R E S E A R C H
Open Access
Fixed points in uniform spaces
Phichet Chaoha
*and Sittichoke Songsa-ard
*Correspondence:
phichet.c@chula.ac.th Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
Abstract
We improve Angelov’s fixed point theorems of
-contractions and
j-nonexpansive maps in uniform spaces and investigate their fixed point sets using the concept of virtual stability. Some interesting examples and an application to the solution of a certain integral equation in locally convex spaces are also given.Keywords: fixed points;
-contractions; uniform spaces
1 Introduction
In [], Angelov introduced the notion of -contractions on Hausdorff uniform spaces, which simultaneously generalizes the well-known Banach contractions on metric spaces as well asγ-contractions [] on locally convex spaces, and he proved the existence of their fixed points under various conditions. Later in [], he also extended the no-tion of-contractions toj-nonexpansive maps and gave some conditions to guarantee the existence of their fixed points. However, there is a minor flaw in his proof of Theorem [] where the surjectivity of the mapjis implicitly used without any prior assumption. Additionally, we observe that such a map jcan be naturally replaced by a multi-valued mapJto obtain a more general, yet interesting, notion ofJ-nonexpansiveness. Therefore, in this work, we aim to correct and simplify the proof of Theorem [] as well as extend the notion ofj-nonexpansive maps toJ-nonexpansive maps and investigate the existence of their fixed points. Then we introduceJ-contractions, a special kind ofJ-nonexpansive maps, that play the similar role as Banach contractions in yielding the uniqueness of fixed points. With the notion ofJ-contractions, we are able to recover results on-contractions proved in [] as well as present some new fixed point theorems in which one of them nat-urally leads to a new existence theorem for the solution of a certain integral equation in locally convex spaces. Finally, we prove that, under a mild condition,J-nonexpansive maps are always virtually stable in the sense of [] and hence their fixed point sets are retracts of their convergence sets. An example of a virtually stableJ-nonexpansive map whose fixed point set is not convex is also given.
2 Fixed point theorems
For any setS, we will usePf(S) and|S|to denote the set of all nonempty finite subsets ofS
and the cardinality ofS, respectively. Let (E,A) be a Hausdorff uniform space whose uni-formity is generated by a saturated family of pseudometricsA={dα:α∈A}indexed byA,
∅ =X⊆E, andJ:A→Pf(A). Interested readers should consult [] for general topological concepts of uniform spaces, and [] for the complete development of fixed point theory in
uniform spaces that motivates this work. We first give the definition of aJ-nonexpansive map as follows:
Definition . A self-mapT:X→Xis said to beJ-nonexpansive if for eachα∈A,
dα(Tx,Ty)≤
β∈J(α) dβ(x,y),
for anyx,y∈X.
Example . Let <p<∞,E=pbe equipped with the weak topology, andT:p→p
be defined by
T(x,x, . . . ) =
|x+x|
,
|x+x|
,x,x, . . .
,
for any (x,x, . . . )∈p. ThenA={|f|:f ∈∗p}, where|f|(x) =|f(x)|for eachx∈p.
By Theorem . in [], we have
f(Tx–Ty)≤f
(x–y+x–y) +f
(x–y+x–y)
+f(x–y)+f(x–y)+f(x–y),
for eachf ∈∗p, x= (x,x, . . . )∈p andy= (y,y, . . . )∈p. Here,f=sup{|f(x)|:x∈ X,x ≤}.
By lettingJ:∗p→Pf(∗
p) be defined byJ(f) ={|f|,|g|,|g|,|g|,|g|}, for eachf ∈∗p,
where
g(x) = f
(x+x), g(x) = f
(x+x), g(x) =fx, g(x) =fx,
for eachx= (x,x, . . . )∈p, it follows thatTisJ-nonexpansive.
The above definition of a J-nonexpansive map clearly extends the definition of a
j-nonexpansive map in []. Before giving general existence criteria for fixed points of
J-nonexpansive maps, we need the following notations. For each α∈Aandn∈N, we let
An(α) =(α, . . . ,αn) :α∈J(α) andαk∈J(αk–) for <k≤n
and
A(α) =(α,α, . . . ) :α∈J(α) andαk∈J(αk–) fork>
.
