Nicolas Novitzky Dip Med, PhD, FCP(SA)
H a e m a t o l o g y
C l i n i c a l & L a b o r a t o r y S c i e n c e , D e p a r t m e n t o f M e d i c i n e U n i v e r s i t y o f C a p e T o w n
Multiple Myeloma
Something Old, Something New, Something
Borrowed…
Plasma Cell Dyscrasias
1. Monoclonal gammopathy
2. Smouldering or indolent myeloma. 3. Solitary plasmacytoma
i) bone ii) soft tissue
3.Multiple plasmacytoma or myeloma i) medullary
ii) extramedullary
4. Plasma cell leukaemia
7. Amyloidosis
5. Macroglobulinaemia
Pathophysiology
Plasma cell homeostasis
Antigen dependent increase in
proliferation of B-cells
–
Cell cycle regulation
Cycline dependent kynases Cytokine signals
−
Upregulation of survival signals
• IL-6 • IGF • SDF-1 • VEGF
Reduction in apoptosis
–FAS
–TRAIL/Apo
Karyotypic abnormalities
common
Inherent genetic instability
VDJ recombination Somatic hypermutation Isotype switching Chromosomal translocations
14q32 (75% of myeloma cells) Karyotypic abnormalities in MM
& MGUS
Numeric abnormalities Hypo/hyper diploid Chromosome gains/losses Structural abnormalities TranslocationsIncidence of Chromosomal Abnormalities in MM
Genomic Aberrations
Incidence of aberration
Del (13)
48%
Del (17p)
11%
t(4;14) (p16;q32)
14%
Hyperdiploidy
39%
t(11;14) (q13;q32)
21%
• N= 1064 patientsFrom MGUS to Myeloma
Definitions *
MGUS (1-3% annual
progression)
IgG < 30g/L
Plasma cells in BM < 10%
No CRAB
Smoldering myeloma (10%
annual progression)
IgG > 30 g/L
Plasma cells > 10%
No CRAB
Multiple myeloma
IgG > 30 g/L
Plasma cells > 10%
CRAB
MGUS
MGUS
In 3% of > 55 years
• Asymptomatic
Higher incidence among Africans
Family history
Precedes plasma cell disorder in
all cases
Myeloma Amyloidosis Waldestrom MG
Progression (21, 37 & 58%)
oM protein concentration > 15 g/L
o
Aberrant plasma cell population by
flowcytometry
(CD38+, CD56+, lack of CD19, CD45)
o
DNA aneuploidy
All patients need evaluation
o Marrow morphology,o
Cytogenetics or FISH
Bone imaging
o Skeletal survey
Multiple Myeloma
Accumulation of clonal plasma
cells
Impaired haematopoiesis
Secrete paraprotein
Bone disease
2% of cancers
20% of deaths from haematological
malignancies
Presentation age depends on clinical
variant
MGUS 62 yr. (3% of >50 years) Myeloma 69 yr.
Multiple Myeloma
Abnormal proliferation of
clonal plasma cells
IgG
IgA
Light chain only (BJP)
IgD, IgE
IgM very rare in myeloma
Common in Lymphoma esp.
