IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY. Cause No.

Faucet: ADA compliant, chrome plated brass, 4” center set single handle faucet with grid drain waste assembly, adjustable temperature limit stop and 0.5 GPM aerator; equal to

To protect consumers by requiring reasonable security policies and procedures to protect data containing personal information, and to provide for na- tionwide notice in the event of

¶5 While discussing jury instructions, defense counsel asked the trial court for an instruction that would inform the jury that in order to prove aggravated DUI based on a

¶7 Officer Montgomery answered the telephone when attorney Paul Banales returned Urias’s call. Montgomery took Urias out of a holding cell, seated him at the table in

at 426, 429, 573 P.2d at 500, 503 (administrative officer, not superior court, weighs evidence; substantial evidence exists when there is any evidence to support

Pima County Attorney – Criminal Division (if state case) Arizona Attorney General – Criminal Section (if federal case)... Pima County Superior Court Clerk

¶5 In May 2008, Whipple again filed applications for writs of garnishment to collect the first amended judgment from earnings owed to Nichols. After a hearing, the trial court

section 12-1191(A) (1994), litigants “may file in the office of the recorder of the county in which the property is situated” a statutory notice of lis pendens in actions “affecting