New
Mexi
co
St
at
e
Par
ks
St
at
ewi
de
Compr
ehensi
ve
Out
door
Recr
eat
i
on
Pl
an
(
SCORP)
Table
of
Contents
Acknowledgements ... iii
Executive Summary ... 1
Planning Methodology and Limitations of the SCORP ... 1
Public Meetings and Focus Groups ... 1
Statewide Community Survey ... 2
Federal Funding for Outdoor Recreation ... 2
State of New Mexico Health and Obesity Trends ... 2
Economic Impact of Obesity ... 3
New Mexico Demographics ... 3
Recreation in Urban and Rural Areas ... 4
Economic Impact of State Parks and Outdoor Recreation ... 4
Rio Grande Trail (RGT) ... 5
Priorities and Recommendations ... 6
Priority 1 ‐ Promote the Livability of All Communities Through Health and Fitness ... 7
Priority 2 – Enhance Economic Vitality ... 7
Priority 3 ‐ Properly Use and Conserve Natural Resources ... 7
Priority 4 – Develop a Statewide Trail Network That Facilitates Recreation, Transportation and Healthy Lifestyles ... 8
Critical Ingredients for Success ... 8
Education ... 8 Funding ... 9 Foreword ... 11 Planning Context ... 13 What is a SCORP? ... 13 Previous SCORP ... 13
Planning Methodology and Constraints ... 13
Goals and Objectives of the SCORP ... 14
What is Expected of the SCORP? ... 14
Planning Components ... 15
Reflections from the SCORP ... 15
Federal Funding for Outdoor Recreation ... 17
Historic LWCF Funding for New Mexico ... 17
New Mexico’s Recreation Providers ... 19
Importance and Relevance of Outdoor Recreation... 21
State of New Mexico Health and Obesity Trends ‐ The Land and Water Conservation Fund and Public Health ... 21
Economic Impact of Outdoor Recreation ... 23
Economic Impact of State Parks and Outdoor Recreation ... 23
Department of Game and Fish Economic Contributions ... 23
Off‐Highway Vehicle (OHV) Economic Contributions ... 23
National Recreation Economic Trends ... 25
Measuring the Economic Value of a City Park System ... 25
Boating Across the United States ... 25
Golfing as an Industry ... 25
Equestrian Economics ... 26
Americans are Staying Closer to Home ... 26
In New Mexico and the Nation ... 27
New Mexico’s Key Statistics and Outdoor Recreation Trends ... 27
New Mexico’s SCORP Managing Agencies ... 29
Role of SCORP in Allocating Funds ... 29
Who are the Partners in the SCORP? ... 29
State‐wide Demographics ... 31
Central Service Area ... 33
Northwest Service Area ... 35
Northeast Service Area ... 36
Southwest Service Area ... 37
Southeast Service Area ... 38
Public Outreach ... 41
Public Meetings and Focus Groups ... 41
Participation Barriers ... 41
Community Survey ... 43
Statewide Outreach Efforts ... 43
Random Sample Survey Response ... 43
LWCF Agency, Open‐link Web, and Sovereign Nations Survey Responses ... 43
Response Analysis ... 44
Key Survey Findings ... 44
Importance‐Satisfaction Matrix ... 48
ii State of New Mexico
Northwest Service Area Needs ... 49
Northeast Service Area Needs ... 50
Central Service Area Needs ... 50
Southwest Service Area Needs ... 51
Southeast Service Area Needs ... 52
Local Government Survey ‐ Capacity Analysis ... 53
Limitations of the Survey ... 53
Capacity ... 53
Local Government Issues ... 55
County Government Issues ... 55
State Parks Issues ... 55
Federal Agencies and National Forests Issues ... 55
Local Government Program Needs ... 55
County Government Program Needs ... 55
State Parks Program Needs... 55
Federal Agencies/National Forests Program Needs ... 56
Inventory and Level of Service by Region ... 57
Limitations of the Inventory Data Collection ... 58
Statewide Inventory Captured ... 58
Resource Maps ... 59
Mandates and Key Issues Matrix ... 69
Americans with Disabilities Act ... 69
Forest Service Accessibility Resources ... 70
Key Issues Identified ... 70
The Findings ... 73
Priorities ... 75
Priority 1 ‐ Promote the Livability of All Communities Through Health and Fitness ... 75
Priority 2 – Enhance Economic Vitality ... 75
Priority 3 – Properly Use and Conserve Natural Resources ... 76
Priority 4 – Develop a Statewide Trail Network That Facilitates Recreation, Transportation and Healthy Lifestyles ... 76
Critical Ingredients for Success ... 76
Education ... 77
Funding ... 77
Recommendations and Action Steps ... 79
Recommendation 1 ‐ Verify the Inventory ... 79
Action Step 1 – Complete Inventory Database ... 79
Action Step 2 ‐ Reach Out to Sovereign Nations ... 79
Action Step 3 – Track Visitor and Participation Statistics ... 79
Recommendation 2 – Pursue LWCF Projects for Smaller Communities ... 79
Action Step 1 ‐ Promote in Small Communities ... 79
Action Step 2 ‐ Fill Service Gaps ... 80
Action Step 3 – Coordinate Trail Efforts ... 80
Recommendation 3 ‐Structure and Coordinate Planning ... 80
Action Step 1 – Participate in Statewide Collaborations ... 80
Recommendation 4 ‐ Conduct Further Analysis ... 80
Action Step 1 – Address Fishing ... 80
Action Step 2 – Address Picnicking and Relaxation Areas ... 80
Action Step 3 – Address Hunting ... 81
Action Step 4 – Address Camping ... 81
Recommendation 5 – Address Connecting Children to Nature . 81 Action Step 1 – Outdoor Education ... 81
Appendix A – Alternative Funds and Resources ... 83
Appendix B ‐ Outdoor Recreation Industry Trends ... 91
Appendix C ‐ Recreation Age Trends and Population Characteristics ... 113
Appendix D ‐ New Mexico Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) Update Survey Final Results ‐ July 2009 ... 117
Appendix E ‐ Government Information Request for New Mexico SCORP ... 179
Appendix F ‐ Inventory Data Collection Limitations ... 183
Appendix G ‐ New Mexico Inventory Maps ... 185
Appendix H ‐ New Mexico Wetlands Component ... 211
Acknowledgements
The preparation of this plan was financed in part through a Land
and Water Conservation Fund planning grant, and the plan was
approved by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the
Interior under the provisions for the Federal Land and Water
Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88‐578).
