• No results found

ATQ Experiment #5 Chem 26.1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "ATQ Experiment #5 Chem 26.1"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Chua, John Joseph R. 2014-30936

Calculations

Concentration of the standardized HCl solution

M

HCl

=

´X mol

primary standard

´X L

added titrant

=

9.78× 10

−4

8.47 ×10

−3

≈ 0.116 M

Experimental Ksp and Molar Solubility based on Procedure C

2+

¿

Ca

¿

¿

s= ´X

¿

K

sp

=

s (2 s )

2

=

4 s

3

=

4 ∙ 0.025

3

=6.83 ×10

−5 Error

=

|

6.83 ×10

−5

−6.5 ×10

−6

|

6.5 ×10

−6

=

950

Solubility of Ca(OH)2 in Procedure D

2+

¿

Ca

¿

¿

s= ´X

¿

Ionic strength of the different KCl solutions in Procedure E

Ionic strength, for easier calculation in this ATQ, is represented by the function f(x,y) wherein x is the concentration of Ca2+ ions and y is the concentration of OH- ions. (Data tabulated in

Excel, attached herewith)

f ( x , y )=

4 x+ y

2

Solubility of Ca(OH)2 in Procedure E (Data tabulated in Excel, attached herewith)

2+

¿

Ca

¿

s= ´X

¿

ATQ

1. Write the net ionic reaction for the precipitation of Ca(OH)2 and give the Ksp

(2)

a.

¿

2+

¿

+

2OH

¿

Ca(OH )

2

↔ Ca

¿

is the net ionic reaction for the precipitation of Ca(OH)2

and the Ksp expression is

2+

¿

Ca

¿

¿

¿

OH

¿

¿

¿

K

sp

=

¿

.

2. What is the working equation for the determination of the [Ca2+] in the saturated

solution of Ca(OH)2? a.

2+

¿

Ca

¿

¿

¿

OH

¿

=

(

V

added

)(

M

titrant

)

(

V

analyte

)

¿

3. Write the Ksp of Ca(OH)2 in terms of its:

a. Molar solubility i.

2+

¿

Ca

¿

¿

¿

OH

¿

Let s=

¿

∴ K

sp

=

s(2 s )

2

=4 s

3 b. [OH-] i.

2+

¿

Ca

¿

¿

¿

OH

¿

¿

¿

Since

¿

¿

OH

¿

¿

¿

K

sp

=

1

2

¿

c. [Ca2+]

(3)

i.

¿

OH

¿

¿

2+

¿

Ca

¿

Since

¿

2+

¿

Ca

¿

¿

2

¿

K

sp

=

¿

4. Discuss the effects of common ion and increasing ionic strength on the solubility of the Ca(OH)2 precipitate. Do they coincide with theoretical effects? Explain.

a. Theoretically, the addition of a common ion decreases the solubility of

Ca(OH)2 because there is addition of Ca2+ ion which, due to the Le Chatelier’s

Priniciple, directs the reaction to the formation of precipitate. In our data, the solubility increased; this may be brought about by random error which is made by wrong measurement of molarity, excessive titration, and

contaminated glassware, among others. Since Ionic strength is the measure of ion concentration, higher values means higher solubility. The results have coincided with the theoretical ones in ionic strength.

5. What are the possible sources of errors and their effect on the calculated parameters? Rationalize.

a. Errors in standardization can cause a large error on all calculations as it is in the concentration of the titrant everything is based. The assumption of the Ksp

at 25oC also increases the error in calculations, especially the relative error

itself because the experiment is not exposed in the said temperature. References

http://www.titrations.info/acid-base-titration-sodium-hydroxide-and-carbonate http://www.chemguide.co.uk/physical/acidbaseeqia/phcurves.html#top

(4)

