• No results found

UNSUNG HEROES: MILITARY FAMILIES AFTER TEN YEARS OF WAR

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "UNSUNG HEROES: MILITARY FAMILIES AFTER TEN YEARS OF WAR"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

UNSUNG  HEROES:    

MILITARY  FAMILIES  AFTER  TEN  YEARS  OF  WAR  

December  2011  

 

When  service  members  enlist,  their  families  enlist  with  them.    Through  two  of  the  longest  wars  in   American   history   military   families   have   braved   unique   challenges   with   the   same   strength   and   resilience   as   their   loved   ones   fighting   overseas.     A   small   minority—in   2009   there   were   just   over   three  million  military  spouses,  children  and  adult  dependents—they  have  shouldered  the  burdens   of   war   for   ten   years   with   courage   and   dignity.     And,   just   like   their   service   members,   they   have   earned  the  appreciation  and  support  of  their  fellow  Americans  as  they  deal  with  the  challenges  that   come  from  a  decade  of  war.  

IAVA’s  PRIMARY  RECOMMENDATIONS  

Iraq  and  Afghanistan  Veterans  of  America  is  dedicated  to  supporting  the  veterans  of  these  wars  and   their  families.  Some  of  IAVA’s  primary  recommendations  to  strengthen  military  families  include:    

• Make  licenses  and  certifications  more  portable  and  uniform  across  state  lines  to  improve  

military  spouse  employment.  

• Improve  access  to  affordable  and  high-­‐quality  childcare  services,  especially  for  military  

families  who  live  off  base  and  have  fewer  available  options.  

• Enforce  stricter  monitoring  of  lending  practices  to  prevent  predatory  and  abusive  lending  

by  loan  agencies  to  service  members  and  their  families.  

• Issue  a  nation-­‐wide  call  to  recruit  mental  health  professionals  and  improve  training  for  

mental  health  service  providers  to  better  understand  the  specific  needs  of  service  members   and  nuances  of  military  culture.  

• Make  graduation  requirements  more  uniform  across  states  so  that  military  children  are  

able  to  transfer  more  easily  during  frequent  moves  without  falling  behind.  

• Employ  advocacy  campaigns  to  raise  awareness  about  the  unique  challenges  facing  military  

families  and  what  the  general  public  can  do  to  help.    

       

(2)

THE  ECONOMIC  AND  EDUCATIONAL  IMPACT  OF  SERVICE  ON  FAMILIES  

On   top   of   the   normal   challenges   of   modern   life—mortgages,   childcare,   car   payments,   and   other   expenses—military  families  must  also  deal  with  multiple  moves  and  deployments  that  can  hinder   military  spouse  employment  and  educational  opportunities.    Moreover,  the  economic  downturn  has   been  difficult  for  all  Americans,  but  it  has  been  particularly  tough  for  military  families.  

Military  Spouse  Unemployment  

o Spousal  employment  is  one  of  the  most  important  issues  facing  military  families  

today.1  As  of  June  2011,  the  unemployment  rate  among  all  military  spouses,  

including  both  male  and  female  partners,  was  26  percent.2  

o Frequent  moves  are  a  big  challenge  for  military  spouses.  In  one  survey,  almost  one-­‐

fifth  of  military  spouses  said  that  difficulty  transferring  licensure  and  credentials  

was  an  obstacle  to  employment.3  

o Underemployment  is  also  a  significant  problem.  In  2010  RAND  found  that  about  20  

percent  of  military  wives  had  jobs  that  didn’t  match  their  level  of  education  and  

experience,  whereas  only  two  to  four  percent  of  civilian  wives  had  this  problem.4  

