Engine Optimization Methodologies:
Engine Optimization Methodologies:
Tools and Strategies for
Tools and Strategies for
Diesel Engine Design
Diesel Engine Design
George Delagrammatikas
Dennis Assanis, Zoran Filipi, Panos Papalambros,
Nestor Michelena
The University of Michigan
May 24, 2000
BACKGROUND: VEHICLE AND ENGINE
FUNDAMENTALS ENGINE TUNING INVERSE DESIGN CVT, INJECTION TIMINGS MAP SHAPING AND MATCHING ENGINE FLEXIBILITY: COMPRESSION RATIO, CVT,HYBRID NOVEL TECHNOLOGIES
Motivation
Motivation
•
Federal Regulations
–
Fuel economy (CAFE)
–
Emissions (NOx, smog, and other pollutants)
•
Public Awareness
–
‘Green’ movement
–
Global warming scare
•
Decrease Dependence on Foreign Oil
Objectives
Objectives
•
Develop an engine optimization framework
–
21
stcentury conventional and hybrid heavy truck
•
Implement techniques to conventional vehicle
–
Define a problem analytically
–
Apply suitable driving cycle(s)
–
Investigate location of use on engine map
Euro III Steady State Test Procedure
Power Demands on Engine
HEV System Simulation Framework
HEV System Simulation Framework
ADVISOR Matlab-SIMULINK environment
Parallel HEV
ENGINE FUEL DELIVERY LOOK-UP TABLE
RPM TORQUE
Baseline Vehicle Parameters
Baseline Vehicle Parameters
Cummins M11-330 (246 kW) Diesel Engine
Wheel/axle assembly for heavy truck
Kenworth T400 Vehicle
Standard heavy vehicle accessory loads
Standard catalyst for CI engine
Eaton Fuller RTLO-12610B 10-Speed Transmission
Generic 10-spd constant efficiency gearbox
Baseline Cummins Engine Map
Driving Cycles Investigated
Driving Cycles Investigated
US06 REP05
FHDS FUDS
Engine Use Points for Various Cycles
Engine Use Points for Various Cycles
US06 REP05
FHDS FUDS
Power Frequency for Each Cycle
Power Frequency for Each Cycle
US06 REP05
FHDS FUDS
Output Torque
Output Torque
Engine Speed
Engine Speed
Ideal BSFC Line Generation
•
Determine cumulative fuel throughput for
each cycle investigated
–
Interpolate BSFC from engine map for every
torque/speed combination for that given cycle
–
Integrate all BSFC’s from above step
–
Find the total time that engine is producing power
–
Mean effective BSFC = total BSFC/engine on time
Benefits of Flexible Engine Designs
Benefits of Flexible Engine Designs
Actual Transmission Case
Ideal BSFC
Ideal BSFC
vs
vs
. Power Level
. Power Level
Power
Power
BSFC (g/kW-hr)
Benefits of Flexible Engine Designs
Benefits of Flexible Engine Designs
Ideal Transmission Case
Ideal Transmission Case
•
Find ideal BSFC transmission line on engine
map used for a given cycle
–
Interpolate BSFC for every visited power level on
the BSFC vs. Power graph
–
Sum of all BSFC’s is cumulative fuel throughput
–
Mean effective BSFC = numerical average of total
fuel throughput during time steps when engine is
Potential Benefits of Ideal CVT Design
Potential Benefits of Ideal CVT Design
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
US06 REP05 FUDS FHDS
4*BSFCmin 2*BSFCmin
Incr
eas
e in M
ean BSFC Per
Cyc
le
Incr
eas
e in M
ean BSFC Per
Cyc
le
Optimum Injection Timing Method
Optimum Injection Timing Method
•
Using an optimization framework
–
Vary injection timing for every torque/speed
combination (over 200 map points, ~100 executions
per point)
–
Computationally prohibitive
•
Parallel computer framework
–
Run as many maps as you want at different
injection timings
Injection Timing Maps
Injection Timing Maps
Engine Speed
Engine Speed
Output Torque
Optimum Injection Timing Map
Optimum Injection Timing Map
Timing
Variable Compression Ratio Engine
Variable Compression Ratio Engine
•
Hypothetical investigation of novel engine
design
–
Find the ideal fuel consumption benefit
–
Apply ideal transmission techniques from previous
slides
•
Determine how BSFC can be optimized at
various power levels
–
First maximize power density to find engine’s
power upper bound
–
Allow engine controller to change parameters that
are not normally variable
Problem Formulation
Problem Formulation
•
For each power level :
–
50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500 kW
•
Minimize BSFC, subject to:
–
overall phi < 0.6
–
20% < percent premixed burn < 40%
–
peak cylinder pressure < 150 bar
•
Variables:
VCRE - Combined Map
VCRE - Combined Map
TO
RQ
UE
TO
RQ
UE
Ideal BSFC Line vs. Power Level
170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500Power (kW)
BS
FC (
g
/k
W
-hr)
vcre_bsfc base_bsfcHybrid Powertrain Investigations
Demands on Engine - CVT vs. 5-Speed
Demands on Motor - CVT vs. 5-Speed
Battery SOC - CVT vs. 5-Speed
Zero Delta SOC - CVT vs. 5-Speed
Additional Hybrid Clustering Scenarios
Additional Hybrid Clustering Scenarios
Power-Assist Battery Recharge 40 20 60