Absorption cross section of regular black holes in scalar-tensor conformal gravity
Yang Li*and Yan-Gang Miao†
School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
Abstract
In terms of the complex angular momentum method, we compute the absorption cross section by analyzing a massless scalar field around conformally related black holes. At first, we investigate circular null geodesics and thereby prove a precondition for calculating the absorption cross section in the context of conformally related black holes. Then we use the WKB approximation method to derive the analytic expression of Regge frequency and the oscillation part of absorption cross section. We find that this oscillation part depends on the scale factor of conformal transformations. By taking the conformally related Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black hole as an example, we show that this regular black hole has substantially distinctive absorption behavior compared with singular black holes. Our result provides a new approach to distinguish a regular black hole from a singular one.
1 Introduction
Searching for gravitational theory beyond General Relativity (GR) has never stopped since GR was realized to be imperfect as a theory of gravitation. A serious defect is that the black hole (BH) spacetimes in GR include singularities, which is not an honest reflection of astrophysical objects. Many gravitational theories have been proposed to solve this problem, among which the conformal gravity is a promising attempt [1–3]. Among various kinds of conformal gravitational theories constructed so far, we focus on the conformal gravity from scalar-tensor theory [4,5]. The reason is that some BH solutions of GR belong to the solution family of scalar-tensor conformal gravitational theory. This is quite interesting. When a gravitational theory has conformal invariance, one can obtain a new metric by multiplying the original metric by a scale factor. In particular, one can choose actions sophisticatedly, so that there is a GR solution lying in the solution family of scalar-tensor conformal gravitational theory. As a consequence, the metric of scalar-tensor conformal gravitational theory is composed of a GR metric multiplied by a scale factor.
The black hole family obtained in this way is called conformally related black holes (CR BHs) and is usually a kind of regular black holes.
The influence of scale factors is nontrivial. Significantly, the singularity located at the center of a BH can be removed [5, 6] with a proper choice of scale factors, namely, CR BHs are usually regular. Besides the removing of spacetime singularities, various properties of CR BHs have been studied, including the
*E-mail address: [email protected]
†Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected]
arXiv:2108.06470v1 [gr-qc] 14 Aug 2021
quasinormal modes (QNMs) and dynamic stability [6–8], thermodynamics and phase transitions [6,9,10], and the violation of energy conditions in CR BH spacetimes [11].
At present, the absorption property of CR BHs remains to be investigated. The absorption cross sec- tion (ACS) of a BH describes the interaction between the BH and the matter around it, which reflects the essential property of the BH. Some previous studies show [12–16] that the ACS of regular BHs associ- ated with nonlinear electrodynamics (NED) is not very different from that of the Reissner-Nordstr¨om BH.
With fine tuning of parameters, the ACSs of these two kinds of BHs can even be the same. Because the Reissner-Nordstr¨om BH is singular, this phenomenon turns off the feasibility to distinguish the regular BHs associated with NED from singular ones by their ACSs. Nevertheless, the studies about the QNMs of CR BHs are inspiring, which indicates that this dynamic property can be greatly distinct from that of singular BHs, depending on the choice of scale factors. Therefore, it is of considerable value to investigate the ACSs of CR BHs from the perspective on distinguishing a regular BH from a singular one.
We adopt the complex angular momentum (CAM) method to derive the analytic expression of ACSs.
The CAM method was originally applied to scattering problems in quantum mechanics. The pioneering work was done by Watson [17], see the monographs of Newton [18] and Nussenzveig [19] for the details.
The first application of CAM method to gravitational theory was accomplished by Chandrasekhar and Ferrari [20], followed by Andersson and Thylwe [21,22] who applied this technique to the Schwarzschild BH. Later, the connection between the surface waves and QNMs was established [23] in terms of the CAM method, where the QNMs were regarded as the resonance modes of surface waves. Moreover, the related progress was made [24–29], which provided a general proposal to derive the analytic expression of Regge frequency and thereby to work out ACSs. Incidentally, one method rather than the CAM was once proposed [30] to calculate the Regge frequency. In this paper, we follow the way suggested in Refs. [23–29] but generalize it for dealing with CR BHs.
The outline of this paper is as follows. In Sec. 2, we briefly review the BH scattering/absorption theory. In Sec. 3, we prove a precondition for calculating Regge frequency in the context of CR BHs.
We derive in Sec. 4 the analytic expression of Regge frequency by using the third-order WKB method and apply the formula to the model of conformally related Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black holes (CRST BHs). In Sec. 5, we give the general expression of ACSs and show its dependence on scale factors. We illustrate our results by taking the model of CRST BHs as an example. Finally, we present our conclusions in Sec. 6.
2 Review of scattering/absorption theory
The general metric of CR BHs we focus on is as follows:
d ˜s2= S(r)
− f (r)dt2+ 1
f(r)dr2+ r2dΩD−2
, (1)
where S(r) denotes the scale factor and f (r) the lapse function. Eq. (1) is asymptotically flat in the D- dimensional spacetime because both S(r) and f (r) equal one in the limit of r → ∞. As we have mentioned in Introduction, the spacetime singularity of Eq. (1) can be removed, see Refs. [4, 6, 8].
