Volume 2010, Article ID 716035,9pages doi:10.1155/2010/716035
Research Article
New Examples of Einstein Metrics in
Dimension Four
Ryad Ghanam
Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg, 150 Finoli Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601, USA
Correspondence should be addressed to Ryad Ghanam,[email protected]
Received 27 January 2010; Accepted 23 March 2010
Academic Editor: Daniele C. Struppa
Copyrightq2010 Ryad Ghanam. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We construct new examples of four-dimensional Einstein metrics with neutral signature and two-dimensional holonomy Lie algebra.
1. Introduction
The holonomy group of a metricg at a point p of a manifoldM is the group of all linear transformations in the tangent space ofpdefined by parallel translation along all possible loops starting atp1. It is obvious that a connection can only be the Levi-Civita connection
of a metric g if the holonomy group is a subgroup of the generalized orthogonal group corresponding to the signature ofg1–3. At any pointp∈M, and in some coordinate system
aboutp, the set of matrices of the form
Ri
jklXkYl, Rijkl;mXkYlZm, Rijkl;mnXkYlZmWn, . . . , 1.1
whereX, Y, Z, W ∈ TpMand semicolon denotes covariant derivative, forms a Lie subalgebra
of the Lie algebra of MnR of GLn,R called the infinitesimal holonomy algebra of
M at p. Up to isomorphism the latter is independent of the coordinate system chosen. The corresponding uniquely determined connected subgroup of GLn,R is called the infinitesimal holonomy group ofMatp.
A metric tensorg is a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form on each tangent space TpM for all p ∈ M. The signature of a metric g is the number of positive and negative
p, q, where p is the number of positive eigenvalues and q is the number of negative eigenvalues. Ifp q,we say that the metric is of neutral signature. In this article, we are interested in four-dimensional metrics with neutral signature.
If the metricgsatisfies the condition
Rij R
4gij, 1.2
whereRij are the components of the Ricci tensor andRis the scalar curvature, then we say
thatgis an Einstein metric and the pairM, gis an Einstein space.
In4, Ghanam and Thompson studied and classified the holonomy Lie subalgebras
of neutral metrics in dimension four. In this paper, we will focus on one of the subalgebras presented in4, namely,A17. For this subalgebra we will show that the metric presented in 4will lead us to the construction of Einstein metrics. InSection 3, we will give the metrics explicitly, and in Section 4, we will show that these Einstein metrics produce A17 at their two-dimensional holonomy.
As a final remark regarding our notation, we will use subscripts for partial derivatives. For example, the partial derivative of a functionawith respect toxwill be denoted byax.
2. The Subalgebra
A17
As a Holonomy
In this section we will consider the Lie algebraA17; it is a 2-dimensional Lie subalgebra of the Lie algebra of the generalized orthogonal groupO2,2of neutral signature4,5. A basis for
A17is given by
e1
−J J −J J
, e2
J L L J
, 2.1
where
J
0 1 −1 0
, L
0 1
1 0
. 2.2
We turn now to a theorem of Walker6that will be a key to the existence of a metric gthat producesA17as a two-dimensional holonomy.
Theorem 2.1Walker6. LetM, gbe a pseudo-Riemannian manifold of classC∞.Ifgadmits a parallel, nullr-distribution, then there is a system of coordinatesxirelative to whichgassumes the following form:
gij
⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣
0 0 I
0 A H
I Ht B
⎤ ⎥ ⎥
whereIis ther×ridentity matrix andA, B, H,andHtare matrix functions of the same class asM, satisfying the following conditions but otherwise arbitrary.
1AandBare symmetric;Ais of ordern−2r×n−2rand nonsingular,Bis of order
r×r,His of ordern−2r×r,andHtis the transpose ofH.
2AandHare independent of the coordinatesx1, x2, . . . , xr.
Now we show thatA17is a holonomy Lie algebra of a four-dimensional neutral metric.
Proposition 2.2. A17is a holonomy algebra.
Proof. In this case, we have an invariant null 2-distribution, and so by Walker’s theorem,
there exists a coordinate system, sayx, y, z, w, such that the metricgis of the form
g
⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1
1 0 a c
0 1 c b
⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎦
, 2.4
wherea, b, care smooth functions inx, y, z, w. Since the invariant distribution contains a parallel null vector field, we must have
axbxcx0. 2.5
It was shown in4that, in order for g to produceA17 as its holonomy algebra, the functionsa, b,andcmust satisfy the following conditions:
byy0, cyy0, cyw−byz0. 2.6
3. New Einstein Metrics
InSection 2, we obtained a metric of the form
g
⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1
1 0 a c
0 1 c b
⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥
⎦, 3.1
wherea, b,and care smooth functions iny, z, w and they satisfy2.5and2.6. We solve
these conditions to obtain
by, z, wmz, wynz, w,
with
rwmz, 3.3
wherem, n, r, sare smooth functions inz, w.
