metal-organic papers
m1156
Shenet al. [Co(C4H7N2O2)2Cl(C6H5NO2)]H2O doi:10.1107/S1600536805015424 Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, m1156–m1158
Acta Crystallographica Section E
Structure Reports
Online
ISSN 1600-5368
Chlorobis(dimethylglyoximato)(isonicotinic
acid)cobalt(III) monohydrate
Xu-Jie Shen, Li-Ping Xiao and Ru-Ren Xu*
Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence e-mail: rrxu@zju.edu.cn
Key indicators
Single-crystal X-ray study
T= 295 K
Mean(C–C) = 0.008 A˚ H-atom completeness 96%
Rfactor = 0.044
wRfactor = 0.085
Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.1
For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.
#2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain – all rights reserved
In the title compound, [Co(C4H7N2O2)2Cl(C6H5NO2)]H2O,
the two crystallographically distinct Co atoms are both coordinated by a chloride anion, an N-bonded isonicotinic acid ligand and twoN,N-bidentate dimethylglyoximate ligands in a distorted octahedral geometry. A network of O—H O and O—H N hydrogen bonds helps to establish the crystal packing.
Comment
In recent years, the crystal engineering of supramolecular architectures based on metal complexes has been rapidly expanding due to their ability to afford functional materials with potentially useful properties, as well as fascinating molecular structures (Lehn, 1995, 1999; Khlobystov et al., 2001). Dimethylglyoximate (dmg) is a familiar ligand with excellent coordination capability to generate mono-, bi- or trinuclear complexes, which are commonly used as precursors for the formation of supramolecular architectures (Chaudhuri
et al., 1991; Kubiaket al., 1995; Cerveraet al., 1997). Isonico-tinic acid is also a good mono- or bidentate ligand for the construction of supramolecular complexes with versatile binding modes (Covaet al., 2001; Sekiya & Nishikiori, 2001). However, crystal structures of complexes containing both these ligands have been less well documented thus far (Hashizume & Ohashi, 1998). In order to explore the coord-ination behaviour of these two ligands, we synthesized the title compound, a new cobalt(III) complex, (I), and determined its structure.
As shown in Fig. 1, the asymmetric unit of (I) consists of two Co-centred complexes and two uncoordinated water mol-ecules. Both of the Co atoms are hexacoordinated with a slightly distorted octahedral geometry (Table 1). Each Co
atom is coordinated by four N atoms from two bidentate di-methylglyoximate ligands, where the two dmg ligands aretrans
to each other. The Co—N(dmg) bonds range in length from 1.885 (5) to 1.931 (5) A˚ . A chloride anion and an N atom from the isonicotinic acid ligand occupy the other two coordination positions of each Co atom. Intramolecular hydrogen bonds between the two dmg ligands of each Co-centred complex (Fig. 1) enhance the stability of the structure. Intermolecular hydrogen bonds between water molecules and isonicotinic acid O atoms support the molecular packing (Table 2). Fig. 2 shows the packing arrangement of the complex.
Experimental
To a 95% ethanol solution (40 ml) containing [CoCl2(dmg)2]H
[0.36 g, 1 mmol; synthesized according to the method of Heeg & Elder (1980)], isonicotinic acid (0.123 g, 1 mmol) was added. After being stirred for 15 min, the resulting dark-red solution was filtered and allowed to evaporate at room temperature. After 7 d, dark-red crystals of (I) suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained.
Crystal data
[Co(C4H7N2O2)2Cl(C6H5NO2)]
-H2O
Mr= 465.74 Monoclinic, P21
a= 8.2904 (6) A˚
b= 14.2195 (8) A˚
c= 16.9550 (7) A˚ = 90.615 (4)
V= 1998.6 (2) A˚3
Z= 4
Dx= 1.515 Mg m 3
MoKradiation Cell parameters from 2570
reflections = 2.4–22.4 = 1.04 mm1
T= 295 (2) K Block, dark red 0.430.210.15 mm
Data collection
Bruker SMART APEX area-detector diffractometer ’and!scans
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2002)
Tmin= 0.665,Tmax= 0.860
11 170 measured reflections
6172 independent reflections 4394 reflections withI> 2(I)
Rint= 0.052
max= 25.0
h=9!6
k=14!16
l=20!20
Refinement
Refinement onF2
R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.044
wR(F2) = 0.085
S= 0.90 6172 reflections 511 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
w= 1/[2(F
o2) + (0.0281P)2] whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3 (/)max= 0.017
max= 0.51 e A˚
3
min=0.31 e A˚
3
Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 2502 Friedel pairs
[image:2.610.47.293.70.185.2]Flack parameter =0.005 (16)
Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (A˚ ,).