To study the dynamics of such a spacetime, one can investigate the simplest case: the minimally coupled massless scalar field. The dynamics of this scalar field is described by the Klein-Gordon equation,
√1
−g∂µ√
−ggµ ν∂νΦ = 0. (2)
The decomposition of Φ in the background of Eq. (1) has been introduced [6], Φ =
∑
`,m
1
r(D−2)/2[S(r)](D−2)/4e−iωtψ`(r)Y`m(θ1, . . . , θD−2), (3) where Y`m(θ1, . . . , θD−2) stands for the spherical harmonics of D − 2 angular coordinates, 0 ≤ (θ1, θ2, . . . ,
θD−3) ≤ π, and 0 ≤ θD−2 ≤ 2π. With the help of Eqs. (2) and (3), one can obtain the Schr¨odinger-like equation,
∂r2∗ψ`+ ω2−V`
ψ`= 0, (4)
with the effective potential,
V`= f (r)
`(` + D − 3)
r2 +
f(r)
r(D−2)/2[S(r)](D−2)/400
[S(r)](D−2)/4r(D−2)/2
, (5)
where the “tortoise” coordinate r∗ is defined as dr∗≡ dr/ f (r) and the prime means the derivative with respect to the radial coordinate. The scalar wave is purely ingoing at the event horizon and outgoing at the spatial infinity. Under this boundary condition, the eigenvalue ω of the master equation Eq. (4) is discrete. Therefore, one obtains [31–34] eigenmodes, i.e. the QNMs as well as the complex quasinormal frequencies (QNFs), ω = ω`n− iΓ`n, where ω`nrepresents the oscillation and Γ`n the inverse of damping time scale.
The dynamics of the scalar field can also be understood in the perspective of BH scattering. The boundary condition can be written explicitly as follows:
• At the event horizon, the partial wave ψ`(r) is purely ingoing without reflection,
ψ`(r) ∼ e−iωr∗, r∗→ −∞; (6)
• At the spatial infinity, ψ`(r) is asymptotically free,
ψ`(r) ∼ 1
T`(ω)e−iωr∗+i(`+D−32 )π2−iπ4 −S`(ω)
T`(ω)e+iωr∗−i(`+D−32 )π2+iπ4, r∗→ +∞. (7) Note that 1/T`(ω) is the reflective coefficient, S`(ω) is the element of diagonalized scattering ma- trix, and S`(ω)/T`(ω) is the transmitted coefficient. The terms ±i(` +D−32 )π2∓ iπ4 on the exponen- tials are relative phase difference between the reflective and transmitted waves.
According to the boundary condition, the scalar wave is asymptotically free at the spatial infinity, and thus it does not encounter any potential barriers. Therefore, the reflective coefficient in Eq. (7) should vanish, while the transmitted coefficient should survive. This implies that the boundary condition picks the poles of the scattering matrix, at which both T`(ω) and S`(ω) are infinite, but the ratio S`(ω)/T`(ω) is finite.
As S`(ω) is a function of both ` and ω, the poles can be interpreted in two perspectives.
In the first perspective, S`(ω) is analytically continued into the complex ω-plane (ω ∈ C), while ` ∈ N remains. In this case, the poles of the scattering matrix correspond to the QNFs. As a consequence, on the complex-ω plane, the scattering matrix S`(ω) can be expanded at the vicinity of QNFs,
S`(ω) ∝ Γ`n
2(ω − ω`n+ iΓ`n), (8)
which is the Breit-Wigner type of resonances, see Appendix A of Ref. [25] for the details.
In the second perspective we adopt in this paper, S`(ω) is analytically continued into the complex λ -plane (CAM plane), by firstly defining λ ≡ ` + (D − 3)/2 and secondly analytically continuing λ to be complex, while ω ∈ R remains. In this case, the poles of the scattering matrix correspond to the Regge poles. Conventionally, the notation λn(ω) (n = 1, 2, . . .) is used to distinguish different Regge poles.
As suggested in Refs. [23–29], one can interpret resonances as the surface waves travelling around a photon sphere and damping simultaneously. Re λn(ω) denotes the speed of circumnavigation of surface waves and Im λn(ω) the damping of surface waves. In fact, the QNFs are closely related to the Regge poles. When the resonances happen, i.e., the real part of Regge poles satisfies
Re λn(ω`n) = ` +D− 3
2 , ` ∈ N, (9)
one can solve the real part of QNFs. In addition, the minus imaginary part of QNFs can be determined by the Regge poles,
Γ`n= Im λn(ω)dωd Re λn(ω)
d
dωRe λn(ω)2
+ d
dωIm λn(ω)2
ω =ω`n
. (10)
3 Proof of precondition for conformally related black holes
In this section, our main purpose is to prove a precondition used in the calculation of Regge frequency for CR BHs.
The location of photon sphere of a static spherically symmetric BH is determined by the following formulas [35, 36] for the trivial scale factor, S(r) = 1,
f0(rc) − 2
rcf(rc) = 0, (11)
f00(rc) − 2
r2c f(rc) < 0. (12)
In fact, according to Ref. [25], one can approximatively obtain r0≈ rcin the large-` limit, where r0stands for the peak of the effective potential V` (Eq. (5)). We need this approximate result in CR BHs with the nontrivial S(r). Our way to prove is straightforward: If rc and r0 are independent of S(r) in the large-`
limit, the approximate result holds for CR BHs. This is what we call the precondition.