Moreover,  there  was  a  35  percent  gap  in  full-­‐time  employment  between  military  

wives  and  their  civilian  counterparts.5  

Spouses’  Educational  Challenges  

o Military  spouses  often  struggle  with  education.    The  cost  and  frequent  moves  make  

it  difficult  for  military  spouses  to  earn  a  degree.6    Military  spouses  tend  to  take  

longer  to  complete  a  degree  than  they  planned—in  fact,  over  30  percent  take  5  

years  or  more  to  complete  a  degree.7  

Children’s  Educational  Challenges  

o Frequent  moves  are  one  of  the  most  disruptive  features  of  military  children’s  

educational  experiences.  On  average,  military  children  transfer  between  six  and  

nine  times  during  their  years  in  the  education  system.8  

o The  cumulative  length  of  deployment  is  more  strongly  related  to  children’s  

achievement  problems  than  the  number  of  deployments.  Students  with  a  parent   deployed  longer  than  19  months  cumulatively  have  lower  test  scores  than  students   who  had  a  parent  deployed  less  than  19  months  or  did  not  have  a  parent  deploy  at   all.  The  increase  in  responsibilities  at  home  during  parents’  deployment  is  also  likely  

to  have  a  negative  impact  on  students’  academic  performance.  9  

o Efforts  have  been  made  to  improve  education  programs  for  military  children.    

However,  graduation  requirements  are  not  uniform  and  only  36  states  have  signed   the  Interstate  Compact  on  Educational  Opportunity  for  Military  Children  that  works  

to  unify  the  education  requirements.10  

(3)

o Childcare  is  a  critical  issue  for  military  families.    Childcare  availability  and  schedule   options  are  often  limited,  and  deployments  quickly  change  needs.    During  

deployments,  49  percent  of  military  family  members  indicated  that  childcare  was  

their  top  priority.11  

o Almost  one-­‐third  of  families  in  a  2006  study  indicated  they  would  likely  or  very  

likely  leave  military  service  due  to  childcare-­‐related  concerns.12  

Mortgages  and  Foreclosure  

o Military  families  have  been  hit  hard  by  the  foreclosure  crisis.  Foreclosures  in  

military  zip  codes  increased  32  percent  between  2008  and  2010.  More  than  20,000  

service  members  had  their  homes  foreclosed  on  in  2010.13  

Financial  Literacy  

o A  2010  study  found  that  around  27  percent  of  service  members  who  responded  had  

more  than  $10,000  in  credit  card  debt,  whereas  only  16  percent  of  civilians  had  

credit  card  debt  exceeding  that  amount.14The  study  also  found  that  more  than  one-­‐

third  of  military  families  surveyed  indicated  that  they  had  trouble  paying  monthly  

bills,  and  over  20  percent  reported  borrowing  outside  of  banks.15  

Predatory  Lending  

o Payday  lenders  and  other  lending  companies  prey  on  military  families’  financial  

vulnerability.  They  tend  to  locate  near  military  installations  –  there  is  a  much  

greater  density  of  payday  lenders  per  capita  near  military  bases  than  other  areas.16      

o Congress  has  worked  to  address  this  issue.  The  FY  2007  National  Defense  

Authorization  Act  made  it  illegal  to  exploit  military  families  by  targeting  interest   rates  that  were  reaching  as  high  as  780  percent  and  making  it  illegal  to  charge  rates  

exceeding  36  percent  APR,  which  is  still  quite  high.  17      The  Dodd-­‐Frank  Wall  Street  

Reform  and  Protection  Act  of  2010  included  additional  provisions  to  encourage   competition  with  payday  loans  by  providing  incentives  to  lenders  who  provide  

financial  literacy  and  educational  opportunities  to  borrowers.18  

   

(4)

THE  STRAINS  OF  THE  DEPLOYMENT  CYCLE  

Ten  years  of  war  have  resulted  in  an  increased  deployment  cycle,  more  injuries,  and  consequently   greater  stress  on  military  families.    Although  military  families  are  resilient,  they  face  increased  risks   of  mental  health  injuries,  divorce,  intimate  partner  violence  and  substance  abuse.  Deployment  and   military  life  can  have  a  negative  impact  on  the  lives  of  the  approximately  2  million  military  children,   including  mental  and  behavioral  health  issues,  maltreatment  and  education  setbacks.  