The New Mexico Department of Energy, Minerals & Natural
Resources acknowledges the significant contributions made by
those who committed their time and expertise to help update New
Mexico’s official Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation
Plan. Many agencies, organizations, and individuals, as indicated on
this page have made particularly valuable contributions to this
document.
Lastly, we wish to recognize the countless hours devoted to the
SCORP by the staff of the New Mexico State Parks Division, Dave
Simon, State Parks Director; Dave Gatterman, Bureau Chief, Design
and Development; Christy Tafoya, Education & Resource Protection
Program Manager; Cynthia Lovely, Parks Planner, and the writing
and editorial contributions of Maurice (Moses) A. Mondary, Grants
Manager /Trails Administrator and State Liaison Officer, Field
Support Bureau, New Mexico State Parks Division.
SCORP
Advisory
Committee
Bob Anderson, Chief, Recreation Grants Division, NPS, Omaha Office Jane Beu, Outdoor Recreation Planner, NPS, Omaha Office Ed Chismar, Director Parks and Recreation Department, Bernalillo County, President‐Elect, New Mexico Recreation & Park Association Jay Hart, (Past) Director Parks and Recreation Department, City of Albuquerque, NM Kim Elliott, Director Parks and Recreation Department, Roswell, NM Rob Carter, Director Parks and Recreation Department, Clovis, NM
Thanks to our Outdoor Recreation Partners:
USDA ‐ Forest Service
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Reclamation
National Park Service
Army Corp of Engineers
New Mexico State Game and Fish
New Mexico State Land Office
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance
New Mexico State Department of Tourism
Recreational Equipment Incorporated (REI)
“New Mexico ‐‐ the Land of Enchantment”
New Mexico State Parks: Short Trips. Long Memories; Your Best Recreation Value Close to Home
2010 – 2014 Statewide Comprehensive
Outdoor Recreation Plan
(SCORP) Executive Summary
Executive
Summary
Planning
Methodology
and
Limitations
of
the
SCORP
The goal of the 2010‐2014 SCORP was to create a comprehensive
statewide plan that compared the results of a statewide community
survey of outdoor parks and recreation usage, needs, and barriers,
with an extensive inventory of recreational trails, wetlands, and
outdoor recreation facilities from all providers for outdoor
recreation programs and facilities in New Mexico, including
nonprofit and private providers. One of the end results was to be a
verified inventory of all federal, state, county, municipal, and local
providers in one database that could then be mapped and analyzed
for capacity and level of service.
Unfortunately, due to staff vacancies in the Grant Section of the
New Mexico State Parks, a one‐year extension of the existing SCORP
was needed to complete the update process by December 31, 2009.
However, a delayed contracting process further eroded the process,
making it difficult to get the New Mexico SCORP underway. This left
a compressed project timeline with a fast track schedule of roughly
six months to conduct the necessary meetings, surveys, and to
update the inventory in order to complete the SCORP by December
31, 2009.
Therefore, a decision was made to use the time available to lay the
foundation for future, more comprehensive, data collection ‐ the
rationale being that this approach would be the most effective first
step toward what is ultimately targeted to be a more complete and
accurate accounting of the outdoor recreation resources of all
suppliers. For the next SCORP update, an earlier start‐up date,
improved comprehensive project planning, increased project scope,
and a more generous timeline will be dedicated to advertising and
promoting the benefits of participating in the SCORP steering
process, stakeholder and community meetings, user surveys, and
the inventory updating process. This will hopefully result in an
opportunity to enhance the data collection and verification by
allowing for better face‐to‐face contact on a statewide level with
the federal, state, county, municipal, and local providers in New
Mexico.
Public
Meetings
and
Focus
Groups
April 27‐29, 2009 ‐ Northern Portion of the State:
(Farmington, Santa Fe, Las Vegas, and Santa Rosa)
June 1‐5, 2009 ‐ Southern Portion of the State:
(Roswell, Las Cruces, and Socorro)
The following questions were discussed:
What do you value about outdoor recreation in New Mexico?
What is your future vision regarding outdoor recreation?