3.1 r
cindependent of S(r)
We start with the line element Eq. (1) and restrict our discussion, without loss of generality, to the circular geodesic orbits within the equatorial plane. As shown by Chandrasekhar [35] and Cardoso [36], the Lagrangian of a particle moving along one of such obits is‡
2L = −S(r) f (r)˙t2+S(r)
f(r)˙r2+ S(r)r2ϕ˙2, (13) where the dot denotes the derivative with respect to the affine parameter τ and ϕ stands for the azimuthal angular coordinate. The generalized momenta then take the forms,
pt = −S(r) f (r)˙t ≡ −E, (14a)
pϕ = S(r)r2ϕ ≡ L,˙ (14b)
pr = S(r)
f(r)˙r, (14c)
where E and L are conserved energy and angular momentum of the moving particle, respectively. Solving Eq. (14) for ˙t and ˙ϕ , we obtain
˙t = E
S(r) f (r), (15)
ϕ˙ = L
S(r)r2, (16)
and thus give the conserved Hamiltonian,
2H = 2(pt˙t+ pϕϕ + p˙ r˙r −L )
= −S(r) f (r)˙t2+S(r)
f(r)˙r2+ S(r)r2ϕ˙2
= − E2
S(r) f (r)+S(r)
f(r)˙r2+ L2 S(r)r2
≡ δ1, (17)
where δ1= 0 stands for null geodesics, while δ1= −1 for time-like ones. Eq. (17) can be recast into
˙r2= Vr, (18)
with
Vr = f(r) S(r)
δ1− L2
S(r)r2+ E2 S(r) f (r)
, (19)
where Vr denotes the geometric potential of particles. Note to distinguish Vr from the effective scattering potential V`.
‡A minus sign appears when compared to the Lagrangian in Ref. [36] due to the different sign conventions.
The photon sphere consists of circular null geodesics at r = rc, which are unstable orbits such that Vr|r=r
c= 0 = Vr0 r=r
c, (20)
and
Vr00
r=rc< 0. (21)
Eq. (20) determines the value of rc, while Eq. (21) shows the instability of orbits. We can write Eq. (20) explicitly,
Vr|r=rc= 0 =⇒ E2 fc −L2
r2c = 0, (22)
and
Vr0
r=rc = 0 =⇒ E2
[S(r)]2−L2f(r) r2S(r)
!0 r=r
c
= 0, (23)
where fc means f (rc) and the similar notation is also applied to the scale factor, i.e., Sc≡ S(rc), S0c ≡ S0(rc), etc., in the following contexts. Eq. (23) yields
2S0crc fcL2− E2rc2 − L2Sc 2 fc− rcfc0 = 0. (24) Note that none of rc, Sc, S0c, and L equal zero. Substituting Eq. (22) into Eq. (24), we exactly obtain Eq. (11) which is associated with the trivial scale factor, S(r) = 1. Hence, we prove that rcis independent of S(r). It is remarkable that the scale factor does not alter the location of photon spheres.
3.2 r
0independent of S(r)
Now we analyze V` for ` 1. V` has the following behavior in large-` regimes for the CR BHs described by Eq. (1),
V`∼ `2f(r)
r2 , ` 1, (25)
which can simply be verified when ` 1 is applied to Eq. (5) and the terms proportional to `0and `1are omitted. Note that Eq. (25) is exactly same as Eq. (44) of Ref. [36]. Therefore, the peak r0of V`in large-`
regimes is also independent of S(r).
As a summary of Section 3, the approximate result, r0≈ rcfor ` 1, still holds for CR BHs with the nontrivial S(r) because both r0and rcare not altered by S(r) in the large-` limit. Incidentally, this implies that the geometric ACS, which will be discussed in detail in Section 5, is independent of S(r).
4 Regge frequency of conformally related static spherically sym- metric black holes: WKB method
In this section we calculate the Regge frequency for CR BHs in terms of the third-order WKB method, which is the basis for us to investigate ACSs in the next section.
4.1 Regge frequency: General expression
Now we derive the analytic expression of Regge frequency via the third-order WKB method. Origi- nally, the WKB method was used to derive the eigenvalues of Schr¨odinger equation in quantum mechan- ics, see Ref. [38] for a pedagogical introduction. Then it was introduced into BH perturbation theory for the calculation of QNMs, because the master equations of perturbative fields have the Schr¨odinger-like form and the QNMs correspond to the eigenvalues of Schr¨odinger-like equations. The first-order WKB method was proposed by Schutz and Will [39], the third-order one by Iyer and Will [40], the sixth-order one by Konoplya [41], and the higher-order one by Konoplya et al. [42, 43]. Recently, the WKB method has also been used to calculate the Regge frequency in BH perturbation theory, see Ref. [23–25] for the details.
Here we resort to the third-order WKB method. As pointed out in Ref. [25], although the higher-order WKB method has higher precision, the complexity of calculations also grows greatly, which gives rise to a too complicated analytic expression. As a primary application to CR BHs, the third-order WKB is good enough, which can be seen in the following discussions.
We start with the third-order WKB equation [40] in which the QNFs satisfy ω2=
V0(λ ) + h
−2V0(2)(λ ) i1/2
Λ(λ , n)
− iα(n)h
−2V0(2)(λ ) i1/2
1 + Ω(λ , n) , (26)
where ω ∈ R+, λ is Regge frequency, λ ∈ C, n is overtone number, n ∈ N+, and α(n) ≡ n − 1/2. In Eq. (26) the two factors, Λ and Ω take the forms,
Λ(λ , n) = 1
h−2V0(2)(λ )i1/2
1 8
V0(4)(λ ) V0(2)(λ )
1
4+ [α(n)]2
− 1 288
V0(3)(λ ) V0(2)(λ )
!2
7 + 60 [α(n)]2
, (27)
and
Ω(λ , n) = 1
h−2V0(2)(λ )i
5 6912
V0(3)(λ ) V0(2)(λ )
!4
77 + 188 [α(n)]2
− 1 384
[V0(3)(λ )]2V0(4)(λ ) [V0(2)(λ )]3
51 + 100 [α(n)]2 + 1 2304
V0(4)(λ ) V0(2)(λ )
!2
67 + 68 [α(n)]2
+ 1 288
V0(3)(λ )V0(5)(λ ) [V0(2)(λ )]2
19 + 28 [α(n)]2 − 1 288
V0(6)(λ ) V0(2)(λ )
!