Co1—N4 1.887 (5)
Co1—N3 1.895 (4)
Co1—N1 1.901 (5)
Co1—N2 1.914 (5)
Co1—N5 1.962 (4)
Co1—Cl1 2.2190 (15)
Co2—N6 1.891 (5)
Co2—N8 1.896 (5)
Co2—N9 1.898 (4)
Co2—N7 1.900 (5)
Co2—N10 1.977 (4) Co2—Cl2 2.2444 (15)
N4—Co1—N3 80.96 (18) N4—Co1—N1 99.6 (2) N3—Co1—N2 99.0 (2) N1—Co1—N2 80.45 (19) N3—Co1—N5 91.11 (18) N1—Co1—N5 89.08 (18) N5—Co1—Cl1 177.53 (13)
[image:2.610.314.565.74.260.2]N6—Co2—N9 98.6 (2) N8—Co2—N9 80.6 (2) N6—Co2—N7 81.8 (2) N8—Co2—N7 98.9 (2) N6—Co2—N10 90.42 (18) N8—Co2—N10 90.64 (17) N10—Co2—Cl2 178.98 (14)
Table 2
Hydrogen-bonding geometry (A˚ ,).
D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A
O1—H1 O4 0.82 1.72 2.515 (5) 161
O3—H3 O2 0.82 1.72 2.514 (5) 163
O5—H5 O1W 0.82 1.74 2.550 (5) 171
O7—H7 O10 0.82 1.72 2.511 (6) 162
O9—H9 O8 0.82 1.70 2.495 (6) 162
O11—H11 O4i
0.82 1.89 2.669 (5) 159 O1W—H1W O7ii
0.85 (3) 1.95 (3) 2.797 (6) 172 (5) O1W—H2W Cl2iii
0.84 (2) 2.64 (5) 3.188 (6) 125 (4)
Symmetry codes: (i)x;1
2þy;z; (ii)x;y;1þz; (iii) 1x; 1 2þy;1z.
The H atoms attached to O1Wwere located in a difference Fourier map and refined with the distance restraint O—H = 0.85 (1) A˚ . The H atoms attached to O2Wwere not found in the difference map. The other H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.93–0.96 A˚ and O—H = 0.82 A˚ ) and refined as riding on their carrier atoms. All H atoms were assigned a fixed isotropic displacement parameter of
Uiso(H) = 0.08 A˚2.
Data collection:SMART(Bruker, 2002); cell refinement:SAINT
(Bruker, 2002); data reduction:SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2002); program(s) used to refine
metal-organic papers
Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, m1156–m1158 Shenet al. [Co(C
4H7N2O2)2Cl(C6H5NO2)]H2O
m1157
Figure 1
View of the asymmetric unit of (I), with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 40% probability level (arbitrary spheres for the H atoms).
Figure 2
[image:2.610.314.566.335.474.2] [image:2.610.314.561.524.614.2]structure:SHELXTL; molecular graphics:SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXTL.
The authors acknowledge the State Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry for the support of this work. We also thank Professor Long-Guan Zhu for his help.
References
Bruker (2002).SADABS(Version 2.03),SAINT(Version 6.02a),SHELXTL
(Version 5.03) andSMART(Version 5.618). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Cervera, B., Ruiz, R., Lloret, F., Julve, M., Cano, J., Faus, J., Bois, C. & Mrozinski, J. (1997).J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.pp. 395–402.
