Hovedstyret desember 2002
Chapter 3
Demand and production
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.1 Goods consumption index
1995=100. Seasonally adjusted volume
112 114 116 118 120 122 124
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 112 114 116 118 120 122 124 2000 2001 2002
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.2 Retail sales index
Seasonally adjusted volume
114 116 118 120 122 124
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 114 116 118 120 122 124 2000 2001 2002
Source: Statistics Norway
Hovedstyret desember 2002 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
NEF/ EEF/ ECON OBOS
Source: Norwegian Association of Real Estate Agents (NEF), Norwegian Association of Real Estate Agent Enterprises (EFF), Finn.no, ECON and OBOS
3.3 House prices
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.4 Price index for resale homes
Owner-occupied. 1996 Q1 = 100
100 125 150 175 200 225 250 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 Oslo and BærumRest of Norway Stavanger, Bergen og Trondheim
Total resale homes
Rest of Akershus -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16 Year-on-year growth, whole of Norway
Source: Statistics Norway
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.5 Real home prices
Index. 1980 = 100
0 50 100 150 200 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 0 50 100 150 200 Source: BIS US Germany Sweden UK NorwayHovedstyret desember 2002 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 Unadjusted
Source: Norsk Gallup Institutt AS
Trend
3.6 Consumer confidence indicator
Unadjusted and trend (levels)
Hovedstyret desember 2002 -35 -20 -5 10 25 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 -35 -20 -5 10 25 Total
Source: Norsk Gallup Institutt AS
3.7 Consumer confidence indicator
Figures are not seasonally adjusted
Own economy
Hovedstyret desember 2002 0 500 1000 1500 2000 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 0 500 1000 1500 2000
Sources: Opak Byggebransjens Kompetansesenter, Dagens Næringsliv
Ordinary standard, central
High standard, west
3.8 Property index
Prices for rental of office premises in the Oslo area.
Annual price in NOK per square metre
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.9 Number of bankruptcy orders made
Change on same month previous year
-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200
Jan 99 Jul 99 Jan 00 Jul 00 Jan 01 Jul 01 Jan 02 Jul 02
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.10 Sentiment indicator for manufacturing industry
1)Seasonally adjusted diffusion index
2)-6 -3 0 3 6 9 12 15 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 -6 -3 0 3 6 9 12 15
2)Values lower than zero indicate that the majority of industrial
leaders expect a weaker outlook in the next quarter
1) The sentiment indicator for manufacturing is an average of expected changes in production, actual
unfilled orders and stocks of own products from Statistics Norway’s businesss tendency survey
Source: Statistics Norway and Norges Bank
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.11 New orders, manufacturing
Value indices. 1995=100
50 100 150 200 250 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 50 100 150 200 250 Domestic ExportHovedstyret desember 2002
3.12 New orders, manufacturing
Value indices. 1995=100
50 100 150 200 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 50 100 150 200 Domestic ExportSource: Statistics Norway
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.13 Traditional merchandise exports and imports
Seasonally adjusted. In millions of NOK
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
feb 00 aug 00 feb 01 aug 01 feb 02 aug 02
12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Imports Exports
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.14 Household debt burden
1)100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Source: Norges Bank
Baseline scenario
Alternative with 11 per cent rise
in debt
1)Household loan debt as percentage
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.15 Household interest burden
1)and lending rate
0 3 6 9 12 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 0 3 6 9 12
Source: Norges Bank
Interest burden
Lending rate after tax
1)After tax interest expenses as a percentage of disposable oncome and interest expenses
Baseline scenario
Alternative with 11 per cent rise
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.16 Debt and interest burden in non-financial
enterprises excluding petroleum and shipping
Per cent
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Interest burden2) (left-hand scale) Debt burden1) (right-hand scale)1)Debt as a percentage of cash surplus excl interest expenses 2)Interest expenses as a percentage of cash surplus
Cash surplus = Value added - labour costs + capital income
Sources: Statistics Norway and Norges Bank
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.17 Companies’ return
1)and equity ratio
Per cent
0 20 40 60 80 100 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 0 5 10 15 20 25Source: Norges Bank
Interest on debt
Return on equity
Return on total assets
Equity ratio (left-hand scale)
1)Total pre-tax return as a percentage of average total assets and equity. Limited companies in operation for at least two years, excluding companies in the oil and gas industry, financial industry and public sector
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.18 Predicted probabilities of bankruptcy
1)Per cent
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 0 2 4 6 8 10 12Source: Norges Bank
1) Probability that companies stop submitting their acoounts and go bankrupt. Limited companies excl. companies in the oil and gas industry, financial industry and public sector
Median company Median of the 20% weakest Median of the 40% weakest Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.19 Probality of bankruptcy for large non-listed
companies. KMV model
1)Per cent
0 3 6 9 12 15 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 0 3 6 9 12 15 Source: Moody’s KMV1) Non-financial, non-listed companies with a turnover of more than NOK 70 millions
Median company
Median of the 20 % weakest
Median of the 50 % weakest
Hovedstyret desember 2002
General government
finances
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.20 The budget compromise
•
The compromise results in the reallocation of NOK
4.4bn in recorded value. In addition, accrued tax is
reduced by NOK 1.9bn
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.21a The budget compromise:
Most important changes from original proposal
Direct and indirect taxes:
Increase in minimum deduction from 23 per cent to 24 per cent (NOK 455m).