5 + 4 [α(n)]2
. (28)
Moreover, the notation V0(p)(λ ) stands for the derivatives of Vλ −D−3
2 (r) with respect to the tortoise coor- dinate at the peak of the potential,
V0(p)(λ ) = dp dr∗pV
λ −D−32 (r∗) r∗=(r∗)0
, (29)
where Vλ −D−3 2
(r) corresponds to V`(r) that is now regarded as a function of complex λ after the analytic continuation of `. We shall solve Eq. (26) approximatively by assuming |λ | 1 and |Reλ | |Imλ |.
Such an assumption is just the precondition r0≈ rc for ` 1 we just proved in the above section. So we evaluate V0(p)(λ ) at rc rather than at r0. As done in Ref. [25], we also adopt ηc in order to simplify the formulas of Regge frequency,
ηc≡ 1 2
q
4 fc− 2r2cfc(2). (30)
Again taking Eqs. (5), (29), and (30) into consideration, we compute the coefficients in Eqs. (26), (27), and (28). These coefficients are related to V0(p)(λ ) and put in Appendix A.
Now it is ready to solve Eq. (26). By using Eqs. (27), (28), and (29) together with Appendix A, we derive the general formula of the Regge frequency of CR BHs,
λn(ω) ≈ r2c
fcω2+ an+ 2ηc2[α(n)]2εn(ω)
1/2
+ iηcα (n) [1 + εn(ω)] , (31) where
εn(ω) = bn
(rc2/ fc)ω2+ an+ ηc2[α(n)]2. (32) Note that the formula has a similar form to but different coefficients from that in Ref. [25]. The condition,
|λ | 1 and |Reλ | |Imλ |, leads to ω 1. Thus we can further expand λn(ω) in series of ω, λn(ω) =
rc
√fc ω + an (2rc/√
fc) 1 ω
+ iηcα (n)
1 + bn (rc2/ fc)
1 ω2
+ O
ω →+∞
1 ω3
. (33)
Here anand bndepend on Scand its derivatives S(p)c , and they encode nontrivial corrections to the Regge frequency via the scale factor. Such nontrivial corrections show the major difference between the con- formally related BHs and non-conformal ones. The expressions of anand bn are presented in Appendix B. According to Eq. (33), the influence of S(r) is efficiently suppressed in large-ω regimes. As a con- sequence, in high-frequency regimes, λn(ω) ≈ rc/√
fc ω + iηcα (n), i.e., the Regge frequency becomes independent of the scale factor, which is consistent of the result of non-conformal BHs.
4.2 Regge frequency: The conformally related Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black hole
As an application to the result obtained in the above subsection, we give the expression of Regge fre- quency for conformally related Schwarzschild-Tangherlini black holes (CRST BHs) in the D-dimensional spacetime.
When S(r) = 1, CRST BHs return to ST BHs. For the two types of BHs, the lapse function is of the following form,
f(r) = 1 −rh r
D−3
, (34)
with
rD−3h = 16πM (D − 2)AD−2
, AD−2= 2π(D−1)/2
Γ[(D − 1)/2], (35)
where M is mass, rhis radius of event horizons,AD−2 is area of the unit sphere SD−2, and Γ[x] is Gamma function. Using Eqs. (11), (30), (34), and (35), we compute the parameters, rc and ηc,
rc = rh D − 1 2
1/(D−3)
, (36a)
ηc = √
D− 3. (36b)
For illustrations, we derive the Regge frequency for the CRST BHs in 4-, 5-, and 6-dimensional spacetimes, respectively, by using Eq. (33) together with Appendix B,
• D = 4
For the 4-dimensional spacetime, considering Eqs. (34), (36a), and (36b) we have rc = 3
2rh= 3M, (37a)
ηc = 1, (37b)
rc
√fc = 3√
3M. (37c)
Thus, we obtain the Regge frequency from Eq. (33) and Appendix B,
λn(ω) =
"
3√
3 Mω +
√3 an 18 Mω
#
+ iα(n)
1 + bn 27 M2ω2
+ O
ω →+∞
1 ω3
, (38)
with
an = − 29 216+ 1
4Sc2
"
3M2
S(1)c
2
− 6M2ScS(2)c − 8MScS(1)c
#
+5[α(n)]2
18 , (39a)
bn = − 371
15552− 1 8 S4c
( S3c
9M4S(4)c + 42M3Sc(3)+ 28M2S(2)c − 4MS(1)c
−3S2c
6M4
S(2)c 2
+ 9M4S(1)c S(3)c + 32M3S(1)c S(2)c + 8M2
S(1)c 2
−27M4 S(1)c
4
+ 9M2Sc
S(1)c
2
7M2S(2)c + 6MS(1)c
)
−305[α(n)]2
3888 . (39b)
• D = 5
Similarly, for the 5-dimensional spacetime, we have rc = √
2rh= 4 rM
3π, (40a)
ηc = √
2, (40b)
rc
√fc = 4 r2M
3π. (40c)
The corresponding Regge frequency reads λn(ω) =
