• No results found

Torque Wrench Calibration Presentation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Torque Wrench Calibration Presentation"

Copied!
25
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Calibration of a Torque

Wrench as per ISO6789

by

Eddie Tarnow

NLA Test & Measurement Workshop 20 September 2011

(2)

Calibration Setup

350,0 N•m

Reference Standard Torque Transducer &

Readout Unit

Unit Under Test Torque Wrench

Force Applied Clockwise Rotation

(3)

Calibration Scenario

• The Unit Under Test Torque Wrench is a Type II class A tool (adjustable click type) and has a full scale of 350 N•m.

• It has a setting dial resolution of 2 N•m

• We are to calibrate it according to ISO 6789 which requires a calibration point at full scale (100 % of range) viz. at

350 N•m and the estimation of the measurement uncertainty at this point

(4)

GUM Steps

• Model the measurement

• Identify and quantify the sources of uncertainty • Categorize as type A or type B

• Manipulate appropriately to obtain

• Standard uncertainties, u(xi)

• Sensitivity coefficients, ci

• Uncertainty contributor, u(yi)

• Combine to obtain combined standard uncertainty, uc(y)

• Expand to obtain an expanded uncertainty, U, at an appropriate level of confidence

(5)

Measurement Model

STD

Ind

STD

UUT

T

Corr

T

=

+

(6)

Identifying the sources of uncertainty

T

T

UUT U Res

T

STD SCal SRes SCF

U

Rep

(7)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty

• SCAL

• Calibration Results Table from the Calibration Certificate

APPLIED TORQUE

(N•m)

MEAN

UUT CALCULATED TORQUE (N•m) UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT (± N•m) 0,0 0,0 0,1 99,9 100,0 0,3 199,9 200,2 1,0 299,8 300,5 1,0 399,8 400,8 1,0 499,7 501,1 1,0 599,7 601,5 1,0 699,6 701,8 1,0

(8)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty (2)

• SCAL

• This is the uncertainty due to the accuracy of the Reference Standard Torque Transducer, which is not perfect

• Corrections must first be applied, or the uncertainty increased, to take the error into account (largest error on values either side of the calibration point was +1,0 N•m)

• The Reference Standard Torque Transducer used has a full scale of 700 N•m and was calibrated in 100 N•m steps (See calibration

certificate)

• Therefore we will have to use the polynomial equation to determine the actual torque generated by the UUT at 350 N•m since it is a

measurement point in between 300 N•m and 400 N•m.

• Since we have to interpolate a value we will use the largest reported uncertainty from the calibration certificate for the values on either side of the calibration point which is ± 1 N•m.

(9)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty (3)

• SCAL

• Since we will be using the polynomial to interpolate a value at 350 N•m, we DO NOT need to correct for the + 1 N•m error at 399,8 N•m.

• Therefore total uncertainty for the “accuracy” of the Reference Standard Torque Transducer is ±1 N•m

• This is treated as normal at 95,45% Level of Confidence • The divisor is the coverage factor k which for 95,45%

LOC is 2

• The degrees of freedom are always ∞ or 100 % Reliable

due to the source of traceability being accredited and reputable.

(10)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty (4)

• SRES

• This is due to the resolution of the Reference Standard Torque Transducer Readout Unit

• We must first determine the “effective resolution” • The least significant digit displayed is 0,1 N•m • Resolution is always treated as a Rectangular

distribution source of uncertainty and this is the range. • The semi-range is therefore (0,1 N•m/2)=0,05 N•m

• The divisor is √3

• The degrees of freedom are always ∞ or 100 %

(11)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty (5)

• SCF

• Polynomial Equation Coefficients Table from the Calibration Certificate POLYNOMIAL EQUATION y=a+bx+cx 2 +dx3 POLYNOMIAL COEFFICIENTS NORMAL FUNCTION INVERSE FUNCTION a 2,71846 x10-2 -2,70765 x10-2 b 9,99825 x10-1 1,00017 c -7,89039 x10-6 7,95708 x10-6 d 5,16535 x10-9 -5,22137 x10-9

Standard Error of the polynomial curve fit for a Level of Confidence of 68,27% and 4

degrees of freedom

(12)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty (6)

• SCF

• This is the additional uncertainty which results from the interpolation calculation to determine the torque

generated by the UUT at a point in between the

calibration points of the Reference Standard Torque Transducer

• It is obtained directly from the calibration certificate as the “Standard Error of the polynomial curve Fit” value = ± 0,045 N•m

• This is treated as a normal distribution at a 68,27% Level of Confidence

(13)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty (7)

• URES

• This is due to the resolution of the UUT Torque Wrench scale. (How it influences the setting of the wrench to a specified torque)

• Typically this would be the smallest graduation on the UUT setting dial which for this UUT is 2 N•m

• This is the range of the rectangular distribution • Therefore the semi-range is (2 N•m/2)=1 N•m

• The divisor for Rectangular Distributed uncertainty contributors is √3

• The degrees of freedom for resolution is always ∞ or

(14)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty (8)

• UREP

• This results from the variability in the measurement results obtained after repeating the measurement 5 times.

