• No results found

MEASURE J BOND AUTHORIZATION 3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "MEASURE J BOND AUTHORIZATION 3"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Board of Trustees Meeting

March 8, 2021

MEASURE J BOND AUTHORIZATION

3

Status: Information

Presented by: Ron Perez

Vice President, Administrative Services

Issue

College of the Sequoias Community College District has determined that it is necessary and desirable to relocate its Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs from downtown Tulare and Visalia campus. The District is in preliminary discussion with its financial advisor, KNN Public Finance and its underwriter, Piper Sandler & Company on the amount the District could issue from the “College of the Sequoias Tulare Area Improvement District No. 3.

The College of the Sequoias Master Plan 2015-2025 contains a Phase II on the Tulare Campus and has a desire to access the remaining authorization in order to build a new CTE building housing: Environmental Control Technician, Electrical Training, Industrial Maintenance, Architecture CNC Machine, Industrial Automation, Construction, Faculty Offices and others. Initial programming is currently taking place.

Background

An election was held in the Tulare Area Improvement District No. 3 of the College of the Sequoias Community College District on November 4, 2008 (the “Election”) for the issuance and sale of general obligation bonds of the District for various purposes in the maximum amount of $60,000,000 (the “Authorization”).

The remaining unissued authorization is approximately $22.85M. The College established the Tulare Area Improvement District No. 3 and subsequently passed Measure J in November 2008. Measure J authorized the College to sell up to $60

million in General Obligation Bonds (GO Bonds) to fund voter-approved capital projects. The last GO Bond issue to access project funding was completed in June 2016;

however, the College still has $22.8 million in authorized GO Bonds. Access to the full amount of funding has been “stranded” due to a tax rate capacity constraint in the 2038-2040 range which created a “bottleneck” and impaired access to the significant amount of tax rate capacity beyond those years which would fund repayment of the full $22.8 million in GO Bonds.

The Administration, working with its financing team, has developed a financing plan to overcome the tax rate capacity constraint and access the entire $22.8 million. The plan is to first refinance three (3) existing GO Bonds, which have a refinancing amount of

(2)

$9.1 million, and save $3.5 million. The disproportionate amount of savings relative to the amount refinanced is largely due to refinancing a Capital Appreciation Bond (CAB) which has a rate of 7.25%. The repayment plan for the refinancing will be biased towards creating additional tax rate capacity in 2038-2040 to alleviate the “bottleneck”. The second part of the plan, now with long-term tax rate capacity accessible, is to issue the full $22.8 million in GO Bonds utilizing only Current Interest Bonds, i.e. no CABs. This new issue, Series F, will be the final issue from Measure J and will have a 30-year repayment with an all-inclusive rate of approximately 3.15% (based on current market conditions).

Recommended Action

(3)

March 8, 2021

College of the Sequoias

Community College District

Financing Plan to Access the

Funding Authorized by

Measure J for the

Tulare Area

(4)

Introduction

The College of the Sequoias (COS) has several existing GO Bond issues under Measures J

The historical tax rate has been well managed to the $25 target maximum

The projected tax rate is expected to be less than $25 even if “status quo”

Several existing GO Bond series can be refinanced based on current market conditions

Refinancings are integral to the proposed financing plan

Future tax assessments are reduced by $3.5 million – helpful when issuing New Money

Measure J has $22.8 million in existing but unissued GO Bond authorization

COS inquired about accessing at least $12 million to combine with funds on hand

Assessed value is key to funding – annual growth projection is 1% less than historical average

Proposed financing plan provides COS up to the full $22.8 million in funding access

Restructuring of principal repayments contends with tax rate capacity “bottle neck”

New Money issue is largely amortized long-term where there is ample tax rate capacity

(5)

Existing Obligations

Election of 2008 –Measure J- $60,000,000 Authorization -Passed November 4, 2008 with 71.90%

Issue Name Issue Date Final Maturity First Call Date Par Amount of Bonds Originally Issued

Par Amount of Outstanding Bonds

Series A February 11, 2009 August 1, 2025 August 1, 2019 $19,998,218 $1,359,127

Series B May 17, 2011 August 1, 2041 August 1, 2021 $10,004,927 $8,871,881

2011 BAN July 27, 2011 September 1, 2013 N/A $11,501,011

--Series C August 14, 2013 August 1, 2042 August 1, 2023 $3,401,460 $3,211,460

2013 BAN August 14, 2013 July 1, 2016 N/A $5,276,844

--Series D June 1, 2016 August 1, 2040 August 1, 2026 $3,710,000 $3,430,000

Series E (2017 Rfdg) June 14, 2017 August 1, 2032 August 1, 2027 $14,015,000 $13,590,000