√
2 rcω + an 2√
2 rcω
+ i√
2 α(n)
1 + bn 2rc2ω2
+ O
ω →+∞
1 ω3
, (41)
with
an = − 5 16+ 1
2πS2c
"
M
S(1)c
2
− 4MScS(2)c − 5√ 3π√
MScS(1)c
#
+3[α(n)]2
4 , (42a)
bn = −101
512− 1 24π2S4c
( S3c
16M2S(4)c + 60√
3πM3/2S(3)c + 84πMSc(2)− 21√
3π3/2√ MS(1)c
−S2c
40M4S(1)c S(3)c + 120√
3πM3/2S(1)c S(2)c + 24M2 S(2)c 2
+ 75πM
S(1)c 2
−24M2 S(1)c
4
+ 12MSc S(1)c
2 5
√
3πMSc(1)+ 6MS(2)c
)
−31[α(n)]2
128 . (42b)
• D = 6
As done in the above two cases, for the 6-dimensional spacetime, we have rc = 5
2
1/3
rh=
√3
15M 22/3√3
π
, (43a)
ηc = √
3, (43b)
rc
√fc = 55/6√3 M 22/3 6
√
3π2, (43c)
and write the corresponding Regge frequency, λn(ω) =
"r 5
3rcω + an 2p5/3 rcω
# + i√
3 α(n)
1 + bn (5/3)rc2ω2
+ O
ω →+∞
1 ω3
, (44)
with
an = −31
60− 3
20π2/3Sc
(30M)2/3S(2)c + 12√3
30πMS(1)c
+7[α(n)]2
5 , (45a)
bn = −409
720− 3
800π4/3S3c (
Sc2
153
√
30M4/3S(4)c + 480√3
π MS(3)c
+56(30π)2/3M2/3S(2)c − 192√3 30π√3
MS(1)c
−Sc
15√3
30M S(2)c 2
+ 30√3
30MS(1)c S(3)c +840√3
π M2/3S(1)c S(2)c + 56(30π)2/3√3 M
S(1)c 2
+30M2/3 S(1)c
2 12√3
π M1/3S(1)c +√3
30M2/3S(2)c
)
−91[α(n)]2
180 . (45b)
From the above Regge frequencies of CRST BHs, we find that anand bndepend on M, Sc, and S(p)c in a subtle way. In the second terms of an and bn, the combination of M, Sc and S(p)c is balanced such that the dimensions of all subterms in every second term offset precisely with one another, which makes anand bnexactly dimensionless. The powers of M in anand bnare not uniform in different dimensional spacetimes because the dimension of mass changes with spacetime dimensions as shown in Eq. (35).
5 Absorption cross section
Based on the Regge frequency performed above, we are now ready to compute the ACSs for CR BHs.
This section is divided into two subsections, where one focuses on the analytic expression of ACSs and the other to the illustration of ACSs in the model of CRST BHs.
5.1 Analytic expression of absorption cross sections
As shown in Refs. [26, 44], the ACS of a D-dimensional static spherically symmetric BH reads§
σabs(ω) = π(D−2)/2 Γ [(D − 2)/2] ωD−2
+∞
`=0
∑
Γ[` + D − 4]
Γ[`] (2` + D − 3) Γ`(ω), (46) where Γ`(ω) denotes a greybody factor.¶ Further, based on a modified version of Sommerfeld-Watson transformation [18], σabs can be analytically continued [26] to be a function of complex variables such that ` + (D − 3)/2 ≡ λ ∈ C. After these performances, one can rewrite σabswhich consists of three parts,
σabs(ω) = 2π(D−2)/2 Γ [(D − 2)/2] ωD−2
Z +∞
0
Γ[λ + (D − 3)/2]
Γ[λ − (D − 5)/2]λ Γ
λ −D−32 (ω) dλ
− 4πD/2
Γ [(D − 2)/2] ωD−2Re
"
+∞
∑
n=1
Γ[λn(ω) + (D − 3)/2]
Γ[λn(ω) − (D − 5)/2]
eiπ[λn(ω)−(D−3)/2]λn(ω)γn(ω) sin[π(λn(ω) − (D − 3)/2)]
#
+ π(D−2)/2
Γ [(D − 2)/2] ωD−2 Z +i∞
0
"
iΓ[λ + (D − 3)/2]
Γ[λ − (D − 5)/2]
eiπ[λ −(D−3)/2]λ Γ
λ −D−32 (ω) sin[π(λ − (D − 3)/2)]
+iΓ[−λ + (D − 3)/2]
Γ[−λ − (D − 5)/2]
eiπ[λ +(D−3)/2]λ Γ−λ −D−3 2 (ω) sin[π(λ + (D − 3)/2)]
#
dλ , (47)
where γn(ω) is the residue of greybody factor at the n-th Regge pole, γn(ω) ≡ Resh
Γλ −D−3 2 (ω)i
λ =λn(ω). (48)
The three terms in Eq. (47) play different roles. Let us give a detailed explanation.
§This formula is valid for any effective potentials that are the function of radial coordinate only, so it is also valid in the CR BHs with a nontrivial scale factor. See also Ref. [45].
¶Note to distinguish this factor from the Gamma function, Γ[x].
The first term corresponds to the geometric absorption cross section, σgeo, which has the following form [26],
σgeo= π(D−2)/2bD−2c
Γ[D/2] , (49)
where bc≡ rc/√
fc is independent of S(r). As a result, σgeo is independent of S(r), which indicates that the first term of Eq. (47) is out of our central concern.
We shall see that the third term of Eq. (47) is also out of our central concern. The reason is as follows.
