MTH 215: Introduction to Linear Algebra
Lecture 5
Jonathan A. Ch´ avez Casillas
11University of Rhode Island Department of Mathematics
September 24, 2017
Jonathan Ch´avez
1
Cofactors and n × n Determinants
2
Triangular Matrices
3
Properties of the Determinant
Jonathan Ch´avez
Determinant of a 2 × 2 Matrix
Definition
Let A =
a bc d
. Then thedeterminantof A is defined as
det A = ad − bc
What about the determinant of an n × n matrix for other values of n?
Notation.
For det a bc d
, we often write
a b c d
, i.e., usevertical barsinstead ofsquare brackets.
Jonathan Ch´avez
How do we find the determinant of an n × n matrix?
The determinant of an n × n matrix is defined recursively, using determinants of (n − 1) × (n − 1) submatrices, and requires some new definitions and notation.
Definition
Let A = [aij] be an n × n matrix. Thesignof the (i , j) position is (−1)i +j. Thus the sign is 1 if (i + j) is even, and −1 if (i + j) is odd.
Jonathan Ch´avez
The Minor of a Matrix
Definition
Let A = [aij] be an n × n matrix. Theijth minorof A, denoted as minor (A)ij, is the determinant of the n − 1 × n − 1 matrix which results from deleting the ith row and the jth column of A.
A =
a11 a12 · · · a1j · · · a1n
a21 a22 · · · a2j · · · a2n
.. .
.. .
.. .
.. . ai 1 ai 2 · · · aij · · · ain
..
. ... ... ... an1 an2 · · · anj · · · ann
For any matrix A, minor (A)ij is found by first removing theith rowandjth column, and taking the determinant of the remaining matrix.
Jonathan Ch´avez
The Minor of a Matrix
Example
Find minor (A)12of
A =
"
1 1 32 4 1
5 2 6
#
Solution
First, remove the1st rowand2nd columnfrom A.
A =
"
1 1 32 4 1
5 2 6
#
The resulting matrix is A =
2 15 6
Jonathan Ch´avez
Solution (continued)
A =
2 15 6
Using our previous definition, we can calculate the determinant of this matrix to be (2)(6) − (5)(1) = 12 − 5 = 7
Therefore,minor (A)12= 7.
Jonathan Ch´avez
The Cofactors of a Matrix
Definition
Theijthcofactorof A is
cof(A)ij= (−1)i +jminor (A)ij
Example (continued)
Let
A =
"
1 1 32 4 1
5 2 6
#
Find cof(A)12.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Solution
By the definition, we know that cof(A)12= (−1)1+2minor (A)12 From earlier, we know that minor (A)12= 7.
Therefore, cof(A)12= (−1)1+2minor (A)12= (−1)37 = −7
Jonathan Ch´avez
Cofactor Expansion
Using these definitions, we can now define thedeterminant of the n × n matrix A:
Definition
det A = a11cof(A)11+ a12cof(A)12+ a13cof(A)13+ · · · + a1ncof(A)1n
This is called thecofactor expansion of det A along row 1.
In other words,
det (A) =
n
X
j=1
aijcof (A)ij=
n
X
i =1
aijcof (A)ij
The first formula consists of expanding the determinant along the ith row and the second expands the determinant along the jth column.
Cofactor expansion is also calledLaplace Expansion.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Cofactor Expansion
Example
Let A =
"
1 1 3
2 4 1
5 2 6
#
. Find det A.
Solution
Using cofactor expansion along row 1,
det A = 1cof11(A) + 1cof12(A) + 3cof13(A)
= 1(−1)2
4 1 2 6
+ 1(−1)
3
2 1 5 6
+ 3(−1)
4
2 4 5 2
= 1(24 − 2) − 1(12 − 5) + 3(4 − 20)
= 22 − 7 + 3(−16)
= 22 − 7 − 48
= −33
Jonathan Ch´avez
Solution (continued)
A =
"
1 1 32 4 1
5 2 6
#
Now try cofactor expansion along column 2.
det A = 1cof12(A) + 4cof22(A) + 2cof32(A)
= 1(−1)3
2 1 5 6
+ 4(−1)4
1 3 5 6
+ 2(−1)5
1 3 2 1
= −1(12 − 5) + 4(6 − 15) − 2(1 − 6)
= −(7) + 4(−9) − 2(−5)
= −7 − 36 + 10
= −33
We get the same answer!
