• No results found

Special Multiplicative Operators for the Solution of ODE – Invariants and Representations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Special Multiplicative Operators for the Solution of ODE – Invariants and Representations"

Copied!
18
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Special Multiplicative Operators for the Solution of ODE –

Invariants and Representations

Zenonas Navickas

1

, Tadas Telksnys

2

, Minvydas Ragulskis

2,*

1Department of Applied Mathematics, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.

2Research Group for Mathematical and Numerical Analysis of Dynamical Systems, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Received 12 July 2014; received in revised form 05 August 2014; accepted 10 September 2014

Abstract

The generalized multiplicative operator of differentiation is introduced in this paper. It is shown that the

generalized multiplicative operator can be expressed as a product of two noncommutative but multiplicative

exponential operators, though the generalized multiplicative operator is not an exponential operator itself. The

generalized multiplicative operator is effectively exploited for the construction of solutions to nonlinear ordinary

differential equations through formal transformations of invariants and representations of initial conditions. The

concept of the generalized multiplicative operator provides the insight into the algebraic structure of solutions to

nonlinear ordinary differential equations which cannot be identified using conventional exponential operators.

Keywords: ordinary differential equation, multiplicative operator, invariant

1.

Introduction

The construction of analytic solutions to nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODE) is an important research topic.

Numerous techniques have been developed for that purpose during the last decades. An explicit algorithm based on the Laurent

series for the construction of meromorphic solutions of autonomous nonlinear ODE is presented in [1]. The frequency domain

approach is used to prove the existence of a unique bounded, exponentially stable solution to some third order nonlinear

differential equations [2]. Existence and boundary behavior for singular nonlinear ODE is investigated in [3]. WTC-Kruskal

algorithm is developed in [4] in order to study the Painleve property of nonlinear ODE. Differential transform method has been

successfully exploited for solving nonlinear ODE and their systems [5, 6]. The Adomian decomposition method is used to

construct the solution in a form of an infinite series where the components are usually determined recurrently [7].

Semi-analytical Chebyshev collocation method is used to solve high-order nonlinear ODE in [8]. We list only a small fraction of

different techniques and semi-analytical algorithms for the construction of exact solutions to ODE.

The application of algebraic techniques for the construction of analytic solutions to ODE is a classical field of research [9,

10]. An overview on developments of algebraic theory approach to ODE is given in [11]. The application of algebraic theory to

the numerical treatment of ODE is studied in [12]. The differential operator is one of the key concepts in the algebraic theory of

differential equations [13]. The exponential differential operator is especially useful for these purposes [14, 15].

*Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected]

(2)

It is well known that the concept of the invariant plays an important role in mathematics in general [16]. In particular,

special invariants of ODE have been recently formulated in the context of geometrical analysis of differential equations [17, 18].

The main objective of this paper is to introduce the concept of the generalized multiplicative operator of differentiation and to

demonstrate its applicability in solving practical problems. Moreover, we will demonstrate the relationship among the

generalized multiplicative operator of differentiation and invariants of differential equations what will help to develop special

techniques for the construction of analytic solutions to nonlinear ODE problems.

This paper is organized as follows. Symbols and notations are listed in section 2; the generalized multiplicative operator

is introduced in section 3; the expression of the solution in the operator form is derived in section 4; a number of examples are

given in section 5 and concluding remarks are given in the last section.

2.

Symbols and notations

The following notations will be used throughout the manuscript (appropriate definitions will be given later):

n – the order of the explicit ordinary differential equation; y – the dependent variable;

1 1 0,s, ,sn

s  – Cauchy parameters (initial conditions);

 – the canonical variable (the center of the series expansion of the solution); x – the free variable;

,s0,s1, ,sn1

p  – an R-valued function of  and Cauchy parameters;

x, ,s0,s1, ,sn1

f   – an R-valued function of x,  and Cauchy parameters;

1 1 0, , ,

, 

n

s s s

 – the set of functions p

,s0,s1,,sn1

;

1 1 0, , ,

,

,

n

s s s

x  – the set of functions f

x,,s0,s1,,sn1

;

s, t – Cauchy parameters for n2 (i.e. s:s0; t:s1); x

D , D,

0

s

D , …, Dsn1– ordinary differential operators in respect of variables x, , s0, …, sn1; y

D – the generalized differential operator;

M,M0 – multiplicative operators;

G – the generalized multiplicative operator;

,s0,s1, ,sn1

v  – the invariant associated with Dy;

3.