When there is no ambiguity, we will denote an element of bothAn(α) andA(α) simply by (αk). Notice that for eachα∈Aandn∈N, the setsAn(α) andπn(A(α)) are finite, where
πndenotes thenth coordinate projection (αk)→αn.
Proof SupposeT:X→XisJ-nonexpansive. Letx∈Xand (xγ) be a net inXconverging
tox. Then for eachα∈A, we have
dα(Txγ,Tx)≤
β∈J(α)
dβ(xγ,x).
Since (xγ) converges to x, (dβ(xγ,x)) converges to for anyβ∈A, and this proves the
continuity ofT.
Theorem . Let T :X→X be J-nonexpansive whose A(α)is finite for anyα∈A.Then T has a fixed point in X if and only if there exists x∈X such that
(i) the sequence(Tnx
)has a convergence subsequence,and
(ii) for eachα∈Aand(αk)∈A(α),limn→∞dαn(x,Tx) = .
Proof (⇒): It is obvious by lettingxbe a fixed point ofT.
(⇐): Suppose that (Tnix
) converges to somez∈X. Letα∈Aand (αk)∈A(α). Then
limi→∞dα(z,Tnix) = andlimn→∞dαn(x,Tx) = . We can choose N∈Nsufficiently
large so thatdα(z,Tnix) <anddαni(x,Tx) <, for alli≥N. It follows that
dα
z,Tni+x
≤dα
z,Tnix
+dα
Tnix
,Tni(Tx)
≤dα
z,Tnix
+
(αk)∈Ani(α)
dαni(x,Tx)
≤ +A(α) .
Sinceαis arbitrary, (Tni+x
) converges toz. By the continuity ofT, we havez=Tzand
hencezis a fixed point ofT.
As a corollary of the previous theorem, we immediately obtain Theorem [], with a corrected and simplified proof, as follows:
Corollary . Let T:X→X be a j-nonexpansive map.If there exists x∈X such that
(i) the sequence(Tnx)has a convergence subsequence,and
(ii) for everyα∈A,limn→∞djn(α)(x,Tx) = ,
then T has a fixed point.
Proof The proof follows directly from the previous theorem by considering the mapJ:
α→ {j(α)}. Notice thatA(α) ={(jn(α))}which is finite.
We will now consider a special kind ofJ-nonexpansive maps that resemble Banach con-tractions in yielding the uniqueness of fixed points. Letdenote the family of all functions φ: [,∞)→[,∞) satisfying the following conditions:
() φis non-decreasing and continuous from the right, and () φ(t) <tfor anyt> .
Notice thatφ() = , and we will callφ∈subadditive ifφ(t+t)≤φ(t) +φ(t) for all t,t≥. Also, for a subfamily{φα}α∈Aof,α∈A, (αk)∈An(α) andi≤n, we let
φi(α
Definition . A self-mapT:X→Xis said to be aJ-contraction if for eachα∈A, there existsφα∈such that
dα(Tx,Ty)≤
β∈J(α)
φα
dβ(x,y) ,
for anyx,y∈X, andφαis subadditive whenever|J(α)|> .
Clearly, a-contraction as defined in [] is aJ-contraction and aJ-contraction is always
J-nonexpansive. A natural example of aJ-contraction can be obtained by adding (finitely many) appropriate-contractions as shown in the following example.
Example . Given two-contractionsT:X→XandT:X→Xas defined []. Then
there existj,j:A→A, and for eachα∈A, there existφ,α,φ,α∈such that
dα(Tx,Ty)≤φ,α
dj(α)(x,y) and dα(Tx,Ty)≤φ,α
dj(α)(x,y),
for anyα∈Aandx,y∈X. If for eachα∈A,j(α)=j(α) and there is a subadditiveφ,α∈
so that φ,α(t)≤φ,α(t) andφ,α(t)≤φ,α(t) for anyt≥, then the mapH=T+T is
clearly aJ-contraction with respect toJ(α) ={j(α),j(α)}andφH,α=φ,αfor anyα∈A.
Lemma . If T:X→X is a J-contraction.Then we have
dα
Tnx,Tny ≤
(αk)∈An(α)
φα◦φ(nα–k)
dαn(x,y) ,
for anyα∈A,n≥and x,y∈X.
