• No results found

Box Culvert

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Box Culvert"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

Box Culverts

Design Example

Design a reinforced concrete box culvert under a drain for the following data: Properties of the drain:

1 2

300 , 8 , 15 , 3.5 ,

side slopes 2 :1 , 75 and bed level 201

n Q cumec W m W m d m H V b m m        Properties of channel: 1 1 1

60 , 30 ,side slopes 2 :1 , water table in the region 200 , 2 , b 5.5 , b 3.5 , freeboard above channel water surface 0.4 .

Q cumec b m H V m

d m h m f m m

   

   

Bed reduced level (B.R.L.) = 200 m 3

2.4 /

c T m

 

Design the same transition type for both inlet and outlet. Draw the details of your design.

(2)

2 Solution

Drain waterway

For the drain check the waterway

min 4.83 4.83 300 83.65 P Q m   

Applied wetted parameter . 75 2 3.52

3.5 2

2 90.65 83.65 O.K. app P m m        Channel waterway

For the channel,

30 2 260

2 0.8823

V   m s

  

Maximum channel fluming is 40%, 0.4 30 12  m take 12.05m Let the channel waterway be reduced from 30 m to 12.05 m. Take 4 vents 2.75 1.9 meach

Figure 2: Box culvert vents.

60 2.87 3 OK 4 2.75 1.9 V   m sm s   2.87 0.66 1 OK 9.81 1.9 r F     Length of expansion 30 12.05 3 26.925 2 m     Length of contraction 30 12.05 2 17.95 2 m     1.9 m 2.75 m 12.75 m 12.05 m

(3)

3 Pucca Floor

Length of u.s. pucca floor 17.95 8.975 say 9

2 m m

 

Length of u.s. pucca floor 3 26.925 20.20

4 m    Design of Transitions a. Expansion transition

30 , 12.05 , 26.925 c f f x f c c f c f f B B L B L B x B B B m B m L m       542.2 45 x B x   x (m) 0 5 10 15 20 26.925 Bx (m) 12.05 13.56 15.49 18.07 21.69 30.00 b. Contraction transition 30 , 12.05 , 17.95 c f f Bm Bm Lm 361.49 30 x B x   x (m) 0 5 10 15 17.95 Bx (m) 12.05 14.46 18.07 24.10 30.00 Uplift Pressures a. Seepage pressure Seepage head

201 3.5

2004.5 m

Total seepage path

1

3

0.98 2 1.9 0.35 0.35 1 33.95 20.2 22.61m

         

Depth of earth at inside edge0.6 75 0.005  0.98 m 1. At bottom of barrels 1.96 2.6 4.56 4.5 18.05 3.59 22.61 L h m      

Uplift at the base of the barrels 2 2 3.59 2.58 6.17 say 6.2 t m t m    2. At d.s. end of barrels 4.5 6.73 1.34 22.61 h    m

(4)

4

3. At 5 m from d.s. end of floor 4.5 5

0.33 22.61 3

h    m

 

4. At 10 m from d.s. end of floor 4.5 10

0.66 22.61 3

h  m

 

5. At 15 m from d.s. end of floor 4.5 15

0.99 22.61 3

h  m

 

Figure 3: Seepage head at different points under the pucca floor. b. Static head

1. At bottom of barrels floor

Elevation of bottom of barrels floor201

0.98 0.35 1.9 0.35  

197.4 m Static head200 197.4 2.58 m

Weight of earth, water and concrete 3.5 00.98 2

0.35 0.35

2.4 0.35 1.9 5 2.4 12.75 7.76m of water 6.2mO.K.             2. At d.s. end of barrels

El. of end of barrels 201

0.6 0.35 1.9

 

75 33.95

0.005 197.61m

       

Assume floor thickness 3.0 m

El. of lower point 197.61 3 194.61m   Static head200 194.61 5.39 

(5)

5

Min. floor thickness 6.72 3.05

2.2 m

  this is larger than the assumed 3.0 m, Assume thickness3.1m, therefore,

El. of lower point197.61 3.1 194.51m  Static head200 194.51 5.49 m 

Total head5.49 1.33 6.82 m

Min. floor thickness 6.82 3.1 assumed thickness O.K.