The integration with respect to λ leads to an overall factor. By definition, the greybody factor is the modulus square of transmission coefficient, so it is not larger than 1, namely, Γ
λ −D−32 (ω) ≤ 1. Therefore, we know that the overall factor has an upper bound, which can be obtained by setting Γ
λ −D−32 (ω) = 1 in the third term of Eq. (47),
Z +i∞
0
(
iΓ[λ +D−32 ] Γ[λ −D−52 ]
eiπ(λ −D−32 )λ
sin[π(λ −D−32 )]+ iΓ[−λ +D−32 ] Γ[−λ −D−52 ]
eiπ(λ +D−32 )λ sin[π(λ +D−32 )]
)
dλ . (50)
By means of numerical integration of Eq. (50), we find that the effect of the third term of Eq. (47) is quite small if compared to that of the second term. In fact, within the intermediate frequency region that we concern most, the third term just contributes a minor correction to the total ACS. This will be further illustrated intuitively in Sec. 5.2.
The second term of Eq. (47) represents the contribution from the Regge poles. It manifests the oscil- lation behavior of ACSs with respect to ω, therefore it does contain the characteristic information of CR BHs. For this reason, the second term is our concern.
Now let us introduce the method we shall use for calculation of the second term of Eq. (47). Gamma functions have the property,
Γ(z + a)
Γ(z + b) ∼ 1 z
−a+b
, if |z| → +∞ and |arg z| < π. (51) Moreover, the sine function can approximately be reduced to
sin (π[λn(ω) − (D − 3)/2])
= 1
2i h
eiπ[λn(ω)−(D−3)/2]− e−iπ[λn(ω)−(D−3)/2]i
= 1
2i h
eπ Imλn(ω)
eiπ[Reλn(ω)−(D−3)/2]e−2πImλn(ω)− e−iπ[Reλn(ω)−(D−3)/2]i
≈ −1
2i h
eπ Imλn(ω)e−iπ[Reλn(ω)−(D−3)/2]i
, (52)
where we have omitted the term, eiπ[Reλn(ω)−(D−3)/2]e−2πImλn(ω), because it is greatly suppressed by the factor e−2πImλn(ω). It is obvious to see that the leading order of e−2πImλn(ω)approximately equals 0.043 when D = 4 and n = 1 and it is even smaller when D > 4 and n > 1. By using Eqs. (51) and (52), we obtain the second term of Eq. (47) approximately as follows:
σabsRP(ω) ≈ 8πD/2
Γ [(D − 2)/2] ωD−2Re
"
+∞
∑
n=1
ie2iπ[Reλn(ω)−(D−3)/2]e−2πImλn(ω)[λn(ω)]D−3γn(ω)
#
. (53)
The greybody factor can be written [26] as
Γλ −D−3
2 (ω) =
1 + exp
−2π ω2−V0(λ ) q
−2V0(2)(λ )
−1
. (54)
Substituting Eq. (54) into Eq. (48), we compute γn(ω). Further substituting γn(ω) into Eq. (53), we finally obtain the explicit form of σabsRP(ω).
In the following we focus on the CRST BH. Although the derivations are straightforward, the residues of greybody factor in D-dimensional spacetimes are not listed here but just those in the four-, five-, and six-dimensional spacetimes as a sample for CRST BHs.
• D = 4
γn(ω) = − 1
2π − i α (n) 6√
3πMω
+ 1
23328πM2S4cω2 (
486M3Sc
S(1)c 2
7MS(2)c + 6S(1)c
−151S4c− 1458M4 S(1)c 4
−162M2S2c
6M2
S(2)c
2
+ 9M2S(1)c S(3)c + 32 MS(1)c S(2)c + 8 S(1)c
2
+54MS3c
9M3S(4)c + 42M2S(3)c + 28MSc(2)− 4S(1)c
−276[α(n)]2S4c )
+ O
ω →+∞
1 ω3
. (55)
• D = 5
γn(ω) = − 1
√2π− i
√3α(n) 4√
2πMω
+ 1
2048√
2π2MS4cω2 (
96M3/2Sc
S(1)c
2 5
√
3πS(1)c + 6√ MS(2)c
−192M2 S(1)c
4
− 111π2Sc4
−8MS2c
24M
S(2)c
2
+ 40MS(1)c S(3)c + 120√ 3π√
MS(1)c S(2)c + 75π
S(1)c
2
+8√ MS3c
16M3/2S(4)c + 60M√
3πS(3)c + 84√
MπS(2)c − 21√
3π3/2Sc(1)
)
− 33[α(n)]2 256√
2Mω2+ O
ω →+∞
1 ω3
. (56)
• D = 6
γn(ω) = −
√3
2π − i 3√6 3α(n)
√3
255/6π2/3 3
√ Mω
+ 1
20000√
3π5/3M2/3S3cω2 (
270M
S(1)c 2 12√3
30π S(1)c
+ 302/3M1/3S(2)c
−1468√3
30π4/3S3c− 135M23Sc
(30M)23 S(2)c
2
+ 2 (30M)2/3S(1)c S(3)c +56√3
30πM13S(1)c S(2)c + 112π23 Sc(1)
2
+27√3 MS2c
5
302/3
MS(4)c
+160√3
30πM2/3S(3)c + 560π2/3M1/3S(2)c − 64 302/3
π Sc(1)
)
− 11
35/6
√3
2[α(n)]2 25 52/3√3
π M2/3ω2
+ O
ω →+∞
1 ω3
. (57)
In the final part of this subsection, we derive the analytic expressions of σabsRP(ω) for the CRST BHs.
We omit all contributions from the Regge poles of higher excitations, i.e., those with n > 1. The reason is same as that explained above, that is, all these contributions are suppressed by the exponential function e−2πImλn(ω), where Im λn(ω) = ηcα (n) +O(1/ω2) = ηc(n − 1/2) +O(1/ω2), see Eq. (33). Here we list the results in the four-, five-, and six-dimensional spacetimes.
