• No results found

Common fixed point theorem for a sequence of Mappings in G-metric spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Common fixed point theorem for a sequence of Mappings in G-metric spaces"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

[Volume 2 issue 5 May 2014]

Page No.403-407 ISSN :2320-7167 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER RESEARCH

Common fixed point theorem for a sequence of Mappings in G- metric spaces

Gopal Meena1 , Dharmendra Nema2

Assistant Professor1 , Department of Applied Mathematics Jabalpur Engg. College Jabalpur (M.P.), India

[email protected] PG Student2 ,Department of Applied Mathematics

Jabalpur Engg. College Jabalpur(M.P.), India

Abstract:

In the present paper we have established a Common fixed point theorem for a sequence of mappings on a closed subset of Complete 𝐺𝐺-metric spaces. Also we introduce a example to support the usability of our result.

Kew words : Common fixed point , 𝐺𝐺-metric space 1. Introduction .

Throughout this paper , unless otherwise stated 𝑆𝑆 is a closed subset of Complete 𝐺𝐺 -metric space (𝑋𝑋, 𝐺𝐺). In 1991 Koparde and Waghmode[3] have proved common fixed point theorem for the sequence {𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛} of mappings . After that Pendhare and Waghmode[6], Veerapandi and kumar[9], Badshah and Meena[1] , proved many results for sequence of mappings in Hilbert spaces.

In 2005, Mustafa and Sims introduced a new class of generalized metric spaces(see[4,5]),which are called 𝐺𝐺 -metric space, as generalization of a metric space (𝑋𝑋, 𝑑𝑑). Subsequently, many fixed point results on such spaces appeared (see, for example[7,8]).

Here we present the necessary definitions and results in 𝐺𝐺-metric spaces , which will be useful for the rest of the paper.

Definition1.1. Let 𝑋𝑋 be a nonempty set. Suppose that 𝐺𝐺 ∶ 𝑋𝑋 × 𝑋𝑋 × 𝑋𝑋 → 𝑅𝑅+ is a function satisfying the following conditions :

(1) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧) = 0 if and only if 𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦𝑦 = 𝑧𝑧 ; (2) 0 < 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦) for all 𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦 𝜖𝜖 𝑋𝑋 with 𝑥𝑥 ≠ 𝑦𝑦 ;

(3) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦) ≤ 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧) for all 𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦 , 𝑧𝑧 𝜖𝜖 𝑋𝑋 with 𝑦𝑦 ≠ 𝑧𝑧 ;

(4) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧) = 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑧𝑧, 𝑦𝑦) = 𝐺𝐺(𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧, 𝑥𝑥) = ... (symmetry in all three variables) ;

IJMCR www.ijmcr.in| 2:5 |May|2014|403-407 | 403

(2)

(5) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧) ≤ 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑎𝑎, 𝑎𝑎) + 𝐺𝐺(𝑎𝑎, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧) for all 𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦 , 𝑧𝑧, 𝑎𝑎 𝜖𝜖 𝑋𝑋 .

Then 𝐺𝐺 is called a 𝐺𝐺-metric on 𝑋𝑋 and (𝑋𝑋, 𝐺𝐺) is called a 𝐺𝐺-metric space.

Definition1.2.A 𝐺𝐺-metric space (𝑋𝑋, 𝐺𝐺) is said to be symmetric if 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑦𝑦) = 𝐺𝐺(𝑦𝑦, 𝑥𝑥, 𝑥𝑥) for all 𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦 𝜖𝜖 𝑋𝑋.

Definition 1.3 Let (𝑋𝑋, 𝐺𝐺) be a 𝐺𝐺-metric space. We say that {𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛} is

(1) a 𝐺𝐺-cauchy sequence if, for any 𝜀𝜀 > 0, there is 𝑀𝑀𝜖𝜖 𝑁𝑁 (the set of all positive integers) such that for all 𝑛𝑛, 𝑚𝑚, 𝑙𝑙 ≥ 𝑀𝑀 , 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚 , 𝑥𝑥𝑙𝑙) < 𝜀𝜀 .