What are the barriers to service?
Who are the private and nonprofit providers?
What new things have you seen in outdoor parks and
recreation lately?
In terms of outdoor recreation, what would be good for the
whole community?
2 State of New Mexico Outdoor recreation resources and opportunities are extremely
important to those that attended. The impact of these amenities
and services on people’s quality of life, environmental issues, and
healthy living makes outdoor recreation an essential service to
citizens. New Mexico boasts many diverse types of activities and
environments. As a result, outdoor recreation services contribute
greatly to the State’s economy.
Statewide
Community
Survey
Four separate outreach efforts were used to conduct the
community survey portion of the outdoor recreation needs
assessment, which included:
A statistically‐valid Random Sample Survey mailed to 8,000
statewide residents with a postage‐paid return envelope
addressed to the survey firm RRC Associates in Boulder, CO
with a password protected online web option.
A survey mailed to Land and Water Conservation Fund
(LWCF) agency database of those who have received this
type of Federal funding in New Mexico.
Open‐Link Web Survey on the New Mexico State Parks
website.
Sovereign Nations outreach including 500 surveys
proportioned by population to the Navajo Nation agencies
and chapters, Pueblos, and Apache tribes.
Federal
Funding
for
Outdoor
Recreation
Federal funds for outdoor recreation are made available through
the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). States are eligible
for these funds based upon approval of SCORP. In New Mexico, the
agency responsible for SCORP is the State Parks Division of the
Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD). The
division uses the funds to help state, local, and tribal governments
acquire, develop, and rehabilitate recreation facilities and
resources.
In the last 40 years, New Mexico has received almost $41 million
from the LWCF program. Those grants have leveraged an additional
$41 million from state, local, and tribal governments through
matching funds for a total of $82 million invested in outdoor
recreation. One hundred percent (100%) of all counties in New
Mexico have benefited from LWCF funding since 1965.
Trends Impacting Outdoor Recreation:
•
Health and Obesity
• Need for Diverse Recreation Opportunities
• Urban and Rural Recreation
•
Growing Support for Outdoor Recreation
•
Diminished Connection to Nature
Compelling Trends:
New Mexicans’ increasingly sedentary lifestyles and
disconnection from nature are resulting in alarming health
declines and a diminished conservation ethic.
State
of
New
Mexico
Health
and
Obesity
Trends
The obesity epidemic and healthy aging are critical issues facing
New Mexicans. In addition, it appears that projects that are “close
to home” may have the greatest statewide appeal. Therefore,
smaller local projects, trail connections, fishing ponds and river
access, restrooms, trailheads, and looped park trails may provide
the largest community reach and provide additional opportunities
for healthy and active lifestyles. Nature deficit disorder and
connecting children to nature are critical issues facing New
Mexicans.
The Center for Disease Control reported that New Mexico had a 24
percent obesity rate for adults in 2007. Obesity is defined as having
a body mass index of greater than or equal to 30 percent of total
body weight. Further, the United Health Foundation has ranked
New Mexico 29th in its 2007 State Health Rankings. This is up nine
rankings from 2006.
The State’s strengths include:
Strong per capita public health funding. Low levels of air pollution.
Low rates of cancer deaths and cardiovascular deaths.
Some of the challenges the State faces include: High rate of uninsured population. Low high school graduation rate. High violent crime rate.
According to the
NM Department of Health’s, The State of Healthin New Mexico 2009, Weight Status, “In 2007, significantly fewer
high school students in New Mexico were obese (10.9%) than
nationally (13.0%). In addition, fewer New Mexico high school
students were overweight (13.5%) than high school students
nationally (15.8%). [However] This difference is driven mainly by
lower rates among non‐Hispanic White students in New Mexico,
who experience the lowest rate of weight problems (combined
obesity and overweight: 18.6%), followed by Hispanic (26.0%) and
American Indian students (32.4%).
Over 60% of New Mexican adults were overweight or obese (35.7%
and 25.1%, respectively) compared with over 62% nationally (36.6%
overweight and 26.3% obese) in 2007. Over the last decade, the
rates of overweight and obesity have increased across the nation as
well as in New Mexico. Among subpopulations, American Indian
(32.8%) and Hispanic (30.0%) adults in the state experience
significantly higher obesity rates than non‐Hispanic White (20.5%).”
Economic
Impact
of
Obesity
“An estimated $324 million is spent in New Mexico annually on
medical expenditures that are attributable to obesity in adults, with
$52 million spent within the Medicare population and $84 million in
the Medicaid population. The economic burden of obesity suggests
that environmental and policy changes that reduce barriers to being
physically active and choosing healthful foods and beverages are
required in communities and at schools and work sites, and in the
food industry and health care systems throughout the state.”1 Urbanization and Rural demographic shifts are creating a greater
demand for outdoor recreation opportunities and the need for
diverse recreational offerings.
New
Mexico
Demographics
These are some factors that drive the need for diverse recreation
opportunities:
Roughly seven percent of the residents are under five years
of age, while over 25 percent are under 18 years old. Almost 13 percent are 65 years and older, and this group
will be increasing at a fast rate. Current population
projections suggest that this group will grow .7 percent by
the year 2013.