The generalized multiplicative operator

3.1 Existing designs (or original designs)

(3)

R

      

1 0

:

n

s s

j

p  ; where R

1 0, ,

, ssn

 are variation intervals (or unions of intervals) of variables

R

1 0

,

,

,

s

s

n

. These functions are differentiable any number times in respect of every variable. It can be noted that the identification of variation intervals (or unions of intervals) is a straightforward task whenever the expression of

, 0, , n1

j s s

p   is given explicitly. For example, the function

0 0

4 1 1

1 ,

s s

p

  

 

(1)

is defined and differentiable any number of times in respect of  and s0 when 

;0

 

 0;

and 

      

4 1 ;

0

s (the

principal square root is considered in Eq. (1)). The analysis of functions of the first type is not the objective of this paper, but we

will consider only such functions pjpj

,s0,,sn1

that intervals ,s0,,sn1 exist and are not empty sets. The set of functions of the first type is denoted as

1 1 0, , ,

, 

n

s s s

 .

Functions of the second type are constructed from functions of the first type using the following algorithm.

(i) Construct the power series:



 

0

1 0

1 0

0

,

,

,

!

,

,

,

,

j

n j

j

n

p

s

s

j

x

s

s

x

f

(2)

(ii) Extend the function f0

x,,s0,,sn1

to a wider domain (if it is possible) using classical extension techniques. The

extended function f

x,,s0,,sn1

is denoted as the second type function. For example, the series



 

 

   

  

  

     

   

    

  

  

0 0

0 0

0 0

4 1 1 4

1 1

1 !

! ,

,

j

j

j

j j

s x s

j j x s

x f

 

can be extended to a function

x s

s s

x f

  

  

0 0 0

4 1 1

4 1 1 ,

,

  

for s0

;0

and 

1 14s0

x. From now on we will use the equality

s

x

s

s j

j x

j

j j

  

        

   

    

  

 



 0

0

0 0 1 1 4

4 1 1

4 1 1

1 !

! 

 

assuming that the transformation into the extended function does not cause any misunderstandings and will not specify the domain of x,  and s0.

Other forms of the second type functions can be used. Typical cases (structures of f0) are listed below:



  

0

1 0

1 0

0 , , ,

! ,

, , ,

j

n j

j

n p s s

j x s

s x

(4)



 

0

1 0

1 0

0 , , ,

! ,

, ,

j

n j

j

n p s s

j s

s

f      .

It can be noted that it is not necessary to introduce the function norm (neither for the first type functions nor for the second

type functions) in the process of the construction of analytic solutions of nonlinear ordinary differential equations.

The set of extended functions is denoted as

1 0, ,

,

, 

n

s s

x  (,s0,,sn1x,,s0,,sn1).

3.2 The generalized operator of differentiation Let us consider an explicit ODE:

    

  

 , , , , n11 n n

n n

dx y d dx dy y x P dx

y d

 ; (3)

with initial conditions

k x k

n k

s dx

s s x y

d

 

, 0, , 1

, 

;k0,1,,n1; (4)

where yy

x,,s0,,sn1

is the solution to the initial value problem (Eq. (3, 4)); nN is the fixed order of the differential

equation; PnPn

,s0,,sn1

is a function of the first type. Then, the generalized operator of differentiation Dy associated with Eq. (1) reads [19]:

1

2 1

0 2 1 0 1

1 , , ,

:    

n n n n s

s n s

s

y D sD s D s D P s s D

D    (5)

This paper is organized as follows. Symbols and notations are enlisted in section 2; the generalized multiplicative

operator is introduced in section 3; the expression of the solution in the operator form is derived in section 4; a number of

examples are given in section 5 and concluding remarks are given in the last section.