Proof Recall thatφαis assumed to be subadditive whenever|J(α)|> . Then, for anyα∈A,
n≥ andx,y∈X, we clearly have
dα
Tnx,Tny ≤
α∈J(α) φα
dα
Tn–x,Tn–y
≤
α∈J(α)
φα α∈J(α)
φα
dα
Tn–x,Tn–y
≤
α∈J(α)
α∈J(α)
φα◦φα
dα
Tn–x,Tn–y
.. .
≤
α∈J(α)
α∈J(α)
· · ·
αn∈J(αn–)
φα◦φα◦ · · · ◦φαn–
dαn(x,y)
=
(αk)∈An(α)
φα◦φ(nα–k)
dαn(x,y) .
We now obtain some general criteria for the existence of fixed points ofJ-contractions.
(i) for eachα∈A,there existscα∈such that
φαi(t)≤cα(t),
for any(αk)∈A(α),i∈N,t≥,and
(ii) there existsx∈Xsuch that for eachα∈A,(αk)∈A(α),i∈Nandn,m∈N,we have
dαi
Tnx,Tmx ≤Mα(x),
for someMα(x)∈R,
then T has a fixed point.Moreover,if for eachα∈A and x,y∈X,there exists Fα(x,y)∈R+ such that
dαi(x,y)≤Fα(x,y),
for all(αk)∈A(α)and i∈N,then the fixed point of T is unique.
Proof For eachα∈Aandn,m,N∈N, sinceφαis non-decreasing, we have
dα
Tnx,Tmx ≤
α∈J(α)
φα
dα
Tn–x,Tm–x
≤
α∈J(α) φα
supdα
Tn–x,Tm–x :n,m≥N ,
and by lettinghα
N:=sup{dα(Tnx,Tmx) :n,m≥N}, it follows that
hαN≤
α∈J(α) φα
supdα
Tn–x,Tm–x :n,m≥N
=
α∈J(α) φα
hα
N–
≤
α∈J(α)
α∈J(α) φα
φα
hα
N–
.. .
≤
(αk)∈AN–(α)
φα◦φ(Nα–k)
hαN–
≤
(αk)∈AN–(α)
cNαMα(x)
≤A(α)cNα
Mα(x) . ()
Also, for a givent≥, since ≤cNα(t) =cα(cNα–(t)) <cNα–(t), we havelimN→∞cNα(t) =rα
for somerα≥. Sincecαis right continuous, we havelimN→∞cα(cNα–(t)) =cα(rα), and
hencecα(rα) =rα. Therefore,rα= . By (), it follows thatlimN→∞hαN = . Sinceα is
ar-bitrary, (Tkx
Now suppose that for each x,y∈X and α ∈A, there existsFα(x,y)∈R+ such that
dαi(x,y)≤Fα(x,y) for all (αk)∈A(α) and i∈N. If x, y are fixed points ofT, then by Lemma ., we have for eachα∈Aandn∈N,
dα(x,y) =dα
Tnx,Tny
≤
(αk)∈An(α)
φα◦φn(α–k)
dαn(x,y)
≤
(αk)∈An(α) cnα
dαn(x,y)
≤A(α)cnαFα(x,y) .
Sincelimn→∞cn
α(Fα(x,y)) = , we must havex=y.
As a corollary of the previous theorem, we immediately obtain Theorem in [] as fol-lows.
Corollary . Suppose X is a bounded and sequentially complete subset of E and T:X→ X is-contraction.If
(i) for eachα∈A,there existscα∈such thatφjn(α)(t)≤cα(t)for alln∈Nandt≥,
(ii) for eachn∈N,sup{djn(α)(x,y) :x,y∈X} ≤p(α) :=sup{dα(x,y) :x,y∈X},
then there exists a unique fixed point x∈X of T.
Proof For eachx,x,y∈X,α∈A, (αk)∈A(α) andi,m,n∈N, by lettingJ(α) ={j(α)}and Mα(x) =p(α) =Fα(x,y), we haveA(α) ={(α,j(α),j(α), . . . ,jk(α), . . . )}, dαi(T
mx
,Tnx) = dji(α)(Tmx,Tnx)≤Mα(x) and dαi(x,y)≤Fα(x,y). Hence, by Theorem ., T has a
unique fixed point.
Theorem . Suppose X is sequentially complete and T:X→X is a self-map satisfying:
for eachα∈A and k∈N,there existφα,k∈,a finite set Dα,kand a map Pα,k:Dα,k→A such that
dα
Tkx,Tky ≤
γ∈Dα,k φα,k
dPα,k(γ)(x,y) ,
for any x,y∈X.
