheorem 1.3, this

is equivalent to the condition that

1 +

n=1

g2

g2+ 1−γanz

n

>0. (2.7)

Sincegn≥g2>0 forn≥2, we have

1 +g g2

2+ 1−γ

n=1

anzn

=

1 +g g2

2+ 1−γz+

1 g2+ 1−γ

n=2

g2anzn

1

g2

g2+ 1−γr+

1 g2+ 1−γ

n=2

g2an rn

>1

g2

g2+ 1−γr+

1−γ g2+ 1−γr

(5)

Thus (2.7) holds true inΔ, and proves (2.1). The inequality (2.2) follows by takingh(z)= z/(1−z) in (2.1).

Now consider the function

F(z)=z−1g γ

2 z

2 (γ <1). (2.9)

Clearly,F(z)∈Tg(γ). For this functionF(z), (2.1) becomes g2

2g2+ 1−γ

F(z) z

1−z. (2.10)

It is easily verified that

min

g2

2g2+ 1−γ

F(z)

= −1

2 (z∈Δ). (2.11)

Therefore the constant

g2

2g2+ 1−γ (2.12)

cannot be replaced by any larger one.

Corollary 2.2. If f(z)∈TS∗(α) andh(z)C, then 2−α

2(32α)(f ∗h)(z)≺h(z),

f(z)>−32α

2−α (z∈Δ). (2.13) The constant factor

2−α

2(32α) (2.14)

in the subordination result (2.13) cannot be replaced by a larger number.

Remark 2.3. The caseα=0 inCorollary 2.2was obtained by Singh [7]. Corollary 2.4. If f(z)∈TC(α) andh(z)∈C, then

2−α

53α(f ∗h)(z)≺h(z),

f

(z)>− 53α

2(2−α) (z∈Δ). (2.15) The constant factor

2−α

53α (2.16)

in the subordination result (2.15) cannot be replaced by a larger one.

Remark 2.5. Theorem 1.1is obtained by takingγ=2β−1−αand

gn=(2n+α−2β) n

k=2

(k+α−1)

(6)

inTheorem 2.1. Similarly, puttingγ=32αand

gn=n−λ+|n+λ−2α| (n=2, 3...,α >1, 0≤λ≤1) (2.18)

inTheorem 2.1yieldsTheorem 1.2. Finally, by takingγ=32αand

gn=nn−λ+|n+λ−2α| (n=2, 3...,α >1, 0≤λ≤1) (2.19)

inTheorem 2.1, we get [8, Theorem 2, page 5].

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledged support from IRPA Grant 09-02-05-00020 EAR.

References

[1] H. S. Al-Amiri, Prestarlike functions of orderαand typeβwith negative coefficients, Annales Uni-versitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio A. Mathematica 39 (1985), 1–11 (1988).

[2] A. A. Attiya, On some applications of a subordination theorem, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 311 (2005), no. 2, 489–494.

[3] S. Owa and J. Nishiwaki, Coefficient estimates for certain classes of analytic functions, Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 3 (2002), no. 5, 5, article 72.

[4] S. Owa and H. M. Srivastava, Some generalized convolution properties associated with certain sub-classes of analytic functions, Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 3 (2002), no. 3, 13, article 42.

[5] S. Ruscheweyh, New criteria for univalent functions, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 49 (1975), no. 1, 109–115.

[6] H. Silverman, Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proceedings of the American Math-ematical Society 51 (1975), no. 1, 109–116.

[7] S. Singh, A subordination theorem for spirallike functions, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 24 (2000), no. 7, 433–435.

[8] H. M. Srivastava and A. A. Attiya, Some subordination results associated with certain subclasses of analytic functions, Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics 5 (2004), no. 4, 6, article 82.

[9] H. S. Wilf, Subordinating factor sequences for convex maps of the unit circle, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 12 (1961), no. 5, 689–693.

Rosihan M. Ali: School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang 11800, Malaysia

E-mail address:[email protected]

V. Ravichandran: School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang 11800, Malaysia

E-mail address:[email protected]

N. Seenivasagan: School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Penang 11800, Malaysia

References

Related documents

heitskreis regulaeren Funktionen [On the boundaries of starlikeness and boundaries of univalence of certain classes of functions regular in the disc | z | &lt; 1 ]

In this paper, we study applications of the differential subordination and superordination of analytic p-valent functions in the open unit disc associated with certain operator

Srivastava,The Hardy space of analytic functions asso- ciated with certain one-parameter families of integral operators, J. Srivastava, Inequalities involving certain families

subordinating factor sequence, Hadamard product, generalized hypergeometric

In this paper we derive several subordination results for certain new classes of analytic functions defined by using Salagean

We are proposing the work to make the function q to satisfy the best dominant’s conditions of the differential subordination by making suitable changes for the functions p and

Multivalently analytic functions, Hadamard product (or convolution), Differential subordination, Hypergeometric functions, Linear operators, Wright’s generalized

Subordination Properties for Certain Subclass of Uniformly β-Starlike and β-Convex Functions by Using Convolution.. 1 Dinesh Kumar, 2 A.K.Arora,