Network Design Proposal

(1)

Chris Conlon Chris Conlon

Network Design Proposal

For

C

ontinental

N

oodle

O

rganization

Maverick Network Consulting Inc.

Requirements:

Node

Node NNaammee VV--CCoorrdd HH--CCoorrdd

N1

N1 NNeew w YYoorrkk 449999 1144!!"" N#

N# $$oos s %%nnggeelleess 99##11&& '''' N&

N& CChhii((aaggoo )9)9''"" &&44##"" N4

N4 DDaallllaass ''44&&"" 44!!&&44 N)

N) _P_Ph_hiilla_ad_de_ellp_ph_hiia_a ₎_)#_#&_&9₉ ₁₁₎_)!_!"_" N"

N" **aasshhiinnggttoonn+ + DDCC ))""#### 11))''&& N

N ,,eeaattttllee ""&&&&"" ''''99"" N'

N' --iiaammii ''&&))11 ))## N9

N9 %%ttllaannttaa ##""!! ##!!''&& N1!

N1! ..oossttoonn 4444#### 11##4499 N11

N11 DDeenn//eerr ))!!11 ))''9999 N1#

N1# RRoo((hheesstteerr+ + NNYY 449911&& #1#199)) N1&

N1& ..oouullddeerr+ + CC00 44""!! ))99)) N14

N14 __a_an_n(_(o_ou_u/_/e_err+_{+ .}_.C_C ₎₎₉_9'_'!_! ₉_9!_!&_&#_# N1)

N1) 2 2orontooronto 49'149'1 #4''#4'' N1"

N1" --ee33ii((o o CCiitt+ + --ee33ii((oo 1111##99&& &&441199 N1

N1 RRiio o dde e 55aanneeiirroo 11""""&& 6699""""))

,e/eral sites 78 (oordinates were deri/ed rom $at$on Data ,e/eral sites 78 (oordinates were deri/ed rom $at$on Data

::

C

Ciitty y LLaattiittuudde e LLoonnggiittuudde e V V HH

.oulder 4!

.oulder 4!;; !!< !!< N N 1!)1!);; 1"< 1"< * * 4"! 4"! )9))9) -e3i(o

-e3i(o Cit Cit 1919;; #4< #4< N N !99!99;; 1#< 1#< * * 11#9& 11#9& &419&419 .uenos

.uenos %ires %ires &4&4;; &)< &)< , , !)'!)';; #9< #9< * * 1""& 1""& 69"")69"") 2

2oronoronto+ Canada to+ Canada 4&4&;; &&99= = N N !!99;; #&= #&= * * 49'1 49'1 #4''#4'' 

an(ou/ean(ou/er+ r+ .C+ .C+ Canada Canada 4949;; 11""= = N N 11##&&;; != != * * )9'! )9'! 9!&#9!&#

•

• >a(h (it has 11 ?ran(h lo(ations whi(h must ?e networked to a>a(h (it has 11 ?ran(h lo(ations whi(h must ?e networked to a

1#

1#thth_{?a(k?one (onne(ted site@}_{?a(k?one (onne(ted site@} •

• 2he ?a(k 2he ?a(k?one sites ne?one sites need to ?e (oned to ?e (onne(ted /ine(ted /ia intera inter6(it links6(it links

whi(h are arranged in a ull meshed ?a(k?one@ whi(h are arranged in a ull meshed ?a(k?one@

•

• >a(h (it=s a((ess network ollows the same traA( pattern and>a(h (it=s a((ess network ollows the same traA( pattern and

qualit+ relia?ilit+ ser/i(e+ inno/ation+ pri(e and Be3i?ilit must qualit+ relia?ilit+ ser/i(e+ inno/ation+ pri(e and Be3i?ilit must ?e weighed e/enl@

?e weighed e/enl@

•

• 2 2wo designs mwo designs must ?e su?miust ?e su?mitted one ?eitted one ?eing the leang the least (ost and thest (ost and the

other ?eing the ?est o/erall (hoi(e@ other ?eing the ?est o/erall (hoi(e@

(2)

Local Access Network Designs Intra-City!

2raA( -odel or >a(h Cit sing #464' traA( Eenerator Prole 7 restri(ting the algorithms to onl use D)" linksG

H2%.$> ,I2>,

HN%->JJ 2YP>JIDDJ C0RDJ8C0RDJJP%R>N2JJ P0P $>>$J2R%F02J 2R%FINJ

N1 > 1 )!!& &'# N1 1 1 #4!! #4!! N# > 1 )) &'49 N# 1 1 #4!! #4!! N& > 1 "1! 4'&& N& 1 1 4'!! 4'!! N4 > 1 &"! #))! N4 1 1 4'!! 4'!! N) > 1 #4" &"#& N) 1 1 #4!! #4!! N" > 1 )!4 ##'9 N" 1 1 #4!! #4!! N > 1 )4") #)#4 N 1 1 4'!! 4'!! N' > 1 "4!9 #&" N' 1 1 #4!! #4!! N9 > 1 )!#' &194 N9 1 1 4'!! 4'!! N1! > 1 "'!" &9!# N1! 1 1 4'!! 4'!! N11 > 1 ))#) 4!9" N11 1 1 #4!! #4!! N1# N 1 "11& #1'! N1# 1 # &'4!! &'4!! H2%.$> $IN>2YP>,

H ,2YJ 2YP> ,P>>DJJJ FIK>DLC0,2 DI,2LC0,21 DI,2LC0,2# DI,21 D)" $, )"!!! )!! ) & #!!