. If there exists x∈Xsuch that for eachα∈Athere existsMα(x)∈R+so that
k∈N|Dα,k|φα,k(Mα(x)) <∞and
dPα,k(γ)(x,Tx)≤Mα(x),
for allk∈Nandγ∈Dα,k,thenT has a fixed point inX.
. If for each α∈Aandx,y∈X,there existsFα(x,y)∈R+such that
k∈N|Dα,k|φα,k(Fα(x,y)) <∞and
for allk∈Nandγ∈Dα,k,thenT has a unique fixed point inXand,for anyx∈X, the sequence(Tnx)converges to the fixed point ofT.
Proof First notice thatTis clearly aJ-contraction. . For anyα∈Aandm>n∈N, we have
dα
Tnx,Tmx ≤
n≤i<m dα
Tix,Ti+x
≤
n≤i<m
γ∈Dα,i
φα,i
dPα,i(γ)(x,Tx)
≤
n≤i<m
|Dα,i|φα,i
Mα(x).
Also, sincek∈N|Dα,k|φα,k(Mα(x)) <∞, (Tkx) is a Cauchy sequence and converges to a
fixed point ofT by the sequential completeness ofXand the continuity ofT. . For anyx∈X,α∈Aandm>n∈N, we have
dα
Tnx,Tmx ≤
n≤i<m dα
Tix,Ti+x
≤
n≤i<m
γ∈Dα,i
φα,i
dPα,i(γ)(x,Tx)
≤
n≤i<m
|Dα,i|φα,i
Fα(x,Tx).
Also, sincek∈N|Dα,k|φα,k(Fα(x,Tx)) <∞, (Tkx) is a Cauchy sequence and converges to a
fixed point ofT by the sequential completeness ofXand the continuity ofT. Now, since for eachα∈A,k∈Nandx,y∈F(T),
dα(x,y) =dα
Tkx,Tky
≤
γ∈Dα,k φα,k
dPα,k(γ)(x,y)
≤
γ∈Dα,k φα,k
Fα(x,y)
=|Dα,k|φα,k
Fα(x,y),
andlimk→∞|Dα,k|φα,k(Fα(x,y)) = , we have the uniqueness. Corollary .(Theorem in []) Let us suppose
(i) for eachα∈Aandn> ,there existφα,n∈andj(α,n)∈Asuch that
dα
Tnx,Tny ≤φα,n
dj(α,n)(x,y),
for anyx,y∈X,
(ii) there exists x∈Xsuch thatdj(α,n)(x,Tx)≤p(α) <∞(n= , , . . .),
nφα,n(p(α)) <∞andj:A×N→A.
Proof By lettingDα,k={j(α,k)}for anyα∈Aandk∈NandPα,k=πk|Dα,k. Then for each
i∈N, we have|Dα,i|= andMα(x) =p(α). By Theorem .(),Thas a fixed point.
Theorem . Suppose X is sequentially complete and T:X→X is a J-contraction whose A(α)is finite for eachα∈A.If,for eachα∈A,there exists cα∈satisfying:
(i) cα(t)/tis non-decreasing int,
(ii) φαn(t)≤cα(t)for any(αk)∈A(α),n∈Nandt∈[,∞),and
(iii) there existx∈XandMα(x)∈R+such thatdαn(x,Tx)≤Mα(x)for any
(αk)∈A(α)andn∈N, then T has a fixed point in X.
Proof LetDα,i=Ai(α),Pα,i((αk)) =αi, andφα,i(t) =ciα(t) for anyi∈N,α∈A, (αk)∈Ai(α),
andt∈[,∞). Then for anyα∈Aandx,y∈X, we have, by Lemma .,
dα
Tix,Tiy ≤
(αk)∈Ai(α)
φα◦φ(i–αk)
dαi(x,y)
≤
(αk)∈Ai(α)
ciα
dαi(x,y)
=
(αk)∈Dα,i φα,i
dPα,i((αk))(x,y) .