Over 30 percent of residents earn below $25,000 a year,
with approximately 43 percent earning less than $35,000. It is estimated that almost 18 percent of the population falls
below the poverty line, almost five percent more than the
nation.
Almost 11 percent of the population are Native American
Indians living on or off of a reservation, pueblo, or on tribal
land, as compared with the United States average of one
percent.
1
4 State of New Mexico
Persons of Hispanic or Latino origin represent over 44
percent of the population versus 15 percent for the nation.
The demographic profile of recreation users also emerged as a
possibly important planning issue. Concern was expressed for both
the potential challenges of providing recreational activities for the
aging baby‐boomers as well as the need to provide more facilities
and activities for youth. Around the state, outdoor recreation was
viewed as critical to positive youth development. It plays an
important role in both providing youth with positive outlets for their
energy as well as instilling an outdoor environmental ethic at an
early age. On the opposite side of the age spectrum, providing for
an increasingly active but growing senior population means
retrofitting existing areas to accommodate the different needs of
this population segment.
Recreation
in
Urban
and
Rural
Areas
New Mexico is the 5th largest state in land area with approximately
122,000 square miles. The 2000 Census shows New Mexico ranked
at 36th with a total population of 1,819,046. Approximately one‐
third of the population lives in the urbanized area of Albuquerque,
Bernalillo County, and Sandoval County (Rio Rancho and Corrales).
Approximately one‐third of the population lives in small to medium
urban clusters ranging from 2,500 to over 100,000 residents. These
urban clusters are scattered around the state with the largest
concentration in Southeastern New Mexico. The remainder of the
state’s population largely lives in areas very rural in nature.
There is a difference between outdoor recreation planning issues
for urbanized and rural areas. For New Mexico’s smaller and more
rural communities, the lack of fiscal as well as human resources
makes the provision of outdoor recreation opportunities
challenging. For these communities, the Land and Water
Conservation Fund is one of the few known funding sources for
outdoor recreation investments. However, because of the limited
budgets for smaller communities, the 50/50 match required by the
LWCF can pose a hardship.
Of further concern to funding agencies, however, is that the lack of
human and fiscal capacity for smaller communities complicates both
the creation of new recreational areas and maintenance of existing
ones. While LWCF might provide a temporary solution for a small
community struggling to add a trail or recreational facility, LWCF
cannot solve the long term problem of local municipalities’ fiscal
challenges with recreation area maintenance and land stewardship.
Economic
Impact
of
State
Parks
and
Outdoor
Recreation
According to NM State Parks Division data, “Seventy
percent of New Mexicans live within 40 miles of a State
Park. “
Forty percent of New Mexico’s state residents participate in
wildlife‐associated recreation, both inside and outside of
New Mexico.
Outdoor recreation supports 47,000 jobs across New
Mexico and generates $184 million in annual New Mexico
state tax revenue.
The outdoor recreation industry produces $2.75 billion
annually in retail sales and services across New Mexico –
accounting for 4.6% of gross state product.
Visitors to the New Mexico State Parks have been steadily
increasing since 2005.
Except for those with direct economic interests, people often fail to
consider the importance that outdoor recreation holds for local
economies. In parts of New Mexico, outdoor recreation and tourism
have long played an important economic development role. Many
of New Mexico’s smaller and more rural communities are “gateway
communities” that are located near an access point to an outdoor
recreation site such as the national forest, a reservoir, ski area or
historic site and usually derive a good measure of their community
income from supporting outdoor recreation activities through
lodger’s taxes, gross receipts taxes, and employment in businesses
that sell supplies or provide hospitality services.
Need for a Statewide Trail System That Promotes Recreation and
Healthy Lifestyles.
According to New Mexico Statute, “The purpose of the State Trails
System Act [16‐3‐1 to 16‐3‐9 NMSA 1978] is to provide public access
to, and the enjoyment and appreciation of, the New Mexico
outdoors in order to conserve, develop, and use the natural
resources of the state for purposes of health and recreation. It is the
intent and purpose of the State Trails System Act to encourage
horseback riding, hiking, bicycling, and other recreational
activities. “
Once again, trails are an important issue for the residents of New
Mexico. According to the 2010‐2014 SCORP survey question What
About Trails, respondents were asked to indicate how important
various aspects of trail improvements in New Mexico were to them
and their household. Eight of the nine categories were rated
relatively important to the respondents overall, with 56 to 66
percent responses of 4 or 5 “very important” on the 5‐point scale.
At the same time, a certain percentage of the population (generally
around 20%) considered most of the trail amenities as not
important (ratings of 1 or 2).
Rated highest was providing trail amenities (benches, trash
containers, drinking fountains, dog pick‐up bag dispensers, signage,
etc.—66% very important). Next was improving trail maintenance
(64%), improving trail connectivity between towns and
neighborhoods (63%), building neighborhood trails (62%), adding or
expanding trailheads (60%), building more soft surface trails (58%),
improving trail connectivity to regional trails outside of your town
(58%), and building regional trail systems (56%). Rated lowest was
building more paved trails (43% very important and 40% not
important).
The USDA Forest Service, National Park Service, NM State Parks,
Department of Tourism Scenic Byways and local and tribal
governments all have efforts underway to provide recreational and
historical trails within their areas of responsibility. Within New
Mexico the popularity of multi‐use trails has increased the demand
for more open space and trails, especially near urban areas.