2.2 m

  

3. At 5 m from d.s. end of pucca floor Assume thickness2.5 m

El. of lower point197.61 2.5 195.11m  Static head200 195.11 4.895 m  Total head4.895 0.33 5.22 m Min. floor thickness 5.22 2.37

2.2 m

  , this is smaller than the assumed 2.5 m thickness, Assume thickness2.3m

El. of lower point197.61 2.3 195.31m  Static head200 195.31 4.69 m 

Total head4.69 0.33 5.02 m

Min. floor thickness 5.02 2.28 2.3 O.K.

2.2 m m

  

4. At 10 m from d.s. end of pucca floor Assume thickness2.5 m

El. of lower point197.61 2.5 195.11m  Static head200 195.11 4.895 m  Total head4.895 0.66 5.55 m

Min. floor thickness 5.55 2.52 2.5 not O.K.

2.2 m m

  

Assume thickness2.6 m

El. of lower point 197.61 2.6 195.01m   Static head200 195.01 4.99 m 

Total head4.99 0.66 5.65m

Min. floor thickness 5.65 2.57 2.6 O.K.

2.2 m m

  

5. At 15 m from d.s. end of pucca floor Assume thickness3.0 m

El. of lower point 197.61 3.0 194.61m   Static head200 194.61 5.39 m 

(6)

6

Min. floor thickness 6.38 2.9 3.0 not O.K., revise

2.2 m m

  

Assume thickness2.9 m

El. of lower point197.61 2.9 194.71m  Static head200 194.71 5.29 m 

Total head5.29 0.99 6.28m

Min. floor thickness 6.28 2.85 2.9 O.K.

2.2 m m

  

Figure 4: Floor thickness at different points.

Upstream pucca floor

Length of seepage path

1

3 0.6 2 0.35 1.9 0.35 1 23.55 9 14.65 m           Seepage head204.5 200 4.5m 1. U.S. end of barrels

23.55 0.6 2 2.6 11.65 3 4.5 3 0.92 14.65 L m h         Assume thickness = 0.8 m Total head0.8 0.92 1.72 m 

Min. floor thickness 1.72 0.78 0.8 O.K.

2.2 m m

  

2. At 5 m from u.s. end of floor 4.5 5

0.51 14.65 3

h    m

Assume floor thickness = 0.6 m Total head0.6 0.51 1.11m 

Min. floor thickness 1.11 0.505 0.6 O.K.

2.2 m m

(7)

7

PROFILE

PLAN

(8)

8

Structural Design

Number of barrels = 4

Size of barrels = 2.75 m×1.9 m

Bank level = 205.5 m

Drain high flood level = 204.5 m

Uplift at base of barrel = 6.2 t/m2 Unit weight of dry earth = 1.6 t/m3 Unit weight of saturated earth = 2.0 t/m3 Unit weight of submerged earth = 1.0 t/m3 Angle of internal friction in all conditions = 30º

Depth of earth cover = 5.5 m

Figure 6: A cross-section of the proposed box culvert. Dimensions are in meters.

Design

Depth of dry earth cover205.5 204.5 1m  Depth of saturated earth204.5 200 4.5m

Weight of dry and saturated earth 

1 1.6 4.5 2  

10.6t m3 Weight of top slab0.35 2.4 0.84t m2

Weight on top slab including its own weight10.6 0.84 11.44t m  2

Weight of barrels per meter length

12.75 2 5 1.9  

0.35 2.4 29.4t m Total dead load/meter of barrels29.48 10.6 12.75 164.55t m  

(9)

9

Net vertical load acting on foundation164.55 79.05 85.5t m Pressure on foundation soil 85.5 6.70 2

12.75 t m

 

Pressure acting on the base slab= soil reaction + uplift6.7 6.2 12.9t m  2 Net upward pressure on the base slab 2

2 12.9 0.84 12.06 say 12.1 t m t m    Earth Pressure 1 sin 30 1 1 sin 30 3 p C      

Pressure at point (a)Cp  d 1 Cps

204.5 199.825

w

204.5 199.825

6.770t m2 Pressure at point (n) 6.77 1 1 2.25 1 2.25 9.77 2

3 t m

      

Figure 7: Loading on the culvert barrels.

