• No results found

A study on the prescribing pattern and cost comparison of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in a multi-specialty hospital

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "A study on the prescribing pattern and cost comparison of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in a multi-specialty hospital"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Research Article

ISSN: - 2306 – 6091

Available Online at: www.ijphr.com

An African Edge Journal

SJ Impact Factor

5.546

A STUDY ON THE PRESCRIBING PATTERN AND

COST COMPARISON OF NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY

DRUGS IN A MULTI-SPECIALTY HOSPITAL

*

Rangapriya M, Sujitha Jai Karnesh G, Theertha C K, Usha M

Swamy Vivekanandha College of Pharmacy, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India

___________________________________________________________________________

Abstract

Objectives: To study the prescribing pattern and cost comparison of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in a multi speciality hospital. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for the period of six months between February and July 2018. The parameters analyzed were demographics, NSAIDs prescribed, clinical indication, type of therapy, concomitant drugs. Data collected was analyzed by frequency and percentage. Results: Overall frequency of NSAIDs prescription in this study was 29.31%. Diclofenac (43.90%) was the commonest NSAID prescribed. High frequency of co-prescription of gastro protective agents (86%) was noted. Monotherapy has been followed in 188 prescriptions (53.71%) than combination therapy in 75 prescriptions (21.42%). The preferred route of administration was oral in 136 prescriptions (38.85%) followed by parenteral route in 85 prescriptions (24.28%).The majority of the prescriptions contain only 1 NSAID (51.42%) followed by 2 NSAIDs (26.57%).The NSAIDs prescriptions were more predominantly found in the orthopaedics department and the common indication was osteoarthritis in 123 patients (35.14%). Conclusion:

The concomitant use of NSAIDs and other medications revealed the possibility of drug interactions, medication error and adverse drug reactions in the patients. Cost comparison of the drugs prescribed recommends the use of generic medications in place of branded drugs as it may decrease the economic burden of the patients.

Keywords:

Prescribing pattern, NSAIDs, Gastro protective agents, Cost comparison.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Received on- 24.01.2019; Revised and accepted on- 04.02.2019; Available online- 20.02.2019

Introduction

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most widely prescribed drugs to treat various acute and chronic disease conditions.1 These drugs are used for the management of pain and inflammation with good efficacy and represent most widely prescribed class of medications in the world and are used as over the counter drugs.2 NSAIDs provide symptomatic relief from pain and swelling in chronic joint diseases such as in rheumatoid arthritis and in more acute inflammatory conditions such as sports injuries, fracture, acute arthritic

pains, sprains and other soft tissue injuries. They also provide relief from post-operative, dental, menstrual pain, and from the pain of headache and migraine. There are different NSAIDs formulations available, including tablets, injections and gels.3

All drugs grouped in this class have antipyretic, analgesic and anti- inflammatory actions in different measures. In contrast to morphine, they do not depress CNS, physical dependence, have no abuse liability and are weaker analgesics (except

(2)

antipyrine were produced at that time. The next major advance was for the development of phenylbutazone which produces anti-inflammatory activity is almost comparable to corticosteroids. The term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were coined to designate such drugs. Indomethacin was introduced in 1963. The propionic acid derivative ibuprofen has been added since then and cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition is recognised to be their most important mechanism of action. Subsequently some selective COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib, etc.) have been added. The antipyretic-analgesics are chemically diverse, but most are organic acids.4

Prescription pattern monitoring studies (PPMS) are used for assessing the prescribing, dispensing and distribution of medicines. The main aim of prescription pattern monitoring scale is to promote rational use of medicines (RUM).5 Prescribing appropriate drugs in right doses is an integral part by which a physician can influence the patient’s health and well-being.6 Irrational use of medicines is a major worldwide problem. WHO identified that more than half of all the medicines were prescribed, dispensed or sold inappropriately, and most of the patients fail to take them correctly.7 Prescription Pattern helps as an auditing tool in developing a more comprehensive medical system having more benefits and less errors.8

Drug Related Problems like drug interactions, adverse drug reactions, medication error etc constitutes safety issue among hospitalized patients leading to patient harm and increased healthcare costs.9 Cost of drug therapy is the major hurdle in effective treatment of disease and compliance towards the drug regimen. There are evidences describing that the prices of prescription medicines affect users, suppliers, and in particular payers in the healthcare system.10

Rational use of medicines is that the patient receives medication appropriate to the clinical need, at the proper dose, for the proper duration

regimen for the patient. 11 The study was aimed to assess the prescribing pattern and cost comparison of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in a multi-speciality hospital.

Methods

A Prospective, Observational study was conducted in the Vivekanandha Medical Care Hospital, located in Elayampalayam, Tiruchengode, Namakkal for a period of 6 months from February – July 2018. A total of 507 prescriptions were screened and only 353 prescriptions were selected for the study on the basis of following inclusion and exclusion criteria. All the In patients and out patients, both male and female patients of any age group were included in the study. Prescription without NSAIDs drugs and critically ill patients were excluded from the study. Patient case sheets served as the source of information. Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale was utilized for the analysis.