Determination of Ksp and Solubility of Ca(OH)2

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3

Filtrate, L 0.05 0.05 0.05

HCl, L 0.0227 0.0219 0.022

[OH] 0.052664 0.050808 0.05104

[Ca] 0.026332 0.025404 0.02552

s 0.026332 0.025404 0.02552

Ksp 7.30317E-05 6.55792E-05 6.64817E-05

s, X bar 0.025752

Ksp, X bar 6.83114E-05

Ksp, Theo. 0.0000065

% Error 950.9438806

Effect of Common Ions on the Solubility of Ca(OH)2

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3

Filtrate, L 0.05 0.05 0.05 HCl, L 0.025 0.0239 0.0232 [OH] 0.058 0.055448 0.053824 [Ca] 0.029 0.027724 0.026912 s 0.029 0.027724 0.026912 s, X bar 0.027878667 Ksp, X bar 8.66714E-05 Solubility of Ca(OH)2 in 0.010 M KCl

(5)

Filtrate, L 0.05 0.05 0.05 HCl, L 0.023 0.0262 0.0232 [OH] 0.05336 0.060784 0.053824 [Ca] 0.02668 0.030392 0.026912 s 0.02668 0.030392 0.026912 Ksp 7.59657E-05 0.000112289 7.79647E-05 s, X bar 0.027994667 Solubility of Ca(OH)2 in 0.050 M KCl

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3

Filtrate, L 0.05 0.05 0.05 HCl, L 0.0255 0.02445 0.0243 [OH] 0.05916 0.056724 0.056376 [Ca] 0.02958 0.028362 0.028188 s 0.02958 0.028362 0.028188 Ksp 0.000103527 9.12579E-05 8.95886E-05 s, X bar 0.02871 Solubility of Ca(OH)2 in 0.10 M KCl

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3

Filtrate, L 0.05 0.05 0.05 HCl, L 0.0264 0.0259 0.0255 [OH] 0.061248 0.060088 0.05916 [Ca] 0.030624 0.030044 0.02958 s 0.030624 0.030044 0.02958 Ksp 0.00011488 0.000108476 0.000103527 s, X bar 0.030082667 Solubility of Ca(OH)2 in 0.25 M KCl

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3

Filtrate, L 0.05 0.05 0.05

HCl, L 0.0284 0.0282 0.028

[OH] 0.065888 0.065424 0.06496

[Ca] 0.032944 0.032712 0.03248

(6)

Ksp 0.000143017 0.000140017 0.000137059

s, X bar 0.032712

Solubility of Ca(OH)2 in 0.50 M KCl

Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3

Filtrate, L 0.05 0.05 0.05 HCl, L 0.0303 0.0298 0.0294 [OH] 0.070296 0.069136 0.068208 [Ca] 0.035148 0.034568 0.034104 s 0.035148 0.034568 0.034104 Ksp 0.000173685 0.000165228 0.000158663 s, X bar 0.034606667

[KCl] Solubility Ionic Strength 0.01 0.027994667 0.093984 0.05 0.02871 0.13613 0.1 0.030082667 0.190248 0.25 0.032712 0.348136 0.5 0.034606667 0.60382 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.040 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 f(x) = 0 exp( 265.87 x ) R² = 0.99 Solubility Ionic Strength

References

Related documents

In conclusion, we describe a correlation between cumulative biological dysregulation and excess weight in children and adolescents, suggesting that AL could be a useful index of

With Introductory pages, containg the First American Charter, the Fir^t American Pronunziamento, a Chart of the Official Symbols and Seals, Record Blanks of

• Goal of this lecture • What’s Wireless LAN • Security History (WEP) • Main WEP Vulnerabilities • 802.11 safeguards.. • WLAN security enhancements (WPA, WPA2, 802.11i)

For what you about to learn is an accumulation of some of the most powerful and proven ways in the history to influence, control and generally get other people to like you, act

cell type, page size, and block size, on system-level metrics such as performance, cost, and power consumption in various applications with different characteristics, e.g..

This is because, for it to make sense that one could experience A-change, it is necessary and sufficient that subject identity is preserved through the change; but it is

39 This chapter first describes some essentials for modeling embedded reactive systems in their physical environments: The synchronous model of computation, hybrid systems,

The so- lution for logic programs presented here is based on a transformation of the input program, which makes explicit the dependencies of the given program points on the