• No results found

Multiple Myeloma Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Multiple Myeloma Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed"

Copied!
41
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Nicolas Novitzky Dip Med, PhD, FCP(SA)

H a e m a t o l o g y

C l i n i c a l & L a b o r a t o r y S c i e n c e , D e p a r t m e n t o f M e d i c i n e U n i v e r s i t y o f C a p e T o w n

Multiple Myeloma

Something Old, Something New, Something

Borrowed…

(2)

Plasma Cell Dyscrasias

1. Monoclonal gammopathy

2. Smouldering or indolent myeloma. 3. Solitary plasmacytoma

i) bone ii) soft tissue

3.Multiple plasmacytoma or myeloma i) medullary

ii) extramedullary

4. Plasma cell leukaemia

7. Amyloidosis

5. Macroglobulinaemia

(3)
(4)

Pathophysiology

Plasma cell homeostasis

Antigen dependent increase in

proliferation of B-cells

Cell cycle regulation

 Cycline dependent kynases  Cytokine signals

Upregulation of survival signals

• IL-6 • IGF • SDF-1 • VEGF 

Reduction in apoptosis

FAS

TRAIL/Apo

Karyotypic abnormalities

common

Inherent genetic instability

 VDJ recombination  Somatic hypermutation  Isotype switching 

Chromosomal translocations

 14q32 (75% of myeloma cells) 

Karyotypic abnormalities in MM

& MGUS

 Numeric abnormalities Hypo/hyper diploid Chromosome gains/losses  Structural abnormalities Translocations

(5)
(6)

Incidence of Chromosomal Abnormalities in MM

Genomic Aberrations

Incidence of aberration

Del (13)

48%

Del (17p)

11%

t(4;14) (p16;q32)

14%

Hyperdiploidy

39%

t(11;14) (q13;q32)

21%

• N= 1064 patients

(7)

From MGUS to Myeloma

Definitions *

MGUS (1-3% annual

progression)

IgG < 30g/L

Plasma cells in BM < 10%

No CRAB

Smoldering myeloma (10%

annual progression)

IgG > 30 g/L

Plasma cells > 10%

No CRAB

Multiple myeloma

IgG > 30 g/L

Plasma cells > 10%

CRAB

(8)

MGUS

MGUS

In 3% of > 55 years

• Asymptomatic

Higher incidence among Africans

Family history

Precedes plasma cell disorder in

all cases

 Myeloma  Amyloidosis  Waldestrom MG

Progression (21, 37 & 58%)

o

M protein concentration > 15 g/L

o

Aberrant plasma cell population by

flowcytometry

(CD38+, CD56+, lack of CD19, CD45)

o

DNA aneuploidy

All patients need evaluation

o Marrow morphology,

o

Cytogenetics or FISH

Bone imaging

o Skeletal survey

(9)

Multiple Myeloma

Accumulation of clonal plasma

cells

Impaired haematopoiesis

Secrete paraprotein

Bone disease

2% of cancers

20% of deaths from haematological

malignancies

Presentation age depends on clinical

variant

 MGUS 62 yr. (3% of >50 years)  Myeloma 69 yr.

(10)

Multiple Myeloma

Abnormal proliferation of

clonal plasma cells

IgG

IgA

Light chain only (BJP)

IgD, IgE

IgM very rare in myeloma

Common in Lymphoma esp.

Waldenstrom’s

Non-secretory

M protein found in serum or

urine or both at time of

diagnosis: 97%

Serum M spike by protein

electrophoresis: 80%

Abnormal serum immunofixation:

93%

Abnormal urine immunofixation:

75%

(11)

Diagnostic Criteria

Plasma cells >10% in marrow

• Or (in any quantity) in a biopsy from other

tissues (plasmacytoma)

Monoclonal protein (paraprotein)

in serum / urine

• except in non-secretory myeloma

Evidence of end-organ damage

• Calcium >2.75 mmol/L)

• Renal failure attributable to myeloma • Hb < 10gm/dl

• Lytic bone lesions

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS):

 Serum paraprotein <30 g/L AND

 Clonal plasma cells <10% on bone marrow

biopsy AND

 NO myeloma-related organ or tissue

impairment

Asymptomatic (smouldering)

myeloma:

 Serum paraprotein >30 g/L AND/OR  Clonal plasma cells >10% on bone

marrow biopsy AND

 NO myeloma-related organ or tissue

impairment

Multiple myeloma

 IgG > 30 g/L

 Plasma cells > 10%

(12)
(13)

No anemia, bone lesions

normal calcium and

kidney function

Criteria for Diagnosis

MGUS <3 g M spike <10% PC AND Smoldering MM ε 3 g M spike OR ε 10% PC

Active MM

•ε 10% PC

•M spike +

AND

Kyle RA. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 564

Anemia, bone lesions,

high calcium or

abnormal kidney function

(14)