Data Analysis

The prescriptions were analyzed for the demographic characteristics of the patients, diagnosis, NSAID formulations, dose, route, frequency, duration of administration, concomitant medications, The datum were analyzed for DRPs such as ADRs, DDIs and Mediation errors using Naranjo causality assessment scale and Micromedex software. Variation of NSAIDs costs in different brands were analysed using the internet. The results of the collected data were described in the form of percentage, table and graphs by using MS-Excel 2010.

Results

Gender wise distribution

(3)

Fig. No. 01: Gender wise distribution of prescriptions (n=353)

Fig. No. 02: Age wise distribution (n=353)

Age wise distribution

Among 353 prescriptions containing NSAIDs, it was widely used in the age group of 60-69 years were 32.86 %, followed by the age group of 50-59 years were 19.83%. Then the remaining 4.24% were in the age group of 20-29 years, 7.93% were in the age group of 30-39 years, 13.03% were in the age group of 40-49 years, 18.69% were in the age group of 70-79 years and 3.39% were in the age group of 80 -89 years. (Fig. No. 02)

Department wise classification

Out of the total 353 prescriptions, the NSAIDs were mostly prescribed in the department of orthopaedics (31.16%), followed by 27.47% were referred in the department General medicine, 8.49% in the department of Cardiology, 13.88% in the department of Ophthalmology, 10.19% in the department of Dental, 3.39% in the department of Emergency, 1.41% in the department of Surgery,0.56% in the department of Gynaecology, 1.13% in the department of Nephrology and 2.26% in the department of Paediatrics.( Fig. No. 03).

Distribution of NSAIDs prescribed

In the 353 prescriptions, the total number of NSAIDs prescribed were 566. In that, 43.90% of Diclofenac, 36.26% of Paracetamol, 27.76% of Aspirin, 21.81% of Aceclofenac + Paracetamol,

12.74% of Ketorolac, 1.98% of Bromofenac , 0.84% of Naproxen, 3.96% was Etoricoxib , 0.56% of Aceclofenac, 3.11% of Indomethacin, 2.85% of Nepafenac, 4.53% of Flurbiprofen and 3.11% of Indomethacin were prescribed. (Fig. No. 04)

Distribution based on the type of therapy

Out of 353 prescriptions, 191 prescriptions (54.10%) shows monotherapy, 75 prescriptions (21.42%) were having combination therapy and 87 prescriptions (24.64%) received both monotherapy and combination therapy. (Fig. No. 05)

Number of NSAIDs per prescription

Out of 353 prescriptions, (51.84%) 183 prescriptions consist of single NSAID, 26.34%) 93 prescriptions consist of 2 NSAIDs, (11.61%) 41 prescriptions consist of 3 NSAIDs, (8.49%) 30 prescriptions consist of 4 NSAIDs and (1.69%) 6 prescriptions consist of 5 NSAIDs. (Fig. No. 06)

Route of administration of NSAIDs prescribed

(4)

28.04%

8.49%

13.88%

10.19%

3.39%

1.41%

0.56%

1.13% 2.26%

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Pe

rc

en

tage

Fig. No. 03: Department wise classification (n=353)

27.7%

43.90%

36.26%

12.74%

1.98%

0.84%

3.96%

0.56%

3.11%

21.81%

2.83% 4.53%

0.56%

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

P

e

rc

e

nt

a

g

e

(%

)

Drugs

(5)

Fig. No. 05: Distribution based on type of therapy prescribed (n= 353)

Fig. No. 06: Number of NSAIDs per prescription (n=353)

Fig. No. 07: Route of Administration of NSAIDs (n=353)

Distribution based on clinical indication of NSAIDs prescribed

Out of 353 prescriptions, 35.06% (126 prescriptions) were diagnosed with Osteoarthritis, 13.59% (48 prescriptions) were diagnosed with fever, 12.74% (45 prescriptions) were diagnosed

(6)

0

P

er

ce

n

tage

Diagnosis

Fig. No. 08: Distribution based on the indication for NSAIDs prescribing (n=353)

Concomitant drugs prescribed

The majority of the prescription contains anti-ulcers (gastro protective agents) (86.01%), and antibiotics (71.64%). Other prescribed drugs such

as anti-asthmatics, diuretics, corticosteroids, laxatives, mucolytics, anti-diabetics, anti-anxiety, neurotonics and analgesics.