Waldenstrom’s
Non-secretory
M protein found in serum or
urine or both at time of
diagnosis: 97%
Serum M spike by protein
electrophoresis: 80%
Abnormal serum immunofixation:
93%
Abnormal urine immunofixation:
75%
Diagnostic Criteria
•
Plasma cells >10% in marrow
• Or (in any quantity) in a biopsy from other
tissues (plasmacytoma)
•
Monoclonal protein (paraprotein)
in serum / urine
• except in non-secretory myeloma
•
Evidence of end-organ damage
• Calcium >2.75 mmol/L)• Renal failure attributable to myeloma • Hb < 10gm/dl
• Lytic bone lesions
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS):
Serum paraprotein <30 g/L AND
Clonal plasma cells <10% on bone marrow
biopsy AND
NO myeloma-related organ or tissue
impairment
Asymptomatic (smouldering)
myeloma:
Serum paraprotein >30 g/L AND/OR Clonal plasma cells >10% on bone
marrow biopsy AND
NO myeloma-related organ or tissue
impairment
Multiple myeloma
IgG > 30 g/L Plasma cells > 10%
No anemia, bone lesions
normal calcium and
kidney function
Criteria for Diagnosis
MGUS <3 g M spike <10% PC AND Smoldering MM ε 3 g M spike OR ε 10% PCActive MM
•ε 10% PC
•M spike +
AND
Kyle RA. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 564
Anemia, bone lesions,
high calcium or
abnormal kidney function
Signs & Symptoms in 1027 Newly Diagnosed
Myeloma Patients
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Bone lesions Fatigue Cr >2 mg/dL Ca >11 mg/dL Wt loss (>9 kg) % pat ient s 79 Hb<12 g/dL 73 Bone pain 66 32 13 19 12Bone Imaging in MM
Skeletal radiography is the
primary diagnostic test to detect
destructive bony lesions in
multiple myeloma
MRI is useful in assessing spinal
compression fractures, focal mass
or from osteopenia due to
increased osteolysis
PET scans can be used to detect
soft tissue or bone metastases
Myeloma Bone Disease
Post-treatment appearance of multiple myeloma at FDG PET. Appearance of multiple myeloma at
Salmon & Durie
Prognostic factors
Stage III: one or more of
Hb < 8.5g/dL
Serum calcium > 3mmol/l
Skeletal survey: 3 or> lytic bone lesions Serum paraprotein
•
> 70g/L IgG, > 50g/L IgA
Urinary light chain excretion >
12g/24h
Stage I: all of
Hb > 10g/dL Normal calcium
Skeletal survey: normal or single
plasmacytoma or osteoporosis
Serum PP < 50 g/L IgG, < 3o g/L IgA Urinary light chain excretion < 4 g/24h
Stage II: fulfilling the criteria of
International Staging System (ISS)
for Symptomatic Myeloma
*β2m < 3.5 mg/L and albumin < 3.5 g/dL or β2m 3.5 - < 5.5 mg/L, any albumin
Stage
Criteria
Median
Survival (mo)
I
β2m < 3.5 mg/L
albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dL
62
II*
Not stage I or III
44
III
β2m ≥ 5.5 mg/L
29
Multiple Myeloma
Treatment
Smoldering or Stage I myeloma
Counseling and observation Follow up
CBC, SPEP, chemistry every 3 mo
Bone survey ± Bone marrow biospy every 6
mo
Clinical trial of thalidomide or other
biological therapy
Progression to Stage II, III disease
Treat accordingly
Solitary plasmacytoma
Radiation therapy 45 to 50 Gy
Follow up
CBC,
SPEP
, UPEP, chemistry
every 3 months
Bone Survey ± CT scan or
MRI every 6 mo
Yearly evaluation after one
Therapy
Melphalan & Prednisone
(NCI; MY-2, n= 460)
• Objective response 46%
o (50% reduction in tumour bulk)
o CR: 2% • Unchanged 10% • Progressive disease 44% • Increase in paraprotein • Hypercalcemia • Increase in plasmacytosis/omas • Increase in number/size lytic lesions
Duration of response: 18 month
Overall survival: 24-36 months
Cycle is repeated every 4-6 weeks
High Dose Therapy in Myeloma
Autologous stem cell
transplantation
MRC Myeloma Working Party
– OR: 90% – CR: 25-80%
Intergroupe Francais du Mye’lome
• VCMP/VBAP vs. ABMT • Nº= 100 + 100 • OR : 74 vs. 42% • EFS @ 5 yr. : 28 vs. 10% • OS @ 5 yr. : 52 vs. 12% •
Prognosis:
Biological Cell Modifiers in Myeloma
Immuno-modulating agents
Thalidomide
Lenolidomide
Pomalidomide
Proteasome inhibitors
Bortezomib
Carfilzomib
Histone deacetylases
Vorinostat
Panobinostat
Mammalian target or
rapamicin complex (mTOR)
Temsirolimus
Everolimus
Heat shock protein 90
Perifostine
Tanepsimycin
Monoclonal antibodies
Thalidomide
Thalidomide
Old drug (1958)
Sedative, anti emetic Teratogenic !!!