Signs & Symptoms in 1027 Newly Diagnosed

Myeloma Patients

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Bone lesions Fatigue Cr >2 mg/dL Ca >11 mg/dL Wt loss (>9 kg) % pat ient s 79 Hb<12 g/dL 73 Bone pain 66 32 13 19 12

(15)

Bone Imaging in MM

Skeletal radiography is the

primary diagnostic test to detect

destructive bony lesions in

multiple myeloma

MRI is useful in assessing spinal

compression fractures, focal mass

or from osteopenia due to

increased osteolysis

PET scans can be used to detect

soft tissue or bone metastases

(16)
(17)

Myeloma Bone Disease

Post-treatment appearance of multiple myeloma at FDG PET. Appearance of multiple myeloma at

(18)
(19)

Salmon & Durie

Prognostic factors

Stage III: one or more of

Hb < 8.5g/dL

Serum calcium > 3mmol/l

Skeletal survey: 3 or> lytic bone lesions Serum paraprotein

> 70g/L IgG, > 50g/L IgA

Urinary light chain excretion >

12g/24h

Stage I: all of

Hb > 10g/dL Normal calcium

Skeletal survey: normal or single

plasmacytoma or osteoporosis

Serum PP < 50 g/L IgG, < 3o g/L IgA Urinary light chain excretion < 4 g/24h

Stage II: fulfilling the criteria of

(20)

International Staging System (ISS)

for Symptomatic Myeloma

*β2m < 3.5 mg/L and albumin < 3.5 g/dL or β2m 3.5 - < 5.5 mg/L, any albumin

Stage

Criteria

Median

Survival (mo)

I

β2m < 3.5 mg/L

albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dL

62

II*

Not stage I or III

44

III

β2m ≥ 5.5 mg/L

29

(21)

Multiple Myeloma

Treatment

Smoldering or Stage I myeloma

 Counseling and observation  Follow up

CBC, SPEP, chemistry every 3 mo

Bone survey ± Bone marrow biospy every 6

mo

Clinical trial of thalidomide or other

biological therapy

Progression to Stage II, III disease

Treat accordingly

Solitary plasmacytoma

Radiation therapy 45 to 50 Gy

Follow up

CBC,

SPEP

, UPEP, chemistry

every 3 months

Bone Survey ± CT scan or

MRI every 6 mo

Yearly evaluation after one

(22)

Therapy

Melphalan & Prednisone

(NCI; MY-2, n= 460)

• Objective response 46%

o (50% reduction in tumour bulk)

o CR: 2% • Unchanged 10% • Progressive disease 44% • Increase in paraprotein • Hypercalcemia • Increase in plasmacytosis/omas • Increase in number/size lytic lesions 

Duration of response: 18 month

Overall survival: 24-36 months

Cycle is repeated every 4-6 weeks

(23)

High Dose Therapy in Myeloma

Autologous stem cell

transplantation

MRC Myeloma Working Party

– OR: 90% – CR: 25-80%

Intergroupe Francais du Mye’lome

• VCMP/VBAP vs. ABMT • Nº= 100 + 100 • OR : 74 vs. 42% • EFS @ 5 yr. : 28 vs. 10% • OS @ 5 yr. : 52 vs. 12% •

Prognosis:

(24)
(25)

Biological Cell Modifiers in Myeloma

Immuno-modulating agents

Thalidomide

Lenolidomide

Pomalidomide

Proteasome inhibitors

Bortezomib

Carfilzomib

Histone deacetylases

Vorinostat

Panobinostat

Mammalian target or

rapamicin complex (mTOR)

Temsirolimus

Everolimus

Heat shock protein 90

Perifostine

Tanepsimycin

Monoclonal antibodies

(26)

Thalidomide

Thalidomide

Old drug (1958)

 Sedative, anti emetic  Teratogenic !!!

 Withdrawn from market in 1962

Anti inflammatory

 Immunomodulating

 Inhibits TNF and IL-1

 Anti-angiogenesis 

Side effects

 Somnolence, tiredness  Peripheral neuropathy  Thrombophilia  Constipation

(27)
(28)

Lenolidomide

Synthetic immuno-modulatory

agent

Lower side effect profile

No Peripheral neuropathy

No constipation

No sedation

Not teratogenic

Associated with

Thombosis

Marrow suppression

Inhibits angiogenesis

Reduced VEGF levels

Decreased vascular density

Immuno-stimulatory

2000 x more potent than

thalidomide

NK cells

CD4+

IL-2 & IF- production

Inhibits apoptosis & IL-6

production

(29)
(30)

Treatment Decision Tree

Transplant candidate

Initial therapy

 Thalidomide based  CTD  Bortezomib based  VCD

Auto SCT (single / double)

Maintenance

 Thalidomide

 Pamidronate / zeledronic

acid

Salvage

 Bortezomib or lenolidomide  With anthacyclines (Doxyl)

Non- transplant candidate

Initial Therapy

MPT

VMP

Maintenance

Thalidomide

Pamidronate / zeledronic acid

Salvage

Bortezomib based

(31)

Multiple Myeloma Treatment Lines

a

Induction Consolidation Front-line treatment Maintenance Maintenance Rescue Relapsed Bor/Dex Bor/Dex/Dox Bor/Thal/Dex Len/Dex

SCT

Observation Thal Thal/Pred Bor Bor/Liposomal Dox Len/Dex

aTransplant eligible patients.

