• No results found

Chilled Water Pump Head Calculation-port-214f

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Chilled Water Pump Head Calculation-port-214f"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

HYDRAULIC CALCULATION

FOR

CHILLED WATER PUMPS

TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD

(2)

Head loss calculation using ( 1 ) COLBROOK Formula For CHILLED WATER PUMPS no. mm m mm GPM l/s 0.2 0 .2 8 .0 2 .0 0 .2 0 .3 0 .9 0 .5 2 .0 1 .0 1/1 m m/s 1/1 1/1 m m m m m m A - B 6" GI 154 2 0.1 680 42.8 1 1 1 1 1 5.4 2.29756 354008.19 0.01882 3.29 0.07 1.45 1.52 1.52 1.519 B - C 8" GI 203 22 0.1 1360 85.7 4 1 2.1 2.65406 538084.07 0.01755 3.11 0.68 0.75 1.44 1.44 2.956 C - D 6" GI 154 8 0.1 679 42.8 5 1.5 2.29418 353487.59 0.01882 3.28 0.26 0.4 0.66 0.66 3.621 D - E 8" GI 203 42 0.1 756.23 47.6 4 1 2.1 1.47579 299202.44 0.01817 0.99 0.42 0.23 0.65 0.65 4.272 E - F 6" GI 154 32 0.1 491.41 31 2 1 1.5 1.66036 255828.18 0.01919 1.75 0.56 0.21 0.77 0.77 5.042 F - G 4" GI 102 20 0.1 293.96 18.5 2 2 2.4 2.2549 230586.1 0.02077 5.26 1.05 0.62 1.67 1.67 6.717 G - H 2 1/2" GI 62.7 13 0.1 99.22 6.25 1 4 3.9 2.02578 126975.78 0.02363 7.88 1.02 0.82 1.84 1.84 8.558 H - I 2" GI 52.5 20 0.1 77.18 4.86 4 3.6 2.24785 117967.29 0.0246 12.1 2.41 0.93 3.34 3.34 11.9 I - J 1 1/2" GI 40.9 16 0.1 44.58 2.81 4 3.6 2.13351 87345.974 0.0255 14.4 2.31 0.84 3.15 3.15 15.05 J - K 1 1/4" GI 35.1 17 0.1 25.04 1.58 3 1 1.8 1.63217 57256.581 0.026 10.1 1.71 0.24 1.96 1.96 17 K - FCU 3/4" GI 21 19 0.1 5.5 0.35 1 3 1 1 1 12.3 1.00422 21048.545 0.0264 6.47 1.23 0.63 1.86 1.86 16.91 TOTAL 211 1 1 1 25 20 1 2 12 7 19

Pressure drop in chiller = 12.00m

Pressure drop in FCU = 1.32m

two way valve loss = 1.00m

total friction loss = 18.86m

Total dynamic head supply = 33.18m

Total dynamic head return = 21.18m

no . pa rt o f p ip e DN N o m in a l d ia m e te r Fl e xi b le ID P ip e I n n e r d ia m e te r L P ip e l e n g th K P ip e r o u g h n e ss Q Fl o w r a te 18.86 d h (1 ) L in e r lo ss S tr a in e r d isch a rg e o u tl e t A ccu m u la ti ve P re ssu re D H To ta l lo ss To ta l h e a l (D H + G H ) / p ip e V M e a n V e lo ci ty RE R e yn o ld s n u m b e r To ta l lo ca l fa ct o rs DN ch e ck va lve L o ss m p e r 1 0 0 m d h (2 ) L o ca l lo ss GH S ta ti c h e a l F L in e r lo ss fa ct o r G lo b e va lve