Conventional properties of differentiation hold for Dy. Several properties are listed below:

(i) Dy

c1f1c2f2

c1Dyf1c2Dyf2; where

c

1

,

c

2

R

;

f

1

,

f

2

x,,s0,,sn1.

(ii) Dy

f1f2

Dyf1

f2f1

Dyf2

.

(iii)

 

 

 

2 2

2 1 2 1 2 1

f Df f f Df f f

Dy   .

(iv)

  

        

m j

j m y j y m

y D f D f

j m f

f D

0

2 1

2

1 ; where

   

 

 

     

; , ! !

! ; , 0

m j j m j

m m j

j m

 , 2 , 1 , 0 ,m

j .

(v) Let f

 

z be a function differentiable any number of times in respect of the variable z. If

x, ,s0, ,sn1

:f

f1

x, ,s0, ,sn1

F     then

 

, , , , 1

, , 0, , 1

1 0

1 

 

y n

s s x f z z

yF D f z D f x s s

D

n

 

 .

(5)

Proof.

Without the loss of generality we will prove Property (ii) for n2. Let us assume that the generalized operator of differentiation reads DyP

 

s,t DsQ

 

s,t Dt and functions PP

 

s,t ; QQ

 

s,t ; f1f1

 

s,t ; f2 f2

 

s,t are

differentiable in respect of variables s and t any number of times. Then,

 



1 2 1 2

1

2

1

2

1

2 1

2

.

2 1 2 1 2

1 2 1 2

1 2

1

f D f f f D f D Q f f D P f f f D Q f f D P

f D f f f D Q f D f f f D P f f QD PD f

f D

y y

t s

t s

t t

s s

t s y

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

End of proof.

Other properties can be proved analogously.

3.3 The multiplicative operator y

D can be exploited to construct the multiplicative operator M:



0 !

: j

j y j

D j x

M . (6)

The operator M satisfies following equalities [19, 20]:

(i) M

a1f1a2f2

a1Mf1a2Mf2; a1,a2R;

1 0, ,

, 2

1,f  s sn

f .

(ii) Mm

x

m; mZ0.

(iii) Mf1

,s0,,sn1

f1

x,Ms0,,Msn1

.

(iv)

1 0

2

1 0

1 1 0

2

1 0

1

, , ,

, , , ,

, ,

, , ,

 

 

  

n n n

n

Ms Ms

x f

Ms Ms

x f s s f

s s f M

  

  

.

Without the loss of generality we will prove the equality Mf1

 

s,tf1

Ms,Mt

when DyP

 

s,t DsQ

 

s,t Dt. Proof.

Let y1:Msy1

x,s,t

; y2:Mty2

x,s,t

; z:Mf1

  

s,tz x,s,t

and w: f1

Ms,Mt

f1

y1

x,s,t

 

,y2 x,s,t

.

Then,

 

 

 

 

 

 

,

 

, .

, ,

! ,

! 1 ,

! ,

1 1

1 0

1 1

1 1 0

1 1

t s Mf QD t s Mf PD

t s Mf D t s f D j x D t s f D j x t

s f D j x x t s Mf D

t s

y j

j y j

y j

j y j

j

j y j

x

 

 

 

     

   



 

  

The last equality yields the following differential equation with partial derivatives:

0

        

t z Q s z P x z

; (7)

(6)

0 1 1 1         t y Q s y P x y

; y1

0,s,t

s; (8)

and 0 2 2 2         t y Q s y P x y

; y2

0,s,t

t. (9)

Now, it can be observed that:

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

    . , , , , , , , 2 , , , , 1 1 , , , , 1 2 , , , , 1 1 , , , , 1 2 2 , , , , 1 1 1 , , , , 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 t w Q s w P t y v v u f t y u v u f Q s y v v u f s y u v u f P t y Q s y P v v u f t y Q s y P u v u f x y y f w D t s x y v t s x y u t s x y v t s x y u t s x y v t s x y u t s x y v t s x y u t s x y v t s x y u t s x y v t s x y u x                                                                                         

The last relationship yields the equality:

0          t w Q s w P x w

; w

0,s,t

f

y1

0,s,t

 

,y2 0,s,t

  

f s,t . (10) Therefore, finally:

x st

 

wx st

z , ,  , , .