Chaudhuri, P., Winter, M., Della Vedova, B. P. C., Fleischhauer, P., Haase, W., Floerke, U. & Haupt, H. J. (1991).Inorg. Chem.30, 4777–4783.
Cova, B., Briceno, A. & Atencio, R. (2001).New J. Chem.25, 1516–1519. Flack, H. D. (1983).Acta Cryst.A39, 876–881.
Hashizume, D. & Ohashi, Y. (1998).J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.2, pp. 1931– 1935.
Heeg, M. J. & Elder, R. C. (1980).Inorg. Chem.19, 932–934.
Khlobystov, A. N., Blake, A. J., Champness, N. R., Lemenovskii, D. A., Majouga, A. G., Zyk, N. V. & Schroder, M. (2001).Coord. Chem. Rev.222, 155–192.
Kubiak, M., Głowiak, T., Moszner, M., Zio´łkowski, J. J., Asaro, F., Costa, G., Pellizer, G. & Tavagnacco, C. (1995).Inorg. Chim. Acta,236, 141–147. Lehn, J.-M. (1995). Supramolecular Chemistry. Concepts and Perspectives.
Weinheim: VCH.
Lehn, J.-M. (1999).Chem. Eur. J.5, 2455–2563.
Sekiya, R. & Nishikiori, S. (2001).Chem. Commun.pp. 2612–2613.
metal-organic papers
m1158
Shenet al. [Co(Csupporting information
sup-1
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1156–m1158
supporting information
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1156–m1158 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536805015424]
Chlorobis(dimethylglyoximato)(isonicotinic acid)cobalt(III) monohydrate
Xu-Jie Shen, Li-Ping Xiao and Ru-Ren Xu
Chlorobis(dimethylglyoximato)(isonicotinic acid)cobalt(III) monohydrate
Crystal data
[Co(C4H7N2O2)2Cl(C6H5NO2)]·H2O Mr = 465.74
Monoclinic, P21
Hall symbol: P 2yb a = 8.2904 (6) Å b = 14.2195 (8) Å c = 16.9550 (7) Å β = 90.615 (4)° V = 1998.6 (2) Å3 Z = 4
F(000) = 936 Dx = 1.515 Mg m−3
Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 2570 reflections θ = 2.4–22.4°
µ = 1.04 mm−1 T = 295 K Block, dark red 0.43 × 0.21 × 0.15 mm
Data collection
Bruker APEX area-detector diffractometer
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator
φ and ω scans
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2002) Tmin = 0.665, Tmax = 0.860
11170 measured reflections 6172 independent reflections 4394 reflections with I > 2σ(I) Rint = 0.052
θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.4° h = −9→6
k = −14→16 l = −20→20
Refinement
Refinement on F2
Least-squares matrix: full R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044 wR(F2) = 0.085 S = 0.90 6172 reflections 511 parameters 4 restraints
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
H-atom parameters constrained w = 1/[σ2(F
o2) + (0.0281P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
(Δ/σ)max = 0.017
Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3
Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3
Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 2502 Friedel pairs
supporting information
sup-2
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1156–m1158