Since
|Dα,i+|φα,i+(Mα(x))
|Dα,i|φα,i(Mα(x))
=|Ai+(α)|c
i+
α (Mα(x))
|Ai(α)|ci
α(Mα(x)) ≤
cα(ciα(Mα(x))) ci
α(Mα(x)) ≤
cα(Mα(x)) Mα(x)
< ,
for anyi∈N, we havei∈N|Dα,i|φα,i(Mα(x)) <∞. Then by Theorem .(),Thas a fixed
point.
Corollary .(Theorem in []) Let us suppose
(i) the operatorT:X→Xis a-contraction,
(ii) for eachα∈Athere exists a-functioncαsuch thatφjn(α)(t)≤cα(t)for alln∈N
andcα(t)/tis non-decreasing,
(iii) there exists an elementx∈Xsuch thatdjn(α)(x,Tx)≤p(α) <∞(n= , , . . .).
Then T has at least one fixed point in X.
Proof By lettingJ(α) ={j(α)}for anyα∈AandMα(x) =p(α). Then|A(α)|= , and, by
Theorem .,Thas a fixed point.
Example . Given a sequentially complete locally convex space X, and two -contractionsT,T:X→X;i.e., there existj,j:A→A, and for eachα∈A, there exist
φ,α,φ,α∈such that
dα(Tx,Ty)≤φ,α
dj(α)(x,y) and dα(Tx,Ty)≤φ,α
dj(α)(x,y),
(i) jn+=jn◦jandjn◦j=jn+for anyn∈N,
(ii) for eachα∈A,φ,α(t) =c(α)tandφ,α(t) =c(α)tfor somec(α) +c(α)∈(, ),
and
(iii) there existsx∈Xsuch thatdjn(α)(x,Tx)≤p(x,α) <∞and djn
(α)(x,Tx)≤p(x,α) <∞for anyα∈Aandn= , , . . .. ThenH=T+T
is aJ-contraction withJ(α) ={j(α),j(α)}andφH,α(t) = (c(α) +c(α))t.
Also, by (i) and (iii), we have|A(α)|= <∞and
dαn(x,Hx)≤
dαn(x,Tx) +dαn(x,Tx)
≤
p(x,α) +p(x,α)
.
Hence,Hsatisfies all conditions in Theorem ., and it has a fixed point inX. Notice that
H may not be a-contraction, by choosingj andjso thatdj(α)+dj(α)∈/ Afor some α∈A, and hence Theorem in [] cannot be applied.
We now end this section by giving an application to the solution of a certain integral equation in locally convex spaces.
Example . Following terminologies in [], letXbe an S-space topologized by the family of seminorms{| · |α:α∈A}andC([,T];X) the space of all continuous functions
from [,T] intoXtopologized by the family of seminorms{ · α:α∈A}, wherexα:=
supt∈[,T]|x(t)|α for anyx∈C([,T];X). LetL(X) denote the set of all continuous linear
operators onX,
L(X) =
l∈L(X) :∀α∈A,∃M(α) > ,∀x∈X,|lx|α≤M(α)|x|α
,
and let{S(t)}t≥be aC-semigroup onXsuch thatS: [,∞)→L(X) is locally bounded.
Now, we replace H and H in [] by conditions (N), (N) and (N) as follows:
(N) B:C([,T];X)→C([,T];X)is an operator such that there existsJB:A→Pf(A)
so that for anyα∈A, there iskα,B∈Lloc([,T]; [,∞))such that
Bx(t) –By(t)α≤kα,B(t)
β∈JB(α)
x(t) –y(t)β,
for anyx,y∈C([,T];X).
(N) f : [,T]×X×X→Xis continuous and there existJf:A→Pf(A)and Kf ∈Lloc([,T]; [,∞))such that for eachα∈A,
f(t,u,v) –f(t,u,v)α≤Kf(t) β∈Jf(α)
|u–u|β+|v–v|α
,
for anyt∈[,T]andu,u,v,v∈X,
(N) Kf ·kα,B∈Lloc([,T]; [,∞)).
Consider the integral equation
x(t) =S(t)x+
t
whose solution is closely related to the mild solution of the differential equation
dx
dt =ax+f
t,x(t),Bx(t) ,
whereadenotes the infinitesimal generator of{S(t)}t≥.