Jonathan Ch´avez
The Determinant is Well Defined
Theorem
The determinant of an n × n matrix A can be computed using cofactor expansion alongany row or column of A.
What is the significance of this theorem?
This theorem allows us to choose any row or column for computing cofactor expansion, which gives us the opportunity to save ourselves some work!
Jonathan Ch´avez
Problem
Let A =
0 1 −2 1
5 0 0 7
0 1 −1 0
3 0 0 2
. Find det A.Solution
Cofactor expansion along row 1 yields
det A = 0 × cof(A)11+ 1 × cof(A)12+ (−2) × cof(A)13+ 1 × cof(A)14
= cof(A)12− 2 × cof(A)13+ cof(A)14, whereas cofactor expansion along, row 3 yields
det A = 0 × cof(A)31+ 1 × cof(A)32+ (−1) × cof(A)33+ 0 × cof(A)34
= 1cof(A)32+ (−1)cof(A)33,
so, in the first case we must computethreecofactors, but justtwocofactors in the second case.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Solution (continued)
Therefore, we can save ourselves some work by using cofactor expansion along row 3 rather than row 1.
A =
0 1 −2 1
5 0 0 7
0 1 −1 0
3 0 0 2
det A = 1 × cof(A)32+ (−1) × cof(A)33
= 1 × (−1)5
0 −2 1
5 0 7
3 0 2
+ (−1) × (−1)6
0 1 1
5 0 7
3 0 2
= −
0 −2 1
5 0 7
3 0 2
−
0 1 1
5 0 7
3 0 2
Each of the two determinants above can easily be evaluated usingcofactor expansion along column 2.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Solution (continued)
det A = −
0 −2 1
5 0 7
3 0 2
−
0 1 1
5 0 7
3 0 2
= −(−2)(−1)3
5 7 3 2
− 1(−1)3
5 7 3 2
= −2(10 − 21) + 1(10 − 21)
= −2(−11) + (−11)
= 22 − 11
= 11.
Therefore, det A = 11.
Jonathan Ch´avez
A Row or Column of Zeros
Example
Let
A =
−8 1 0 −4
5 7 0 −7
12 −3 0 8
−3 11 0 2
.By choosing column 3 for cofactor expansion, we get det A = 0, i.e.,
det A = 0 × cof(A)13+ 0 × cof(A)23+ 0 × cof(A)33+ 0 × cof(A)43= 0.
Important Fact
If A is an n × n matrix with a row or column of zeros, then det A = 0.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Table of Contents
1
Cofactors and n × n Determinants
2
Triangular Matrices
3
Properties of the Determinant
Jonathan Ch´avez
Determinants of a Triangular Matrices
Definitions
1 An n × n matrix A is calledupper triangularif all entries
below
the main diagonal are zero.2 An n × n matrix A is calledlower triangularif all entries
above
the main diagonal are zero.3 An n × n matrix A is calledtriangularif it is upper triangular or lower triangular.
Theorem
If A = [aij] is an n × n triangular matrix, then
det A = a11× a22× a33× · · · × ann, i.e., det A is the product of the entries of the main diagonal of A.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Example
det
"
1 2 30 5 6
0 0 9
#
= 1 × det
5 60 9
= 1 × 5 × det
9= 1 × 5 × 9
= 45.
Notice that 45 is the product of the entries on the main diagonal.
"
1 2 30 5 6
0 0 9
#
Jonathan Ch´avez
Table of Contents
1
Cofactors and n × n Determinants
2
Triangular Matrices
3
Properties of the Determinant
Jonathan Ch´avez
Elementary Row Operations and Determinants
Example
Let
A =
"
2 0 −30 4 0
1 0 −2
#
.Computing det A by cofactor expansion along row (or column) 2 yields
det A = 4(−1)4
2 −3 1 −2
= 4(−1) = −4.
LetB1,B2, andB3be obtained from A byinterchanging rows 1 and 2,multiplying row 3 by −3, andadding twice row 1 to row 3, respectively, i.e.,
B1=
"
2 0 −3 1 0 −2
0 4 0
#
, B2=
"
2 0 −3
0 4 0
−3 0 6
#
, B3=
"
2 0 −3
0 4 0
5 0 −8
#
.