Remaining Authorization $22,885,395 $0.00 $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00

Series A Series B Series C Series D Series E (2017 Refunding)

Historical Tax Rate –Measure J

Tax rate has been managed well by COS – assessed value reductions were cause of minor

excesses above $25

(6)

Assessed Value Growth

COS has had to attest to the projected assessed valuation

(AV) growth in each of its new issues under Measure J

The long-term projected AV growth rate has traditionally

been 4.5% or higher

irrespective of the real estate market

condition

2011 was recessionary

2013 was recovery

2016 was higher growth

There is no guidance from the Education Code nor County

on how to project AV for the purpose of issuing GO Bonds

Some County Treasurers have a preferred limit

however do not make it policy to provide a particular

AV growth percentage

Primary guide seems to be historical growth levels –

20-year historical mean is 5.0%

Our recommendation is to begin the assessment for the

New Money with 4.0% projected AV growth

This will be the final requisite projection given this New

Money issuance will likely exhaust the authorization

Source: Certificate of the District Regarding Projection of Tax Rates

Projections of AV Growth in New Money Issues

Series A & B Series C Series D May 11, 2011 August 14, 2013 June 1, 2016

2011 / 2012 0.00% --- ---2012 / 2013 2.00% --- ---2013 / 2014 3.00% --- ---2014 / 2015 4.00% N/A ---2015 / 2016 4.00% N/A 4.60% 2016 / 2017 4.00% 4.50% 4.50% 2017 / 2018 4.25% 4.50% 4.50% 2018 / 2019 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 2019 / 2020 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2020 / 2021 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2021 / 2022 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2022 / 2023 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2023 / 2024 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2024 / 2025 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2025 / 2026 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2026 / 2027 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2027 / 2028 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2028 / 2029 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2029 / 2030 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2030 / 2031 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2031 / 2032 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2032 / 2033 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2033 / 2034 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2034 / 2035 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2035 / 2036 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2036 / 2037 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2037 / 2038 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2038 / 2039 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2039 / 2040 4.75% 4.50% 4.50% 2040 / 2041 4.75% 4.50% ---2041 / 2042 --- 4.50% ---2042 / 2043 --- 4.50% ---2043 / 2044 --- 4.50% ---2044 / 2045 --- 4.50% ---2045 / 2046 --- 4.50% ---2046 / 2047 --- 4.50% ---2047 / 2048 --- 4.50% ---2048 / 2049 --- 4.50% ---2049 / 2050 --- 4.50% ---2050 / 2051 --- 4.50% ---Fiscal Year

(7)

TAX RATE COMPUTATION WORKSHEET

2020/21

Tulare COS SFID 2008

Voter Approved $60 Million 11/4/2008

Amount Issued $36,924,606

Tax Rate Year 1 2009/10

Final Debt Service Pmt Year 2042/43

Reserve Amount $5,462,818

Collection of Reserve at target

CURRENT YEAR REQUIREMENT

Principal and Interest (Feb & Aug) $2,505,447

Add: Reserve Requirements 5,462,818

Other Expenses (GC29142 001-030-2510-6035) 0 7,968,265 Less: Fund balance at 6/30/19 - County 7,393,742

Less: Payment needed before December 2019 (1,940,400)