End of proof.

Other equalities can be proved analogously.

It is worth noting that the multiplicative operator defined by Eq. (6) can be considered as the exponential operator:

 

xDy

Mexp . (11)

Now, let us introduce the operator:

 

    0 0 ! : j j x j j D

M

. (12)

Note, that

 

n

n r r n r n x x n r x

M   

     

  0

0 ; n0,1,2,.

Moreover,

0 1

 

0 1

0f x, ,s , ,sn  f x , ,s , ,sn

M

.

(7)

3.4 The generalized operator of differentiation

We introduce the generalized multiplicative operator:



 

0 !

: j

j y j

D j x

G. (13)

The following properties hold true:

(i) G

a1f1a2f2

a1Gf1a2Gf2; a1,a2R;

1 0, ,

, 2

1,f  s sn

f .

(ii) Gmxm; mZ0.

(iii) Gf1

,s0,,sn1

f1

x,Gs0,,Gsn1

.

(iv)

1 0

2

1 0

1 1 0

2

1 0

1

, , ,

, , , ,

, ,

, , ,

 

n n n

n

Gs Gs x f

Gs Gs x f s s f

s s f G

  

 

.

(v) Let Mskgk

x,,s0,,sn1

. Then Gskgk

x,,s0,,sn1

; k0,1,,n1.

We will prove the third equality (other equalities can be proved analogously).

Proof.

The second property of the multiplicative operator yields:

 

  

  



 

 

0

1 0

0 1

1 0

1

! , , ! , ,

, ,

j

n j y j j

j y j

n D s

j x s

D j x x

f s s

Mf     .

The replacement of the variable x by the expression x (what is possible) yields:

 

    

 

  



 

 

0

1 0

0 1

0

1 0

1

! ,

, !

, ,

, , !

j

n j y j j

j y j j

n j

y j

s D j x s

D j x x

f s s f D j

x

,

what concludes the proof.

End of proof.

Definitions and properties of operators M, M0 and G (Eq. (11, 12, 13)) yield the following equality.

Corollary 1.

M M

G0.

Thus, the generalized multiplicative operator G is a product of two noncommutative but multiplicative and exponential

operators. But the operator G is not an exponential operator. It is worth noting that exponential operators are widely used in

geometric-operator calculus [17, 21, 22]. We will demonstrate that the generalized multiplicative operator G can be effectively

(8)

4.

The expression of the solution to ODE in the operator form

Theorem 1.

The solution to the initial ODE problem Eq. (3, 4) can be expressed in the following form [19]:

yGs0.

Without the loss of generality we will prove that the solution to the differential equation

   

  

dx dy y x P dx

y d

, ,

2 2 2

; yy

x,,s,t

; y

,,s,t

s;

t dx

t s x dy

x



, , ,

(14)

reads:

D tD P

st

D

s j

x t

s x y

j

j t s

j



  

0

2 , ,

! ,

,

,  . (15)

Proof.

It is clear that DyD tDsP2

,s,t

Dt. The operator Dy satisfies all properties of the generalized operator of differentiation. Now, let

D s Ms

j x t s x z

j

j y j

 



0 !

, ,

, . Then,

Mt s MD Ms D Ms D dx

t s x dz

y y

x   

, , ,

.

Analogously,

 

  

    

 

 

dx t s x dz t s x z x P Mt Ms M P t s MP t MD Mt D Mt D dx

t s x z d

y y

x

, , , , , , , , ,

, ,

, ,

, ,

2 2

2 2

2

  

 

.