 

Invisible  Injuries  

o Some  service  members  suffer  both  visible  and  invisible  injuries  that  can  have  a  

devastating  impact  on  their  families.  Studies  found  that  between  20-­‐35  percent  of   OEF/OIF  service  members  could  be  suffering  from  Post-­‐Traumatic  Stress  Disorder  

(PTSD)  and/or  depression.19  

o A  large  study  of  military  spouses  found  that  36.6  percent  of  respondents  whose  

husbands  were  deployed  had  been  diagnosed  with  at  least  one  mental  health   disorder.    The  most  frequent  problems  reported  were  anxiety,  depression  and  

sleeping  difficulties.20      

o One  2009  study  found  that  up  to  one-­‐third  of  children  between  the  ages  of  five  and  

twelve  who  experienced  parental  deployment  had  a  high  likelihood  of  developing  

social  and  psychological  problems.21  

Divorce  

o Military  families  have  faced  an  increased  divorce  rate  since  the  wars  began.    The  

divorce  rate  among  service  members  overall  was  3.6  percent  in  2009,  an  increase  

from  2.6  percent  in  2001.22  Fortunately,  the  rate  stabilized  in  2010;  it  is  now  almost  

the  same  as  the  3.4  percent  national  divorce  rate  in  2009.23      

o Female  service  members,  however,  are  feeling  the  weight  of  this  problem.  Their  

divorce  rate  in  2010  was  7.7  percent,  compared  to  3  percent  for  male  service  

members.24  

Domestic  Violence  and  Child  Maltreatment  

o Domestic  violence  in  the  military  is  not  well  understood.    The  increased  likelihood  

of  domestic  violence  among  service  members  with  PTSD  and  service  members  with   longer  deployments  creates  urgency  to  better  understand  the  prevalence  of  this  

issue.25      

o One  study  of  domestic  violence  among  20,000  soldiers  found  that  the  rate  of  

moderate  husband-­‐to-­‐wife  violence  was  13.1  percent  among  service  members,  

(5)

o One  study  found  that  maltreatment  of  children  from  military  families  in  Texas   doubled  during  the  year  following  9/11,  whereas  rates  of  maltreatment  remained  

the  same  for  nonmilitary  children  in  the  same  period.27  

Substance  Abuse  

o Substance  abuse  is  a  growing  issue.    Department  of  Defense  survey  data  indicate  

about  20  percent  of  service  members  engaged  in  heavy  drinking  behavior  in  2008.28    

 

                                                                                                                       

1  Greentree,  Vivian,  Karen  Rudiscelli,  Shana  Johnson,  and  Leah  Dagher.2010  Military  Family  Lifestyle  Survey-­‐  Comprehensive  

Report:  Sharing  the  Pride  of  Service.  Washington,  DC:  Blue  Star  Families,  Inc.,  2010.  6.  Report.  

<http://bluestarfam.s3.amazonaws.com/42/af/8/569/2010surveyfindings.pdf>.  

2  Walker,  Tiffani.  "Military  Spouse  Employment  Program  Reaches  96  Partners!"  17  Oct  2011.  n.  pag.  Web.  25  Oct.  2011.  

<http://www.dodlive.mil/index.php/2011/10/military-­‐spouse-­‐employment-­‐program-­‐reaches-­‐96-­‐partners/>.   3  Greentree,  11  

4  Lim,  Nelson,  and  David  Schulker.  Measuring  Underemployment  Among  Military  Spouses.  Santa  Monica,  CA:  RAND,  2010.  40-­‐ 41.  Report.  <http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2010/RAND_MG918.pdf>.  

5  Ibid.  xv  

6  Office  of  the  Deputy  Under  Secretary  of  Defense,  Military  Community  &  Family  Policy.  United  States.  Department  of   Defense.  Report  on  Military  Spouse  Education  and  Employment.  Department  of  Defense,  2008.  3.  Report.  

<http://images.military.com/spouse/Report_to_Congress_on_Military_Spouse_Education_and_Employment_Jan_2008.pdf>.  

7  National  Military  Families  Association.  Education  &  the  Military  Spouse:  The  Long  Road  to  Success.  Alexandria,  VA:  National   Military  Families  Association,  2007.  18.  Report.    

<http://support.militaryfamily.org/site/DocServer/Spouse_Education_Report_FINAL.pdf?docID=10381>.  These  rates  represent  

information  about  a  random  sample  of  NMFA  scholarship  applicants.    

8  Department  of  Defense.  United  States.  Department  of  Defense.  Update  to  the  Report  on  Assistance  to  Local  Education  

Agencies  for  Defense  Dependents  Education.  Department  of  Defense,  2011.  4.  Report.  

<http://www.militaryk12partners.dodea.edu/docs/2011_Report2Congress.pdf>.  