Special details
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,
conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used
only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2
are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
x y z Uiso*/Ueq
supporting information
sup-3
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1156–m1158
supporting information
sup-4
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1156–m1158
C28 −0.1275 (8) 0.3018 (4) −0.2863 (3) 0.0437 (16) N1 −0.0915 (6) 0.0767 (3) 0.4834 (2) 0.0329 (12) N2 −0.1282 (6) 0.2428 (3) 0.4458 (2) 0.0347 (12) N3 0.1806 (6) 0.2398 (3) 0.3676 (2) 0.0309 (11) N4 0.2128 (6) 0.0729 (3) 0.4015 (2) 0.0321 (12) N5 0.1532 (5) 0.1937 (3) 0.5247 (2) 0.0282 (11) N6 0.3835 (6) 0.2035 (3) 0.0014 (2) 0.0377 (12) N7 0.2759 (6) 0.0450 (3) −0.0313 (2) 0.0401 (13) N8 −0.0146 (6) 0.0896 (3) 0.0529 (2) 0.0345 (12) N9 0.0965 (6) 0.2440 (3) 0.0886 (2) 0.0346 (12) N10 0.0868 (5) 0.1975 (3) −0.0720 (2) 0.0251 (11) H2W 0.601 (2) 0.416 (4) 0.897 (3) 0.038* H1W 0.482 (5) 0.371 (3) 0.9370 (16) 0.038*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
supporting information
sup-5
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1156–m1158
C14 0.057 (5) 0.047 (4) 0.026 (3) −0.012 (3) −0.004 (3) 0.005 (3) C15 0.030 (3) 0.083 (5) 0.034 (3) 0.009 (5) 0.004 (3) 0.034 (4) C16 0.047 (4) 0.051 (4) 0.038 (4) 0.030 (4) 0.014 (3) 0.015 (3) C17 0.034 (4) 0.122 (7) 0.051 (4) 0.010 (4) −0.001 (3) 0.041 (4) C18 0.110 (8) 0.086 (6) 0.086 (6) 0.068 (6) 0.042 (5) 0.018 (5) C19 0.030 (3) 0.046 (4) 0.027 (3) 0.009 (3) 0.001 (2) 0.007 (3) C20 0.041 (4) 0.038 (4) 0.030 (3) 0.016 (3) 0.002 (3) 0.008 (3) C21 0.035 (4) 0.106 (6) 0.042 (4) −0.010 (4) 0.002 (3) 0.014 (4) C22 0.089 (6) 0.058 (5) 0.056 (4) 0.031 (4) 0.025 (4) 0.012 (3) C23 0.038 (3) 0.028 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.005 (3) 0.000 (2) −0.001 (2) C24 0.049 (4) 0.037 (4) 0.030 (3) −0.002 (3) −0.001 (3) −0.006 (3) C25 0.035 (4) 0.035 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.001 (3) 0.006 (3) 0.004 (2) C26 0.049 (4) 0.027 (3) 0.032 (3) −0.004 (3) −0.002 (3) −0.002 (2) C27 0.044 (4) 0.025 (3) 0.032 (3) 0.003 (3) 0.000 (3) −0.002 (2) C28 0.050 (4) 0.042 (4) 0.039 (4) 0.003 (3) −0.003 (3) 0.010 (3) N1 0.035 (3) 0.029 (3) 0.035 (3) 0.001 (2) −0.003 (2) −0.003 (2) N2 0.033 (3) 0.036 (3) 0.035 (3) 0.003 (2) −0.005 (2) −0.003 (2) N3 0.038 (3) 0.025 (3) 0.029 (3) −0.008 (2) 0.002 (2) 0.001 (2) N4 0.038 (3) 0.032 (3) 0.027 (2) 0.003 (2) −0.005 (2) −0.005 (2) N5 0.023 (3) 0.033 (3) 0.029 (2) 0.001 (2) 0.005 (2) 0.001 (2) N6 0.032 (3) 0.053 (3) 0.029 (3) 0.000 (3) 0.003 (2) 0.007 (2) N7 0.046 (4) 0.043 (3) 0.031 (3) 0.013 (3) −0.002 (3) 0.007 (2) N8 0.038 (3) 0.033 (3) 0.032 (3) −0.005 (3) −0.005 (2) 0.012 (2) N9 0.046 (3) 0.036 (3) 0.021 (2) 0.007 (3) 0.000 (2) 0.003 (2) N10 0.022 (3) 0.028 (3) 0.026 (2) 0.000 (2) 0.007 (2) 0.0022 (19)