The nonzero components of the Ricci tensor forgare
R33− y 2mayy−
1
2nayyayw−rz− 1 2may
1 2r
2,
R34 1
2rw−mz.
3.4
The Ricci scalar is
R0. 3.5
Because of3.3, we obtain
R34 0. 3.6
In this case, the Einstein conditionRij R/4gijbecomes
Rij0. 3.7
Hence, in order to have an Einstein metric, we must have
R33 0, 3.8
and so we obtain the following partial differential equationPDE:
−y 2mayy−
1
2nayyayw−rz− 1 2may
1 2r
20. 3.9
Since we are interested in finding at least one solution, we take the following special values in3.9:
m1, n0, r0, s0 3.10
to obtain the following PDE:
To solve3.11, we use the method of separation. For example, assume thatay, z, wis of the form
ay, z, wfygzhw, 3.12
wheref, g,and hare smooth functions iny, z,and w, respectively. We substitute 3.12in 3.11to obtain
yfygzhw−2fygzhw−fygzhw 0. 3.13
We assume thatgzis nowhere zero to obtain
yfyhw−2fyhw−fyhw 0, 3.14
and so
yfyhw−fy2hw−hw0. 3.15
Hence
yfyhw fy2hw−hw. 3.16
Dividing both sides byhwfygives
yfy
fy
2hw−hw
hw c, 3.17
wherecis a constant.
We now solve3.17and for that we will consider three cases.
1Ifc0, thenfis a linear function given by
fyc1yc2, 3.18
and the condition onhbecomes
2h−h0, 3.19
which gives
The solutionay, z, wto the PDE equation3.11is
ay, z, wc1yc2
c4ew/2gz
c1yc2
ew/2gz, 3.21
wherec1, c2are constants andgzis a smooth nowhere zero function.
2Ifc /0,−1, then the differential equations3.17become
yf−cf0,
2h−1ch0. 3.22
The solutions to3.22are
fyc1yc1c2,
hw c3e1cw/2,
3.23
and so
ay, z, wc1yc1c2
e1cw/2gz, 3.24
wheregzis a no-where zero smooth function inz.
3Ifc−1, then the differential equations3.17become
yff0,
h0. 3.25
The solutions to3.25are
fyc1ln
yc2,
hw c3,
3.26
and so
ay, z, wc1ln
yc2
c3gz
c1ln
yc2
gz, 3.27
4. The Holonomy of the New Metrics
In this section we compute the infinitesimal holonomy algebra and make sure that it produces a two-dimensional algebra. To do so, we consider our metricggiven by
g ⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1
1 0 ay, z, w 0
0 1 0 y
⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎦ . 4.1
The only nonzero components of the curvature are
R2323− 1 2ayy,
R2334 1 2awy−
1 4ay,
R3434−1 2aww
y 4ay−
1 4aw.
4.2
The holonomy matrices are
Rij23
⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣
0 0 0 0
0 0 −1
2ayy 0 0 −1
2ayy 0 0
0 0 0 0
⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ,
Rij34
⎡ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣
0 0 0 0
0 0 1
2awy− 1
4ay 0
0 1 2awy−
1
4ay 0 −
1 2aww
y 4ay−
1 4aw
0 0 −1
2aww y 4ay−
1
4aw 0
⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎥ ⎦ , 4.3
Now, in order for the metric to produce two-dimensional holonomy, we must have
ayy/0, 4.4
−1 2aww
y 4ay−
1
4aw/0. 4.5
1We consider
ay, z, wc1yc2
ew/2gz. 4.6
Then
ayy0, 4.7
and we obtain a one-dimensional holonomy. Therefore we must exclude this case. 2 We consider
ay, z, wc1yc1c2
e1cw/2gz, 4.8
wherec /0,−1. In this case
ayyc1cc1yc−1e1cw/2gz/0. 4.9
The second condition is that4.5gives
ec1w/2 8
2c1yc1c25c1yc1c3c1yc12c2c23c2cc2
/
0. 4.10
This shows that the metric we constructed inSection 3is an Einstein metric with a two-dimensional holonomy. In fact, its holonomy Lie algebra isA17.
3 We consider
ay, z, wc1ln
yc2
gz. 4.11
In this case the first condition is that4.4gives
ayy−c1gz
y2 /0, 4.12
and the second condition is that4.5gives
c1gz
4 /0. 4.13
References
1 G. S. Hall, “Connections and symmetries in spacetime,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 399–406, 1988.
2 G. S. Hall and W. Kay, “Holonomy groups in general relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 428–432, 1988.
3 G. S. Hall and W. Kay, “Curvature structure in general relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 420–427, 1988.
4 R. Ghanam and G. Thompson, “The holonomy Lie algebras of neutral metrics in dimension four,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 2266–2284, 2001.
5 R. Ghanam, “A note on the generalized neutral orthogonal group in dimension four,” Tamkang Journal of Mathematics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2006.