9  Richardson,  Amy  et  al.  Effects  of  Soldiers’  Deployment  on  Children’s  Academic  Performance  and  Behavioral  Health.  Santa   Monica,  CA:  RAND,  2011.  xv-­‐xvii.  Report.  

<http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2011/RAND_MG1095.sum.pdf>.  

10  Department  of  Defense,  20  

11  Dastagir,  Alla.  On  the  Home  Front:  Early  Care  and  Education  a  Top  Priority  for  Military  Families.  Washington,  DC:  The  PEW   Center  of  the  States,  2011.  1-­‐2.  Report.  <http://www.preknow.org/documents/2011_MilitaryFamiliesSurvey.pdf>.  

The  survey  was  conducted  in  2010  by  the  Mellman  Group  and  Public  Opinion  Strategies.  

12  Gates,  Susan,  Gail  Zellman,  Joy  Moini,  and  Marika  Suttorp.  Examining  Child  Care  Need  Among  Military  Families.  Santa   Monica,  CA:  RAND,  2006.  xiv.  Technical  Report.  

<http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2006/RAND_TR279.pdf>.  

13  Zoroya,  Gregg.  "20,000  Military  Members,  Vets  Faced  Foreclosure  in  2010."  USA  Today  04  Feb  2011.  n.  pag.  Web.  17  Oct.   2011.  <http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/2011-­‐02-­‐04-­‐1Avetforeclosures04_ST_N.htm>.  

14  FINRA,  1   15  Ibid.  13  

16  Department  of  Defense.  United  States.  Department  of  Defense.  Report  On  Predatory  Lending  Practices  Directed  at  Members  

of  the  Armed  Forces  and  Their  Dependents.  Department  of  Defense,  2006.  4.  Report.  

<http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/report_to_congress_final.pdf>.A  2007  GAO  report,  Military  Personnel:  DOD’s  Predatory  

Lending  Report  Addressed  Mandated  Issues,  but  Support  Is  Limited  for  Some  Findings  and  Recommendations  

<http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d071148r.pdf>,  does  not  agree  that  these  findings  indicate  predatory  lenders  target  service   members  more  so  than  any  other  population.  

(6)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                17  Swift,  Earl.  "Red,  White,  and  Scammed."  Parade  11  Jul  2010.  n.  pag.  Web.  17  Oct.  2011.  

<http://www.parade.com/news/2010/07/11-­‐red-­‐white-­‐and-­‐scammed.html>.  

18  Kovach,  Andrea.  "Payday  Lenders  Beware:  Financial  Reform  Law  Promotes  Alternative  Small  Dollar  Loans."  Huffington  Post  28   Jul  2010.  n.  pag.  Web.  17  Oct.  2011.  <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrea-­‐kovach/payday-­‐lenders-­‐beware-­‐

fin_b_662745.html>.  

19  Tanielian,  Terri,  and  Lisa  Jaycox,  Eds.  Invisible  Wounds  of  War:  Psychological  and  Cognitive  Injuries,  Their  Consequences,  and  

Services  to  Assist  Recovery.  Santa  Monica,  CA:  RAND,  2008.  eBook.  

<http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2008/RAND_MG720.pdf>.  And  

Atkinson,  Michael,  Adam  Guetz,  and  Lawrence  Wein.  "A  Dynamic  Model  for  Post-­‐Traumatic  Stress  Disorder  Among  U.S.  Troops   in  Operation  Iraqi  Freedom."Management  Science.  55.9  (2009):  1454-­‐1468.  Web.  17  Oct.  2011.  <http://faculty-­‐

gsb.stanford.edu/wein/personal/documents/ptsd-­‐text-­‐ms_rev1.pdf>.  

20  Mansfield,  Alyssa  et  al.  “Deployment  and  the  Use  of  Mental  Health  Services  Among  U.S.  Army  Wives.”  The  New  England  

Journal  of  Medicine.  362.  (2010):  101-­‐109.  <http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0900177>  .    

21  Flake,  Eric,  Beth  Davis,  Patti  Johnson,  and  Laura  Middleton.  "The  Psychosocial  Effects  of  Deployment  on  Military   Children."  Journal  of  Developmental  &  Behavioral  Pediatrics.  30.4  (2009):  271-­‐278.  Web.  17  Oct.  2011.  

