Temporal changes
in
rat
Leydig
cell
function
after the
induction of bilateral
cryptorchidism
G.
P.
Risbridger,
J.
B.
Kerr,
R.
Peake,
K.
A.
Rich
and D.
M.
de Kretser
Department
of
Anatomy,
MonashUniversity,
Clayton,
Victoria3168,
AustraliaSummary.
Adultrats weremadebilaterally
cryptorchid
andstudied atintervals of3,
7,
14or21days
tostudy temporal
changes
inLeydig
cell function. Serum FSH and LHlevelswere measured and the cross-sectionalareaof theLeydig
cells assessedby
morphometry.
The function of theLeydig
cells wasjudged
by
thebinding
of125I-labelled hCG to testicular tissue in vitro and the testosterone response of the testis to hCG stimulation in vitro.
By
3days
aftercryptorchidism,
thebinding
of labelled hCG to testicular tissue wassignificantly
decreasedcompared
to that ofcontrols,
but the testes were able torespond
to hCG stimulation in vitro. At7,
14 and 21days
aftercryptorchidism,
an enhanced testosteroneresponsewas observedand the size of the
Leydig
cells wassignificantly
greater than that of thecontrols,
which indicated increased secretory
activity
by
thecryptorchid
testis.Although
serum FSH levels were
significantly
elevated after 3days
ofcryptorchidism,
serumLH levels did not rise until 7
days, thereby suggesting
that the loss ofreceptors isunlikely
toresult fromdown-regulation
by
LH.The reducedtestosteroneresponseof thecryptorchid
testisin vivotolow doses of hCGand the enhanced responseathigh
doses areprobably
relatedto thereducedbloodflowtothecryptorchid
testisand the decreasedsensitivity
of theLeydig
cellsinducedby LH/hCG
receptorloss.Introduction
Surgically
inducedcryptorchidism
results in aprogressive
degeneration
of thegerm cells of the testis(Clegg,
1963).
Bilateralcryptorchidism
also results in somedegree
ofLeydig
cell failure(Kerr,
Rich & deKretser,
1979b);
1 month after the induction ofcryptorchidism,
serum LHlevels were
elevated,
serum testosterone levels weresignificantly
lower orunchanged,
and adiminishedtestosterone responsetohCG stimulation wasobserved in vivo
compared
tocontrolanimals.
However,
theLeydig
cells werehypertrophied
and theircytological
features weresuggestive
ofincreased steroid secretion consistent with the enhancedsecretory
activity
observed in response to maximal hCG stimulation in vitro(de
Kretser,
Sharpe
&Swanston,
1979).
A marked reduction in theability
of thecryptorchid
testis to bind labelled hCG in vitro wasassociated with the
changes
inLeydig
cell function(de
Kretseretai,
1979).
Itwasconsequently
postulated
thatthe increased LH secretion may havesecondarily
affectedLeydig
cellfunction,
causing hypertrophy
anddown-regulating
the number ofLH/hCG
receptorswhich,
in turn,may have altered thesensitivity
of the testistohCGstimulationin vivo.In this
study
we have examinedLeydig
cell function after the induction of bilateralcryptorchidism
to establish thetemporal
relationship
between the elevation of serumgonadotrophin
levels and thechanges
in thesteroidogenic
secretorycapacity
and hCGbinding
in vitro.Morphometric
analyses
werealsoperformed
toassessthe increase inLeydig
cell size.0022-4251/81/060415-09S02.00/0 ©1981 Journals ofReproduction&FertilityLtd
Materials and Methods Animals
Mature
Sprague-Dawley
ratsaged
2-3 months were madesurgically cryptorchid by
relocation of the testis into an abdominal
position
and closure of theinguinal
canal. Animals werekilledby decapitation
3, 7,
14or21days
after theinduction of bilateralcryptorchidism
andtrunk blood was collected and stored at —
20°C until
assayed
forLH,
FSH and testosterone.Control animals were
sham-operated
by opening
the scrotum andgently displacing
the testesintotheabdomen without closure ofthe
inguinal
canal. Measurementof
in-vitrobinding
ofl2SI-labelled
hCGThe testes were
excised,
weighed, decapsulated
andplaced
in ice-coldphosphate-buffered
saline
(PBS),
pH
7-2. The testes werehomogenized by
handusing
aglass-teflon
homogenizer
andwere
centrifuged
at20 000 gfor 15 min. Thepellet
wasresuspended,
centrifuged
again
andstored in 1 ml
PBS/0-1%
BSAat—20°C beforeuse.Afterthawing,
thepellets
weredispersed
ataconcentration of 200
mg/ml
inPBS.Highly purified
hCG(CR121
:activity
9286i.u./mg,
kindly
provided by
the NationalPituitary Agency,
NIH, Bethesda,
Maryland, U.S.A.)
was iodinatedwith chloramine toa
specific
activity
of 30-50pCi/pg
by
themethod ofGreenwood,
Hunter& Glover
(1963).
