• No results found

Recent higher order QCD results the/3-function at 4-loops and the first moment of gl in O(c~ 3)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Recent higher order QCD results the/3-function at 4-loops and the first moment of gl in O(c~ 3)"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Recent higher order QCD results

the/3-function at 4-loops and the

first moment of gl in O(c~ 3)

S.A. Larin*, T. van Ritbergent and J.A.M. Vermaseren*

*Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 60th October Anniversary Prospect 7a, Moscow 117312, Russia t Randall Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

NIKHEF, P.O. Box 41882, 1009 DB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

A b s t r a c t . We discuss the analytical calculation of the renormalization group /?-function at the 4-loop order of perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics. In addition we have obtained the order a~ contribution to the Ellis-Jaffe sum rule for the structure function gl of polarized deep inelastic lepton-nucleon scattering.

T H E F O U R LOOP ~ - F U N C T I O N IN QCD

The renormalization group ~-function in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) has a history of more than 20 years. The calculation of the one-loop m-function in QCD has lead to the discovery of asymptotic freedom in this model and to the establishment of QCD as the theory of strong interactions [1]. The two-loop QCD fl-function was calculated in [2]. The three-loop QCD fl-function was calculated in Ref. [3] within the minimal subtraction (MS) scheme [4]. The MS-scheme belongs to the class of massless schemes where the m-function does not depend on masses of the thcory and (only) the first two coefficients of the [3-function are scheme-independent. In spite of its scheme dependence at higher orders the m-function is an important object since it governs (within a given scheme) the scale depcndence of the strong coupling constant which is the basic expansion parameter in perturbative calculations. In this section we discuss tile recent analytical four-loop calculation [5] of the QCD m-function in the MS-scheme. The definition of the 4-dimensional m-function is

Oas

0 In #2 - ;~(a,,)

(2)

in which a, = c~,/47r = g2/167r2, g = g(# 2) is the renormalized strong coupling constant of the standard QCD Lagrangian. (We should note at this point that various other normalizations of the beta function coefficients ~i are often used.) # is the 't Hooft unit of mass, the renormalization point in the MS-scheme.

To calculate the/3-function we need to calculate the renormalization con- stant Z,, of the coupling constant

= z ~

(2)

where aB is the bare (unrenormalized) charge. We obtain this renormalization constant in the 4-loop order by calculating the following three renormalization constants of the Lagrangian: Zhh,j for the ghost-ghost-glnon vertex, Zh for the inverted ghost propagator and Z 9 for the inverted gluon propagator. Then by virtue of the Ward identities one has Z,, = Z~hg/(Z~Z~). This is from a calculational point of view one of the simplest ways to obtain Z,., at higher orders (but several other choices are possible as well)

The actual calculation of the renormalization constants Zhhg , Z h and Z,~ in the 4-loop order is done using a technique based on the direct calculation of 4- loop massive vacuum (bubble) integrals (i.e. massive integrals with no external momenta). This technique which is described in more detail in Ref. [5] involves the introduction of an auxiliary mass parameter and provides a procedure that is well suited for the automatic evaluation of huge numbers of Feynman diagrams. This is of vital importance since there are approximately 50000 4- loop diagams contributing to the ghost-ghost-gluon vertex, ghost propagator and gluon propagator combined. The obtained MS fl-function for QCD reads

2 30 = 11 - ~n I 38 ,'31 = 1 0 2 - --~n S ~2 - 2857__ 5033__ nS + ~45n} 2 18

, ,

= - + ,, (50065 6472 \ 1093 ~3 + Ci- + --ffi "} + s (3)

where n I is the number of (active) quark flavours and ~ is the Riemann zeta- function (G = 1.2020569...) . In Ref. [5] the beta-function was obtained for an arbitrary compact semi-simple Lie group, but we quoted here only the result for QCD (i.e. the group SU(3)).

Another prominent renormalization group quantity, the quark mass anoma- lous dimension, has recently been calculated at 4-loops for an arbitrary com- pact semi-simple Lie group [6].

(3)

THE a~ A P P R O X I M A T I O N OF QCD TO THE

ELLIS-JAFFE SUM RULE

Polarized deep inelastic electron-nucleon scattering is described by the hadronic tensor

1 f d4ze,q~(p,

slJAz)g~(o)lp, ~>

~

W,, = ~ = w~pi, ~r ' Q2) +

+i%~,,oqp

Q2) +

"(P : ' ~

g2(.z., Q2)

(4) Here Ju is the electromagnetic quark current x =

Q2/(2p. q)

is the Bjorken scaling variable and Q2 = _q2 is the square of the transferred momentum. IP, s) is the nucleon state. The polarization vector of the nucleon is expressed as so = U(p,

s)%75U(p, s)

where

V(p, s)

is the nucleon spinor.