However, there is no statewide coordinated plan to interconnect
the trails on a statewide basis.
There is a trail effort underway that has the potential to provide
connectivity across a major portion of the state. That initiative is the
Rio Grande Trail (RGT).
Rio
Grande
Trail
(RGT)
The Rio Grande, a true American river, is the second largest river
system in the country. Of its over 1,800 total miles, nearly 500 miles
of the Rio Grande form the heart of New Mexico—the primary
drainage feature and the state’s most valuable natural and cultural
resource. The Rio Grande is a precious lifeline that connects nature,
history, culture, and communities across millennia.
6 State of New Mexico
1
Promote the Livability of
All Communities
Through
Health and Fitness
One relatively newer use and benefit from the Rio Grande is
recreation. The river and its bosque attract and sustain a wide
variety of recreation—from hunting and fishing to river rafting to
hiking, biking, and horseback riding. In many ways, human
recreation in the river corridor also provides a vital connection to
experiencing and appreciating the river, and educating the public
about its past, present, and future.
In June 2006, Governor Bill Richardson and New Mexico State Parks,
which administers the State Trails System Act, proposed the
establishment of the RGT, which would roughly parallel the Rio
Grande. The basic infrastructure of the trail already exists in many
locations via the levee systems and informal trail networks of the
irrigation districts and on some publicly owned land. The New
Mexico Legislature has provided limited funding in order to begin
planning and development of the project.
A multi‐use trail along the Rio Grande has the potential to replicate
successful long‐distance trails in other states. Trails increase
opportunities for healthy living and create a sense of community in
the areas through which they pass. Long‐distance trails often serve
locally as venues for community activities, fundraisers and other
special events, while long‐distance trail users in need of supplies,
lodging and food boost riverside community economies. Trails that
connect schools, businesses, and parks provide environmentally
friendly alternative transportation and offer increased fitness
opportunities. Trails that follow waterways can easily provide
fishing and boating access as well as a parallel water trail for canoes
and kayaks. Finally, trail‐based interpretation efforts could
reconnect the public to the significance of the river and go hand‐in‐
hand with the restoration, protection and beautification of the
riparian corridor.
Additionally, the RGT would provide a foundation to connect with
other area and community trails along the proposed corridor. A
major challenge is the cost of the RGT is estimated at close to $200
million.
Priorities
and
Recommendations
It is imperative for local, state, and federal governments to work
collaboratively with private sector organizations to secure a future
where New Mexicans live healthier lifestyles, the economic well
being of communities is sustained, and wildlife and natural
resources are conserved.
3
Properly Use and
Conserve Natural Resources
2
Enhance Economic Vitality4
Developing a Statewide Trail SystemPriority
1
‐
Promote
the
Livability
of
All
Communities
Through
Health
and
Fitness
Key
Recommendations:
Rehabilitate, update, and upgrade existing public outdoor
recreation facilities to maximize public participation.
Continued expansion or development of new multi‐use urban
trails networks.
Improve access to outdoor recreation resources and facilities by
establishing parks to develop programs that promote health
and livability and to incorporate those programs into state and
local outdoor recreation.
Create more opportunities for youth to engage in outdoor
activities.
Attend to segments of the population that are under‐served by
existing facilities (e.g., seniors, young adults, Latinos, and Native
American populations).
Work with statewide organizations such as the Department of
Health, Department of Human Services, New Mexico Recreation
and Park Association, and others to develop programs that
promote health and livability.
Build more outdoor classrooms, trails, and playgrounds
featuring outdoor recreation skills.
Priority
2
–
Enhance
Economic
Vitality
Key
Recommendations:
Continue to promote outdoor recreation events, programs, and
facilities that attract day travelers and overnight visitation by
creating partnerships with businesses such as convention and
visitor bureaus, recreation equipment vendors, and guide
services.
Conduct new or update existing research on the economic
benefits of outdoor recreation in New Mexico.
Increase education/knowledge of the benefits/values of
outdoor recreation in terms of economic impact.
Rehabilitate, update, and upgrade existing public outdoor
recreation facilities to maximize marketability.
Priority
3
‐
Properly
Use
and
Conserve
Natural
Resources
Key
Recommendations:
Develop structured and coordinated planning methods,
networking opportunities, and advocacy efforts for outdoor
recreation issues, resources, and management to better serve
all providers.
Develop a dynamic, comprehensive inventory of all outdoor
recreation amenities, including federal, state, and local trails
and facilities, using GIS to identify areas lacking access to public
parks.
Expand the SCORP inventory of outdoor recreation resources
and other GIS databases to identify lands suitable for
conservation.
Identify and prioritize key lands for acquisition that will
conserve natural areas, expand, and enhance the current State
Park system.
Identify and prioritize key lands for acquisition that will
conserve natural areas, particularly in the fastest growing areas
of the state.
Increase/improve communication/collaboration between
providers and partners.
Increase education/knowledge of the benefits /values of
outdoor recreation in terms of human character and health.
8 State of New Mexico
Priority
4
–
Develop
a
Statewide
Trail
Network
That
Facilitates
Recreation,
Transportation
and
Healthy
Lifestyles
Key
Recommendations:
Support the ongoing legislation to update the State Trails Act
into a comprehensive mandate for trails.