(7)

Anti-Ulcers prescribed

In this study population, Pantoprazole (46.17%) and Ranitidine (32.27%) were the widely prescribed drugs to treat ulcer. (Fig. No. 10)

Methods of prescribing pattern of NSAIDs

The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prescribed in the brand names were 53.8% and the NSAIDs prescribed in the generic names were 46.1%. (Fig. No. 11)

Fig. No. 10: Anti ulcer drugs prescribed (n=353)

Fig. No. 11: Methods of prescribing pattern of NSAIDs

Discussion

This study describes the prescribing pattern of NSAIDs in a total 353 prescriptions. The present study showed that number of males 189 (54%) were using NSAIDs than females 164 (46.45%) and this was in accordance with the previous study of Kulkarni Dhananjay et al (2013) that an overall higher prevalence of NSAIDs use among male patients was (32.5%).12

Our study shows a higher incidence of NSAIDs use in elderly patients aged between 60 and 69 years (32.86%). This result coincides with the study done by S Kumar et al (2016) shows (22.5%) in the age

group of 41-50 years.13 In the prescribing pattern of NSAIDs, majority of the prescription contains Diclofenac 153 (43.90%) followed by Paracetamol 128 (36.26%) and Aspirin 98 (28%). This finding was in contrast with the study conducted by P. R.R. Vaishnavi et al (2018) shows that paracetamol (27.02%) was the mostly prescribed drug followed by diclofenac (17.84%).14

(8)

al (2016) shows that 68% of NSAIDs prescriptions were prescribed in oral route.15 The majority of the prescription contains only one NSAID (51.84%) followed by 2 NSAIDs (26.34%) these results coincides the study conducted by Pravinkumar Ingle et al (2015).16 The NSAIDs prescriptions were more predominantly found in the orthopaedics department. This finding was in accordance with the study conducted by A D Paul et al (2004)17 and the common indication for NSAIDs prescribed in our study include osteoarthritis in 126 patients (35.69%).Our findings was in accordance with the study conducted by Sam Anbu Sahayam et al (2016) study showed that out of 92 patients, 53 (57.60%) patients were males and 39(42.4%) patients were females.18

In our study we see that NSAIDs were invariably co-prescribed along with anti-ulcer drugs (gastro protective agents) in order to overcome the NSAIDs induced gastrointestinal toxicity in the form of peptic ulcer and gastrointestinal bleeding in 304 prescriptions (86.11%).This result was in accordance with the study conducted by Humaira Farheen et al (2016).15 In this study proton pump inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed gastroprotective agents followed by H2 antagonists

which shows similar results in the study done by Raghavendra B et al (2009).19 The other class drugs used concomitantly in this study were antibiotics, anti- platelets, vitamins, anti-histamines, corticosteroids and it shows the similar results in the study conducted by S Kumar et al (2016) were antibiotics and vitamins.13 Prashker MJ and Meenan RF (1995) examined the total cost of drug to be consist of 3 components i.e. the actual cost of drug, the cost of monitoring patients for side effects of the drugs and the cost of treating the side effects.20

Findings of our study shows the general trend observed in NSAIDs prescription pattern where non-selective NSAIDs constitute the major bulk of prescription. The prescribing pattern of NSAID revealed that Diclofenac was the commonly

the generic drug. These expensive drugs will lead to economic burden to poor and middle class people. Treating NSAIDs induced side effects will also increase the financial burden of the people.

Conclusion

The concomitant use of NSAIDs and other medications revealed the possibility of drug interactions, medication error and adverse drug reactions in the patients. Cost comparison study recommends the use of generic medications in place of branded drugs as it may decrease the economic burden of the patient. It is therefore recommended that physicians and healthcare professionals should review the drug policies and prescribing habits in order to avoid side effects and high cost of drugs. Further investigations and improvement are required in the areas like unique guidelines in the rational use of drugs. Participation of well trained clinical pharmacist in ward rounds which will reduce the incidence of drug related problems. Limitation of the study is the short duration (six months), hence effect of seasonal variation on NSAIDs prescription pattern could not be determined.

Reference

1. Carina Monteiro, Claudia Miranda, Filipia Brito, Cecilia Fonseca, Andre R. T. S. Araujo. Consumption patterns of NSAIDs in central Portugal and the role of pharmacy professionals in promoting their rational use. Drugs & Therapy Perspectives. 2016, 33(1):32-40.

2. Taruna Sharma, S. Dutta, D. C. Dhasmana. Prescribing Pattern of NSAIDs in Orthopaedic OPD of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Uttaranchal: Journal of Medical Education & Research. 2006, 8(3):160-162.

3. Pottast H,Dressman JB,JungingerHE,Midha KK, Oestr H.Biowaiver monographs for immediate release solid oral dosage forms: ibuprofen Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 94 (10):2122. 4. KD Tripathi. Essentials of medical

(9)

5. Shipra Jain, Prerna Upadhyaya, Jaswant Goyal, Abhijith Kumar, Pushpawati Jain, Vikas Seth, et al . A systematic review of prescription pattern monitoring studies and their effectiveness in promoting rational use of medicines.Perspectives in Clinical Research. 2015Apr-Jun; 6(2):86-90. 6. Indranil Banerjee, Tania Bhadury. Prescribing

pattern of interns in a primary health center in India.Journal of basic and clinical pharmacy. 2014Mar-May; 5(2):40-43.