Thus,

 

  

 

dx t s x

dz t s x

z x P dx

t s x

z

d , , ,

, , , , , ,

, ,

2 2

2

  

.

Therefore,

x s t

Gs y

x s t

z ,, ,   ,, , and y

,,s,t

s;

t dx

t s x dy

x



, , ,

.

End of proof.

Eq. (15) can be considered as the generalization of the Picard formula [23] describing the solution of an ordinary

differential equation in a power series form.

(9)

k k

n k

Gs dx

s s x y d

1 0, ,

,

, 

. (16)

Proof.

It is clear that Dkys0 sk for k0,1,,n1. Then,

. !

! !

! ,

, , ,

0

0

0 0

0

0 1

0

k j

k j y j

j

k j y j k

j

j y k j j

j y j k

x k

n k

Gs s D j x

s D j x s

D k j x s

D j x D dx

s s x y d

 

 

 

  

 



 

 

 

 

 

End of Proof.

Properties of multiplicative operators M and G yield the fact that the solution to the ODE initial value problem (Eq. (3, 4))

does satisfy the equality:

, , ,

 

, , , ,

0.

, , , , ,

, , , ,

, , , ,

, , ,

1 1 0 1

0

2 1 0 1

0

1 0 1

1 0 1

0

 

  

 

    

   

   

 

  

  

 

n n n

n

n n n

n n

n

s s s x y s s P

s s s x y s s

s s x y s s s x y x

s s x y

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

For example, the solution to the initial value problem y x dx dy

; y

,,s

s takes the form

xs

 x

s

 

x

y , , 1 1exp . But the function y

x,,s

 

s1

   

exp xx1

 

:z x,,s

with the initial condition z

0,,s

s satisfies the following differential equation:

   

0 , , ,

, ,

,

        

s s x z s s x z x

s x

z

  

.

4.1 Invariants of the generalized operator of differentiation and their properties

Definition 1. A function vv

x,,s0,,sn1

; vx,,s0,,sn1 is an invariant of Dy if

0

v

Dy . (17)

The set of invariants is denoted as

vDyv0

:Ker Dy. Properties of invariants of Dy are listed below.

(i) Let v1,v2Ker Dy and

c

1

,

c

2

C. Then Dy

v v v v v c v

c ; ; Ker

2 1 2 1 2 2 1

1   . The proof follows from properties of Dy. (ii) Let  

z1,z2,,zm

be a function of variables z1,z2,,zm and v1,v2,,vmKer Dy .

Then, 

v1,v2,,vm

Ker Dy. Proof.

, ,

, ,

0

1 1

1   

 

y k

v z m

k k

m m

y D v

dz z z d v

v D

k k

 

(10)

End of proof.

(iii) Let vKer Dy and

1 0, ,

,

, 

 

n

s s x

f . Then, Dy

 

vfv

 

Dyf ; M

   

vfvMf ; G

   

vfvGf . Proof.

 

vf

 

D

v

f

v

D

f

v

 

D

f

D

y

y

y

y . Other equalities can be proved analogously.

End of proof. (iv) Let

1 0, ,

,

, 

 

n

s s x

f   . Then the operator

j y j

j

D j

G

 



0 0

! :

~

0

 

; 0R (18)

yields the invariant G~ f Ker Dy

0 

 .

Proof.

0 !

!

! !

1

! !

! !

~

0

1 0

0

1 0

0

1 0

1

1 0 0

1 0

0

0

0

0 0

0

 

 

 

 

 

    

  

   

     

  

    

    

 

     

  

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

j

j y j j

j y j

j

j y j j

j y j

j

j y j

j y j y

j

j y j y

j

j y j y

y

f D j

f D j

f D j

f D j

f D j

f D j

D

f D j

D f

D j

D f G D

End of proof.

Corollary 3. The replacement of a real complex number 0 in the expression of

0

~

G by a symbol x yields the equality

G

G

~

x

; (19)

moreover, GfKer Dy for

1 0, ,

,

, 

 

n

s s x

f .

Proof.

