• No results found

k-Product Graph Labeling

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "k-Product Graph Labeling"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics

http://www.ijmr.net.in email id- [email protected] Page 240

Asif Navas KR,Research Scholar, kannur University, kannur- 670 567,

kerala, india

Dr Ajitha V,Department of Mathematics, M. G. College ,Iritty-670703,

Kerala, India

Abstract

A (p, q) graph is said to admit k-Product labeling if its vertex can be labeled by positive integers such that the induced edge labels obtained by the absolute difference of the labels of end vertices are the first k-Product numbers. A graph G which admit k-k-Product labeling is called k-k-Product graph. In this paper, we prove path admits k-Product labeling and combs, stars, bistars, coconut trees admit 2-Product labeling and also cycle is not 2-Product when n is not congruent to 0 mod 4. Also admits 2-Product labeling iff the set of all first n 2-Product numbers is a zero sum set.

Keywords k-Product labeling, 2-Product labeling, zero sum set.

Introduction

All graphs in this paper are finite, simple and undirected. The vertex set and edge set of graph G are denoted by V(G) and E(G) respectively. For various graph theoretic notations and terminology we follow Harry [1] and for number theory we follow Burton [2]. A graph labeling is an assignment of integers to the vertices or edges or both subject to certain conditions. A dynamic survey on graph labeling is regularly updated by Gallian [3] and it is published by Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. Vast amount of literature is available on different types of graph labeling and more than 1000 research papers have been published so far in last four decades.

Definition 1.1

A k-Product number is a number obtained by multiplying k-consecutive natural numbers (starting from 2) less than or equal to a given positive integer n. If the k-Product number is denoted by

( ) ( )( ) ( )

The 2-Product numbers are 6, 12, 20, 30, 42, 56, 72, 90, 110...

Definition 1.2

A k-Product labeling of a graph G is a one-one function ( ) that induces a bijection

( ) * ( ) ( ) ( )+ of the edges defined by ( ) ( ) ( ) E(G). The graph which admit such labeling is called a k-Product graph.

Definition 1.3

A finite subset of positive integers is said to be zero sum set if there exist a linear combination,

(2)

Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics

http://www.ijmr.net.in email id- [email protected] Page 241

Definition 1.4

A 2-Product number is a number obtained by multiplying 2-consecutive natural numbers (starting from 2) less than or equal to a given positive integer n. If the 2-Product number is denoted by

( ) ( )( )

The 2-Product numbers are 6, 12, 20, 30, 42, 56, 72, 90, 110...

Definition 1.5

The sum of k-Product numbers is denoted by ( ),

( ) ∑

Main Results

Here we prove that combs, stars, bistars, coconut trees admits 2-Product graph labeling. Also, cycle is not 2-Product graph if is not congruent to ( ). And admits 2-Product labeling iff the set of all first 2-Product numbers is a zero sum set.

Theorem 2.1

The path admits k-Product labeling.

Proof:

Let : be the path and let (1 ) be the edges.

for defined

( ) ( )( ) ( )

We will show that the induced edge labels obtained by the absolute difference of end vertices are the first ( ) k-Product numbers.

For ,

( ) ( ) | ( )( ) ( )

( )( ) ( )( )

|

|( )( ) ( ), (

|

( )( ) ( )

( )

( )

(3)

Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics

http://www.ijmr.net.in email id- [email protected] Page 242

Example 2.2

The 2-product labeling of is shown below.

Figure 1

Theorem 2.3

The comb admits 2-Product labeling.

Proof:

Let be the path and let ( ) be the edges. Let be the pendant vertices adjacent to respectively and

( ) be the edges.

for define

( ) ( )( )

( ) ( )

Then,

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

Thus the induced edge labels are the first ( ) 2-Product numbers. Hence comb admits 2-Product labeling.

Example 2.4

The 2-Product labeling of is shown below.

(4)

Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics

http://www.ijmr.net.in email id- [email protected] Page 243

Theorem 2.5

The star graph admits 2-Product labeling.

Proof:

Let be the apex vertex and let be the pendant vertices of the star .

Define,

( )

( ) ( )( )

We see that induced edge labels are the first 2-Product numbers. Hence star graph admits 2-Product labeling.

Example 2.6

The 2-Product labeling of . is shown below.

Figure 3

Theorem 2.7

The bistar admits 2-Product labeling.

Proof:

Let, V( ) * + ,

( ) * +

Define f by,

( ) ( )

( ) ( )( )

(5)

Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics

http://www.ijmr.net.in email id- [email protected] Page 244 we see that induced edge labels are the first 2-Product numbers.

Hence bistar admits 2-Product labeling.

Example: 2.8

The 2-Product labeling of is shown below.

Figure: 4

Theorem: 2.9

Coconut tree admits 2-Product labeling.

Proof:

Let be the vertices of a path and be the pendant vertices, being adjcent to

Define f by,

( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )( )

we see that induced edge labels are the first -Product numbers. Hence Coconut tree admits 2-Product labeling.

