• No results found

Computing Declarative Prosodic Morphology

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Computing Declarative Prosodic Morphology"

Copied!
10
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)

Figure

Figure 3: MicroCUF vs Prolog and HPSG notation

References

Related documents

Using an uncumbersome, wearable computer to read small, inexpensive, and unpowered RFID tags inconspicuously placed around Ann Arbor, a blind person using this

The MID in the HHS pain function, physical function, deformity, and total scores (range from 2.28 to 11.26) are generally higher than those of the SF-36 subscales (range from 12.37

4) At 4- and 12-month follow-up, changes in the sec- ondary outcomes VAS pain, global disease activity, gen- eric and disease specific functioning and disability (measured by

Methods: We reviewed 17 patients with severe SJT of 3 different types who underwent posterior open-window focal debridement and bone graft for joint fusion.. Among them,five

Exclusion criteria were: (1) MRI defi- ciency or multiple segments of lumbar disc herniation and (2) diagnosis of lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar vertebral fracture,

As the result of the current study showing that distance on longitudinal axis between the weighted center and the geometric center of the nucleus pulposus in Pfirrmann Grade II

The lack of good quality studies, variation in defin- ition of success and limited follow-up of patients means the success rate of clubfoot treatment using the Ponseti method

reported a subluxa- tion/reluxation rate of 13% (six of 45 operated knees) in an average follow-up examination period of 13.5 years, where 14 patients and 15 Roux-Elmslie-Trillat