• It can be dealt with either as “repeatability” or as “reproducibility”

• “Repeatability” – all conditions remained the same during the repeated measurements

• “Reproducibility” – any one or more of the conditions changed during the repeated measurements

• Different approaches can be used to repeat the measurement

(15)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty (9)

Repeatability 20 % Meas 1 20 % Meas 2 20 % Meas 3 20 % Meas 4 20 % Meas 5 20 % Mean 60 % Meas 1 60 % Meas 2 60 % Meas 3 60 % Meas 4 60 % Meas 5 60 % Mean 100 % Meas 1 100 % Meas 2 100 % Meas 3 100 % Meas 4 100 % Meas 5 100 % Mean

(16)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty (9)

Reproducibility 20 % Meas 1 20 % Meas 2 20 % Mean 60 % Meas 1 60 % Meas 2 60 % Mean 100 % Meas 1 100 % Meas 2 100 % Mean 20 % Meas 4 60 % Meas 4 100 % Meas 4 20 % Meas 3 60 % Meas 3 100 % Meas 3 20 % Meas 5 60 % Meas 5 100 % Meas 5

(17)

Quantifying the sources of uncertainty (9)

• UREP

• Treating as “Repeatability” (as per ISO 6789) • We use the ESDM

• ESDM = ESD/SQRT (n) = 0,98/sqrt (5) = 0,436348 N•m

• Treating as “Reproducibility” (preferred option but contrary to ISO 6789)

• We use the ESD • ESD = 0,98 N•m

(18)

GUM Steps

• Model the measurement

• Identify and quantify the sources of uncertainty

• Categorize as type A or type B

• Manipulate appropriately to obtain

• Standard uncertainties, u(xi)

• Sensitivity coefficients, ci

• Uncertainty contributor, u(yi)

• Combine to obtain combined standard uncertainty, uc(y)

• Expand to obtain an expanded uncertainty, U, at an appropriate level of confidence

(19)

Categorize as type A or type B

• SCAL - type B, not statistically determined

• SRES - type B, not statistically determined

• SCF - type A, statistically determined (standard deviation)

• URES - type B, not statistically determined

(20)

GUM Steps

• Model the measurement

• Identify and quantify the sources of uncertainty • Categorize as type A or type B

• Manipulate appropriately to obtain • Standard uncertainties, u(xi)

• Sensitivity coefficients, ci

• Uncertainty contributor, u(yi)

• Combine to obtain combined standard uncertainty, uc(y)

• Expand to obtain an expanded uncertainty, U, at an

appropriate level of confidence

(21)

Uncertainty Budget

Torque Wrench Calibration Uncertainty

Budget.xls

(22)

GUM Steps

• Model the measurement

• Identify and quantify the sources of uncertainty • Categorize as type A or type B

• Manipulate appropriately to obtain

• Standard uncertainties, u(xi)

• Sensitivity coefficients, ci

• Uncertainty contributor, u(yi)

• Combine to obtain combined standard uncertainty, uc(y)

• Expand to obtain an expanded uncertainty, U, at an appropriate level of confidence

(23)

Reporting the result

• The final result is calculated using the “Normal Function” polynomial coefficients

• This is because we want to know the true torque applied to the Reference Standard Torque Transducer when it reads the mean measured value of 350,7 N•m

• The calculated interpolated value was 349,938089 N•m • The calculated measurement uncertainty was

± 1,794160789 N•m

• Rounding the uncertainty to two significant digits gives ± 1,8 N•m

• Rounding the interpolated value to the same number of digits gives 349,9 N•m

• The measurement result is then reported as:

(24)
(25)

Conclusions

• Both methods in this case prove that the UUT is well within the allowable ± 4% of Maximum (± 14 N•m)

• Using the ESDM (In accordance with ISO 6789) results in the smallest uncertainty (unrealistic??)

• Using the ESD (contrary to ISO 6789) results in the largest uncertainty (realistic??)

• Always use the polynomial for calibrations using the laboratory Reference Standard Torque Transducer

• This will correct for any error on the Reference Standard eliminating the need to apply corrections

• This will solve the problem of the “Applied Torque” not being exactly at the nominal values

References

Related documents

V empiričnem delu naloge so prikazana mnenja in odgovori učiteljev naravoslovnih predmetov o tem, kdaj so se prvič srečali s timskim delom, kakšna je njihova ocena

Teacher preparation programs need to pay attention to pre-service elementary teachers’ motivation to learn mathematics to help them develop a deep level of understanding, so they

Applications of Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) and orbitrap based high resolution mass spectrometry in metabolomics and lipidomics. LC–MS-based holistic metabolic

Contemporaneous increases in the volatility of taxes such as the VAT or income taxes are that are frequently collected tend to increase the share of public investment relative

The value indicates a high correlation between the variables and the positive sign also shows the positive relationship between those two; the higher the perceived behaviour

Furthermore, their larger proportion of redundant audio- visual information makes explainer videos particularly suitable for investigating whether the alleged advantage of video

An analysis of the economic contribution of the software industry examined the effect of software activity on the Lebanese economy by measuring it in terms of output and value

Downtime is not mandatory to import Application Express applications, as they can be imported into a Production environment actively being used by end users, as users will retrieve