Provide trails that connect neighborhoods, schools, shopping
areas and workplaces within communities.
Provide connections between existing trails, or closes a gap
within an existing trail system.
Build trails that access open spaces or, provide access to remote
areas (parks, forests, game lands, etc.).
Provide convenient trailheads and access points.
Critical
Ingredients
for
Success
Commitment
Engage in collaboration among agencies with common missions to
develop the synergy needed for all New Mexicans to have access to
quality outdoor recreation resources that meet their needs.
Key
strategies
include:
• Pursue and support the ongoing legislation to update the
State Trails Act into a comprehensive mandate for
establishing and funding trails in New Mexico.
• Pursue Outdoor Recreation Partnerships to strengthen
implementation of the priorities from SCORP.
• Enhance ENMRD SPD efforts to provide statewide recreation
research, planning, and technical assistance services.
• Explore alternative funding sources, ways to improve service
delivery, and means to maximize the benefits that outdoor
recreation has on local communities.
Education
Pursue cooperation and collaborations to share tools and resources
to conserve recreation lands and provide high quality opportunities
for all. By heightening the awareness of recreation’s benefits for
community health and livability, economic vitality, and conservation
of our natural resources, we will elevate the priority of outdoor
recreation with policymakers, planners, practitioners, partners, and
the public.
Key
strategies
include:
• Provide balanced interpretation, education, and outdoor
recreation programs to expand the knowledge and appreciation of
New Mexico’s natural and recreational resources in a manner
consistent with the conservation of the resource.
• Work with the Public Education Department to advance healthy
lifestyles and natural resource conservation in New Mexico’s
classrooms.
Funding
We must act now to use funds efficiently at all levels of
government, leverage with other private and non‐profit
investments and seek consistent funding to guarantee
outdoor recreation for current and future generations.
Key
strategies
include:
• Work with the Governor’s Office, state legislative leaders, and
other funding agencies to maximize existing funds and
develop new funding resources that support state and local
recreation land acquisition, conservation and development,
rehabilitation, and maintenance projects.
• Pursue full permanent funding for NMSA1978, 16‐1‐2, State
Supplemental Land and Water Conservation Fund.
• Pursue permanent funding through reauthorizing, updating
the Laws 1973, Chapter 372; NMSA1978, 16‐3‐1, State Trails
System Act to include creation of Section 8, State Trails
System Fund.
• Create and sustain partnerships to minimize reliance on tax
revenues to support the operation and maintenance of public
parks and outdoor recreation areas.
• Advocate for the continuation of state and local funding
assistance through the Land and Water Conservation Fund
program and other federal programs that support outdoor
recreation opportunities in New Mexico.
2010 – 2014 Statewide Comprehensive
Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP)
Foreword
Under the terms of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act
(LWCF) of 1965 that established the LWCF State Assistance
Program, each state is required to develop a Statewide
Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) at least every five
years. The intent of this plan is to justify state and federal
expenditures for outdoor recreation based upon an analysis of the
following criteria. 1) Assessment of the existing supply of
recreational opportunities using broad‐based public, provider, and
user feedback in relation to recreation trends, deficiencies, under‐
served areas, and desired improvements, and 2) Conducting an
inventory of current recreation facilities, trails, and wetlands.
Since 1967, the New Mexico State Parks Division has continually
updated its SCORP, which defines how state, federal, local, and
tribal governmental agencies cooperate to provide for the outdoor
recreation needs and demands of the state. The goal of each plan
was to compare the results of a statewide survey of outdoor parks
and recreation usage, needs, and barriers, with an extensive
inventory of all providers for outdoor recreation programs and
facilities in New Mexico, including nonprofit and private providers.
The resulting needs assessment and gap analysis demonstrates the
spirit of cooperation among all providers and serves as a roadmap
to justify future funding and development requests from Recreation
Trails funds, Transportation Enhancement funds, and other federal,
state, and local funding and planning resources as well as the LWCF.
We are proud of the variety of culturally rich resources and services
in the State that serve the outdoor recreation needs of close to two
million residents each year. Additionally, both residents and visitors
enjoy day use and overnight camping opportunities provided by the
federal, state, county, local, and sovereign nation parks, as well as
private, nonprofit providers and ski resorts. Additionally, there are
countless outdoor swimming pools, trails, and diverse outdoor
recreation programs and facilities available on a daily basis.
Whether individuals are working out, taking an environmental
education class, camping, competing in a sports league, playing a
round of golf, enjoying a walk through a neighborhood park, or
simply renting a picnic shelter, there is an activity or service for
everyone!
"The park and recreation movement is more essential today than
ever before. The need to protect and promote our natural
resources and open spaces remains paramount. In addition, we
now face a serious problem of sedentariness that is
disproportionately impacting America’s youth, and this is where
the National Park and Recreation Foundation, along with the other
partners in this movement, plays a critical role."
R. Dean Tice, Life Trustee
(NRPA Executive Director, 1986‐2001)
2010 – 2014 SCORP 13
Planning
Context
What
is
a
SCORP?
