• No results found

Lecture 4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Lecture 4"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Software Quality Engineering

BS(SE)-VI

Dr. Assad Abbas

Department of Computer Science

(2)

Cost of Software Quality (CoSQ)

n Cost of software quality – the economic assessment of software quality

development and maintenance – is just another class of software quality metrics, where financial values are used as the measuring tool.

n Application of common financial measures enables management to obtain

the type of general overview of all software quality assurance activities unavailable with any other metrics.

n Application of cost of software quality metrics enables management to

achieve economic control over SQA activities and outcomes. The specific objectives are:

5 Control of organization-initiated costs to prevent and detect software errors

5 Evaluation of the economic damages of software failures as a basis for revising the SQA budget

(3)

3

9/22/20

Objectives of cost of software quality metrics

n Managerial control over the cost of software quality is

achieved by comparison of actual performance figures with: 5 Control budgeted expenditures (for SQA prevention and appraisal

activities)

5 Previous year’s failure costs

5 Previous project’s quality costs (control costs and failure costs)

(4)

Cost metrics/parameters for the evaluation of an SQA

Plan

n Percentage of cost of software quality out of total software

development costs

n Percentage of software failure costs out of total software

development costs

n Percentage of cost of software quality out of total software

maintenance costs

n Percentage of cost of software quality out of total sales of

(5)

5

9/22/20

The classic model of cost of software quality

n The classic quality cost model, developed in the early 1950s by

Feigenbaum and others, provides a methodology for classifying the costs associated with product quality assurance from an economic point of view.

n The model classifies costs related to product quality into two

(6)

The classic model of cost of software quality

n Costs of control include costs that are spent to prevent and

detect software errors in order to reduce them to an accepted level.

n Costs of failure of control include costs of failures that

occurred because of failure to prevent and detect software errors.

n Prevention costs include investments in quality infrastructure

and quality activities that are not directed to a specific project or system, being general to the organization.

n Appraisal costs include the costs of activities performed for

(7)

7

9/22/20

The classic model of cost of software quality

n Internal failure costs include costs of correcting errors that

have been detected by design reviews, software tests and

acceptance tests (carried out by the customer) and completed before the software is installed at customer sites.

n External failure costs include all costs of correcting failures

(8)

The classic model of cost of software quality

n Prevention costs

5 Investments in development of new or improved SQA

infrastructure components or, alternatively, regular updating of those components:

g Procedures and work instructions

g Support devices: templates, checklists, etc.

g Software configuration management system

g Software quality metrics (product, process, project)

5 Regular implementation of SQA preventive activities:

g Instruction of new employees in SQA subjects and procedures

related to their positions

g Instruction of employees in new and updated SQA subjects and

procedures

g Certification of employees for positions that require special

certification

g Consultations on SQA issues provided to team leaders and

(9)

9

9/22/20

The classic model of cost of software quality

n Prevention costs

5 Control of the SQA system through performance of:

g Internal quality reviews

g External quality audits by customers and SQA system

certification organizations

(10)

The classic model of cost of software quality

n Appraisal costs

5 Reviews:

g Formal design reviews (DRs)

g Peer reviews (inspections and walkthroughs) g Expert reviews

5 Costs of software testing

g Unit tests

g Integration tests

g Software system tests

g Acceptance tests (participation in tests carried out by the customer).

5 Costs of assuring quality of external participants, primarily by means of design reviews and software testing. These activities are applied to the activities performed by:

g Subcontractors

(11)

11

9/22/20

The classic model of cost of software quality

n Internal failure costs

5 internal failure costs represent the costs of error

correction subsequent to formal examinations of the software during its development, prior to the system’s installation at the customer’s site.

g Costs of redesign or design corrections subsequent to

design review and test findings

g Costs of re-programming or correcting programs in

response to test findings

g Costs of repeated design review and re-testing (regression

tests).

g Importantly, although the costs of regular design reviews

and software tests are considered appraisal costs, any

(12)

The classic model of cost of software quality

n External failure costs

5 External failure costs entail the costs of correcting failures detected by customers or maintenance teams after the software system has been installed at customer sites.

5 These costs may be further classified into “overt” external failure costs and “hidden” external failure costs. In most cases, the extent of hidden costs is much greater than that of overt costs. Typical overt external failure costs include:

g Resolution of customer complaints during the warranty period

g Correction of software bugs detected during regular operation (often

performed at customer’s site)

g Correction of software failures after the warranty period is over even if the

correction is not covered by the warranty.

g Damages paid to customers in case of a severe software failure detected

during regular operation.

g Reimbursement of customer’s purchase costs, including handling, in case

of total dissatisfaction (relates to COTS software packages as well as to custom-made software).

(13)

13

9/22/20

The classic model of cost of software quality

n Typical examples of hidden external failure costs are:

5 Damages of reduction of sales to customers suffering from high rates of software failures

5 Severe reduction of sales motivated by the firm’s damaged reputation

5 Increased investment in sales promotion to counter the effects of past software failures

(14)

An extended model for cost of software quality

n The extended cost of software quality model, extends the

classic model to include management’s “contributions” to the total cost of software quality. According to the extended

(15)

15

9/22/20

An extended model for cost of software quality

n Managerial preparation and control costs

5 Costs of carrying out contract reviews (proposal draft and

contract draft reviews).

5 Costs of preparing project plans, including quality plans and

their review.

5 Costs of periodic updating of project and quality plans.

5 Costs of performing regular progress control of internal

software development efforts.

5 Costs of performing regular progress control of external

(16)

An extended model for cost of software quality

n Managerial failure costs

5 Managerial failure costs can be incurred throughout the entire

course of software development, beginning in the pre-project stage. Typical managerial failure costs include:

g Unplanned costs for professional and other resources, resulting from

underestimation of the resources upon which the submitted proposals are based.

g Damages paid to customers as compensation for late completion of the

project, a result of the unrealistic schedule presented in the company’s proposal.

g Damages paid to customers as compensation for late completion of the

project, a result of management’s failure to recruit sufficient and appropriate team members.

g Domino effect: damages to other projects performed by the same teams

References

Related documents

The algorithm will only match applicants employers preferred for NESP positions to NESP positions and applicants employers preferred for NETP positions to NETP positions. This way

In the previous sections, we dis- cuss the expectation that a neural network exploiting the fractional convolution should perform slightly worse than a pure binary (1-bit weights

If for any reason the Artist is unable to take possession of sold Works and arrange transportation to the non-local buyer, the Artist and Buyer may make arrangements with OSA

Possible solutions to the crime of illegal organ sales The shortage of transplantable organs is a fact proven by the num- ber of patients on waiting lists.. These numbers

But instructional leadership and social justice leadership dimension were selected based on the perceived relevance to the context of this study in Trinidad and Tobago, where

The cross-sectional study design will be used in finding out the most affected occupations among the sandwich generation of women flood disaster survivors where the relationship

A process was developed to identify potential defects in previous layers of Selective Laser Melting (SLM) Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) 3D printed metal parts using a mid-IR thermal camera

Also, in a typical transaction, we cut out the middleman cost, such as: commissions, mortgage broker fees, loan fees; and our attorney costs are also lower because there is less