Local factors of fittings

e lb o w ( 4 5 l e g .) e lb o w ( 9 0 l e g .) te e re d u ce r g a te va lve

(3)

no. mm m mm GPM l/s 0.2 .20 8.0 2.0 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.5 2.0 1.0 1/1 m m/s 1/1 1/1 m m m m m m no . pa rt o f p ip e DN N o m in a l d ia m e te r Fl e xi b le ID P ip e I n n e r d ia m e te r L P ip e l e n g th K P ip e r o u g h n e ss Q Fl o w r a te d h (1 ) L in e r lo ss S tr a in e r d isch a rg e o u tl e t A ccu m u la ti ve P re ssu re D H To ta l lo ss To ta l h e a l (D H + G H ) / p ip e V M e a n V e lo ci ty RE R e yn o ld s n u m b e r To ta l lo ca l fa ct o rs DN ch e ck va lve L o ss m p e r 1 0 0 m d h (2 ) L o ca l lo ss GH S ta ti c h e a l F L in e r lo ss fa ct o r G lo b e va lve

Local factors of fittings

e lb o w ( 4 5 l e g .) e lb o w ( 9 0 l e g .) te e re d u ce r g a te va lve Safty factor 20%= 10.87m

(4)

CHILLED WATER PUMPS

Project : Agriculture Bank - Gizan Page ( 1 )

Head Loss Calculations:

The total friction loss Hs Consist of:

Hs = Hs1 + Hs2 ……….…… (1) Where: Hs1 : Friction loss Inside pipes

Hs2 : Friction loss inside fittings Linear friction loss equation:

Hs = J . L ……… ………... .... (2) J = l . V² / ( 2 g D ) ………..……….. (3) Where: J : linear loss factor

L : length Of the pipe (m.)

l : friction loss factor (COLBROOK-WHITE formula) V : velocity of water (m/s)

g : gravity acceleration (9.81 m/s²) D : pipe inside diameter (m.)

COLBROOK WHITE formula:……….. ( 4 ) 1

sqr(l)

Where: K : pipe inside Surface roughness (m.) D : pipe inside diameter (m.)

RE : REYNOLD’S no. is given as follows: (1/1)

RE = V x D / n ………. ( 5 ) Where: n : water viscosity= ( n = 1E-06 m2/s)

V : velocity of water (m/s) D : pipe inside diameter (m.)

V = Q / A ………...………. ( 6 ) Where: Q : flow rate (m³/s)

A : cross section are of the pipe (m²) Data for the first pipe : 6"GI Pipe type & size 6"

168.3 mm Out side diameter (mm) 7.11 mm Wall thickness (mm) D = 0.1541 m : pipe inside diameter (m.)

K = 0.0001 m : pipe inside Surface roughness (m.)

= - 2 x log [ k + 2.51 )

(5)

Project : Agriculture Bank - Gizan Page ( 2 ) Flow : Q = 680.0 GPM = 42.84 l/s = 0.04284 m³/sec A = p x D2 / 4 = 3.14 x 0.154 ² / 4 = 0.01865 m² V =Q / A = 2.298m/s Re = V x D / n = 2.298 x 0.1541 / 0.000001 = 354008.19 1 sqr(l) x sqr( l )

By solving above equation :

l = 0.01882

Loss m per 100 m = J x 100 = 0.03286 x 100 m = 3.286 m / 100m Pipe length L = 2.0 m

dh(1) Liner loss = J x L = 0.03286 x 2.0 = 0.066 m Local losses equation is given as follows:

HS2 = SUM ZE . V ² / ( 2 . G ) …..……….. (7) Where: G : Gravity acceleration (9.81 m/s²)

V : Velocity of water (m/s) SUM ZE : Sum of local loss factors

SUM ZE = gate valve 1 x 0.2 = 0.2

Flexible 0 x 0.2 = 0 Globe valve 0 x 8 = 0 check valve 1 x 2 = 2 elbow ( 45 leg.) 0 x 0.2 = 0 elbow ( 90 leg.) 1 x 0.3 = 0.3 tee 1 x 0.9 = 0.9 reducer 0 x 0.5 = 0 Strainer 1 x 2 = 2 discharge outlet 0 x 1 = 0

Total local factors =

HS2 = SUM ZE . V ² / ( 2 . g )

