• No results found

lab report 5.docx

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "lab report 5.docx"

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Evaporation is a process of vaporization where the vapour from the boiling point solution is removed which causes a more concentrated solution to remain. An evaporator is a device used to turn the liquid form of a chemical into its gaseous form. A climbing film evaporator (CFE) is a special type of evaporator which provides a high heat transfer coefficient and a short residence time for the solution to be evaporated. Multi tube CFEs are used to concentrate solutions such as fruit juices that can be damaged by prolonged heat. It is designed to operate under vacuum, which reduces the evaporation temperature and increases the heat flux by either through batch or continuous process. In the application of CFE, it is normally used to study the evaporation and concentration of sensitive products such as milk, fruit juice and for desalination studies. There are also other types of evaporator which uses the same application as climbing film evaporator such as rising film evaporator, thin film evaporator, rotary evaporator and film on film evaporator.

2.0 OBJECTIVE

The objective of the experiment was to determine the concentration of product concentrate of a once through experiment of grape juice (stimulated by KMnO4) and water mixture. Besides that, there were also few other objectives for the experiment:

- To determine the effect of vacuum levels on the evaporation rates

- To determine the influence of evaporation feed level on the evaporation rates - To determine the effect of evaporation time on evaporation rates.

3.0 PROCEDURE

3.1 Effect of evaporator pressure

1. The valve for main cooling water supply is on. Subsequently, turn on cooling water valve to allow flow into the condenser. Ensure that circulating cooling water flow rate is 6 L/min.

2. Before the experiment is started, ensure that V7, V9, V11, V12, V14 are closed.

3. Open valve V2, V3, V5, and close V1, V4, V6. Turn on the feed pump and in order to circulate the KMnO4 solution. Wait until the solution homogenous.

(2)

5. Now with the feed pump turned on, open V6 in order to set the level of KMnO4 to 25 cm level.

6. Measure the volume of the KMnO4 solution inside the column by transferring into volumetric cylinder by opening the valve V14.

7. Repeat the column filling process by opening valve V6 and set to the level 25 again.

8. Starting at atmospheric pressure [vacuum pump is not used] .

9. The steam supply is turn on. Open the steam condensate purge valve to allow purging of condensate.

10.Before the steam is transferred, the purge valve is open, and main steam valve and steam supply valve are closed. Very carefully [ensure that you have put on your glove] open the main steam valve to 1/2 open. At the same time of opening the main steam valve and closed steam purge valve, start the stopwatch timing.

11. Observe the first bubble appearance and record the time taken. 12.Take the reading of steam flow rate and pressure

13.After 20 minutes, close steam supply valve, and open steam purge valve at the same time. No need to close the main steam valve to obtain the same steam flow rate and pressure for the next running.

14.Collect he samples of the Evaporator (via V14), concentrate and condensate (via V12). Concentrate and condensate samples may be taken afterward. But, the evaporator sample have to wait for a while (± 15 minutes).

15.The first sample taken is condensate. Easily, open V12. The second is concentrate. Use vacuum pump to collect the sample. Close V12 and Open V7 to let the liquid flow to the inlet transfer pump. Then close V7 and open V9. Turn on the vacuum pump and the liquid will be transferred to the condensate receiver tank 2. After all the liquid has been transferred, close V9 and easily, open V12 to collect the concentrate sample. Redo the vacuuming if the liquid is still remaining in the inlet transfer pump line.

(3)

17.Return all the samples to the feed tank. (Before executing check with the lecture and ensure that you are cleared by the lecture to conduct these procedures).

18.Set the height of feed at 25 cm again.

19.Turn on the vacuum pump and set the at negative pressure 200 mmHg. (see the pressure gauge)

20. At this pressure, repeat step i through r. And similarly for negative pressure 400 mmHg, 600 mmHg, and 700 mmHg. (Ask the technician to demonstrate on how to relief the negative pressure in evaporator system)

3.2 Effect of evaporator feed level

Steps (1) to (18) are the same as experiment 3.1 19. Set the height of feed at 50 cm again.

20. At this height, repeat step i through r. And similarly for height 75 cm and ‘ 100 cm.

3.3 Effect of evaporation time

Steps (1) to (11) are the same as experiment 3.1. Set the evaporation process for 10, 15, and 20 minutes at constant evaporation pressure, constant height of feed and constant steam flow rate.