(2) a 𝐺𝐺-convergent sequence to 𝑥𝑥𝜖𝜖 𝑋𝑋 if, for any 𝜀𝜀 > 0 ,there is 𝑀𝑀𝜖𝜖 𝑁𝑁 (the set of all positive integers) such that for all 𝑛𝑛, 𝑚𝑚 ≥ 𝑀𝑀 , 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚) < 𝜀𝜀 .

A 𝐺𝐺-metric space (𝑋𝑋, 𝐺𝐺) is said to be complete if every 𝐺𝐺-Cauchy sequence in 𝑋𝑋 is 𝐺𝐺-convergent in 𝑋𝑋.

Proposition 1.1 Let (𝑋𝑋, 𝐺𝐺) be a 𝐺𝐺-metric space . The following are equivalent : (1) {𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛} is 𝐺𝐺-convergent to 𝑥𝑥;

(2) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥) → 0 as 𝑛𝑛 → +∞ ; (3) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥 , 𝑥𝑥) → 0 as 𝑛𝑛 → +∞ ; (4) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚 , 𝑥𝑥) → 0 as 𝑛𝑛 , 𝑚𝑚 → +∞ .

Proposition 1.2 Let (𝑋𝑋, 𝐺𝐺) be a 𝐺𝐺-metric space . The following are equivalent : (1) the sequence {𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛} is 𝐺𝐺-Cauchy ;

(2) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚) → 0 as 𝑛𝑛, 𝑚𝑚 → +∞ .

In this paper we illustrate a common fixed point theorem for sequence of mappings in complete 𝐺𝐺-metric spaces also give an example to support the usability of our result. Our result is a generalization of the results in Hilbert spaces to 𝐺𝐺-metric spaces . To present this work we also see Jaleli and Samet[2].

2.Main Result.

Theorem 2.1. Let 𝑆𝑆 be a closed subset of Complete 𝐺𝐺-metric space (𝑋𝑋, 𝐺𝐺) and {𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛}: S → S be a sequence of mappings which satisfies the condition :

for all 𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧 𝜖𝜖 𝑆𝑆

𝐺𝐺�𝑇𝑇𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 , 𝑇𝑇𝑗𝑗𝑦𝑦 , 𝑇𝑇𝑘𝑘𝑧𝑧� ≤ 𝑎𝑎𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥 , 𝑇𝑇𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥 , 𝑇𝑇𝑖𝑖𝑥𝑥) + 𝑏𝑏𝐺𝐺�𝑦𝑦 , 𝑇𝑇𝑗𝑗𝑦𝑦 , 𝑇𝑇𝑗𝑗𝑦𝑦� + 𝑐𝑐𝐺𝐺(𝑧𝑧 , 𝑇𝑇𝑘𝑘𝑧𝑧 , 𝑇𝑇𝑘𝑘𝑧𝑧) + 𝑑𝑑𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧)

where 𝑎𝑎, 𝑏𝑏, 𝑐𝑐, 𝑑𝑑 are positive Constants such that 𝑎𝑎 + 𝑏𝑏 + 𝑐𝑐 + 𝑑𝑑 < 1. Then {𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛} has a unique Common fixed point.

Proof. Let 𝑥𝑥0 𝜖𝜖 𝑆𝑆 be any arbitrary point . Defined a Sequence {𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛} in 𝑆𝑆 as 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 = 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛+1𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 for 𝑛𝑛 = 0,1,2,3 …

Now we shall prove that {𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛} is a Cauchy sequence , so consider

IJMCR www.ijmcr.in| 2:5 |May|2014|403-407 | 404

(3)

𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2) = 𝐺𝐺(𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛+1𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛+2𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1)

≤ 𝑎𝑎𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1) + 𝑏𝑏𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛+1𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛+1𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛) + 𝑐𝑐𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛+2𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛+2𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1) + 𝑑𝑑𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1)

≤ 𝑎𝑎𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛) + 𝑏𝑏𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1) +𝑐𝑐𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2) + 𝑑𝑑𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1) ≤ 𝑎𝑎𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1) + 𝑏𝑏𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2) +𝑐𝑐𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2) + 𝑑𝑑𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1)

≤ (𝑎𝑎 + 𝑑𝑑)𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1) + (𝑏𝑏 + 𝑐𝑐)𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2) ≤1−(𝑏𝑏+𝑐𝑐)(𝑎𝑎+𝑑𝑑) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1)

i.e 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2) ≤ 𝑘𝑘𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1) where 𝑘𝑘 =1−(𝑏𝑏+𝑐𝑐)(𝑎𝑎+𝑑𝑑) < 1 .