Designs Eenerated:

Cost Reliability Max Utilization Avg. Hop Count

CMST $24,620.00 0.8943 0.386 2.8182

Tour $28,970.00 0.9926 0.386 3.2727

%lthough the 2our design has a 9@& per(ent higher relia?ilit it (osts 1@" per(ent more than the C-,2 design@ .oth designs ha/e less than a )!

per(ent ma3imum link utilization+ whi(h allows some Be3i?ilit or ?andwidth in(reases as well as minimizing dela@ %dditionall+ the C-,2 design has a lower a/erage hop (ount whi(h redu(es network dela@ %ll (osts are ?ased on )"M $eases $ines@

(3)

Figure 1 C-,2G

Figure # C-,2G

(4)

Figure 4 2ourG

Conclusion Intra-City Design

For the lo(al intra6(it networks I re(ommend the C-,2 design@ It is ?oth the (heapest and the least delaed network@ 2he 2our

network is more relia?le ?ut not worth the signi(ant ump in pri(e@ 1 (ities 3 O#4+"#!@!!G J 11 sites per (it 3 O#!!! per routerG  O44!+)4!

"ack#one Network Designs Inter-City!

• Full meshed network ?etween 1 (ities

$eased $ine Considerations

1&" $$s Q "4M?ps  O#+#!!

#4'+#"4 miles  O#4'+#"4

1&" $$s Q 1#'M?ps  O&4+4!! #4'+#"4 miles  O&#+&9"

Frame Rela Design Consideration

Port Charges

1& (ities 3 O1+9#) 1!#4M?ps Port J 4 int=l (ities 3 O+!! J 1 3 O'#)  $%&'()* + $,'*** installation (harge

CIR Charges

(5)

(6)

n 1 n 2 n 3 n 4 n  n ! n " n # n $ n 1 % n 1 1 n 1 2 n 1 3 n 1 4 n 1  n 1 ! n 1 " n 1 0 2 4 4 3 7 1 2 1 3 6 9 8 3 2 0 6 2 4 0 7 1 0 9 7 7 4 7 1 8 9 1 6 2 7 2 5 1 8 1 8 2 4 3 2 3 4 3 2 0 9 1 5 3 2 0 n 2 0 1 7 3 9 1 2 4 1 2 3 7 5 2 2 9 2 9 6 5 2 4 9 7 1 9 3 4 2 5 8 7 8 2 8 2 2 5 4 8 2 3 1 0 8 6 2 1 6 8 1 5 5 6 6 1 5 8 n 3 0 7 9 9 6 5 2 5 9 5 1 7 3 4 1 1 8 4 5 8 6 8 4 8 9 1 8 5 1 7 9 2 7 1 7 7 3 4 3 5 1 6 7 9 5 5 4 8 n 4 0 1 2 8 9 1 1 8 1 1 6 7 5 1 1 1 0 7 2 1 1 5 4 5 6 6 0 1 2 5 7 6 8 2 1 7 6 2 1 1 9 7 9 2 5 5 2 2 4 n  0 1 2 4 2 3 6 3 1 0 3 2 6 6 5 2 7 1 1 5 6 3 2 4 2 1 5 7 4 2 3 9 2 3 2 3 2 0 0 8 5 2 8 4 n ! 0 2 3 2 4 9 2 6 5 4 2 3 9 4 1 4 8 9 2 9 7 1 5 0 1 2 3 5 9 3 5 1 1 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 n " 0 2 7 2 3 2 1 7 5 2 4 9 3 1 0 1 7 2 1 6 7 9 9 6 1 2 1 2 0 7 2 2 3 3 7 6 8 7 7 n # 0 6 0 1 1 2 6 4 1 7 2 0 1 2 0 9 1 7 4 1 2 7 9 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 0 5 4 3 6 6 n $ 0 9 3 6 1 2 1 0 7 4 4 1 2 2 7 2 2 3 5 7 3 2 1 3 4 4 4 9 6 3 n 1 % 0 1 7 6 4 3 3 8 1 7 7 2 2 5 1 1 4 3 0 2 2 7 9 5 4 2 7 n 1 1 0 1 4 2 9 2 3 1 1 0 2 1 3 4 2 1 4 3 3 5 8 7 8 n 1 2 0 1 4 3 7 2 1 8 9 9 6 2 0 5 5 5 5 0 7 n 1 3 0 1 0 8 0 1 3 4 9 1 4 5 4 5 9 0 1 n 1 4 0 2 0 9 4 2 4 4 5 6 9 7 2 n 1  0 2 0 1 8 5 5 5 5 n 1 ! 0 4 6 0 2 n 1 " 0