DH Total loss = HS1 + HS2 = 0.066 + 1.453 = 1.519 m

Total heal (DH+GH) / pipe = Static head + Friction losses ………. ( 8 ) = 0.0 + 1.519 = 1.519 m = - 2 log [ 0.0001 + 2.51 3.7 x 0.154 J = l . V² / ( 2 g D ) = HS(2) = SUM ZE.x V² / ( 2 g ) = 5.4 x 2.2976 X 2.2976 2 x 9.81 5.40 ] = 0.03286 m/m = 1.4529 m 0.01882 x 2.2976 x 2.298 2 x 9.81 x 0.1541 354008.2

(6)

Project : Agriculture Bank - Gizan Page ( 3 )

Data for the second pipe : 8"GI Pipe type & size 8" 219.1 mm Out side diameter (mm)

8.18 mm Wall thickness (mm) D = 0.2027 m : pipe inside diameter (m.)

K = 0.0001 m : pipe inside Surface roughness (m.) Flow : Q = 1360.0 GPM = 85.68 l/s = 0.08568 m³/sec A = p x D2 / 4 = 3.14 x 0.203 ² / 4 = 0.03228 m² V = Q / A = 2.654m/s Re = V x D / n = 2.654 x 0.2027 / 0.000001 = 538084.07 1 sqr(l) x sqr( l )

By solving above equation : l =

Loss m per 100 m = J x 100 = 0.03108 x 100 m = 3.108 m / 100m Pipe length L = 22.0 m

dh(1) Liner loss = J x L = 0.03108 x 22.0 = 0.684 m Local losses equation is given as follows:

HS2 = SUM ZE . V ² / ( 2 . G )

SUM ZE = gate valve 0 x 0.2 = 0

Flexible 0 x 0.2 = 0 Globe valve 0 x 8 = 0 check valve 0 x 2 = 0 elbow ( 45 leg.) 0 x 0.2 = 0 elbow ( 90 leg.) 4 x 0.3 = 1.2 tee 1 x 0.9 = 0.9 reducer 0 x 0.5 = 0 Strainer 0 x 2 = 0 discharge outlet 0 x 1 = 0

Total local factors =

HS2 = SUM ZE . V ² / ( 2 . g )

DH Total loss = HS1 + HS2 = 0.684 + 0.754 = 1.438 m Total heal (DH+GH) / pipe = Static head + Friction losses

= 0.0 + 1.438 = 1.438 m Total Head for pipe 1 & 2 = 1.519 + 1.438 = 2.956 m

Other pipes are calculated same as above, All data and results are arranged in the following table : ] = 0.03108 m/m = 0.7539 m J = l . V² / ( 2 g D ) = 2.10 HS(2) = SUM ZE.x V² / ( 2 g ) = 2.1 x 2.6541 X 2.6541 2 x 9.81 0.01755 538084.1 = - 2 log [ 0.01755 x 2.6541 x 2.654 2 x 9.81 x 0.2027 3.7 x 0.203 0.0001 + 2.51

References

Related documents

If the current disposable income of college students increases, there would be higher consumption expenditures regarding classes 9, 3 and 5 (Recreation and culture; Clothing

The results for ∆GDIGDP are mixed and non-significant while there are significant differences for ∆GAGRVA indicating a higher rate of growth in agricultural value added in groups

The orientation towards the EPR as a collection of voices shifts the enquiry away from a sole focus on which party in the consultation is the source of authority, or where

Intrinsic clearance is modelled as either a single ODE (Clint), ODE-based model of liver metabolism (LiverODE), or a genome-scale metabolic network (GSMN) as described in

Which pillar of education is being strengthened by a teacher who provides learning opportunities for his/her students to develop their social skills and capacities to work with

2) Totalizing the generation volume. 3) Calculating waste volume for other each kind of waste handling by same method. 4) Calculating percentage of waste volume for each kind

Hence, response time based approaches like (Lin et al. 2009) introduce a control loop using feedback about response times and the throughput as depicted in Figure 2.. A

There is a statistically signifi cant difference (.05) between the reported level of stress of California teachers and of non-California teachers on 11 out of 16 survey questions