Example: 2.10

(6)

Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics

http://www.ijmr.net.in email id- [email protected] Page 245

Figure: 5

Result: 2.11

The sum of 2-Product numbers is denoted by ( ),

( ) ( )( ) .

Theorem: 2.12

If be a zero sum set then is an even number, where ∑

Proof:

Suppose * + be a zero sum set.

Then a linear combination, ∑ , where * +

Let be the elements in for which Then,

( )

( )

(7)

Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics

http://www.ijmr.net.in email id- [email protected] Page 246 Thus, is an even number.

Theorem: 2.13

An cycle admits 2-Product labeling iff * ( ) ( ) ( )} is a zero sum set.

Proof:

Suppose admits 2-Product labeling. Let : be the cycle. Let ( ) for

Then, we have,

( ) ( )

. . .

| ( )

Where, ( ) * ( ) ( ) ( )} Above equations can be written as

( ) (1)

( ) (2) .

. .

( ) ( ) Adding ( ) ( ) ( ) , we get

( )

Which implies, ∑

Thus { ( ) ( ) ( )} is a zero sum set.

Conversly, suppose { ( ) ( ) ( )} is a zero sum set. We have to prove -cycle admits 2-Product labeling.

Since, ∑ for * +

Thus , we have,

(8)

Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics

http://www.ijmr.net.in email id- [email protected] Page 247 Where , { ( ) ( ) ( )}

Now, we define ,

( )

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

we see that induced edge labels are the first 2-Product numbers. Thus is 2-Product graph.

Lemma: 2.14

( ) is an odd number when is not congruent to ( )

Proof:

We have,

( )

( )( )

For

( )

( ),( )( )

(( )( )( ) ( ) )

(( )( )( ) )

Now,

( )( )( ) ( )( )( ) ( )

( ) By division algorithm , is one the form ,

If

( ) ( )

, -

, -

Thus, ( )

Similarly, if , then ( ). Thus,

( )( )( ) ( )

Thus, ( ) is an odd number when

(9)

Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics

http://www.ijmr.net.in email id- [email protected] Page 248

( )

(( )( )( ) ( ) )

(( )( )( ) ( ) )

It can be easily verify that ( )( )( ) ( ) ( ).

For

( ) ( ),( )( )

(( )( )( ) ( ) )

(( )( )( ) ( ) )

It can be easily verify that ( )( )( ) ( ) ( ).

Thus, ( )

is an odd number when is not congruent to ( ).

Theorem: 2.15

A cycle doesn't admits 2-Product when is not congruent to ( ).

Proof:

For each , ( ) ( )( ) is an even number.

By Lemma 2.14 , ( )

is an odd number when is not congruent to ( ). Thus

{ ( ) ( ) ( )} is not a zero sum set when is not congruent to ( ) Then by Theorem 2.13,

doesn't admits 2-Product labeling for when is not congruent to ( )

Concluding Remarks

In this paper, we introduce a new concept of k-Product graph labelling, we proved 2-Product graph labelling of standard graphs and introduced zero sum set and its application in labelling of graphs. To investigate analogues result for different graphs and extend the labelling further towards a

generalization is an open area of research.

References

[1] F. Harary Graph Theory, Addition-Wesley, Reading, Mass, 1972.

(10)

Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Aryabhatta Journal of Mathematics and Informatics

http://www.ijmr.net.in email id- [email protected] Page 249

[3] J.A. Gallian, A dynamic survey of graph labelling, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 17 (2010), DS6.

[4] S. Murugesan, D. Jayaraman, J. Shiama Some Higher Order Triangular Sum Labeling of Graphs,International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 - 8887) Volume 72 - No. 10, June 2013.

[5] S. Murugesan,D. Jayaraman,J. Shiama Tetrahedral and Pentatopic Sum Labeling of Graphs, International Journal of Applied Information Systems (IJAIS) ISSN : 2249- 0868 Foundation of Computer Science FCS, New York, USA Volume 5 - No. 6, April 2013 - www.ijais.org.

References

Related documents

Reversion rates of lacZ QP WT, dna E486 and dna B107 leading strand mutational reporter after treatment with 5-azacytidine.. Data show reversion rates per 10 8 cells from

genome fingerprints facilitate comparison of data across different reference sequence versions by 352. encoding consecutive SNV pairs, genotype fingerprints achieve

defined we inext nvestigate how to define the relaxed security properties for the ledger protocol when nodes are running in the snapshot mode to snapshot persistence and

Figure 1 shows the differential cross section corrected for the detector resolutions, compared to the fixed-order calculation and the resummation calculation with three

IAPM and the related mode OCB are single-pass highly parallelizable authenticated-encryption modes, and while they were originally proven secure in the private random permutation

49 Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973 50 Langston University, Langston, Oklahoma 73050 51 University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019.. 52 Brown

per capita utility from aggregate hhld expend., in region r Equivalent Variation, $ US million Equivalent variation for the world Change in trade balance ∆X – M, $ US million Change

Furthermore, we cannot assume that the data acquisition is started early enough to allow for the reconstruction of the first energy deposition in the case of undetected