• No results found

Conductance of Graphene Nanoribbon Junctions and the Tight Binding Model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Conductance of Graphene Nanoribbon Junctions and the Tight Binding Model"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

Figure 1 Armchair-edge graphene metal (indexsemiconductor unit cell, and the N = 23)/semiconductor (index N = 13) junction
Figure 2 Energy band structure of an N = 13 armchair graphene nanoribbon, a obtained from the first nearest-neighbourtight binding method and b including third nearest-neighbours.
Figure 4 Conductance vs Energy for the junction shown in Figure 1, a using first nearest-neighbour parameters and b using third

References

Related documents

Knowledge Management Design Using Collaborative Knowledge Retrieval Function.. Kadarsah Suryadi 1* , Cahyono Sigit Pramudyo

3.4 Content of Copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) In Fish Based on the results of measurements of heavy metal content of Cu in fish that at all stations heavy metal content of Cu

In addition to organizational competencies, specific practices and capabilities leading to better business results and less financial risk, loss, and expense include segmenting

Characterization of the expression ratio noise structure in high- density oligonucleotide arrays.. Felix Naef 1 ,

The aims of this work therefore is fi rstly: to characterize the honeys from different semi-arid regions in Algeria according to their physicochemical properties (pH, free

One the Reason for the performance of proposed algorithm on all the above dataset is due to the very huge size of the dataset, irrelevant attributes present in the dataset,

The relevance criterion addresses three main questions: (i) the extent to which the proposed outcome of the project is consistent with the country’s development priorities and

Altered water quality was evident in annual material load at very low levels of development, while concentration measurements served as an indicator of land use change only at