We now define an operatorGonCx([,T];X) ={x∈C([,T];X) :x() =x}by
(Gx)(t) =S(t)x+
t
S(t–s)fs,x(s),Bx(s) ds,
for any x∈Cx([,T];X). Following the proof of Theorem in [] and for eacht> ,
S(t)∈L(X), then we can show that, for anyα∈A, there existsM(α) > such that
Gx–Gyα≤Hα β∈Jf(α)
x–yβ+
β∈JB(α)
x–yβ
,
whereHα=max{M(α)
T
Kf(s)ds,M(α)
T
Kf(s)kα,B(s)ds}. It is easy to see that if for each
α∈A,Hα∈(, ) andJf(α)∩JB(α) =∅, thenGis aJ-contraction withJG(α) =Jf(α)∪JB(α).
In particular, if we assume further that for eachα∈A,Jf(α) ={α},|JB(α)|= such that
JB◦JB=JBandHα=HJB(α)<
. Then for anyk∈Nandx,y∈Cx([,T];X), we have
Gkx–Gkyα≤Hαkx–yα+
k
i=
(HJB(α))
k–iHi
α
x–yJB(α)
=Hαkx–yα+
k
i=
k–iHαk
x–yJB(α)
≤k–Hαk
x–yα+
k
i=
x–yJB(α)
.
Now, by lettingφα,k(t) = k–Hαkt,Dα,k={(,α), (,JB(α))(,JB(α)), . . . , (k,JB(α))},Pα,k(γ) =
π(γ), andFα(x,y) =max{x–yα,x–yJB(α)}, we have
(i) x–yPα,k(γ)≤Fα(x,y)for anyx,y∈Cx([,T];X),k∈N,α∈A, andγ ∈Dα,k,
(ii) k∈N|Dα,k|φα,k(Fα(x,y)) =
k∈Nk+ (Hα)kFα(x,y) <∞for anyx,y∈Cx([,T];X)
andα∈A.
Therefore, by Theorem .(),Ghas a unique fixed point, so the integral equation () has a unique solution.
3 Fixed point sets
In this section, we will show that, under a mild condition, aJ-nonexpansive map is always virtually stable. This immediately gives a connection between the fixed point set and the convergence set of aJ-nonexpansive map. Recall that a continuous self-mapT :X→X, whose fixed point setF(T) is nonempty, on a Hausdorff spaceXis said to be virtually stable [] if for eachx∈F(T) and each neighborhoodUofx, there exist a neighborhood
V ofxand an increasing sequence (kn) of positive integers such thatTkn(V)⊆Ufor all
nonexpansive self-map, whose fixed point set is nonempty, on a metric space is always uniformly virtually stable with respect to the sequence (n) of all natural numbers. An im-portant feature of a virtually stable map is the connection between its fixed point set and its convergence set as given in the following theorem.
Theorem .([], Theorem .) Suppose X is a regular space.If T :X→X is virtually stable,then F(T)is a retract of C(T),where C(T)is the(Picard)convergence set of T defined as follows:
C(T) =x∈X:the sequenceTnx converges.
As in the previous section, let (E,A) be a Hausdorff uniform space whose uniformity is generated by a saturated family of pseudometricsA={dα:α∈A}indexed byAand∅ =
X⊆E. The following theorem gives a general criterion for a self-map onXto be virtually stable.
Theorem . Let T:X→X be a self-map whose fixed point set F(T)is nonempty,and which satisfies the following conditions:
(i) for eachα∈Aandk∈N,there exist a finite setDα,kand a mapPα,k:Dα,k→Asuch that
dα
Tkx,Tky ≤
γ∈Dα,k
dPα,k(γ)(x,y),
for anyx,y∈X,
(ii) there existsN∈Nsuch that|Dα,n| ≤ |Dα,N|andPα,n(Dα,n)⊆Pα,N(Dα,N)for any
n≥Nandα∈A.
Then T is uniformly virtually stable with respect to the sequence of all natural numbers.
Proof Letz∈F(T) and letUbe a neighborhood ofz. We may assume thatU=mi={w∈ X:dαi(w,z) <}for some> andα, . . . ,αm∈A. For eachn∈N, let
Vn=
m
i=
γ∈Dαi,n
w∈X:dPαi,n(γ)(w,z) < |Dαi,n|
.
By (ii), there existsN∈Nsuch that|Dαi,n| ≤ |Dαi,N|andPαi,n(Dαi,n)⊆Pαi,N(Dαi,N) for anyn≥Nandi= , . . . ,m. LetV=V∩V∩ · · · ∩VN which is clearly a nonempty open
subset ofX,y∈V,l∈Nandi∈ {, . . . ,m}. It follows that
dαi
Tly,z =dαi
Tly,Tlz ≤
γ∈Dαi,l
dPαi,l(γ)(y,z).