We are interested in how elementary operations affect the determinant. Computing det B1, det B2, and det B3:
Jonathan Ch´avez
Example (continued)
det B1 = 4(−1)5
2 −3 1 −2
= (−4)(−1) = 4 = (−1) det A.
det B2 = 4(−1)4
2 −3
−3 6
= 4(12 − 9) = 4 × 3 = 12 = −3 det A.
det B3 = 4(−1)4
2 −3 5 −8
= 4(−16 + 15) = 4(−1) = −4 = det A.
The general effects of elementary row operations on the determinant are summarized in the next theorem.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Theorem
Let A be an n × n matrix and B be an n × n matrix as defined below.
1 Let B be a matrix which results from switching two rows of A. Then det (B) = − det (A) .
2 Let B be a matrix which results from multiplying some row of A by a scalar k. Then det (B) = k det (A) .
3 Let B be a matrix which results from adding a multiple of a row to another row. Then det (A) = det (B).
4 If A contains a row which is a multiple of another row of A, then det (A) = 0
An analogous theorem holds forelementary column operation. If A is a matrix, then anelementary column operationon A is simply the corresponding elementary row operation performed on the transpose of A, AT.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Computing the Determinant
Example
det
"
−3 5 −61 −1 3
2 −4 1
#
=
0 2 3
1 −1 3
2 −4 1
row 1 + 3×(row 2)
=
0 2 3
1 −1 3
0 −2 −5
row 3 − 2×(row 2)
= (1)(−1)2+1
2 3
−2 −5
cofactor expansion: column 1
= −(−10 + 6)
= 4.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Example
det
3 1 2 4
−1 −3 8 0
1 −1 5 5
1 1 2 −1
=7 5 10 0
−1 −3 8 0
6 4 15 0
1 1 2 −1
= (−1)(−1)8
7 5 10
−1 −3 8
6 4 15
= −
0 −16 66
−1 −3 8
0 −14 63
= −(−1)(−1)3
−16 66
−14 63
= −
−2 3
−14 63
= −(−126 + 42)
= 84.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Problem
If det
"
a1 a2 a3
b1 b2 b3
c1 c2 c3
#
= 4, find det
"
−b1 −b2 −b3
a1+ 2b1 a2+ 2b2 a3+ 2b3
3c1 3c2 3c3
#
.
Solution
−b1 −b2 −b3
a1+ 2b1 a2+ 2b2 a3+ 2b3
3c1 3c2 3c3
= (−1)(3)
b1 b2 b3
a1+ 2b1 a2+ 2b2 a3+ 2b3
c1 c2 c3
= (−3)
b1 b2 b3
a1 a2 a3
c1 c2 c3
= (−3)(−1)
a1 a2 a3
b1 b2 b3
c1 c2 c3
= (−3)(−1) × 4
= 12.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Problem
Let A =
"
2 3 53 5 9
1 2 4
#
. Find det A.
Solution
det A =
2 3 5
3 5 9
1 2 4
=
3 5 9
3 5 9
1 2 4
=
0 0 0
3 5 9
1 2 4
= 0.
Notice:
row1 + row3 − row2 =
0 0 0 Hence the determinant equals 0.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Problem
Let
A =
"
a b cp q r
x y z
#
and B =
"
2a + p 2b + q 2c + r 2p + x 2q + y 2r + z 2x + a 2y + b 2z + c#
.Show that det B = 9 det A.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Solution
det B =
2a + p 2b + q 2c + r 2p + x 2q + y 2r + z 2x + a 2y + b 2z + c
R1+(−2)R3
−−−−−−−→
p − 4x q − 4y r − 4z 2p + x 2q + y 2r + z 2x + a 2y + b 2z + c
R2+(−2)R1
−−−−−−−→
p − 4x q − 4y r − 4z
9x 9y 9z
2x + a 2y + b 2z + c
1 9R2
−−→ 9
p − 4x q − 4y r − 4z
x y z
2x + a 2y + b 2z + c
R1+(4)R2
−−−−−→ 9
p q r
x y z
2x + a 2y + b 2z + c
R3+(−2)R2
−−−−−−−→ 9
p q r
x y z
a b c
R1<−>R3
−−−−−−→ −9
a b c
x y z
p q r
R2<−>R3
−−−−−−→ 9
a b c
p q r
x y z
= 9 det A.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Determinants and Scalar Multiplication
Problem
Suppose A is a 3 × 3 matrix with det A = 7. What is det(−2A)?