In the present section we will focus on the first Mellin moment of the struc- ture function gl, the Ellis-Jaffe sum-rule. Moments of deep inelastic structure functions can be expressed [7] in terms of quantities that appear in the op- erator product expansion (OPE) of the two currents J,. In particular the Ellis-Jaffe sum-rule is expressed as

fo 1 dxd(n)(x, Q2) =

C~(1,

a,(Q2))(+ ~__~lgAi +

1 a s )

+C~(1, a~(Q2)) exp \J",(u ~) fl(G) J

(5)

where the plus (minus) sign before

IgAI

corresponds to the proton (neutron) target. C a and C n~ are the flavour singlet and non-singlet coefficient functions that appear in the relevant Operator Product Expansion. 7~(a~) is the anoma- lous dimension of the axial singlet current (see further below), as = 4~ra~ is the strong coupling constant. The proton matrix elements of the axial currents are defined as

IgAIs~ = 2(p, sljs,3lp, s ) = ( A u - Ad)s~, ass~ = 2v~(p, sljS,Slp, s> = (Au + A d - - 2As)s~,

aoOz2)s,, = (p, slJ2lp, s) = ( A u + A d + As)s~ = A~(~2)s~.

(6)

Here

IgAI

is the absolute value of the constant of the neutron beta-decay

, gA/gV

= --1.2601 + 0.0025 [8]. as = 0.579 4- 0.025 [8,9] is the constant of hyperon decays. We use the notation Aq(#2)s~

= (p, sFq% v5qlp, s), q = u, d, s,

for the polarized quark distributions. We omit the contributions of the nucleon matrix elements for quarks heavier than the s-quark but it is straightforward to include them. The matrix element of the singlet axial current a0(# 2) can be redefined in a proper invariant way as a constant/to
(4)

(

f"~(v ~)

"~'~(a']\

ao = exp

t - J

d a , ~ I

'

"

'

''~'

..o(~. ~) :_ AS,ov

(r)

9 , P ' k ' * s ] /

The singlet anomalous dimension 7"~(o,) determines the renormalization scale dependence of the axial singlet current i.e.

d[J2]d(dln, 2)

= ~ [ # ] R where subscript R means that a current is renormalized. Since fi0 is renormalization group invariant it should be considered as a physical constant on the same ground as the constants

gA

and as.

The flavour non-singlet contribution to the Ellis-Jaffe sum rule is known in 3 from [101 where the polarized Bjorken sum rule

S~ dx(gf -9"~) was

the order a,

calculated in this order. To obtain the singlet contribution to the Ellis-Jaffe 3 and ?~(a,) 3 order one needs to calculate C s in the order %

sum rule in the a~

4 The most difficult part of this calculation is to obtain 7*(a.~) in the order %.

4 order (since it is a 4-loop calculation) and this can be done with tile in the a,

same method that was used to obtain the ~-function in the 4-loop order. Further details on the calculations can be found in Ref. [11] where we ob- tained the following result for the Ellis-Jaffe sum rule

, o~ 3dn s

s

[1 (--~-)d~'S+ (-~-)2d~S (---~-) 3 ]

+ +

(+~lgal+-~as)

i

1

d~ s = - 1 d~ _ 55 1 - - ~ + gnf f 10339 61 5 -- 2~ 115~ d3 "" = ,384,216

-~r

+

-~r

+ 'v~ ~ - ~ - +

~r

-

~r

*

'~s~-~

d~ = (1//3o)[-11 + us(S)] 2 4 . ,

)]

d2 = (1//3o)2[--5T - , s u l t ~ + ~r [46351373 312785r 113135~5 ) 4 = ( 1 / Z o ) ~ [ ,~23~1 216 5 8 ~ + z ~ + ,v~ , - ~ - + - 7 , 3 7 " --~n}(- 2353243432 30976/-~ ,3 Jr --~,5113310/- ~ ..~ ~ f ~ l ] ~ _3/4647815 ..~ 2 ~ '322594/- _ '~-,5]220/- 326 r- ~ n5 ( 386 +n}( 235S67,7496 27-~90~3 + 2--~,5] +

f ~

+ 7-~9r (8)

where a~ = a,(Q2), /3o = 11 - 2/3n S is the l-loop coefficient of the b e t a function and fi0 = AEi,~ is the invariant matrix element of the singlet axial current defined in Eq. (7). n S is the number of (active) quark fiavours and is the Riemann zeta-function. In particular, for

nf

= 3 we find

fodxg~(n)l

_ [1 _ ( ~ ) _ 3,583 ( ~ ) 2 _ 20.215 ( ~ ) 3 1 1(4_..~

[gAI +

3~a8 )
(5)