Distribution Factors

At joints a, e, f and n

For ab, mn, ed and fg, distribution factor 2.25 2.25 0.42 2.25 3.1 5.35

  

For an, ef, distribution factor 3.1 0.58

5.35   At joints b, c, d, g, h and m For ba 2.25 3.1 3.1 6.975, D.F. 0.3 3.1 I I       For bc 2.25 3.1 3.1 6.975, D.F. 0.3 3.1 I I       For bm 2.25 3.1 3.1 9.61, D.F. 0.4 2.25 I I      

(10)

10 Fixing Moments

 

 

2 2 11.44 3.1 9.16 12 12.1 3.1 9.69 12 F ab F nm M t m M t m       

2 2 2 2 6.77 2.25 3 2.25 2.86 0.506 3.37 12 30 6.77 2.25 3 2.25 2.86 0.76 3.62 12 20 F an F na M t m M t m              

Figure 8: Fixed end moments in t∙m.

Table 1: Finding moments using moment distribution method.

Joint m n a b c h Member mh mb mn nm na an ab ba bm bc cb hm D.F. 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.42 0.58 0.58 0.42 0.3 0.4 0.3 F.E.M. 9.69 - -9.69 9.69 -3.62 3.37 -9.16 9.16 - -9.16 9.16 -9.69 Balance -2.549 -3.521 3.358 2.432 C.O. -1.275 1.679 -1.760 1.216 Balance 0.382 0.510 0.382 -0.705 -0.974 1.021 0.739 -0.365 -0.486 -0.365 C.O. -0.243 -0.353 0.191 0.510 -0.487 -0.182 0.370 0.255 -0.182 0.191 Balance 0.179 0.238 0.179 -0.295 -0.407 0.388 0.281 -0.187 -0.250 -0.187 C.O. -0.125 -0.147 0.089 0.194 -0.203 -0.094 0.141 0.119 -0.094 0.089 Balance 0.082 0.109 0.082 -0.119 -0.164 0.172 0.125 -0.078 -0.104 -0.078 C.O. -0.052 -0.060 0.041 0.086 -0.082 -0.039 0.062 0.054 -0.039 0.041 Balance 0.033 0.045 0.033 -0.053 -0.074 0.070 0.051 -0.035 -0.047 -0.035 Moment 10.37 0.48 -10.85 6.29 -6.29 5.85 -5.85 10.28 -0.46 -9.83 8.84 -9.37

(11)

11

Figure 9: Design centerline moments in t∙m.

Design Moments

Span ab, de

At face: Sagging moment

2 11.44 3.1 11.44 0.17 0.17 2.84 2 2 t m        Fixing moment 5.85 2.93

10.28 5.85

10.04 3.1 t m     

Net fixing moment10.01 2.84 7.2t m

At centre: Sagging moment

2 11.44 3.1 13.74 8 t m     Fixing moment 5.85 10.28 8.065 2 t m    

Net sagging moment13.74 8.065 5.68t m

Span bc, cd

At face: Sagging moment

2 11.44 3.1 11.44 0.17 0.17 2.84 2 2 t m        Fixing moment 8.84 2.93

9.82 8.84

9.77 3.1 t m     

Net fixing moment9.77 2.84 6.93t m

At centre: Sagging moment

2 11.44 3.1 13.74 8 t m     Fixing moment 9.82 8.84 9.33 2 t m    

(12)

12 Span nm, gf

At face: Sagging moment

2 12.1 3.1 12.1 0.17 0.17 3.02 2 2 t m        Fixing moment 6.29 2.93

10.85 6.29

10.6 3.1 t m     

Net fixing moment 10.6 3.02  7.58t m

At centre: Sagging moment

2 12.1 3.1 14.54 8 t m     Fixing moment 10.85 6.29 8.57 2 t m    

Net sagging moment14.54 8.57 5.97t m

Span mh, hg

At face: Sagging moment3.02t m

Fixing moment 9.37 2.93

10.37 9.37

10.32

3.1 t m

    