7. World Health Organization. The Pursuit of Responsible Use of Medicines: Sharing and Learning from Country Experiences. http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/respo nsible_use/en/ 2012 Oct:15

8. Bhattacharya. A. A, Gupta. H, Dewangan. M. K. Prescription pattern study of the drugs used in tertiary hospitals of the Bilaspur region.Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2012, 5(4):73-76.

9. Carole P Kaufmann, DominikStampfli, Kurt E Hersberger, Markus L Lampert. Determination of risk factors for drug-related problems: a multidisciplinary process. Pharmaceutic and therapeutic Research. 2015 Mar; 5(3):1-7. 10. Burapadaja S, Kawasaki N, Kittipongpatana O,

Ogata F. Study on Variations in Price of Prescription Medicines in Thailand. Yakugaku Ghasshi. 2007;127(3):515-526.

11. Brijalkumar S. Patel, Falguni M. Chavda and Shailesh G. Mundhava. Cost variation analysis of single non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents available in Indian market: An economic perspective. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2016 May:2174-2180.

12. KulkarniDhananjay, Guruprasad N.B, AnandAcharya.A Study of Prescription Pattern of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in medicine outpatient clinic of a rural teaching hospital. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2013 Aug; 2(32): 6089-6096.

13. S.Kumar, PK. Thakur, K.Sowmya, S Priyanka. Evaluation Prescribing pattern of NSAIDS in South Indian Teaching Hospital. Journal of Chitwan Medical College.2016;6(18):54-58. 14. P.R.R.Vaishnavi, Nitin Gaikwadand

S.P.Dhaneria. Assesment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use pattern using world health organisation indicators: A cross-sectional study in tertiary care teaching hospital of Chhattisgarh. Indian journal of pharmacology. 2018Aug; 49(6):445-450.

15. Humaira Farheen, Ghulam Subhani, Mohammed Mohsin. Prescription Pattern of Non-Steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with acute musculoskeletal pain.International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. 2016; 5(6): 2504.

16. Pravinkumar Ingle, Prakash H Patil, Vibhavari Lathi. Study of rational prescribing and dispensing of prescriptions with Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory drugs in orthopaedic outpatient department. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2015; 8(4): 478-481.

17. A. D. Paul, C. K. Chauhan. Study of usage pattern of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) among different practice categories in Indian clinical setting. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2004 Feb;60(12):889-892.

18. Sam Anbu Sahayam J, Kulandaiammal M, Prakash M. Pattern of drug prescribing in osteoarthritis patients attending orthopaedic outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital. Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics. 2016; 6(5): 14-17.

19. Raghavendra B, Narendranath Sanji, Ullal S D, Kamath R, Pai MRSM, Kamath S, et al. Anti-inflammatory Drugs in an Orthopaedic Outpatient Unit of a Tertiary care Hospital. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research.2009 June; 3: 1553-1556.

20. Prashker MJ, Meenan RF. The total costs of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatism. 1995;38(3):318-325.

Indexed by - Scientific index, Research bible, Jour

Informatics, Google Scholar,

Inno-space.org, Cosmos: Germany

Registered & Approved by:

Figure

Fig. No. 01: Gender wise distribution of prescriptions (n=353)
Fig. No. 03: Department wise classification (n=353)
Fig. No. 05: Distribution based on type of therapy prescribed (n= 353)
Fig. No. 08: Distribution based on the indication for NSAIDs prescribing (n=353)
+2

References

Related documents

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first female patient with adult-onset VWMD suffering from long- term menometrorrhagia attributed to the c.254 T > A and c.496A >

AB: Alamar blue; ANOVA: analysis of variance; CLA: conjugated linoleic acid; CON: control group; ConA: concanavalin A; DM: dry matter; FA: fatty acid; NEFA: non esterified fatty

This study also found that the pediatric intensive care unit, clinical experience (35 years), insertion site (arm), reason for removal (dislodge and complication),

Case-control comparison of muscle size measured by MRI Muscle size was significantly different between the groups for three of the measured muscles: both levels of the rectus

These results demonstrate that the effect of extended hours dialysis on key markers of CKD-MBD (lower phosphate, higher calcium and no change in PTH) is in- dependent of changes

It was undertaken because of the obser- vation (Holden & Pirie, 1952) that PRNase attacked leaf nucleoprotein more rapidly than LRNase when quantities of the enzymes were

The capillary formation assay demonstrated that expos- ure to VEGF treatment significantly increased the total tube length as well as the number of branch points at 24 h in