G D j x D

j x D

j x G

j

j y j j

j y j j

j y j

x

       



 

 

0 ! 0 ! 0 !

~   

. Thus, G~xfGfKer Dy for

1 0, ,

,

, 

 

n

s s x

f .

End of proof.

Note that the variable x is regarded as a constant in respect of the operator Dy.

(11)

Eq. (13), Eq. (18) and Eq. (19) yield the equality Dyy0; therefore

y

D

y

Ker

. (20)

Corollary 5. Let

1 0, ,

, , 2

1,f x s sn

f . Then Gf1Gf2 if and only if f1f2. Proof.

If f1f2 then Gf1Gf2.

Now, let us assume that Gf1Gf2 . Then

0 !

0

2 1 2

1  

  



j

j y j

f f D j x f

f

G  what requires that

f1f2

0

Dyj holds for all j0,1,2,. But Dy0

f1f2

f1f2 what concludes the proof.

End of proof.

Corollary 6. Let f

x,,s0,,sn1

Ker Dy. The replacement of the symbol x by the symbol  produces a function

, ,s0, ,sn1

f    . Then, the following equality holds true:

, ,s0, ,sn1

 

f x, ,s0, ,sn1

Gf     . (21)

Proof.

The function f can be expressed in the form



 

0 1 0

! ,

, , ,

j j j n

j x v s

s x

f   since f

x,,s0,,sn1

Ker Dy, where

y

j D

v Ker . But then



 

0 1 0

! ,

, , ,

j j j n

j v s

s

f     what immediately yields Eq. (21).

End of proof.

Let y

x,,s,t

be the solution to differential equation (14) and y

x0,,s,t

:vx0

,s,t

:v ;

u t s u dx

t s x dy

x x x

 

: , , : , , ,

0 0

 

where x0R is not a singular point of differential equation (14). Then,





C

a

u

v

a

D

kl

l k

l k kl y

0

,

Ker

Z

. (22)

It can be noted that Eq. (22) is not the only representation of Ker Dy in terms of u and v. In general, other representations (in other terms) do exist.

4.2 The canonical parameter of the generalized operator of differentiation

(12)

1

 

y

D . (23)

Corollary 7. The variable  is a canonical parameter of Dy because Dy1. Moreover, all other canonical parameters of Dy can be expressed in the form:

v  

 (24)

where vKer Dy.

Corollary 8. Let 1 and 2 be two canonical parameters of Dy. Then, y

D Ker

2 1 

.

4.3 Structural expressions of the solution to ODE

We will consider several typical structural expressions of solutions. Let us assume that the function zz

,s0,,sn1

can be expressed in the form:

v vm

z, 1,, (25)

where

1 0, ,

,

 

n

s s  

 ; vjvj

,s0,,sn1

Ker Dy; j1,2,,m. Then, properties of the generalized operator of differentiation yield:

x v vm

Gz , 1,, . (26)

Note that

D v v

j x v Gv

j

j y j

 

 



1 !

. Various particular cases of Eq. (25) could be considered. Several typical

examples are listed below.

Theorem 2.

Let us assume that s0 can be expressed in the form:

v vm

s0, 1,, . (27)

Then,

xv vm

y , 1,, . (28)

Proof.

The proof follows from Eq. (13) and Eq. (26).

End of proof.

Eq. (28) also represents the structural expression of the solution in Eq. (13).

(13)

solve the initial problem defined by Eq. (3, 4) – the solution is automatically generated by Eq. (28). Since this result is of

fundamental importance, we denote the expression in Eq. (27) as the s0 representation.

The natural question arises what is easier – to find invariants or to solve the initial problem using conventional techniques.

A discussion on these questions is provided in section 5.

Corollary 9. A particular case of the s0 representation:

 

 

1 0

k

k k f

v

s, (29)

where vkvk

,s0,,sn1

Ker Dy for all k yields the solution to the ODE defined by Eq. (3, 4):

 

 

1 k

k k f x

v

y . (30)

Eq. (30) represents another structural expression of the solution in Eq. (13).