• D = 4
σabsRP(ω) = −8e−π
"
3√
3Mπ sin 6√
3πMω
2ω −π cos 6
√
3πMω 2ω2
−π sin 6
√3πMω 1296√
3MS2cω3
162M2ScS(2)c − 81M2 Sc(1)
2
+ 216MScS(1)c + 61S2c
#
+ O
ω →+∞
1 ω4
. (58)
• D = 5
σabsRP(ω) = 8e−
√2π" 32√ 2M sin
h8p2πM/3 ω
i
3π2ω −
4√
6M cos
h8p2πM/3 ω
i π3/2ω2
− sinh
8p2πM/3 ω
i 4√
2π2Sc2ω3
16MScS(2)c − 4M S(1)c
2
+ 20√
3πMScS(1)c + 13πS2c
#
+ O
ω →+∞
1 ω4
. (59)
• D = 6
σabsRP(ω) = −8e−
√3π " 25√
5M sinh
55/6π2/3 3
√2M/√6 3
ω i 8π2ω
−
5(152/3)M2/3cos h
55/6π2/33
√ 2M/√6
3
ω
i 2√3
2π5/3ω2
−
√3
3M sin h
55/6π2/3 3
√ 2M/√6
3
ω
i 16√6
5π2Scω3
9(15M)2/3S(2)c
+54√3
60πMS(1)c + 95√3
2π2/3Sc
#
+ O
ω →+∞
1 ω4
. (60)
5.2 Graphs of σ
absRP(ω) for CRST BHs
Now we present the above results more intuitively in graphs. We restrict our attention onto the (CR)ST BHs and plot the behavior of σabsRP(ω) with respect to ω. The dimensionless quantities, σabsRP(ω)/Ah and rhω , are adopted, where Ah≡AD−2rD−2h is the area of event horizon of a (D − 2)-dimensional sphere.
For simplicity, we refer to σabsRP(ω) as the “oscillation” in the context.
At first, in order to justify the correctness of our results, we show that our results are consistent with the Sinc results obtained in Ref. [26], where the latter is based on the model of non-conformal Schwarzschild- Tangherlini BHs. Thus we set S(r) = 1 and choose the lapse function to be that of the Schwarzschild- Tangherlini BH in our results. We plot the comparison in Fig. 1, where the red and green curves agree with each other in a wide range. Only when the frequency is extremely low, does the disagreement appear slightly. The reason is that our results includeO(1/ω3) corrections to σabsRP(ω), while the Sinc results only include the order ofO(1/ω). Fig. 1 manifests the consistency of our results with the Sinc’s. Moreover, this figure also justifies that the third term of Eq. (47) indeed contributes a minor correction to the total ACS, see the blue curves. The effect of blue curves decreases rapidly when the frequency increases, such that it can be omitted in the intermediate region of frequency.
Next, we investigate the influence of scale factor S(r) on σabsRP(ω). This will be accomplished by studying the distinction between CRST BHs and ST BHs. We consider one specific kind of scale factors,
S(r) = 1 + L r
2N
, (61)
where N is a dimensionless constant and L is a typical length scale of CRST BHs, e.g., rh, or rc, or the Planck length [4]. As long as N is large enough, the CRST BHs are free of spacetime singularity. In fact, we can verify that the Ricci scalar behaves as r2N−D+1 and the Kretschmann scalar as r4N−2D+2 when r→ 0 for the choice of Eq. (61). If we take N = 25 in the four-, five-, and six-dimensional spacetimes in Fig. 2 and N = 10, 25, 50, 100 in the four-dimensional spacetime in Fig. 3, the corresponding CRST BHs are regular.
We present the behavior of σabsRP(ω) with respect to ω in Fig. 2 by using Eqs. (58), (59), and (60), where the case of CRST BHs with nontrivial scale factors and the case of ST BHs with the trivial scale factor
higher-orders Sinc 3rd term
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 -0.2
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
rhω σabsRP/Ah
D=4
higher-orders Sinc 3rd term
1 2 3 4 5 6
-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05
rhω σabsRP/Ah
D=5
higher-orders Sinc 3rd term
2 4 6 8 10
-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05
rhω σabsRP/Ah
D=6
Figure 1: The red curves stand for our results, the green curves for the Sinc ones in Ref. [26], and the blue curves for the upper bound of the third term in Eq. (47).
(N = 0) are plotted. It is quite interesting that the amplitude of σabsRP(ω) of CRST BHs always possesses a non-monotonic behavior, unlike that of ST BHs which is monotonic. To show this phenomenon more clearly and without loss of generality, we have made an appropriate choice of parameters, such as N = 25 and L = rc. For the CRST BHs, the amplitude of σabsRP(ω) is quite large in extremely low frequency regimes. As ω increases, the amplitude of σabsRP(ω) decreases almost to zero at a certain value of ω which is called “the minimum amplitude”, and then the amplitude increases. Comparatively speaking, the amplitude of σabsRP(ω) for the ST BHs decreases monotonically. In large-ω regimes, the oscillations of the two kinds of BHs tend to the same. We note that the effect of the third term of Eq. (47) can also be neglected, see the blue curves.