(4)

4.0 RESULTS

Effect Of Vacuums Level On Evaporation Rates

No . Pressu re (mmH g) Level of KMnO 4 (cm) Time (first bubble ) (min) Time (to boil) (min)

Evaporate Concentrate Condensate

RI Volume (ml) RI Volum e (ml) RI Volume (ml) 1 Atm press 25 1.32 5.15 1.337 565 1.340 8 65 1.340 7 3.4 2 -200 25 0.59 1.26 1.339 400 1.337 9 177 1.339 58 3 -400 25 0.25 0.54 1.340 2 335 1.337 9 172 1.336 122 No . Pressu re (mmH g) Level of KMnO 4 (cm) Time (first bubble ) (min) Time (to boil) (min)

Evaporate Concentrate Condensate

Conc entrat ion (M) Volume (ml) Conce ntratio n (M) Volum e (ml) Conc entrat ion (M) Volume (ml) 1 Atm press 25 1.32 5.15 0.057 565 0.136 2 65 0.134 2 3.4 2 -200 25 0.59 1.26 0.098 7 400 0.075 8 177 0.098 7 58 3 -400 25 0.25 0.54 0.123 7 335 0.075 8 172 0.036 2 122

(5)

-450-400-350-300-250-200-150-100 -50 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Graph for Effect of vacuum levels on

Evaporation rates

time to boil (min)

time for first bubble (min)

Pressure (mm Hg) Time(min)

Sample Calculation Given RI = 1.337

Using this equation: y = 20.837x-27.802 Substitute RI into x, y = 20.837(1.337)-27.802 So, concentration = y = 0.0571 M

Effect of Evaporator Feed Level

No . Pressu re (mmH g) Level of KMnO 4 (cm) Time (first bubble ) (min) Time (to boil) (min)

Evaporate Concentrate Condensate

RI Volume (ml) RI Volum e (ml) RI Volume (ml) 1 Atm press 50 0.48 1.54 1.338 2 540 1.338 165 1.338 92 2 Atm press 75 0.44 2.22 1.338 5 630 1.3379 240 1.337 7 170

(6)

No . Pressu re (mmH g) Level of KMnO 4 (cm) Time (first bubble ) (min) Time (to boil) (min)

Evaporate Concentrate Condensate

Conc entrat ion (M) Volume (ml) Conce ntratio n (M) Volum e (ml) Conc entrat ion (M) Volume (ml) 1 Atm press 50 0.48 1.54 0.082 1 540 0.0779 165 0.077 9 92 2 Atm press 75 0.44 2.22 0.088 3 630 0.0758 240 0.071 7 170 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Graph for Effect of Evaporator feed level

time to boil (min)

time for first bubble (min)

Level of KMnO4 (cm) Time (min)

Effect of Evaporation Time

N o Pressur e (mmHg ) Level of KMnO 4 (cm) Runnin g time (min) Time (first bubble) (min) Time (to boil) (min)

Evaporate Concentrate Condensate

RI Volum e (ml) RI Volum e (ml) RI Volum e (ml) 1 ATM Press 25 10 1.02 1.43 1.338 8 570 1.3385 70 1.338 4 20.5 2 ATM Press 25 15 0.50 1.21 1.339 8 515 1.3392 125 1.338 6 40 3 ATM Press 25 20 2.05 2.59 1.337 0 565 1.3408 65 1.340 7 3.4

(7)

N o Press ure (mm Hg) Level of KMnO 4 (cm) Runnin g time (min) Time (first bubbl e) (min) Time (to boil) (min)

Evaporate Concentrate Condensate

Concentrat ion (M) Volum e (ml) Concentr ation (M) Volum e (ml) Concentr ation (M) Volume (ml) 1 ATM Press 25 10 1.02 1.43 0.0946 570 0.0883 70 0.0862 20.5 2 ATM Press 25 15 0.50 1.21 0.1154 515 0.1029 125 0.0904 40 3 ATM Press 25 20 2.05 2.59 0.0570 565 0.1632 65 0.1342 3.4 Sample Calculation Given RI = 1.337

Using this equation: y = 20.837x-27.802 Substitute RI into x, y = 20.837(1.337)-27.802 So, concentration = y = 0.0571 M Runnin g time (min) Time (first bubbl e) (min) Time (to boil) (min)

Evaporate Concentrate Condensate

Concentra tion (M) Rate (1st bubbl e) Rate (boiling) Concentr ation (M) Rate (1st bubbl e) Rate (boiling) Concentr ation (M) Rate (1st bubble ) 10 1. 02 1.43 0.0946 0.092 7 0.0662 0.0883 0.086 6 0.0617 0.0862 0.0845 15 0.50 1.21 0.1154 -0.230 8 -0.0954 0.1029 -0.205 8 -0.0850 0.0904 -0.1808 20 2.05 2.59 0.0570 0.027 8 0.0220 0.1632 0.079 6 0.0630 0.1342 0.0655 Calculation :

Rate (1st bubble ) = Concetration(M )

Time 1 st Bubble(min)

Rate (boiling ) = Concetration(M )

(8)

8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Effect of Evaporator Time

1st Bubble Boiling Point

Running Time (min) Time (min) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 -0.25 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15

Rate of Reaction vs Running Time for Evaporates

1st Buble Time Boiling Time

Running Time (min) Rate of Reaction (M/min)

(9)

8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 -0.25 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15

Rate of Reaction vs Running Time for Concentrate

1st Buble Time Boiling Time

Running Time (min) Rate of Reaction (M/min)

5 10 15 20 25 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1

Rate of Reaction vs Running Time for Condensate

1st Buble Time Boiling Time

Running Time (min) Rate of Reaction (M/min)

5.0 DISCUSSION

1. In this experiment a number of factors that affect the evaporation of a substance ( KMnO4 ) are being studied. In the first part, the liquid is

(10)

principle, as the surrounding pressure decreases, the boiling point of a liquid substance also decreases.