Note that

 

1 k

k k x

v

y if fk

 

 k (what is a rather common situation).

Corollary 10.

Let us assume that the expression of the invariant vv

,s0

Ker Dy is given. Then Gvv

G,Gs0

what yields the

algebraic equation:

, , , 0, , 1

v x yx s sn

v   . (31)

Then the solution y could be expressed from Eq. (31). Thus it is possible (not always) to reduce the initial problem

defined by Eq. (3, 4) to the solution of the algebraic problem defined by equation Eq. (31).

It can be noted that other generalizations are also possible.

5.

Examples

A number of examples are given in this Section. We start from the most primitive examples and continue with more

demanding nonlinear ODE problems.

Example 1. Let us consider a differential equation 0 dx dy

; yy

x,,s

with the initial condition y

,,s

s. Then,

s

y D D

D 0 ;



 

0 !

j

j j

D j x

G   . The invariant reads v

 

,s :s because Dyss. Then, the s-representation reads: s

s . Therefore, Gss; y

x,,s

Gs. Finally, y

x,,s

s; y

,,s

s and





R

k Z k

k k

y

a

s

a

D

0

(14)

Example 2. Let us consider a differential equation 0

2 2

dx

y d

; yy

x,,s,t

with initial conditions y

c;c,s,t

s;

t dx

t s x dy

x



, , ,

. Then, DyD tDs0Dt . The invariant reads: v

,s,t

st because

D tDs



st

tt0. Then the s-representation reads: s

s t

t . Now, Gs

s t

Gt (note that

  

G Gt xt t

G    ). Thus ystxt ; y

,,s,t

s ;

t dx

t s x dy

x



, , ,

. Note that

t

dx t s x dy

Gt ,, ,  and





0

;

,

Ker

0 0

,

0

0

x

x

a

t

t

x

t

s

a

D

kl

Z l k

l k kl

y

R

.

Example 3. Let us consider a differential equation P

 

x dx dy

1

 ; yy

x,,s

with the initial condition y

,,s

s. The generalized operator of differentiation reads: DyD P1

 

Ds;

 



 

0

1

! j

s j

D P D j x

G    . Now, let us define a

primitive function Pˆ1

 

x for P1

 

x :

 

 

P zdz

Pˆ1 1 ; Pˆ1

 

 0 where

R and Pˆ1

 

 exists. Then, the invariant reads:

 

,s s Pˆ1

 

v   because

D P1

 

Ds

sPˆ1

 

P1

 

 P1

 

 0 . Then the s-representation reads:

 

s Pˆ1

Pˆ1

 

s   . Thus, Gs

sPˆ1

 

Pˆ1

 

x . Finally y

x,,s

sPˆ1

 

Pˆ1

 

x ; y

,,s

s and

 

 

 







 1 1 0 0 1 0

ˆ

;

,

ˆ

ˆ

Ker

0

x

P

a

x

x

P

P

s

a

D

k

Z k

k k

y

R

.

Example 4. Let us consider a differential equation

 

 

y Q

x P dx dy

1 1

 ; yy

x,,s

with the initial condition y

,,s

s.

Then, y

 

 

Ds s Q P D D

1 1  

 ;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 1

1

! j

j s j

D s Q P D j x

G  . Let Pˆ1

 

x and Qˆ1

 

x be primitive functions for P1

 

x and

 

x

Q1 . Then, the invariant reads: v

 

,sQˆ1

 

sPˆ1

 

 , because

 

 

ˆ1

 

ˆ1

 

1

 

1

 

0

1

1

   

 

    

D Q s P P P

s Q P

D s . Now,

the s-representation can be expressed in the implicit form Qˆ1

 

s

Qˆ1

 

sPˆ1

 

Pˆ1

 

 . Therefore,

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

1 ˆ ˆ ˆ

ˆ s Q s P GP

Q

G    ; Qˆ1

G

 

s

Qˆ1

 

sPˆ1

 

Pˆ1

G

 

; Qˆ1

y

x,,s

Qˆ1

 

sPˆ1

 

 Pˆ1

 

x . Finally

x s

Q

Q

 

s P

 

P

 

x

y ,,  ˆ11 ˆ1  ˆ1  ˆ1 . The explicit solution exists if the inverse function Qˆ11

 

x

does exist.