Non-conformal Conformal 3rd term
2 4 6 8 10 12
-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
rhω σabsRP/Ah
D=4,N=25
1.6 Non-conformal
Conformal 3rd term
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
-0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03
rhω σabsRP/Ah
D=5,N=25
14
Non-conformal Conformal 3rd term
10 20 30 40 50 60
-0.015 -0.010 -0.005 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015
rhω σabsRP/Ah
D=6,N=25
23
Figure 2: Comparison between CRST BHs and ST BHs, where L = rc and N = 25 are chosen for the convenience of plotting. The red curves stand for the CRST BHs and the green curves for the ST BHs, where the vertical black lines mark the positions of “the minimum amplitude” in the four-, five-, and six-dimensional spacetimes, respectively. The blue curves stand for the upper bound of the third term in Eq. (47). Note that the blue curves are very close to the horizontal axes.
We further investigate the non-monotonic behavior and find that it exists universally for a wide range of parameter N. To show this universality, we plot the results with various values of N for the four-
dimensional CRST BH in Fig. 3. The situations for five- and six-dimensional models are similar and thus not presented here. We note that the effect of the third term of Eq. (47) can be neglected as expected.
Non-conformal Conformal 3rd term
2 4 6 8 10
-0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
rhω σabsRP/Ah
D=4,N=10
0.59 Non-conformal
Conformal 3rd term
2 4 6 8 10 12
-0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
rhω σabsRP/Ah
D=4,N=25
1.6
Non-conformal Conformal 3rd term
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
-0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06
rhω σabsRP/Ah
D=4,N=50
3.3 Non-conformal
Conformal 3rd term
5 10 15 20
-0.02 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02
rhω σabsRP/Ah
D=4,N=100
6.7
Figure 3: Comparison between the CRST BHs and ST BHs in the four-dimensional spacetime, where L= rc and N = 10, 25, 50, 100 are set. The red curves stand for the CRST BHs and the green curves for the ST BHs, where the vertical black lines mark the positions of “the minimum amplitude” in the cases of N= 10, 25, 50, 100, respectively. The blue curves stand for the upper bound of the third term in Eq. (47).
Note that the blue curves are very close to the horizontal axes.
We also find that the behavior of σabsRP(ω) is not sensitive to L. Only when L is ridiculously large, e.g. L> 2000rcin the four-dimensional CRST BH with N = 25, does the non-monotonic behavior vanish according to our numerical calculation. Note that N is the exponent in S(r), while L is a numerator of fraction. It is natural that the influence of N is more prominent than that of L. Furthermore, if the astrophysical data are taken into consideration, the magnitude of L is not likely to be larger than the BH mass in the geometric units [46]. As a result, the non-monotonic behavior always appears in a physically natural range of L and N.
We end this section with a summary of our results. After some appropriate approximation, we obtain the analytic expressions of σabsRP(ω) for the four-, five-, and six-dimensional CRST BHs. When CRST BHs
are reduced to ST BHs, our results agree with the Sinc’s [26]. With a specific choice of the scale factor which regularizes the CRST BH spacetimes, the amplitude of σabsRP(ω) of CRST BHs is non-monotonic, which gives rise to our main conclusion: The CR BHs are substantially different from their non-conformal counterparts in the aspect of ACSs.
6 Conclusion
We analyze the null geodesics of CR BHs and prove the condition, r0≈ rc for ` 1, that is, the location of photon spheres is independent of scale factors in the large-` limit. Then using the third- order WKB approximation together with this condition, we obtain the Regge frequency and the ACS of a massless scalar field absorbed by CR BHs. Our analyses show that the ACSs of CR BHs depend on the scale factor, which can be used to distinguish CR BHs from non-conformal BHs.
To illustrate the distinction, we investigate a specific class of CR BHs, the CRST BHs, and find that there is the non-monotonic behavior of ACS amplitudes in a wide range of parameter N. This phenomenon manifests the characteristic of CR BHs in the aspect of ACSs.
Significantly, it is possible to use the above mentioned phenomenon to determine observationally the scale factor of CR BHs if the CR BHs exist in our Universe. The scale factor tends to unity asymptotically, so the CR BHs and the non-conformal ones are similar at a large astronomical distance. Nevertheless, we can still distinguish these two kinds of BHs by their absorption spectra. In Ref. [11], the authors concluded that a larger N causes a less violation to the energy condition, which implies that a larger N seems more reasonable and natural in our world. For a larger N, “the minimum amplitude” of σabsRP(ω) appears in the higher-frequency regimes of absorption spectra, which is a more prominent spectral indication of the scale factor. As for astrophysical experiments, it is technically easier to observe the high-energy rays and particles than the low-energy ones. Therefore, it is feasible to distinguish a CR BH from a non-conformal BH through the observations.
It is also feasible to search for regular BHs in this way. According to the earlier studies [12–16], the ACSs of regular NED BHs do not possess any special spectral characteristics, such as the non-monotonic behavior. Therefore, the ACSs of NED BHs are indistinguishable from those of singular BHs, such as the Reissner-Nordstrom BH. However, this is not the case for regular CR BHs. The distinction is prominent as we have shown. Therefore, we provide a feasible approach for searching for regular BHs.
Finally, we have an argument about the Hawking radiation of CR BHs. The ACSs are related to the energy flux of Hawking radiation [47–49]. For example, the following formula holds for the four- dimensional Schwarzschild BH,
d2E(ω)
dωdt ∝ ωD−1σabs(ω)
exp(8πMω) − 1, (62)
which implies that the radiated energy per unit time and unit frequency is proportional to the ACS of four- dimensional Schwarzschild BHs. By integrating Eq. (62) with respect to t and ω, we can obtain the loss of BH energy through the radiation, ∆E. Obviously, ∆E is a function of N and L. This implies that the loss of BH energy does depend on the scale factor S(r) although the Hawking temperature is independent [4–6]
of this factor. Such an inference is surprising because it seems there are unknown properties hidden in the
![arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 5 Jan 2021]()