Under the terms of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act
(LWCF) of 1965 that established the LWCF State Assistance
Program, each state is required to develop a Statewide
Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) at least every five
years. The intent of this plan is to justify state and federal
expenditures based upon an analysis of the existing supply of
recreational opportunities using broad‐based public, provider, and
user input regarding recreation trends, deficiencies, under‐served
areas, and desired improvements, and an inventory of current
recreation facilities, trails, and wetlands. Since 1967, the New
Mexico State Parks Division has commissioned a SCORP which
outlines how state, federal, local, and tribal governmental agencies
cooperate to provide for the outdoor recreation needs and
demands of the State.
The LWCF Act explicitly requires the SCORP to include:
a. The name of the state agency that will have the authority to
represent and act for the State in dealing with the Secretary
for purposes of the LWCF Act of 1965, as amended.
b. Inventory of statewide outdoor recreation facilities.
c. Wetlands priority inventory.
d. An evaluation of the demand for and supply of outdoor
recreation resources and facilities in the State.
e. A program for the implementation of the plan.
f. Certification by the Governor that ample opportunity for
public participation has taken place in plan development.
g. Other necessary information, as may be determined by the
Secretary.
Previous
SCORP
The 2004‐2009 SCORP was prepared by a research team from the
Community and Regional Planning Program at the University of New
Mexico School of Architecture and Planning. Relevant background
and historic information regarding the SCORP and the importance of
outdoor recreation still applies and is not repeated in this update.
Planning
Methodology
and
Constraints
The goal of the 2010‐2014 SCORP was to create a comprehensive
statewide plan that compared the results of a statewide community
survey of outdoor parks and recreation usage, needs, and barriers,
with an extensive inventory of recreational trails, wetlands, and
outdoor recreation facilities from all providers for outdoor
recreation programs and facilities in New Mexico including
nonprofit and private providers. One of the end results was to be a
verified inventory of all federal, state, county, municipal, and local
providers in one database that could then be mapped and analyzed
for capacity and level of service.
Unfortunately, due to staff vacancies in the Grant Section of the
New Mexico State Parks, a one‐year extension of the existing SCORP
was needed to complete the update process by December 31, 2009.
However, a delayed contracting process further eroded the process,
making it difficult to get the New Mexico SCORP underway. This left
a compressed project timeline with a fast track schedule of roughly
six months to conduct the necessary meetings, surveys, and to
update the inventory in order to complete the SCORP by December
31, 2009.
Therefore, a decision was made to use the time available to lay the
foundation for future more comprehensive data collection. The
rationale being that this approach would be the most effective first
step toward what is ultimately targeted to be a more complete and
accurate accounting of the outdoor recreation resources of all
suppliers. For the next SCORP update, an earlier start‐up date,
improved comprehensive project planning, increased project scope,
and a more generous timeline will be dedicated to advertising and
promoting the benefits of participating in the SCORP steering
process, stakeholder and community meetings, user surveys, and
the inventory updating process. This will hopefully result in an
opportunity to enhance the data collection and verification by
allowing for better face‐to‐face contact on a statewide level with
the federal, state, county, municipal, and local providers in New
Mexico.
Goals
and
Objectives
of
the
SCORP
The goals of the SCORP and its associated planning process are to
direct each state's use of its LWCF apportionment. The objectives of
the SCORP and its associated planning process are to:
a. Fulfill the purposes of the LWCF Act.
b. Provide each state the maximum opportunity and flexibility
to develop and implement its plan.
c. Describe the role of the LWCF in the state’s provision of
outdoor recreation resources and the state’s policies for use
of its LWCF apportionment.
d. Provide a basis for determining each state’s LWCF eligibility.
e. Ensure relevant, influential, and timely planning for the
state’s use of its LWCF apportionment.
What
is
Expected
of
the
SCORP?
The planning process must include ample opportunity for public
participation involving all segments of the state’s population.
The plan must be comprehensive. The plan will be considered
comprehensive if it:
a. Identifies outdoor recreation issues of statewide
importance based upon, but not limited to, input from the
public participation program. The plan must also identify
those issues the state will address through the LWCF and
those issues that may be addressed by other means.
b. Evaluates demand, i.e., public outdoor recreation
preferences, but not necessarily through quantitative
statewide surveys or analyses.
c. Evaluates the supply of outdoor recreation resources and
facilities, but not necessarily through quantitative statewide
inventories.
2010 – 2014 SCORP 15
Planning
Components
Needs Assessment/Public Outreach/Focus Group Meetings.
Stakeholder Surveys:
o Customized to address New Mexico’s residents
and outdoor recreation users.
o Allowed sub‐analysis by the five service areas of
the state, and by respondent characteristics.
o Provided a website response option.
o Provided respondents an opportunity to win
either a day‐use pass or a coupon for one night of
free camping at a New Mexico state park for
participating in the survey.
Market and Demographic Analysis:
o Five distinct service areas:
Central (Bernalillo County/Albuquerque)
Northwest
Northeast
Southeast
Southwest
o Sources of information included 2000 Census and
ESRI Business Solutions.
Inventory and Level of Service (LOS) Analysis of Existing
Conditions for Outdoor Recreation Spaces/Facilities, Wetlands,
and Trails– Gap Analysis.
Outdoor Recreation Providers Identification.
Assumptions and Visioning Workshops.
Financial Management Analysis.
Recommendations & Action Plan.
