• No results found

Westerly Creek, A Poster Child for Understanding the Benefit of Stormwater Investment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Westerly Creek, A Poster Child for Understanding the Benefit of Stormwater Investment"

Copied!
35
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Westerly Creek, A Poster Child for Understanding the

Benefit of Stormwater Investment

Presented at the ASFPM Annual Conference Atlanta, GA June 1 – June 5 2015

Jon Villines, EIT, CFM – Aurora Water Alan Turner, PE, CFM – CH2M

(2)

What is this project about? – Westerly Creek

 Two UDFCD Major Basins:

– Upper (9.0 sq. mi., upstream of Westerly Creek Dam)

– Lower (7.0 sq. mi. Westerly Creek Dam to Sand Creek)

 City of Aurora and Denver

 CH2M Updating MDP and FHAD for Upper Westerly Creek (2014)

 Lower Westerly last studied in 2010

 Major detention areas: Jewell Wetlands, Utah Park, Expo Park, Westerly Creek Dam, Kelly Road Dam (all 100-year)

(3)

What is this project about? – Westerly Creek

Denver International Airport City of Longmont City of Boulder Downtown Denver

(4)

What is this project about? – Westerly Creek

Kelly Road Dam

Westerly Creek Dam

Expo Park

Utah Park

(5)

Why Westerly Creek? – September, 2013 Storms

 Aurora and Westerly Creek Watershed were one of the hardest-hit areas

 11.76 inches of rain over 7-days

 Peak of 5.96 inches of rain on September 12, 2014

 Historic levels of rain and runoff, but minimal damage

 $2.5 million in known damages to COA assets

 But it could have been much worse…

 $48.8M investment (2014 $) in detention facilities over 56 years

(6)

Why Westerly Creek – Peoria St, Downstream of

Utah Park

(7)

Why Westerly Creek – Peoria St, Downstream of

Utah Park

(8)

Why Westerly Creek – Peoria St, Downstream of

Utah Park

(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)

What’s the Objective? – Describe Benefit of Detention

 During/after storm, citizens said “Parks and streets are flooding!”

 Detention & conveyance functioned as-designed

 COA fared surprisingly well

 Multi-use detention facilities not well understood

 Gov. Hickenlooper expressed interest in quantifying benefit

 CH2M contracted to study

benefit/cost of Westerly Creek detention facilities

APPROXIMATESEPTEMBER

2013 FLOODEXTENTS

Expo Park Kelly Road Dam

Westerly Creek Dam

Utah Park

(15)
(16)

1

st

: What Facilities Did we want to look at?

(17)

1

st

: What Facilities Did we want to look at?

 Expo Park  Utah Park

(18)

2

nd

: Update Hydrology to Remove Detention

With Detention Hydrograph at

Westerly Creek Dam

Without Detention Hydrograph

at Westerly Creek Dam

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 F low ( c fs ) Time (Minutes)

Flow Without Detention 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 F low ( c fs ) Time (Minutes

(19)

3

rd

: Develop 2-D models for Upper and Lower Basin

Manning’s N

(20)

3

rd

: Develop 2-D models for Upper and Lower Basin

(21)

Lastly: Determine Impacted Structures

 Used Data from a variety of Sources

– City of Aurora Building Shapefile – City of Aurora Parcel Data

– City of Denver Building Shapefile

 Three Categories of Structures Identified

 Commercial Structures

 Multi-Family Residential

 Single Family Residential

 Structure Value Determined from Zillow

(22)

Cost Benefit Analysis Of Westerly Creek Detention

Structures

(23)

Cost Development – Construction Costs of Dams

 Dams were constructed and improved over a 56 Year period

 Records of Construction cost not always available

 Accurate costs found for:

– Jewell Wetlands – Expo Park

– Utah Park

– Westerly Creek Dam

 An estimate for Kelly Road dam was done based on other ponds in basin

 Cost Escalated to 2014 Costs

y = 6996.2x + 2E+06 R² = 0.9854 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Cost of Construction (2014 $) versus Detention Volume for

Westerly Creek Detention Facilities

(24)

Cost Development – Construction Costs of Dams

 Dams were constructed and improved over a 56 Year period

 Records of Construction cost not always available

 Accurate costs found for:

– Jewell Wetlands – Expo Park

– Utah Park

– Westerly Creek Dam

 An estimate for Kelly Road dam was done based on other ponds in basin

(25)

Cost Development – Construction Costs of Dams

Detention Facility Year

Constructed Constructed Cost ($) Volume (Ac-Ft) 2014 Cost ($) Jewell Wetlands 2001 $1,110,000 85 $1,484,000 Utah Park 2009 $5,400,000 158 $5,960,300 Expo Park 1999 $2,341,097 226 $3,325,400

Westerly Creek Dam 1987 $15,124,000 4,150 $31,508,300

Kelly Road Dam* 1953 $329,000 130 $2,910,000

Kelly Road Dam Exp.* 1979 $1,108,000 360 $3,609,000 *Cost estimated from other ponds.

