• No results found

Second_Law.pdf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Second_Law.pdf"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Heat Reservoir/Bath/Source/Sink

 A system at some temperature T throughout and is conditioned in such a way that it can exchange

heat but no work with its surroundings

For example, a mass of water at temperature T throughout – its volume remains practically constant

 It is an effectively infinite pool of thermal energy at a given, constant temperature. The temperature

of the reservoir does not change when heat is added or extracted because of the infinite heat capacity.

(2)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Conversion of heat into work: Heat Engine

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Heat

Engine Q1

Q2

W = Q1 – Q2

Efficiency:

1 2 1

2 1

1

1

input heat

output work

Q Q Q

Q Q

Q W

 

 

 

(3)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

 Is it possible to design a heat engine that yields η =1 (100% efficiency)? Q2 = 0 !!!

 Well, even an ideal heat engine can not deliver 100% efficiency

 What is an ideal heat engine?

 Idea of ideal heat engine was introduced by Carnot, a French engineer, in 1824 which realizes a cyclic process called the Carnot cycle.

 Comprises two isothermal and two adiabatic processes  All processes are reversible – an ideal case

(4)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

 Heat transfer takes place only in two isothermal processes: Q1 amount of heat is absorbed by the

working substance from the hot reservoir at temperature T1 and Q2 amount of heat is rejected by the substance to the cold reservoir at temperature T2

 The processes are reversible – temperature of the working substance is equal to the temperature of

the reservoir during the heat transfer

(5)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Carnot cycle with simple compressible system

 a → b: Reversible isothermal expansion

 b → c: Reversible adiabatic expansion

 c → d: Reversible isothermal compression

(6)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Carnot cycle of an ideal gas





a b V V V V

V

V

nRT

V

dV

nRT

pdV

W

Q

b a b a

ln

1 1 1 1





d c V V V V

V

V

nRT

V

dV

nRT

pdV

W

Q

d c d c

ln

2 2 3 2

adiabatic process b → c:

T

1

V

b1

T

2

V

c1

adiabatic process d → a:

T

1

V

a1

T

2

V

d1 d c a b

V

V

V

V

12

1 2 1 2

/

ln

/

ln

T

T

V

V

T

V

V

T

Q

Q

a b d c

1 2 1 2

1

1

T

T

Q

Q

(7)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Carnot cycle of a paramagnet

 a → b: Reversible isothermal demagnetization

 b → c: Reversible adiabatic demagnetization

 c → d: Reversible isothermal magnetization

(8)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Carnot Engine: Reversible engine

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Carnot

Engine Q1

Q2

W = Q1 – Q2

Efficiency:

1 2

1 2

1 1

T T Q

Q

 

(9)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Carnot Refrigerator: Reversible heat pump

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Carnot

refrige rator

Q1 = Q2 + W

Q2 W

Coefficient of Performance (CoP):

(10)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

A Carnot engine is operated between two heat reservoirs at temperature 27 °C and 327 °C. Find the efficiency of the engine. The engine releases 50 cal heat per cycle into the cold reservoir. How much heat does it absorb per cycle from the hot reservoir? What is the work output per cycle? What is the coefficient of performance of a heat pump operated between the same two reservoirs?

% 50 5 . 0 273 327 273 27 1 1 1

2  

      T T

cal 100 cal 273 27 273 327 50 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2         T T Q Q T T Q Q cal 50 cal 100 5 . 0 1 1     

W Q

Q W

% 100 1 27 327 273 27 CoP 2 1

2  

(11)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Carnot

Engine Q1

Q2 = 0

W = Q1

 Is it possible to design a heat engine that yields η = 100% ?

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Carnot

refrige rator

Q1 = Q2

Q2 W = 0

 Is it possible to design a heat pump that yields CoP = ∞?