TABLE 1. Second and third-order coefficients for the Ellis-Jaffe sum rule. nf non-singlet singlet ( ~ / ~ ) ~ (~/~) ~ (~,/~)~ (~,/~)" -3.58333 -20.21527 -0.54959 -4.44725 4 - 3 . 2 5 0 0 0 -13.85026 1.08153 4.87423 5 -2.91667 -7.84019 2.97845 13.07103 6 -2.58333 -2.18506 5.27932 20.73034

In table 1 we have listed the numerical values of tile second and third-order

coefficients for the Ellis-Jaffe sum rule for ny = 3, 4, 5, 6. One carl observe the

sign-constant character of perturbative QCD series both for non-singlet and singlet contributions. T h e series tends to preserve its sign-constant character even when perturbative coefficients of the singlet contribution change their

signs around the value ny = 4.

One can see t h a t the obtained perturbative coefficients of the Ellis-Jaffe sum rule grow rather moderately. If we assume that the error of the truncated asymptotic series is determined by the last calculated term, then the obtained a3 approximation for this sum rule provides a good theoretical framework for extraction of the fundamental constant h0 = AEin~, the invariant axial proton charge, from experiment.

R E F E R E N C E S

1. D.J. Gross, F. Wilczek,Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1343 (1973);

H.D. Politzer,Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346 (1973);

G. 't Hooft, report at the Marseille Conference on Yang-Mills Fields, 1972.

2. W.E. Caswell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 244 (1974);

D.R.T. Jones, Nucl. Ph.ys. B75, 531 (1974);

E.S. Egorian, O.V. Tarasov, Theor. Mat. Fiz. 41, 26 (1979).

3. O.V. Tarasov, A.A. Vladimirov, A.Yu. Zharkov, Phys. Lett. B93, 429 (1980);

S.A. Larin, J.A.M. Vermaseren, Phys. Lett. B303, 334 (1993).

4. G. ~t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B61,455 (1973).

5. T. van Ritbergen, J.A.M. Vermaseren, S.A. Latin, Phys. Lett. B490~ 379

(1997).

6. J.A.M. Vermaseren, S.A. Larin, T. van Ritbergcn, UM-TH-97-03, hep- ph/9703284.

7. N. Christ, B. Hasslacher, A.H. Mueller, Phys. Rev. D6, 3543 (1972).

8. Particle Data Group, Phys. Rev. D54, 1 (1996).

9. F.E. Close, R.G. Roberts, Phys. Lett. B316, 165 (1993).

10. S.A. Larin, J.A.M. Vermascren, Ph.ys. Lett. B259, 345 (1991).

11. S.A. Larin, T. van Ritbergen, J.A.M. Vermaseren, UM-TH-97-02, hep- ph/9702435.

References

Related documents

The threshold into the stadium is through a series of layers which delaminate from the geometry of the field to the geometry of the city and creates zones of separation,

Further, by showing that v τ is a modular unit over Z we give a new proof of the fact that the singular values of v τ are units at all imaginary quadratic arguments and obtain

A consequence of this perspective of woman directors being appointed as part of the symbolic management of the independence of the board is that, when these directors lose

National Conference on Technical Vocational Education, Training and Skills Development: A Roadmap for Empowerment (Dec. 2008): Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department

Um fato interessante ´e que na base padr˜ao, com excec¸˜ao do classificador 2-NN, o menor resultado foi obtido utilizando o mesmo bag size (70%) e em todos os casos os pior

What are the driving factors leading companies to request sales tax outsourcing services:. • Complexity of returns at the local level of tax (County

• Follow up with your employer each reporting period to ensure your hours are reported on a regular basis?. • Discuss your progress with

Provided the measurement guidelines, reporting guidelines, and the additional data attributes (as mentioned above) are obtained, The Green Grid believes PUE can be used to compare