Bor/Dex = bortezomib, dexamethasone; Bor/Dex/Dox = bortezomib, dexamethasone, doxorubicin; Bor/Thal/Dex = bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone; Len/Dex = lenalidomide, dexamethasone; SCT = stem-cell transplant; Thal/pred = thalidomide, prednsione; Bor/Liposomal/Dox = bortezomib, liposomal doxorubicin.

(32)
(33)

Survival Benefits of New Agents

43mo

Median not yet reached

P = 0.001

73.9 mo 16mo

P < 0.001

Overall From relapse

(34)

Treatment of Bone Disease

Bisphosphonates

Surgical procedures

Vertebroplasty

Balloon Kyphoplasty

Radiotherapy

Treatment of myeloma

MM patients with lytic disease or osteopenia on plain radiographs or imaging studies

Intravenous pamidronate 90 mg deliver over at least 2 hrs or zoledronic acid 4 mg over 15 minutes every 3 to 4 weeks.

Continue therapy for 2 yrs & consider stopping in patients w/ responsive or stable disease; further use at physician’s discretion

(35)

Blade et al, Arch Int Med 1999; Leung et al, Kidney Int 2008

Clinical Problems: Renal Failure

Incidence in myeloma

Renal dysfunction in 20-40%

Dialysis required in 5-10%

 1-1.5% of all renal failure

2 year mortality 58 vs. 31%

Mechanisms:

Interstitial nephritis

Ca++, uric acid, drugs, etc.

Tubular necrosis

Cast nephropathy

Light chain deposition, tubular

atrophy (MIDD)

Amyloidosis

Reversible 20-70%

 Creatinine< 500 mmol/L  Proteinuria < 1 gr/ day  Ca++ > 3 mmol/L

(36)

Clinical Problems: Renal Failure

Management

 Supportive

 Hydration, alkalynisation of urine,

biphosphonates (CrCl > 30 mL)

 Omit nephrotoxins, radiological contrast

media, furosemide

 Prognosis related to response to therapy

Plasmapheresis

 Useful to clear light chains (for MIDD

only)

If > 50% reduction response in 80%

Renal replacement

High cut-off dialyser to remove

light chains

Chronic haemodialysis

 Median survival 2 years

Specific therapy

VAD 40% CR; 20% PR

Bortezomib based 75% CR

(37)
(38)

Myeloma Drugs

(39)

Monthly and Median Costs of Cancer Drugs at the

Time of Approval by the FDA from 1965 through 2008

(40)

Risk Adapted Therapy

Age Renal

function

Co morbid conditions

Geography Access Patient Preference

Risk Profile

(41)

Conclusions

Multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous malignancy

Adverse factors include high ISS, adverse cytogenetics and poor

response to initial therapy

Older age and aggressive disease remain substantial challenges

Myeloma has become a chronic disorder for patients with

favourable prognostic factors

Combination of newer drugs, with older cytotoxic agents lead

to a new paradigm

References

Related documents

   Additionally,  DVStretch  is  windproof  and  provides  waterproof  protection..  For  more  information,  visit

Catering Services Consultancy Crane Services Fire and Safety Handy Craft Hotel / Catering House Keeping Jute Product Marine Services Medicines Miscellaneous Services. Network

migraine patients also present with true benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) even after the migraine headache event has ceased.. This is thought to be caused by

Results revealed no ethnic differences in students’ achievement motivation and reasons for attending college, with one exception - Hispanic students were more likely to attend

Second Year Project Part I; Second Year Project Part II; Aerodynamics B; Thermodynamics and Compressible Aerodynamics; Low Speed Wind tunnel Practical; Supersonic

As mentioned above, due to non-linearity of activation function along with non-convexity of the parameter space, the existing proof techniques do not apply directly to the

De ministeries van I&amp;M en EZ hebben het programma Ruimte in Regels voor Groene Groei (R2G2) ingesteld om Groene Groei, Ambitieus Ondernemerschap en Innovatieve investeringen te

Roof access, pathways, and spacing requirements shall be provided in order to ensure access to the roof; provide pathways to specific areas of the roof; provide for smoke