<http://journals.lww.com/jrnldbp/Abstract/2009/08000/The_Psychosocial_Effects_of_Deployment_on_Military.1.aspx>.  

22  Associated  Press.  "Military  Divorce  Edges  Up  Due  to  Stress."Military.com  28  Nov  2009.  n.  pag.  Web.  27  Oct.  2011.   <http://www.military.com/news/article/military-­‐divorce-­‐edges-­‐up-­‐due-­‐to-­‐stress.html>.  

23  Census  Bureau.  United  States.  U.S.  Census  Bureau.  2012  Statistical  Abstract:  The  National  Data  Book.  2011.  1339.  Web.  

<http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s1339.pdf>.  

24  "Military  Divorce  Edges  Up  Due  to  Stress."Military.com  28  Nov  2009.  n.  pag.  Web.  27  Oct.  2011.   <http://www.military.com/news/article/military-­‐divorce-­‐edges-­‐up-­‐due-­‐to-­‐stress.html>.  

25  Sherman,  M.D.,  F.  Sautter,  M.H.  Jackson,  J.A.  Lyons,  and  X.  Han.  "Domestic  Violence  in  Veterans  with  Posttraumatic  Stress   Disorder  Who  Seek  Couples  Therapy."Journal  of  Marital  Family  Therapy.  32.4  (2006):  479-­‐490.  Web.  17  Oct.  2011.  

<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17120520>.  And    

Marshall,  A.D.,  J.  Panuzio,  and  C.T.  Taft.  "Intimate  Partner  Violence  Among  Military  Veterans  and  Active  Duty   Servicemen."  Clinical  Psychology  Review.  25.7  (2005):  862-­‐876.  Web.  17  Oct.  

2011.<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16006025>.   26  Marshall,  862  

27  Rentz,  E.  Danielle  et  al.  "Effect  of  Deployment  on  the  Occurrence  of  Child  Maltreatment  in  Military  and  Nonmilitary  Families."  

American  Journal  of  Epidemiology.  165.10  (2007):  1199-­‐1206.  Web.  17  Oct.  2011.  

<http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/165/10/1199.full.pdf+html>.  Deployment  data  come  from  the  Department  of  Defense  

personnel  tempo  (PERSTEMPO)  through  the  Defense  Manpower  Data  Center.    Incidents  of  child  maltreatment  data  come  from   the  2000-­‐2003  National  Child  Abuse  and  Neglect  Data  System.    The  study  uses  data  strictly  from  Texas  because  the  state  had   the  best  available  data  for  military  status  and  a  large  military  population.  

28  Military  Health  System.  United  States.  Department  of  Defense.  Survey  of  Health  Related  Behaviors  Among  Active  Duty  

Military  Personnel:  2008  Survey  Summary  as  Q  &  A.  Department  of  Defense,  2009.  2-­‐3.  Web.  

<http://www.tricare.mil/2008SurveyQ&As.pdf>.    The  survey  defined  heavy  drinking  behavior  as  five  or  more  alcoholic  drinks  at  

References

Related documents

Tapscott (1998 and 2009) has argued that an entire generation of young people is different to previous generational cohorts because of their experience of networked and

1.. devices in order to suit his purpose. To answer the most serious objection that Brahrni was written from left to right whereas Semitic ran from right to left,

Edelstein (2004) explains that although Americans acknowledge that there are environmental problems, they do not see the immediate threat of environmental issues, as their daily

The West Virginia yellow beefsteak heirloom tomato ‘Kellogg’s Breakfast ’ and the bicolor heritage variety ‘Hillbilly’ were also selected for evaluation in addition to traditional

The OSCEs were positively evaluated by students and tutors, who valued that the BPGs provided an integrated approach with real-life scenarios with a strong cultural

On the basis of these considerations, the new common definition of the SIDS–SIUDS complex is “The sudden death of a fetus after the 25th gestational week or infant under one year

The first type is to remain a non-signatory (non-participation) and the second type of is to violate the spirit of an IEA (non-compliance). The reason is that nobody can be

We evaluate the optimization based approaches, namely the Lasso (Lasso in the results), the original SBL algorithm (Tipping 2001, SBL), the Wipf and Nagarajan (2008) SBL algorithm (ℓ