Withdrawn from market in 1962
Anti inflammatory
Immunomodulating
Inhibits TNF and IL-1
Anti-angiogenesis
Side effects
Somnolence, tiredness Peripheral neuropathy Thrombophilia ConstipationLenolidomide
Synthetic immuno-modulatory
agent
Lower side effect profile
No Peripheral neuropathy
No constipation
No sedation
Not teratogenic
Associated with
Thombosis
Marrow suppression
Inhibits angiogenesis
Reduced VEGF levels
Decreased vascular density
Immuno-stimulatory
2000 x more potent than
thalidomide
NK cells
CD4+
IL-2 & IF- production
Inhibits apoptosis & IL-6
production
Treatment Decision Tree
Transplant candidate
Initial therapy
Thalidomide based CTD Bortezomib based VCD
Auto SCT (single / double)
Maintenance
Thalidomide
Pamidronate / zeledronic
acid
Salvage
Bortezomib or lenolidomide With anthacyclines (Doxyl)
Non- transplant candidate
Initial Therapy
MPT
VMP
Maintenance
Thalidomide
Pamidronate / zeledronic acid
Salvage
Bortezomib based
Multiple Myeloma Treatment Lines
a
Induction Consolidation Front-line treatment Maintenance Maintenance Rescue Relapsed Bor/Dex Bor/Dex/Dox Bor/Thal/Dex Len/DexSCT
Observation Thal Thal/Pred Bor Bor/Liposomal Dox Len/DexaTransplant eligible patients.
Bor/Dex = bortezomib, dexamethasone; Bor/Dex/Dox = bortezomib, dexamethasone, doxorubicin; Bor/Thal/Dex = bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone; Len/Dex = lenalidomide, dexamethasone; SCT = stem-cell transplant; Thal/pred = thalidomide, prednsione; Bor/Liposomal/Dox = bortezomib, liposomal doxorubicin.
Survival Benefits of New Agents
43mo
Median not yet reached
P = 0.001
73.9 mo 16mo
P < 0.001
Overall From relapse
Treatment of Bone Disease
Bisphosphonates
Surgical procedures
Vertebroplasty
Balloon Kyphoplasty
Radiotherapy
Treatment of myeloma
MM patients with lytic disease or osteopenia on plain radiographs or imaging studies
Intravenous pamidronate 90 mg deliver over at least 2 hrs or zoledronic acid 4 mg over 15 minutes every 3 to 4 weeks.
Continue therapy for 2 yrs & consider stopping in patients w/ responsive or stable disease; further use at physician’s discretion
Blade et al, Arch Int Med 1999; Leung et al, Kidney Int 2008
Clinical Problems: Renal Failure
Incidence in myeloma
Renal dysfunction in 20-40%
Dialysis required in 5-10%
1-1.5% of all renal failure
2 year mortality 58 vs. 31%
Mechanisms:
Interstitial nephritis
Ca++, uric acid, drugs, etc.
Tubular necrosis
Cast nephropathy
Light chain deposition, tubular
atrophy (MIDD)
Amyloidosis
Reversible 20-70%
Creatinine< 500 mmol/L Proteinuria < 1 gr/ day Ca++ > 3 mmol/LClinical Problems: Renal Failure
Management
Supportive
Hydration, alkalynisation of urine,
biphosphonates (CrCl > 30 mL)
Omit nephrotoxins, radiological contrast
media, furosemide
Prognosis related to response to therapy
Plasmapheresis
Useful to clear light chains (for MIDD
only)
If > 50% reduction response in 80%
Renal replacement
High cut-off dialyser to remove
light chains
Chronic haemodialysis
Median survival 2 years
Specific therapy
VAD 40% CR; 20% PR
Bortezomib based 75% CR
Myeloma Drugs
Monthly and Median Costs of Cancer Drugs at the
Time of Approval by the FDA from 1965 through 2008
Risk Adapted Therapy
Age Renal
function
Co morbid conditions
Geography Access Patient Preference
Risk Profile
Conclusions
Multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous malignancy
Adverse factors include high ISS, adverse cytogenetics and poor
response to initial therapy