Ifl<N, then
dαi
Tly,z <
γ∈Dαi,l |Dαi,l|
Ifl≥N, sincePαi,l(γ)∈Pαi,l(Dαi,l)⊆Pαi,N(Dαi,N), we havedPαi,l(γ)(y,z) <
|Dαi,N|for each γ ∈Dαi,l, and hence
dαi
Tly,z <
γ∈Dαi,l |Dαi,N|
=|Dαi,l| |Dαi,N|
≤.
Hence,T is uniformly virtually stable with respect to the sequence of all natural
num-bers.
Corollary . Suppose that T is J-nonexpansive with F(T)=∅.If there exists N∈Nsuch that|An(α)| ≤ |AN(α)|andπn(An(α))⊆πN(AN(α))for any n≥N andα∈A,then T is uniformly virtually stable with respect to the sequence of all natural numbers.
Proof By lettingDα,n=An(α) andPα,n=πn|An(α)for anyn∈Nandα∈A, we have
dα
Tlx,Tly ≤
γ∈Dα,l
dPα,l(γ)(x,y),
for anyx,y∈X. The result then follows from Theorem ..
Example . LetE=equipped with the weak topology andT:→be defined by
T(x,x, . . . ) =
|
x+x|
,
|x+x|
,x,x, . . .
,
for any (x,x, . . . )∈. ThenA={|f|:f∈}, and by Lemma . and Theorem . in [],
we have
fTnx–Tny
≤f
√
|x–y+x–y|+|x–y+x–y|
+ √
(|x–y|+|x–y|+|x–y+x–y|+|x–y+x–y|)
– √
+f
|x–y|+|x–y+x–y|+
|x–y|+|x–y+x–y|
+f|x–y|+f|x–y|+f(x–y),
for eachf ∈,n∈N,x= (x,x, . . . ) andy= (y,y, . . . )∈.
By lettingJ:→P() be defined byJ(f) ={|f|,|g|,|g|,|g|,|g|}for eachf∈, where
g(x) =f
√
+ √ – √+
(x+x),
g(x) =f
√
+ √ – √+
(x+x),
g(x) =f
√ – √ +
x, g(x) =f
√ – √+
x,
Notice that (, , . . . ) is a fixed point ofT, and for eachf ∈andn,m∈N,πn(A(|f|)) =
πm(A(|f|)). Then, by Theorem .,Tis virtually stable and hence the fixed point set ofT
is a retract of the convergence set ofT. Moreover, the fixed point set is not convex be-causex= (, , , , , . . . ) andy= (, , –, –, , . . . ) are fixed points ofT, while the convex combination x+y= (, , –, –, , . . . ) is not.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the anonymous referee(s) for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving this manuscript. This research is (partially) supported by the Centre of Excellence in Mathematics, the Commission on Higher Education, Thailand.
Received: 23 January 2014 Accepted: 23 May 2014 Published:02 Jun 2014
References
1. Angelov, VG: Fixed point theorems in uniform spaces and applications. Czechoslov. Math. J.37, 19-33 (1987) 2. Cain, GL, Nashed, MZ: Fixed points and stability for a sum of two operators in locally convex spaces. Pac. J. Math.
39(3), 581-592 (1971)
3. Angelov, VG:J-Nonexpansive mappings in uniform spaces and applications. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc.43, 331-339 (1991) 4. Chaoha, P, Atiponrat, W: Virtually stable maps and their fixed point sets. J. Math. Anal. Appl.359, 536-542 (2009) 5. Weil, A: Sur les Espaces à Structure Uniforme et la Topologie Générale. Hermann, Paris (1938)
6. Angelov, VG: Fixed Points in Uniform Spaces and Applications. Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca (2009) 7. Chaoha, P, Songsa-ard, S: Fixed points of functionally Lipschitzian maps. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal.15(4), 665-679
(2014)
8. Chonwerayuth, A, Termwuttipong, I, Chaoha, P: Piecewise continuous mild solutions of a system governed by impulsive differential equations in locally convex spaces. Science Asia37, 360-369 (2011)
10.1186/1687-1812-2014-134