Example 5. Let us consider a differential equation y2 dx dy

; yy

x,,s

with the initial condition y

,,s

s. Then, s

y D s D

D  2 . It can be observed that

 

 

s s s v v

  

1

, because

0

1 1 1

1 2

2 2 2

2

        

   

s s s s s s s

s D s D v

(15)

Thus,

  

s x xy

s x y G

Gs Gs s

s G s s

, , 1

, , 1

1

1 

 

      

 . The algebraic equation for the identification of y takes the form:

xy y s s

 

 1

1  . Finally

 s

x

s s

x y

1 ,

, . It can be noted that

0

1 ,

, 2 

  

x s

s D

s D s x y

Dy s and

s

s y,,  and









R

0 0

,

1

Ker

0

x

a

x

s

s

a

D

k

Z k

k

k

y

.

Example 6. Let us consider a linear ordinary differential equation 2 0

2

 

by

dx dy a dx

y d

; yy

x,,s,t

with initial conditions y

,,s,t

s ;

t

dx t s x dy

x



, , ,

. Then, DyDtDs

atbs

Dt and invariants becomev1

,s,t

 

t2s

 

exp1

; v2

,s,t

 

t1s

 

exp 2

where 1 and 2 are two different roots of the algebraic equation 2ab0. Note that Dyv1Dyv2 0. Then, the s-representation reads:

  

 

  

  

  

   

 

2 2

1 2

1 1

1 2

1 2

exp exp

exp

exp 

   

 

t s t s

s .

Thus, the solution reads:

 

    

 

   

t s x s t x

y 2

2 1

1 1

2 1

2

exp exp

and

 

 

 





 

R

kl l

k

l k

kl

y

a

t

s

t

s

a

D

0 ,

2 1

1

2

exp

exp

Ker

.

Example 7. Let us consider a linear ordinary differential equation 2 2 0 20 0

2

 

y

dx dy dx

y

d

; yy

x,,s,t

with initial conditions y

,,s,t

s ;

t

dx t s x dy

x



, , ,

. Then, Dy D tDs

t s

Dt 2 0 0

2 

   

 and invariants read

0

0

1 ,s,tsts exp

v ; v2

,s,t

 

t0s

 

exp0

; Dyv1Dyv2 0. The s-representation takes the form: s

s

t0s

 

exp 0

   

exp0 

t0s

 

exp 0

  

exp0 .

Thus, the solution reads:

y

s

t

0

s



x

exp

0

x

and

 

 

    

  

 

   

 



R a s

t s

t s a

D kl

l k

l k

kl y

0 ,

0 0

0

0 exp exp

Ker       

.

So far, the solution of trivial differential equations has been demonstrated in Examples 1 – 7. These examples were used

References

Related documents

The largest part of the production of fried calamari from Hạ Long and that of Pélardon cheese are processed and sold inside the area of production through highly local

Contrary to the school bullying literature, albeit adopting predominantly a victim perspective, workplace bullying research has tended to focus less on the actual protagonists and

In this study, variables like gender, age, good know- ledge, having good attitude, willingness to implement EMR system, computer literacy, computer related skills, availability

What I have tried to do in this article is to explore the diverse ways in which women mountaineers construe and write their relationship between the domestic hearth and

The utilization of two macrophytes ( Lemna and Wolffia ) in their quality as a biofilter in RAS increased dissolved oxygen in the water, significantly decreased the

Exposure to low-moderate levels of inorganic arsenic was associated with increased odds of fixed ratio restrict- ive lung pattern, lower FEV1 and lower FVC, borderline associated

Our recommender system has four main parts, the first is for data collection by two modes: explicit data collection, which is based on what student will fill in his profile,