Geometric parameters (Å, º)
supporting information
sup-6
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1156–m1158
O6—C14 1.213 (7) C16—C18 1.482 (8) O7—N6 1.347 (5) C17—H17A 0.9600 O7—H7 0.8200 C17—H17B 0.9600 O8—N7 1.350 (6) C17—H17C 0.9600 O9—N8 1.328 (5) C18—H18A 0.9600 O9—H9 0.8200 C18—H18B 0.9600 O10—N9 1.357 (6) C18—H18C 0.9600 O11—C28 1.319 (7) C19—N8 1.303 (6) O11—H11 0.8200 C19—C20 1.462 (8) O12—C28 1.170 (7) C19—C21 1.478 (8) O1W—H2W 0.843 (10) C20—N9 1.299 (7) O1W—H1W 0.85 (3) C20—C22 1.504 (7) C1—N1 1.304 (7) C21—H21A 0.9600 C1—C2 1.469 (7) C21—H21B 0.9600 C1—C3 1.498 (8) C21—H21C 0.9600 C2—N2 1.285 (7) C22—H22A 0.9600 C2—C4 1.474 (8) C22—H22B 0.9600 C3—H3A 0.9600 C22—H22C 0.9600 C3—H3B 0.9600 C23—N10 1.344 (6) C3—H3C 0.9600 C23—C24 1.371 (7) C4—H4A 0.9600 C23—H23 0.9300 C4—H4B 0.9600 C24—C25 1.387 (8) C4—H4C 0.9600 C24—H24 0.9300 C5—N3 1.292 (7) C25—C26 1.394 (7) C5—C6 1.445 (7) C25—C28 1.508 (7) C5—C7 1.501 (8) C26—C27 1.379 (7) C6—N4 1.298 (7) C26—H26 0.9300 C6—C8 1.492 (8) C27—N10 1.333 (6) C7—H7A 0.9600 C27—H27 0.9300
supporting information
sup-7
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1156–m1158
supporting information
sup-8
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, m1156–m1158
H7B—C7—H7C 109.5 C6—N4—O4 122.2 (5) C6—C8—H8A 109.5 C6—N4—Co1 116.5 (4) C6—C8—H8B 109.5 O4—N4—Co1 121.2 (4) H8A—C8—H8B 109.5 C9—N5—C13 117.5 (4) C6—C8—H8C 109.5 C9—N5—Co1 121.0 (3) H8A—C8—H8C 109.5 C13—N5—Co1 121.5 (3) H8B—C8—H8C 109.5 C15—N6—O7 120.5 (5) N5—C9—C10 123.4 (5) C15—N6—Co2 116.2 (5) N5—C9—H9A 118.3 O7—N6—Co2 123.3 (4) C10—C9—H9A 118.3 C16—N7—O8 122.7 (5) C9—C10—C11 119.1 (5) C16—N7—Co2 115.8 (5) C9—C10—H10 120.5 O8—N7—Co2 121.5 (4) C11—C10—H10 120.5 C19—N8—O9 119.4 (5) C12—C11—C10 117.7 (5) C19—N8—Co2 117.9 (4) C12—C11—C14 123.3 (5) O9—N8—Co2 122.7 (4) C10—C11—C14 119.0 (5) C20—N9—O10 120.7 (5) C13—C12—C11 119.5 (5) C20—N9—Co2 116.6 (4) C13—C12—H12 120.2 O10—N9—Co2 122.6 (4) C11—C12—H12 120.2 C27—N10—C23 118.3 (4) N5—C13—C12 122.8 (5) C27—N10—Co2 121.4 (4) N5—C13—H13 118.6 C23—N10—Co2 120.3 (3) C12—C13—H13 118.6
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)
D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1···O4 0.82 1.72 2.515 (5) 161 O1—H1···N4 0.82 2.46 3.045 (6) 129 O3—H3···O2 0.82 1.72 2.514 (5) 163 O3—H3···N2 0.82 2.39 2.998 (6) 131 O5—H5···O1W 0.82 1.74 2.550 (5) 171 O7—H7···O10 0.82 1.72 2.511 (6) 162 O7—H7···N9 0.82 2.42 3.011 (6) 129 O9—H9···O8 0.82 1.70 2.495 (6) 162 O9—H9···N7 0.82 2.41 3.007 (7) 130 O11—H11···O4i 0.82 1.89 2.669 (5) 159
O1W—H1W···O7ii 0.85 (3) 1.95 (3) 2.797 (6) 172 (5)
O1W—H2W···Cl2iii 0.84 (2) 2.64 (5) 3.188 (6) 125 (4)