(26)

Cost Development – Structure Value Assumptions

 Structure Values were based on Neighborhood Averages from Zillow

 Assumptions for Categories

– Single Family

• 1 or 2 Story Structure w/basement

– Multi-Family

• 6 units per a structure

• Structure is multi-story with no basement

• Value based on neighborhood sales

– Commercial

• Structure is multi-story with no basement

• Average Commercial Value is $1.75 million dollars

Neighborhood Avg. Value

Structure

East Colfax $199,900 1-Story With Basement Lowry Field $534,000 2-Story w/ basement Expo Park $200,000 2-Story w/

basement Utah Park $230,000 2-Story w/

basement Windsor $475,000 2-Story w/

basement Village East $350,000 2-Story w/

basement East Ridge $300,000 2-Story w/

(27)

Cost Development – Damage Assumptions

 Damage based on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Depth Damage Tables

 Both Structure Damage and Contents Damage Considered

 Assumption of 1’ depth of water

(28)

Results –Flood Plains for Upper Westerly Creek

Without Detention

With Detention (Existing)

Expo Park Kelly Road Dam

Westerly Creek Dam

Utah Park Jewell Wetlands Expo Park Kelly Road Dam Westerly Creek Dam Utah Park Jewell Wetlands

(29)

Results –Structures Impacted with Existing Detention

 Structures Affected

– 69 Commercial Buildings – 99 Multi-Family Buildings – 389 Single Family Buildings

 Cost of Damage – Structure damage = $56,590,000 – Contents Damage = $33,510,000 – Total Damage = $90,100,000 Expo Park Kelly Road Dam Westerly Creek Dam Utah Park Jewell Wetlands

(30)

Results –Structures Impacted without Existing

Detention

 Structures Affected

– 204 Commercial Buildings – 282 Multi-Family Buildings – 1,657 Single Family Buildings

 Cost of Damage

– Structure damage = $195,075,000 – Contents Damage = $115,415,000 – Total Damage = $310,490,000

Expo Park Kelly Road Dam

Westerly Creek Dam

Utah Park

Jewell Wetlands

(31)

Cost Benefit Analysis

Costs

Benefits

Detention Facility 2014 Cost

(Million $)

Jewell Wetlands $1.48

Utah Park $5.96

Expo Park $3.33

Westerly Creek Dam $31.51 Kelly Road Dam $2.91 Kelly Road Dam Exp. $3.61

Total Cost = $48.80

Damage Type Damage

(Million $) Without Detention Structure Damage $195.08 Contents Damage $115.42 Total Damage $310.50 With Detention Structure Damage $56.59 Contents Damage $33.51 Total Damage $90.10 Net Benefit = $220.40

(32)

Cost Benefit Analysis

Benefit Cost Ratio =

4.5

Expo Park

Kelly Road Dam

Westerly Creek Dam

Utah Park

Jewell Wetlands

(33)

Summary – Value goes beyond Health and Safety

 The Benefits of Master Planning and implementation of drainage improvements are huge.

 Benefits go beyond Structure Damage

– Improved water quality

– Environmental Enhancement – Recreational Enhancement – Increased Park Space

– Enhanced Property Values – Reduction in Flood Insurance

Costs

– Additional Developable Land – Increased Tax base for City

Jewell Wetlands

(34)

Conclusions – Take Away from September 2013

 Total Damages seen in 2013 = $2.5 Million Dollars

– Most Damage was Sediment and Debris removal

– Peoria Street Reconstruction – Handful of Structures Damaged

 Without Improvements

– Approximately $8.6 Million Dollars in Damage

– Approximately 60 Structures Damaged

(35)

References

Related documents

not possible to compute the correspondence error directly. Instead, we employ two metrics: 1) the Nearest Point Error (NPE) to quantify the shape difference from the deformed

At the time, South Africa was con- centrating on its peaceful nuclear explosives (PNEs) in a program run by the Atomic Energy Board that envisioned an underground test rather

In R v Waterhouse (2004) 20 CRNZ 897, the Court allowed an appeal against a sentence of 10 years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 6 years, imposed on

stor,NB_ORA_SERV=aie-mediaserver-ib,NB_ORA_POLICY=OracleAppPolicy)' CONNECT=*; 5> ALLOCATE CHANNEL ch01 TYPE 'SBT_TAPE'

Currently, less than one percent of tree plantation residues is converted into biofuel products (e.g., wood pellets) in Argentina, but growing global interest in biofuels may

With the advent of new glass ionomer sealant [Fuji IX and Ketac Molar] which claims to be possessing better properties, it becomes necessary to compare and evaluate these

We actually see that the same printed notation can mean very dierent mathe- matical objects, and that the same mathematical object can be displayed in many dierent styles.. This

multidisciplinary team… I work as a social worker with a team of professionals, primary care and so forth, and all of us are equal at the table.”.. NLN