Triplicate
100-pl
aliquots
of thesuspension
were incubated with 100 ul125I-labelled
hCG(100
000c.p.m.)
and 50pi
PBS buffer for 16 h at 22°C. Thenon-specific
binding
ofI25I-labelled hCGwasdeterminedby
the addition ofan excessofhCG(100
i.u. in 50ul
PBS;
Pregnyl:
Organon)
instead of buffer alone. The incubation was terminatedby
theaddition of 3 ml 0-9%
(w/v)
NaCl,
the tubes werecentrifuged
at 1500 g for 30 min and theresulting
radioactivity
in thepellet
was measured in a Packard gamma spectrometer. Thelowerspeed
ofcentrifugation
resulted inonly
an 0-5-1-0% decrease in 125I-labelled hCG bound totissue when
compared
tocentrifugation
at 20 000 g;consequently
the lowerspeed
was usedroutinely
because of increasedcapacity
of thecentrifuge.
TheLH/hCG
binding
wasexpressed
asnghormone boundpertestis.2 4 6 16
Incubation time(h)
20
Text-fig.
1. The effect of timeonthebinding
of125I-labelledhCGtotesticularhomogenatesfromnormaland
cryptorchid
rat testes.Eachpoint
representsthemean ± s.e.m.of5replicates.
The
possibility
that the presenceofdegenerating
germcells inthehomogenates
oftestesfromcryptorchid
ratsmay alter the kinetics of125I-labelledhCG,
incomparison
topreparations
from control rats, was evaluatedby performing
a time-course ofbinding
at 22°C for 16 h for bothpreparations.
Although
the totalbinding
tohomogenates
fromcryptorchid
testes werelower,
the kinetics didnotdiffer from those forcontroltesticularhomogenates
(Text-fig.
1).
Stimulationof
testosteroneproduction by
hCGinvitroThe testes were
removed,
weighed,
decapsulated
andplaced
in 2 mlKrebs-Ringer-bicarbonate buffer
(Dawson,
Elliot,
Elliot &Jones,
1969) containing
1 mgglucose/ml
(KRBG).
Testosterone
production
in responseto hCGwas determinedby
methodspreviously published
(de
Kretser etai,
1979).
At 2 weeks after the induction ofcryptorchidism,
the in-vitrotestosterone response to different doses of hCG
(2-1500 mi.u./ml:
(Pregnyl: Organon)
wasdetermined. Unless indicated the concentration of hCG usedinthe studieswas700
mi.u./ml.
Studieson
Leydig
cells isolatedfrom cryptorchid
ratsPreliminary
attempts to isolateLeydig
cells from rats 21 or 28days
afterinducing
cryptorchidism by
the method ofMendelson,
Dufau & Catt(1975)
met with considerabledifficulty.
Thispresumably
resulted from increasedcollagen
accumulation in theperitubular
tissue of
cryptorchid
rats(Kerr
etai,
1979a)
requiring
more extensive incubation withcollagenase.
These extensive incubations(30—60 min)
resulted in poorLeydig
cellviability,
especially
from normal rats.However,
since the presentstudy
demonstrateschanges
inLeydig
cell function within 7days
ofinducing
cryptorchidism,
i.e. beforecollagen
accumulation isincreased,
Leydig
cells were obtainedby
incubation withcollagenase
(Sigma
Type 1),
0-25mg/ml,
for 15 min fromcontrol andcryptorchid
testes.Thebinding
of125I-labelled
hCGandthe in-vitroresponseto 700 mi.u. hCGwerethen assessed.In-vivo
dose—response
tohCGIn view of
previous
results(Kerr
etai,
1979b),
which demonstrated poor response of thecryptorchid
testis to hCG stimulation in vivo buthyper-responsivity
to hCG invitro,
adose-response
test to hCG stimulation in vivo wasperformed.
Normal rats and21-day-cryptorchid
ratswereinjected
s.c.with5,
50 or200 i.u. hCG and killedby
decapitation
60min later. This time was chosen because earlier studies in normal rats and those with
spermatogenic damage
from other causes showed this to be the time to achieve the maximal initialresponse(Rich,
Kerr &deKretser,
1979).