Net fixing moment10.32 3.02 7.3t m

At centre: Sagging moment14.54t m

Fixing moment 9.37 10.37 9.87

2 t m

  

Net sagging moment14.54 9.87 4.67t m

Span an, ef

At face: Sagging moment

a. Due to rectangular portion

2 6.77 2.25 6.77 0.17 0.17 1.197 2 2 t m       

b. Due to triangular portion 3 2.25 2 2.25 2.25 2 3 3 2.25 3 n n R R       Sagging moment 2 3 2.25 2.77 0.17 0.17 0.343 3 2 t m       

(13)

13

Fixing moment 5.85 2.08

6.29 5.85

6.26

2.25 t m

    

Net fixing moment6.26 1.54 4.72t m

At centre: Sagging moment14.54t m

a. Due to rectangular portion 6.77 2.25

4.28

8 t m

 

b. Due to triangular portion

3 2.25 2.25 1.5 1.13 1.13 0.95 6 2 2 3 t m        

Total sagging moment4.28 0.95 5.23t m

Fixing moment at centre 5.85 6.29 6.07

2 t m

  

Net sagging moment5.23 6.07  0.84t m

Reinforcement

Use thickness of slab= 35 cm 32.5

e

dcm

Span ab, bc, cd, de

At face (-ve steel) 5 2 6 7 7.2 10 21.54 1200 32.5 t A    cm   Use Ø16 mm bars, As 2cm2 Spacing 100 9.3 21.54 2 cm   Use Ø16 mm bars @ 9 cm c/c At centre (+ve steel)

5 2 6 7 5.68 10 16.99 1200 32.5 t A    cm   Spacing 100 11.77 16.99 2 cm  

(14)

14

Use Ø16 mm bars @ 11.5 cm c/c

Refer to Table 2 for the reinforcement of the rest of the members.

Table 2: Steel Reinforcement.

Member Fixing moment t∙m

(-ve moment) Sagging moment t∙m (+ve moment) ab,de 7.20 Ø16 mm bars @ 9 cm c/c 5.68 Ø16 mm bars @ 11.5 cm c/c bc, cd 6.93 Ø16 mm bars @ 9 cm c/c 4.41 Ø16 mm bars @ 11.5 cm c/c nm, gf 7.58 Ø16 mm bars @ 8.5 cm c/c 5.97 Ø16 mm bars @ 11 cm c/c mh, hg 7.30 Ø16 mm bars @ 8.5 cm c/c 4.67 Ø16 mm bars @ 11 cm c/c an, ef 4.72 Ø16 mm bars @ 14 cm c/c -0.84 Ø12 mm bars @ 25 cm c/c bm, dg 0.48 Ø12 mm bars @ 25 cm c/c -0.47 Ø12 mm bars @ 25 cm c/c Maximum moment7.58t m 5 7.58 10 28.74 32.5 O.K. 100 9.18 d    cmcm

References

Related documents

We first discuss the method for implying risk-neutral moments, and then show the method to fit a 4-moment distribution using the Generalized Hyperbolic (GH) class of densities as

Rajashekar (2018), came to conclusion that the maximum positive moment develops at the centre of top and bottom slab for the condition that the sides of the culvert not

Rajashekar (2018), came to conclusion that the maximum positive moment develops at the centre of top and bottom slab for the condition that the sides of the culvert not

Okay, it is called a bent portal frame then also you have three members four potential degrees of freedom 4 minus 3 1 then also you have only one unknown and it is

For the following beams and frames defined in Problems 10.20- 10.34, determine the member end moments using moment distribution...

Some of the mathematical properties of Gumbel - Fr chet distribution like quantile function, moments, incomplete moments, probability weighted moments, moment generating

Moment Estimators.

Design of reinforced concrete members shall be based on Strength Design Method (Load Factor Design) shall be used for the design of reinforced concrete structural members