Increase in depreciation rates for machinery (NOK 1565m). Inheritance tax - increase in tax-free allowance (NOK 195m). Reduced tax on spirits (NOK 110m).
Reduction in taxation of shipping companies (NOK 92.8m).
Pensioners etc.:
Increase in basic pension for married and cohabiting pensioners (NOK 950m)
Ceiling on own contribution for medicines not raised (NOK 380m) Old age and disability pensioners with minimum pension exempted from paying own contribution on reduced rate prescription medicines (NOK 160m).
Source: Ministry of Finance
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.21b The budget compromise:
Most important changes from original proposal (cont.)
Municipalities:
Increased allocations to municipalities (NOK 1000m)
- Including increased focus on day-care centres (NOK 286m) and increased non-taxable income to municipalities (NOK 715m) Increased borrowing limit (NOK 1000m) for refurbishing schools
Other:
Increase in roads budget (NOK 150m)
Rules for layoffs - employer's payment period not to be extended (NOK 240m)
Reimbursement scheme plus net wages ferry companies not to be abolished (NOK 550m)
Lending limits of Norw. State Housing Bank increased (NOK 500m) Transfers of capital totalling NOK 0.8bn to Norway Post and Norwegian State Railways
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.22 The budget compromise
Coverage:
Reduced allocation to the Norwegian
Public Service Pension Fund NOK 2195m Reduced allocation to "Misc. expenses" NOK 550m Misc. Spending cuts/revenue increases NOK 1655m Total coverage NOK 4400m
Source: Ministry of Finance
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.23 The budget compromise
½ % ½ %
Real, underlying rise in spending
Not available (¾ %)
Municipal income, real growth2)
Approx. 11.6bn 10.6bn
Tax reductions in 2003, recorded value1)
Approx. 8.9bn 6.4bn
Tax reductions in 2003, accrued value1)
2bn 2bn
Structural non-oil deficit, real change from 2002 to 2003
30.7bn 30.7bn
Structural non-oil deficit, level
Compromise Government’s
proposal Fiscal year 2003
1) Some of the tax reductions are associated with changes approved for 2002
2) The Ministry of Finance has not provided updated estimates because of the downward revison by of estimated municipal tax revenues in 2002 by NOK 1bn compared with the estimate in the National Budget. This has resulted in considerable uncertainty concerning tax revenues in 2003. However, as a result of the compromise, municipal revenues will be increased by a nominal NOK 1bn, i.e. approx. ½ % of total municipal sector revenues.
Hovedstyret desember 2002
Regional network
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.24 Regional network (7 regions)
211 Total 15 Public sector 73 Services 36 Retail trade 20 Construction 65 Manufacturing 2 Primary industries Region North Kunnskaps-. parken Bodø Region Central Norway,Allforsk Region Inland Østlandsforsk. Region East Norges Bank Region South Agder forskning Region SW Rogalands forsk. Region NW Møreforsk
Second round
(Contact meetings in October and November) Contacts – by industry
Hovedstyret desember 2002
3.25 Summary
•
General decline in production in the export industry.There are, however, a number of exceptions to this development
•
Manufacturing production for the domestic market has come to a standstill•
For retail trade and services, there is growth for activities aimed at the household sector and no growth for activities aimed at the business sector•
Manufacturing employment is falling, while employment in retail trade is risingHovedstyret desember 2002