Similar dataare available forcryptorchid
rats(unpublished).
The sera wereseparated
and storedat —20 °C until
assayed
fortestosterone.Radioimmunoassay of
serumLH,FSH andtestosteroneFSH and LH were measured
by
double-antibody radioimmunoassays
using
methodspreviously
described(Lee,
deKretser,
Hudson &Wang, 1975).
The FSH assay utilized anantiserum raisedto
purified
human FSH and showed less than 0-5%cross-reactivity
withratLH and TSH. PurifiedratFSH(NIAMDD-FSH-I3)
wasiodinatedwithlactoperoxidase
and usedastracer and NIAMDD-FSH-RP1 as standard. The antiserum
(NIAMDD-LH-S4)
was used tomeasure rat LH and
purified
rat LH(NIAMDD-LH-I4)
wasused asbothtracer andstandard. Theintra-assay
variationranged
from 7to 9% for both assays. Allsamples
from thestudy
weremeasured in thesameassay.
Testosterone was measured
by
aspecific radioimmunoassay
similar to that describedby
Corker & Davidson
(1978).
Incubation media wereassayed directly
for testosterone contentbecause ether-extracted and unextracted
samples
gave similar results. The anti-serum totestosterone was raised in
sheep
against testosterone-3-carboxymethyloxime coupled
tobovine serum albumin and showed a98%cross-reactivity
with5a-dihydrotestosterone.
Theintra-assay
coefficient of variationwas6-8% and the
inter-assay
coefficient ofvariationwas 16%.Histology
Thetestesofratsthathad been
cryptorchid
for3, 7,
14or21days
werefixedby
perfusion
of a mixture ofglutaraldehyde (5% by vol.),
formaldehyde
(4% by vol.)
and2,4,6-trinitro-cresol
(0-05% by vol.)
bufferedtopH
7-4 with 0-2M-sodiumcacodylate
aspreviously
described(Kerr
& de
Kretser,
1975). Following post-fixation
in osmiumtetroxide,
the smallpieces
of testicular tissueweredehydrated
and embedded in amixture ofEpon
:Araldite(1:1,
v/v).
Sections 0-5-1pm in thickness were stained with toluidine blue and examined with a Leitz
Orthoplan
microscope.
The cross-sectional areaofLeydig
cells,
selected atrandom,
wasmeasuredusing
aLeitz
Image
Analyser. Equal
numbers ofLeydig
cells(n
=300)
were measured from 3 animalsin each of the4 groups. Statistical
analysis
The results were
subjected
toanalysis
by
Student's t test except for the data in Table 1concerning
serum FSH and theincremental rise oftestosterone tohCG stimulation. Due tothe variance inthe latterincreasing
withthemagnitude
ofthe mean,the data werelog-transformed
and
subjected
toanalysis
ofvariance.Results
There was a marked reduction in testis
weight
after the induction ofcryptorchidism
(Table 1),
such that at 21
days
thecryptorchid
testis wasapproximately
one quarter of theweight
of thecontrol testis. Therewas nofurther decline in testis
weight
at21days
aftercryptorchidism.
Table 1. The effect of
cryptorchidism
ofrats on testicular weight, serum FSH and LH concentrations, bindingof125I-labelledhCGand incremental rise oftestosteroneproduction
Daysafter induction ofcryptorchidism
14 21 Testiswt(g) Control 1-53±0-06 1-15±0-06 1-44±0-06 1-63±0-04 Cryptorchid 1-54±0-06 106±0-11* 0-47 ± 0-04* 0-42 ±0-03* Serum LH(ng/ml) Control 1-02±0-11 0-69±0-11 0-47 ± 0-08 0-76±0-09 Cryptorchid 0-82±011 1-47 ±0-22* 1-72±0-14* 1-50+0-09* Serum FSH(ng/ml) Control 492 ± 27 421 ± 18 402 ±21 544 ± 22 Cryptorchid 767 ± 32* 638±53** 855+50** 1093 ± 126**
Bindingof'"¡-labelledhCG (ng/testis)
Control 16-9±1-3 13-3+0-5 12-7±0-5 10-3+ 2-8
Cryptorchid 11-9±1-1** 4-3±0-5** 3-4 ± 0-4** 2-0 ± 0-2**
Incremental rise intestosterone tohCG
(ng/testis)
Control 350 ± 70 530 ± 70 520 ± 80 190 ± 60
Cryptorchid 260 ± 60** 1100±140** 1680 ± 260** 1560 ±320**
Valuesare mean±s.e.m.for 8rats/group.