BALANCE TO BE RAISED $2,514,923

UNSECURED REVENUES

NET UNSECURED VALUES TIMES PR YR Sec Rate 123,698

PRIOR YEARS DELINQUENCY RATE 0.946600

TOTAL UNSECURED REVENUE $117,093

UNITARY REVENUES

TOTAL UNITARY REVENUE $904,508

SECURED REVENUES

VALUE LOCAL 9,518,689,464

TIMES DLQT RATE (RESERVED) 97.27%

EQUALS NET VALUE 9,258,829,242

TOTAL VALUES 9,258,829,242

TIMES 1% (to convert value to tax dollar amount) 1%

SECURED REVENUE $92,588,292

SECURED AMOUNT TO RAISE (a-b-c) $1,493,322

CALCULATED SECURED TAX RATE 0.0161

Secured Tax Rate Formula = ( a-b-c)/d

SECURED TAX RATE SET (PER AUDITOR) 0.0200 To Compare - Prior Year Tax rates 0.02

Tax Rate Projections

The County of Tulare has been extremely helpful in explaining

their logic and methodology which has its own specific nuances

Authorization is aggregated as of FY 2020/21 for

determining annual amount to raise

Reserve amount is equal to Maximum Annual Debt Service

(MADS) of entire authorization

Any increase in MADS is collected over 6 years in equal

amounts, i.e. 1/6 per annum

Unitary Tax Revenue calculated in accordance with statute

Represents 36% of the amount required for debt service

but diluted over time as secured property tax levy grows

Lawsuit pending since 2015 challenging the methodology *

We have kept our projection constant at the 2020/21 level

of ~$904,000

Calculated tax rate and tax rate levied may differ – objective may

be a managed “smoothing” from year-to-year

We utilized the County’s tax rate methodology to determine

the cash flow available to pay debt service and the

commensurate projected tax rates

Source: County of Tulare, Auditor-Controller’s Office

County Tax Rate Methodology

4

* BNSF Railway Co v. Alameda County et al., CA Northern District Court Case No. 4:19-cv-07230-HSG

1

2

(8)

$5.00   $12.18   $7.64   $7.46   $7.04   $6.62   $6.60   $6.55   $6.09   $5.69   $5.14   $6.59   $5.87   $4.38   $4.07   $3.67   $3.31   $2.98   $2.63   $2. 28   $4.06   $15.65   $25.00   $25.00   $25.00   $25.00   $25.00   $25.00   $25.00   $25.00   $25.00   $0.00 $2.50 $5.00 $7.50 $10.00 $12.50 $15.00 $17.50 $20.00 $22.50 $25.00 $27.50 $30.00

Projected Tax Rate - Existing Obligations Tax Rate Capacity

The existing obligations under Measure J can all be repaid within the $25 limit

The tax rate is fairly consistent through 2033 but then begins to grow through 2040

The result is a “bottleneck” in 2038 through 2040 that inhibits the ability to access the ample tax

rate capacity beyond that point

Status Quo

Projected Tax Rate –Measure J– Status Quo

AV Growth 2018-19 3.9% 2019-20 5.4% 2020-21 5.0% Thereafter 4.00% “Bottleneck”

Long-term tax rate capacity is stranded due to the “bottleneck” – traditional solution of using Capital Appreciation Bonds (CABs) is not

(9)

$5.00 $13.83 $9.20 $9.02 $8.60 $8.20 $8.14 $7.48 $7.09 $6.73 $6.24 $6.82 $6.13 $4.63 $4.31 $3.91 $4.81 $4.94 $4.91 $4.93 $7.78 $14.66 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $0.00 $2.50 $5.00 $7.50 $10.00 $12.50 $15.00 $17.50 $20.00 $22.50 $25.00 $27.50 $30.00

Projected Tax Rate - POST-REFUNDING Tax Rate Capacity

The benefits of refinancing several existing GO Bonds are threefold:

Traditional logic of providing savings in future tax assessments of $3.5 million

Mitigates burden of layering in additional assessments to repay New Money

Provides opportunity to “reshape” the amortization and create tax rate capacity

The option to refinance differs between the candidates for refinancing – requires that both Tax

Exempt and Taxable refunding bonds be issued

Refinancing

Projected Tax Rate –Measure J – Post-Refunding

AV Growth 2018-19 3.9% 2019-20 5.4% 2020-21 5.0%

Thereafter 4.00%

Cash flow savings combined with restructuring the principal repayment alleviates the “bottleneck” and provides access to the long-term tax rate capacity

Former “Bottleneck”

(10)

Refinancing Refinancing Refinancing Aggregate

Series B Series B Series C Outcome of

CIBs Convertible

CABs

CIBs Refinancing

A. Tax Status of the Refunding Bonds Tax Exempt Taxable Taxable TE / Taxable

B. Final Maturity of the Refunding Bonds 2031 2041 2042 2042

C. Rate on the Refunding Bonds After Costs 1.30% 2.95% 3.05% 2.75%

D. Par Amount of Bonds Refunded $2,630,000 $5,405,000 ** $1,070,000 $9,105,000

E. Average Coupon of Bonds Refunded 5.30% 7.25% *** 5.00% 6.35%

F. Total Cash Flow Savings, aka Savings in Future Taxes $777,000 $2,550,000 $240,000 $3,567,000

G. Net Present Value Savings, aka Savings in Today’s Dollars $727,000 $1,640,000 $167,000 $2,534,000

H. NPV Savings as % of Bonds Refunded (5% Minimum) 27.5% 30.4% 15.6% 27.8%

I. Negative Arbitrage in Escrow, i.e. Escrow Earnings Deficit $18,000 $702,000 $66,000 $786,000

J. Escrow Efficiency Ratio (50% Minimum) * 97% 78% 71% 76%

Refinancing Outcomes

* Ratio is equal to NPV Savings divided by the sum of Negative Arbitrage and NPV Savings