Solution
Write A =
"
a11 a12 a13
a21 a22 a23
a31 a32 a33
#
. Then −2A =
"
−2a11 −2a12 −2a13
−2a21 −2a22 −2a23
−2a31 −2a32 −2a33
#
.
det(−2A) =
−2a11 −2a12 −2a13
−2a21 −2a22 −2a23
−2a31 −2a32 −2a33
= (−2)
a11 a12 a13
−2a21 −2a22 −2a23
−2a31 −2a32 −2a33
= (−2)(−2)
a11 a12 a13
a21 a22 a23
−2a31 −2a32 −2a33
= (−2)(−2)(−2)
a11 a12 a13
a21 a22 a23
a31 a32 a33
= (−2)3det A = (−8) × 7 = −56.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Solution (continued)
Think about the matrix −2A as the matrix obtained from A be multiplyingeach of its rows by −2. This involvesthree elementary row operations, each of which contributes a factor of −2 to the determinant, and thusdet A = (−2) × (−2) × (−2) × 7 = (−2)3× 7.
Theorem
If A is an n × n matrix and k is any scalar, then
det(kA) = kndet A.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Determinants of Inverses
Theorem
An n × n matrix A is invertible if and only ifdet A , 0. In this case, det(A−1) = 1
det A.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Example (Illustration of the above Theorem.)
Let A =
2 −3−6 4
.Then det A = 2(4) − (−3)(−6) = −10.
Since det A , 0, the above Theorem tell us that A is invertible, and that det(A−1)should be equal to −101. We can verify this directly.
Using the formula for the inverse of a 2 × 2 matrix
A−1= 1
−10
4 36 2
.Therefore, det A−1=
−1 10
24 3 6 2
=
−1 10
2(8 − 18) = 1
100× (−10) = −1 10.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Problem
Find all values of c for which A =
"
c 1 00 2 c
−1 c 5
#
is invertible.
Solution
det A =
c 1 0
0 2 c
−1 c 5
= c
2 c c 5
+ (−1)
1 0 2 c
= c(10 − c2) − c
= c(9 − c2)
= c(3 − c)(3 + c).
Since A is invertiblewhen det(A) , 0, A is invertible for all c , 0, 3, −3.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Determinants of Products and Transposes
Theorem
Let A and B be n × n matrices. Then
det (AB) = det A × det B.
Theorem
If A is an n × n matrix, then the determinant of its transpose is given by det(AT) = det A.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Problem
Suppose A, B and C are 4 × 4 matrices with
det A = −1, det B = 2, and det C = 1.
Find det(2A2(B−1)(CT)3B(A−1)).
Solution
det(2A2(B−1)(CT)3B(A−1)) = 24(det A)2 1
det B(det C )3(det B) 1 det A
= 16(det A)(det C )3
= 16 × (−1) × 13
= −16.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Problem
Suppose A is a 3 × 3 matrix. Find det A and det B if
det(2A−1) = −4 = det(A3(B−1)T).
Solution
First,
det(2A−1) = −4 23det(A−1) = −4
1
det A = −4 8 = −1
2. Therefore, det A = −2. Using this fact,
det(A3(B−1)T) = −4 (det A)3det(B−1) = −4 (−2)3det(B−1) = −4 (−8) det(B−1) = −4
1
det B = −4
−8 =1 2
Therefore, det B = 2.
Jonathan Ch´avez
Problem
Let A be an n × n matrix. Find all conditions that ensure det(−A) = det A.
Solution
Since det(−A) = (−1)ndet A, det(−A) = det A if and only if (−1)ndet A = det A.
When is this possible?
1 (−1)ndet A = det A whenever det A = 0.
2 If det A , 0, then (−1)ndet A = det A only if (−1)n= 1, i.e., only if n is even.
Therefore, det(−A) = det A only ifdet A = 0 or n is even.
Jonathan Ch´avez
End of lecture for Thursday, September 26, 2017
Jonathan Ch´avez