. .

𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2) ≤ 𝑘𝑘𝑛𝑛𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥0 , 𝑥𝑥1 , 𝑥𝑥2) for all n Now for any positive integers 𝑙𝑙 ≥ 𝑚𝑚 ≥ 𝑛𝑛 ≥ 1. We Consider

𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚 , 𝑥𝑥𝑙𝑙) ≤ 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2) + 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+2 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛+3) + ⋯ + 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚+1) + +𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚, 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚+2) + 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚+1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚+2 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚+3) + ⋯ + 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑙𝑙−2 , 𝑥𝑥𝑙𝑙−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑙𝑙) ≤ 𝑘𝑘𝑛𝑛𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥0 , 𝑥𝑥1 , 𝑥𝑥2) + 𝑘𝑘𝑛𝑛+1𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥0 , 𝑥𝑥1 , 𝑥𝑥2) + … + 𝑘𝑘𝑚𝑚−1𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥0 , 𝑥𝑥1 , 𝑥𝑥2) +

+ 𝑘𝑘𝑚𝑚𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥0 , 𝑥𝑥1 , 𝑥𝑥2) + 𝑘𝑘𝑚𝑚+1𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥0 , 𝑥𝑥1 , 𝑥𝑥2) + … + 𝑘𝑘𝑙𝑙−2𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥0 , 𝑥𝑥1 , 𝑥𝑥2) 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 , 𝑥𝑥𝑚𝑚 , 𝑥𝑥𝑙𝑙) ≤1−𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑛𝑛 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥0 , 𝑥𝑥1 , 𝑥𝑥2) → 0 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑛𝑛 → ∞.

i.e. {𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛} is a 𝐺𝐺-Cauchy sequence . Since 𝑆𝑆 is a closed subset of Complete 𝐺𝐺-metric space X , so {𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛} converges to a point 𝑢𝑢 in 𝑆𝑆.

Now we shall prove that 𝑢𝑢 is a common fixed point of the sequence {𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛} of mappings from 𝑆𝑆 into itself. Let 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 ≠ 𝑢𝑢 for all n , and Consider,

𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢) ≤ 𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1) + 𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1, 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢) ≤ 𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1) + 𝐺𝐺(𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛−1𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−2, 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢)

≤ 𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1) + 𝑎𝑎𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−2 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛−1𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−2, 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛−1𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−2) + 𝑏𝑏𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢) +𝑐𝑐𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢) + 𝑑𝑑𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−2, 𝑢𝑢 , 𝑢𝑢)

≤ 𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1 , 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1) + 𝑎𝑎𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−2, 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1, 𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−1) + 𝑏𝑏𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢) +𝑐𝑐𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢) + 𝑑𝑑𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛−2, 𝑢𝑢 , 𝑢𝑢)

IJMCR www.ijmcr.in| 2:5 |May|2014|403-407 | 405

(4)

𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢) ≤ (𝑏𝑏 + 𝑐𝑐)𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢)

i.e. 𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢) < 𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢) , which is a contradiction . Thus 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 = 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢 = 𝑢𝑢 , for all 𝑚𝑚, 𝑛𝑛 .

Hence 𝑢𝑢 is a Common fixed point of the sequence {𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛} of mappings.

Uniqueness:

Suppose 𝑢𝑢 ≠ 𝑣𝑣 such that 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑣𝑣 = 𝑣𝑣 for all n . Consider,

𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑢𝑢 , 𝑣𝑣) = 𝐺𝐺�𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑝𝑝𝑣𝑣�

≤ 𝑎𝑎𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑢 ) + 𝑏𝑏𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢 , 𝑇𝑇𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑢 ) + 𝑐𝑐𝐺𝐺�𝑣𝑣 , 𝑇𝑇𝑝𝑝𝑣𝑣 , 𝑇𝑇𝑝𝑝𝑣𝑣 � + 𝑑𝑑𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢 , 𝑢𝑢 , 𝑣𝑣 ) i.e. 𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑢𝑢 , 𝑣𝑣) < 𝐺𝐺(𝑢𝑢, 𝑢𝑢 , 𝑣𝑣) , which is again a contradiction .