(12)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

 The first law of thermodynamics arose as the result of the impossibility of constructing a machine

which could create energy

 It, however, places no limitations on the possibility of transforming energy from one form into

another

 What we just have realized that, on the basis of first law alone, the possibility of transforming heat

into work or work into heat always exists provided the total amount of heat is equivalent to the total amount of work. However, there are very definite limitations to the possibility of transforming heat into work

 We need to introduce the SECOND LAW to rule out the possibility of constructing a perpetuum

(13)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Original statement of Lord Kelvin: It is impossible by means of inanimate material agency to derive mechanical effect from any portion of matter by cooling it below the temperature of the coldest of the surrounding objects

Original statement of Max Planck: It is impossible to construct an engine which, working in a complete cycle, will produce no effect other than the raising of weight and cooling of a heat reservoir

Kelvin-Planck statement: It is impossible to construct an engine that, operating in a cycle, will

produce no effect other than the extraction of heat from a reservoir and the performance of an

equivalent amount of work

(14)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Clausius statement: It is impossible to construct a refrigerator that, operating in a cycle, will produce

no effect other than the transfer of heat from a lower-temperature reservoir to a higher-temperature

reservoir

Kelvin-Planck statement and Clausius statement are equivalent. If we assume one statement is violated, it will lead to the violation of other statement

(15)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Let, Clausius statement is invalid! We can have a refrigerator, whose only final result is to transfer heat from cold reservoir to hot reservoir!

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Carnot

Engine B

Q1

Q2

W = Q1 – Q2 Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Refrig

erator A

Q2

Q2

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Comp

osite Engine

C

Q1 – Q2

W = Q1 – Q2

(16)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Let, Kelvin-Planck statement is invalid! We can have a heat engine, whose only final result is to transform heat absorbed from a reservoir into work

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Heat

Engine A

Q1

W = Q1

Violates Clausius statement Violates Kelvin-Planck statement

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Refrig

erator B

W + Q2

Q2 W

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) Comp

osite device

C Q2

(17)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Carnot’s Theorem and corollary:

Direct consequences of the second law of thermodynamics:

The Theorem: No heat engine can be more efficient than a reversible heat engine operating

between the same two reservoirs

The Corollary: All reversible heat engines operating between the same two reservoirs have the

(18)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Carnot’s Theorem: Proof

Reversible Engine (R) Any other Engine (I)

Work delivered 𝑊 𝑊

Heat absorbed from source 𝑄1 𝑄1

Heat released at sink 𝑄1 − 𝑊 𝑄1′ − 𝑊

Efficiency 𝜂𝑅 = 𝑊/𝑄1 𝜂𝐼 = 𝑊/𝑄1

'

'

or

assume

1 1

1 1

Q

Q

Q

W

Q

W

R I

(19)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Violates Clausius statement Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) I

W

'

1

Q

W

Q

1

'

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) R

W

W

Q

1

1

Q

Hot Reservoir (T1)

Cold Reservoir (T2) C

'

1 1

Q

Q

'

1 1

Q

Q

R I

(20)

Second Law of Thermodynamics

 Consider two reversible engines R1 and R2 operating between the same two reservoirs and assume

𝜂𝑅1 > 𝜂𝑅2

 Engine R1 drives engine R2 backwards so that it becomes a reversible refrigerator  Following the same procedure we conclude 𝜂𝑅1 ≤ 𝜂𝑅2

 Next, assume 𝜂𝑅2 > 𝜂𝑅1 and Engine R2 drives engine R1 backwards so that it becomes a reversible refrigerator: 𝜂𝑅2 ≤ 𝜂𝑅1

Corollary: Proof

References

Related documents

Furthermore, while symbolic execution systems often avoid reasoning precisely about symbolic memory accesses (e.g., access- ing a symbolic offset in an array), C OMMUTER ’s test

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence of sleep disorders among children aging between 4 and 9 years using Hindi version of Pediatric Sleep

It requires an integration of timer, counter & watchdog timer in a sequential control system for better safety and control.[1]In this paper we propose to

Experiments were designed with different ecological conditions like prey density, volume of water, container shape, presence of vegetation, predator density and time of

Section 3 focuses on the proposed methods of feature extraction such as principal component analysis and wavelet transform and tumor classification using gene

The aim of this study was to evaluate the current vac- cination status of the HCWs in all of the Departments different from the Department for the Health of Women and Children of one

In the sucrose condition, the Bayes factor was .096, which can be interpreted as “ substantial evidence ” that for people who have tasted sucrose, a high outlay of initial

• Expand services for learning and access to information and educational resources in a variety of formats, in all types of libraries, for individuals of all ages in order to