Reflections
from
the
SCORP
The New Mexico SCORP reflects the current state of the economy
and consequently focuses more on improvements to existing
infrastructure, linkages, cooperative provision strategies, and
sustainability than growth and development. New Mexico’s large
land mass coupled with relatively small population density, along
with the socio‐economic conditions of New Mexico strains available
local resources, as a considerable amount of the state has small,
rural, spread‐out communities. Often, a state or national park acts
as a local or regional facility for these rural areas, and
transportation is another major barrier.
Federal
Funding
for
Outdoor
Recreation
Federal funds for outdoor recreation are made available through
the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). States are eligible
for these funds based upon approval of SCORP. In New Mexico, the
agency responsible for SCORP is the State Parks Division of the
Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD). The
division uses the funds to help state, local, and tribal governments
acquire, develop, and rehabilitate recreation facilities and
resources.
In the last 40 years, New Mexico has received almost $41 million
from the LWCF program. Those grants have leveraged an additional
$41 million from state, local, and tribal governments through
matching funds for a total of $82 million invested in outdoor
recreation. One hundred percent (100%) of all counties in New
Mexico have benefited from LWCF funding since 1965.
New Mexico is one of 14 states with no dedicated source of funds
for its parks and recreation agencies. LWCF is a 50% Federal/ 50%
State/Local match program. For many of New Mexico’s local
governments, the 50% match can represent a budgetary burden
due to their current and forecasted economic constraints.
Currently, the unmet needs for outdoor recreation facilities and
parkland acquisition for the State of New Mexico are estimated to
total $35.5 million.
Historic
LWCF
Funding
for
New
Mexico
Since its inception, annual appropriations to the Fund have ranged
from a high of $369 million in 1979 to four years of zero funding
between 1996 and 1999. The LWCF experienced significant
increases in Congressional appropriations for state and local grants
during the 2000‐2002 fiscal years (FY), peaking at $140 million in FY
2002. However, beginning in FY 2003, and continuing through FY
2008, funding for LWCF state grants dropped to $23 million, the
lowest figure since FY 1992 except for the zero years noted above.
Table
1
shows the annual stateside LWCF appropriations for NewMexico from 2002 to 2009. Supplemental apportionment pursuant
to the Gulf of New Mexico Energy Security Act (GOMSEA) was
appropriated in 2009.
Table
1:
NM
LWCF
Annual
Apportionment
2002
‐
2009
Fiscal Year Appropriation GOMSEA
2009 $ 218,632 $ 94,373 2008 $ 266,457 2007 $ 322,708 2006 $ 322,708 2005 $1,037,078 2004 $1,055,871 2003 $1,048,717 2002 $1,555,060 Source: http://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/lwcf
The LWCF Stateside Program has never been adequately funded. In
fact from 1996 thru 1999, there were no apportioned LWCF funds
made available to the State Assistance Program. Additionally, during
the Bush Administration, from 2000 thru 2008, there were no LWCF
State Assistance Program funds in the President’s Budget. It was
only through the intervention of Congress that the State Assistance
Program received the $20 million to $30 million annual
apportionment that was distributed to all the 50 states and
territories. “It’s not how much we spend but how we take care
18 State of New Mexico
According to the 2009 Land & Water Conservation Fund Coalition
Report, “LWCF funding has been low and unpredictable over the
program’s forty‐four year history, approaching the full funding level
of $900 million only twice. In the past ten years, program funding
has followed a dramatic decline, with a total of less than $155
million in Fiscal Year 2008. Meanwhile, demand for these funds to
protect our nation’s most treasured natural, cultural, and recreation
areas has skyrocketed. In the face of often intense development
pressures, an ever‐increasing number of key resource properties
will be lost if they are not purchased and conserved by the public.
Today, LWCF can meet only a small fraction of that urgent need.
And each year, more and more of America’s irreplaceable wild
lands, fish and wildlife habitats, scenic areas, historic sites, and
neighborhood parks are developed, fragmented, and otherwise
sacrificed because there is simply not enough LWCF money to go
around. The Land and Water Conservation Fund Coalition is a group
of nonprofit organizations working together to support ample
funding for the LWCF, the Forest Legacy Program and natural
resource adaptation funding. We are pleased to present this report
and the following recommendations:
The Land and Water Conservation Fund should be fully fundedat $900 million annually ‐‐ the congressionally authorized level ‐ ‐ to ensure that critical natural, historical, ecological, cultural,
and recreational resources will be protected around the nation.
This is necessary to preserve and enhance the integrity of our
national parks, national wildlife refuges, national forests,
Bureau of Land Management lands, and other federal areas, as
well as the vast network of state, county, and neighborhood
parks serving close‐to‐home open space and public recreation
needs. In addition, investments should be made immediately to
address acquisition management needs at the four federal land
management agencies, with particular attention to securing
additional staff with expertise necessary to implement a
strategic land acquisition program.”
Federal Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) oil and gas leasing
revenues authorized by Congress to fund the LWCF at $900
million annually should be permanently dedicated to this
purpose. Historically, almost all of this funding has been
diverted into general revenues for other purposes. In Fiscal Year
2008, the Department of the Interior collected $23.4 billion
from onshore and offshore energy production, more than
doubling the 2007 total of $11.6 billion. Congress should ensure
that at least $900 million, consistent with the underlying
principle of the LWCF, are dedicated annually to long‐term
protection of our nation’s land and water resources.