Thus 𝑢𝑢 = 𝑣𝑣 . Hence 𝑢𝑢 is a unique common fixed point of sequence {𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛} of mappings.

Example.2.1. Let 𝑋𝑋 = [0,1] , and 𝐺𝐺 = 𝑋𝑋 × 𝑋𝑋 × 𝑋𝑋 → 𝑅𝑅+ be defined by :

𝐺𝐺(𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧) ={

Then (𝑋𝑋, 𝐺𝐺) is a Complete 𝐺𝐺-metric space . Let {𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛}: 𝑋𝑋 → 𝑋𝑋 be a sequence of mappings defined by 𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛𝑥𝑥 =4𝑥𝑥𝑛𝑛 for all 𝑥𝑥 𝜖𝜖 𝑋𝑋 , then {𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛} satisfies the inequality of theorem 2.1. Hence the sequence {𝑇𝑇𝑛𝑛}of mappings has a unique common fixed point in 𝑋𝑋.

3. References.

[1] Badshah V.H. and Meena G., Common Fixed Point theorem of an infinite sequence of mappings, Chh. J. Sci. Tech. Vol. 2(2005), 87- 90.

[2] Jleli Mohamed and Samet Bessem.,Remarks on G-metric spaces and fixed point theorems, Fixed Point Theory and Application..2012 doi: 10.1186/1687-1812-2012-210.

[3] Koparde P.V. and Waghmode B.B., On sequence of mappings in Hilbert space, The Mathematics Education , XXV (1991), 197.

[4] Mustafa Z., A new structure for generalized metric spaces-with applications to fixed point theory.

PhD thesis, the University of Newcastle, Australia (2005).

[5] Mustafa Z. Sims B., A new approach to generalized metric spaces, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 7(2), (2006), 289-297.

[6] Pendhare D.M. and Waghmode B.B., On sequence of mappings in Hilbert space, The Mathematics Education , XXXII (1998), 61.

[7] Shatanawi W., Fixed point theory for contractive mappings satiafying Ф-maps in G-metric spaces.

Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010, Article ID 181650 (2010).

[8] Shatanawi W., Some fixed point theorems in ordered G-metric spaces and applications. Abstr. Appl.

Anal. 2011, Article ID 126205 (2011).

[9] Veerapandi T. and Kumar Anil S., Common Fixed Point theorems of a sequence of mappings in Max{ 𝑥𝑥, 𝑦𝑦, 𝑧𝑧} ,otherwise

0 , if 𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦𝑦 = 𝑧𝑧

IJMCR www.ijmcr.in| 2:5 |May|2014|403-407 | 406

(5)

Hilbert space, Bull. Cal. Math. Soc. 91(4),(1999), 299-308.

IJMCR www.ijmcr.in| 2:5 |May|2014|403-407 | 407

References

Related documents

Mechanistic data suggest the increased efficacy of dual ATRi and DNA-PKi in combination with radiation is based on both modulation to DNA repair focus formation and the resulting

To further explore the role of PRP in the reg− ulation of innate response in Alzheimer’s disease patients, the release of IL−1 β , IL−6, IL−10, and TNF− α in

Distribution of Polykrikos hartmannii in the world seas: Symbols are indicated vegetative cell (▼), resting cyst (●) and first vegetative cell record from the Aegean Sea

Мэдээлэл боловсруулалт ба үр дүн: Судалгаанд ажлын үнэт зүйлийг ажлын бодит байдал, хамт олны уур амьсгал, ажлын нийгэм дэх байр суурь, нэр хүнд, хувь хүний

Previous models of driving-Y chromosome dynamics also found seasonality to be important and recommend that releases should be made early in the rainy season so as to capitalise on

Thus, lovastatin appears to accelerate cortical bone repair primarily by enhancing new bone formation within the bone marrow cavity and by replacing fibro-cartilaginous tissue in

Our study is evaluating thyroid profile in the presence and absence of autoantibodies and how it effect the fertility of Omani women, through serum thyroid evaluation, estimation