** Value of Convertible CABs on Closing Date, i.e. Accreted Value at date Escrow Account is funded *** Fixed rate of accretion, not an annual coupon

(11)

$0.00 $2.50 $5.00 $7.50 $10.00 $12.50 $15.00 $17.50 $20.00 $22.50 $25.00 $27.50 $30.00

Projected Tax Rate - POST-REFUNDING Projected Tax Rate - NEW MONEY Tax Rate Capacity

New Money is layered in to match the available tax rate capacity which is largely in long term

Linchpin is to have an average coupon on the GO Bonds maturing beyond 2036 that is low

enough to not breach the $25 maximum in the “bottleneck” area

There are two options to pursue to contend with the requisite long-term low average coupon

Sell a portion of the New Money as Taxable Bonds which lowers the average coupon

Refinance additional existing GO Bonds in the “bottleneck” area that may impair the

refinancing outcomes but creates additional tax rate capacity in those years

New Money

AV Growth 2018-19 3.9% 2019-20 5.4% 2020-21 5.0% Thereafter 4.00%

New Money is largely amortized in the

long-term now that the “bottleneck” has been addressed and there is

funding access

Former “Bottleneck” Projected Tax Rate –Measure J – Post New Money

(12)

New Money Outcomes

New Money

Current Interest

Bonds

A.

Par Amount of Bonds Issued and Net Proceeds for Projects *

$22,860,000

B.

Rate on New Money Bonds Inclusive of Issuance Costs

3.15%

C.

Final Maturity of the New Money Bonds

2051

D.

Total Debt Service to Maturity, Assuming Paid to Final Maturity

$40,742,000

E.

Repayment Ratio (Total Debt Service to Maturity ÷ Par Amount of Bonds)

1.79x

F.

First Optional Redemption Date

8/01/2031 @ Par

(13)

Closing Points

The College of the Sequoias (COS) needs the funding afforded by Measure J

Initial maximum was understood to be $8 million as result of Financial Advisor interviews

COS inquired about accessing at least $12 million to combine with funds on hand

The financing plan affords access up to the $22.8 million in remaining authorization

“Bottleneck” was perceived as impediment

Refinancing provides accessibility to funding

o

Generates approximately $3.5 million in future tax assessment savings

o

Enables the restructuring of repayment timing

Long-term tax rate capacity becomes accessible

Accomplished without issuance of Capital Appreciation Bonds (CABs)

Timetable is driven by preferred date for presentation to the Board of Trustees

(14)

Tentative Schedule

Date Activity

Week of March 1st Informational Presentation to Board Sub-Committee

Week of March 8th Circulate Preliminary Numbers, Financing Schedule and Distribution List

Week of March 15th Circulate Draft Authorizing Resolution, Legal Documents, and Preliminary Official Statement (POS)

Week of March 29th Rating Conference Call

Monday, April 5th Board Agenda Deadline for April 12thBoard Meeting to Submit Financing Documents

Week of April 12th Receive Rating

Monday, April 12th Board of Trustees acts on authorizing resolution, legal documents and POS

Friday, April 16th Preliminary Official Statement Posted Electronically and Distributed to Investors

Week of April 26th Pre-Price & Price Bonds

References

Related documents

The exclusion of coverage for the dishonest acts of owners, partners, principals of an insured does not apply when a management company is an insured under an

UPnP Control Point (DLNA) Device Discovery HTTP Server (DLNA, Chormecast, AirPlay Photo/Video) RTSP Server (AirPlay Audio) Streaming Server.. Figure 11: Simplified

The clean screen is not available for HMI devices with touch screen and function keys. In this case, configure a screen without operator controls,

14 When black, Latina, and white women like Sandy and June organized wedding ceremonies, they “imagine[d] a world ordered by love, by a radical embrace of difference.”

The summary resource report prepared by North Atlantic is based on a 43-101 Compliant Resource Report prepared by M. Holter, Consulting Professional Engineer,

For the poorest farmers in eastern India, then, the benefits of groundwater irrigation have come through three routes: in large part, through purchased pump irrigation and, in a

Results of the survey are categorized into the following four areas: primary method used to conduct student evaluations, Internet collection of student evaluation data,

Progress in this area will help retain and attract more health care professionals to Arizona and reduce the health care costs.  Support efforts to train and recruit