*
<0-05,** <0005comparedtocontrols.
Serum FSH levels were
significantly
increased within 3days
and continued to rise above control values withincreasing
time after the induction ofcryptorchidism
(Table 1).
Serum LH levels show considerablevariability
in controlanimals,
presumably
relatedtoepisodic
secretion,
but a
significant
(P
<0-05)
rise in serum LH abovebasal levels wasnot apparentuntil 7days
aftercryptorchidism;
valuesthenremained elevatedthroughout
thestudy
(Table
1).
The
binding
of labelled hCGtotesticular tissue from3-day-cryptorchid
ratswassignificantly
(P
<0-01)
lowerthan that for controls. Thereafterthebinding capacity
of thecryptorchid
testis showeda furtherdecline,
reaching
19% of control valuesat21days
ofcryptorchidism
(Table
1).
Scatchard
analyses
ofthe results aftercryptorchidism
for 7days
show that thelossofbinding
wasnot associated witha
change
in theaffinity
of the hormone for thereceptor(Text-fig.
2).
Nosignificant
difference of theslopes
wasfound eitherby
calculating
theerrorsandusing
Student'st testor
by
the useofabioassay
programmeto testparallelism
of theregression
lines(Finney,
1964).
O-8 Control • Cryptorchid 200 400 12Sl-labelledhCGbound (pg/20mg testicularhomogenate)Text-fig.
2. Scatchardanalysis
of thebinding
data obtainedusing
testicular tissue from control and7-day-cryptorchid
animals. Eachpoint
representsthemeanoftriplicate
determinations frompooled
samples
of testiculartissuefromthe 5 animals in eachgroup.By
3days
after the induction ofcryptorchidism,
the testes were abletorespond
to hCG in vitroby
a rise in testosteroneproduction.
Therewas nodifference intestosteroneproduction
by
control and
cryptorchid
testes at3days,
buttestes from7-,
14-and21-day-cryptorchid
animals showed asignificantly
(P
<0-01)
enhancedresponseto hCG stimulationin vitrocompared
tocontrol testis
(Table 1).
The results inText-fig.
3 demonstrated that at all doses of hCG thecapacity
of the testis toproduce
testosterone in vitro was greater for thecryptorchid
testes.Calculation of the dose
required
to stimulate a half-maximal increase was 23-5i.u./ml
forthecryptorchid
testis and 4-5i.u./ml
for controlgroups.The size of the
Leydig
cells wassignificantly
(P
<0-05)
enlarged
within 3days
of the induction ofcryptorchidism
and the increasewasmaintained(Table 2).
Response
of
isolatedLeydig
cellsLeydig
cells isolated from testes 7days
after theinduction ofcryptorchidism
demonstratedasignificantly
greaterresponseoftestosterone tohCG stimulationthandid cellsfrom control rats(Table 3).
Thebinding
of125I-labelledhCGtoLeydig
cells fromcryptorchid
ratswasreducedto45% ofthat for
Leydig
cells from controlrats(Table
3).
.Jr
Basal 10 100
hCG(mi.u./ml]
1000
Text-fig. 3. The effect ofincreasingconcentrations of hCGontestosterone
production
in vitro. Valuesaremean±s.e.m.(per
mlof incubationbuffer)for 5testes.Table 2. The effect of
cryptorchidism
in ratsonthe cross-sectionalareaof the
Leydig
cellsDaysafter
Total cross-sectionalarea(urn2)
cryptorchidism Control Cryptorchid
3 108 ± 6 159 ± 9*
7 109 ± 6 156± 6*
14 111 ±5 154±9*
21 103±4 166±4*
Valuesare mean ± s.e.m.for 300 cells in each of
3rats/group.
•Significantly different from control value: < 0-01.
Table 3. The in-vitro responses of
Leydig
cells isolated from thetestesofrats
cryptorchid
for 7days
No. of
test-tubes Control Cryptorchid
-:-,- -MM-I-».--.-*—- I -tfc!-' . "I 1 -I' -*«-**-— Testosteroneproduction (ng/106cells) Basal 5 3-5+ 0-1 3-3±0-3 hCG-stimulated 5 4-5±0-1 6-2 ±0-2* '"I-labelledhCGbinding
(pg/106cells)
3 48-1± 1 21-8±0-9*Values are mean ± s.e.m.; each test-tube contained 106 cells from a
different animal.