2. This effect is shown in the table and graph of Part A, whereby as the pressure inside the evaporator is decreased from atmospheric pressure to -200kPa and -400kPa, the time taken for boiling also decreased. This indicates a lower boiling point, thus the heating process occurs at a higher rate and more efficient under lower pressure.

3. The second part is to study the effect of initial feed level to the rate of evaporation process. The first feed level used is 50cm, then repeated with 75cm. The increase in feed level indicated that the volume of feed to be heated also increases, while the amount of heat supplied to heat the liquid is kept constant in both procedures.

4. Thus, the time taken for the 75cm feed to bubble and boil is more than the time taken for the 50cm feed, since the rate of heating is slower for the liquid with a higher volume. This is proven from the table and graph of Part B. 5. Besides that, from the data tabulated, it is observed that the concentration of

feed at the evaporator, condenser and concentrate unit also varies and can be determined by the value of the refraction index (RI) from the refractometer. In every experiment, the concentration of feed at the evaporate is the highest, followed by the concentrate and the condensate.

Errors & Modifications

While conducting the experiment there are a few errors that had occurred and might affect the results of the experiment. The errors that are considered in this experiment are parallax error, inconsistency of the pressure drop in the pump and human error.

1) Parallax error

- While observing the height of the liquid levels, the observant eyes might not be in the parallax angle since the height of the column is more than the student’s height.

- While recording the volume of the liquid using the measuring cylinder, the same parallax error might occurred since the position of the cylinder is on the table lower than the position of the eyes.

2) Inconsistency of pressure drop in the pump

- The pressure reading in the pump always fluctuates and drops at constant value. We always need to adjust the pressure manually so that it maintains at desired level.

(11)

- While recording the time using the stopwatch, human error might occur where there might be a time interval between the stopping time and the recorded time.

- While observing the bubbles with bare eyes, we might miss the first few bubbles which were too small to be seen, causing longer bubble time being recorded.

To overcome those problems that may lead to inaccurate results, we find some recommendations that should be taken into action which are:

1 A tool should be provided for the students to observe the height of the liquid in the column in the correct eye position.

2 While observing and recording the volume of the liquid in the measuring cylinder, a white paper should be placed at the back of the cylinder for a more accurate reading.

3 Equipment like the pump should undergo regular maintenance or replace with a new one since the current pump is always fluctuating. A digital reading pump is a better replacement compared to the analogue reading pump in giving a more accurate value.

6.0 CONCLUSION

In this experiment, different parameters have been manipulated to study their effect on evaporation rates. The manipulated variables are vacuum levels, feed flow rate and evaporation time. In the first experiment, the value of vacuum levels inside the evaporator is varied from atmospheric pressure to -400mmHg. From the result obtained, it can be seen that as the pressure (vacuum level) decreases, the time for first bubble and boiling point also decreases.

In the second experiment, the pressure is maintained at atmospheric pressure while the level of the feed is varied from 25cm to 75cm. From the results, we can see that as the level of feed increases, the evaporation time take place faster. This shows that evaporation time is indirectly proportional to the feed level.

In the third experiment, the effect of evaporation time with time taken for feed to boil is determined. The time for the first bubble to appear and the feed to boil is recorded. From the result gained, we can see that as the running time increase, the rate of evaporation decreases. In the graphs provided, the rate of reaction against running time for evaporates, condensate, and concentrate is illustrated to show that the relation between evaporation time on concentration of product left.

(12)

Therefore, we can conclude that all the parameters tested give influence to the evaporation rates. All of these factors must be measured in order to attain absolute evaporation rates.

7.0 REFERENCES

1. McCabe W.M., Smith J.C., Harriot P., Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering 5th Ed., McGraw Hill.

2. Perry R.H., Green D., Eds. Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 6th Ed., McGraw

Hill.

References

Related documents

This complete validation process, which used two independent and large patient samples and combined classical and contemporary methods, such as Rasch analysis, showed that the

Comparemos esto con un momento culminante para Diana Glass, en la novela de Heker, de la historia que intenta contar, cuando el torturador lleva por primera vez a Leonora a darse

On the other hand, because of reduced total SOD activity, ROS had damaging effects on the plant cells and there was no difference between relatively salt sensitive and

Violation: Unfit or incompetent by reason of negligence, habits or other cause; and guilty of unprofessional conduct, to wit: failure to maintain a record for each patient which

Communicative English in Banks, Human Resource Management, Management Development Programme , Procedure of Suit Filing and Techniques of Suit Settlement, Maintaining Records of

Puji dan syukur kepada Tuhan Yang Maha Esa atas segala berkat dan rahmat yang dilimpahkan-Nya sehingga penulis dapat menyusun dan menyelesaikan skripsi dengan judul " Pengaruh

From the inception of our nation, maritime law, including congressional enactments, provided special aid and assistance to the U.S. This longstanding maritime policy reflects both

Tool 4 is a guide to interacting medicines which may increase the risks associated with the use of high dose antipsychotics.. It provides links to resources to check for