*
Significantlydifferent from controlvalue, <0-001.
In-vivo
dose-response of
testosteronetohCGstimulationBasal serum testosteronelevels in controls and
21-day-cryptorchid
rats didnot differ(Table
4).
Atadose of5i.u. hCG serumtestosteronelevelsweresignificantly
greaterincontrolanimalsthan in
cryptorchid
rats, but the reverse was true with 200 i.u. hCG. There was no differencewith50i.u. hCG.
Table 4. The
dose-response relationship
between the levels ofserumtestosteroneand the dose of hCG administered to control and21-day-cryptorchid
ratsSerumtestosterone(ng/ml)
DoseofhCG
(i.u.) Control Cryptorchid
0 2-0±0-2 1-9±0-2
5 16-4±0-9 8-0±1-2**
50 18-3 ±2-2 21-9±2-5
200 17-6±1-5 27-5±3-8*
Valuesare mean±s.e.m.for 5rats/group. Significantly different from controlvalues, *
<
0-05,**
<0-001.
Discussion
This
study
demonstrates that the reduction in the number of available testicularLH/hCG
receptors in thecryptorchid
ratisnotdirectly
relatedto animmediatechange
inperipheral
LHconcentrations. Serum LH values were
unchanged
3days
after the induction of bilateralcryptorchidism
andwerenotsignificantly
elevated until 7days
ofcryptorchidism.
However,
an initialsignificant
reduction in thebinding
of labelled hCGtocryptorchid
testis in vitro wasfirstobserved at 3
days
and continued to decline to lower levels after 21days
ofcryptorchidism
compared
to controls. The decline in hCGbinding
was also found inLeydig
cells isolated fromcryptorchid
testes and incubated with the tracer in the absence of seminiferous tubules anddegenerating
germ cells. Theseresults,
and the demonstration that the kinetics of thebinding
reaction were similar in both control andcryptorchid
testicularhomogenates
(Text-fig. 1),
exclude the
possibility
that the loss ofbinding
was due todamage
of the iodinated hCGby
lysosomal products
released fromdegenerating
germcells.This
temporal
patternisnot consistent with theexplanation
that thedecreasedbinding
is the result of the increased serum LH levels aftercryptorchidism.
Scatchardanalysis
demonstratesthat the
change
inhCGbinding
isduetoaloss ofreceptorsrather thananychange
in theaffinity
of thehormone-receptor
interaction. Further studies are necessaryto determinethe mechanismby
which hCGbinding
is decreasedfollowing
cryptorchidism.
Despite
the loss ofLH/hCG
receptors, thecryptorchid
testis is able torespond
in anexaggerated
manner to hCG stimulation in vitro and does not demonstrate thedesensitizing
effect found aftertheloss of hCG receptorsinducedby
high
doses ofhCG(Tsuruhara, Dufau,
Cigorraga
&Catt,
1977).
Thisprovides
further evidence that the loss ofreceptorsfollowing
hCG is not the cause of thedesensitization,
inkeeping
with the data ofHaour & Saez(1978)
who showed that
cycloheximide
couldpreventthe loss ofLHreceptorscausedby
large
dosesofhCG but did not prevent the desensitization process. The
hypertrophy
of theLeydig
cellsprecedes
the enhancedproduction
oftestosteroneby
thecryptorchid
testis and correlates withprevious
ultrastructural observations of an increase in theorgandíes
involved in steroidbiosynthesis
(Kerr
etai, 1979b).
Thefinding
thatpreparations
ofLeydig
cells isolated fromcryptorchid
testes show anexaggerated
hCG-inducedtestosterone responseis evidence that thisphenomenon
isnot the result ofanychange
inthe steroid metabolism ofdamaged
seminiferous tubules. The dose of hCGrequired
to cause half-maximalstimulation ofthecryptorchid
testis isgreater than that
required
by
the control testis and may be a measure of decreasedsensitivity
consistent with the loss ofLH/hCG
receptors.Examination of thedose-response relationship
of testosterone to hCG stimulation in vitroprovided
results different from thosepreviously
obtained(de
Kretser etai,
1979)
in that the present data showhyper-responsiveness
of thecryptorchid
testis atlow doses ofhCG. It ispossible
that the use of hemi-testes in theprevious
study
may be theresult ofthesedifferencesasDufau,
Catt & Tsuruhara(1971)
have shown thatmechanical
disruption
of the testis can result in decreased testosteroneproduction.
The results described herein arereproducible
and are identical to those obtainedusing
testes from rats irradiatedasfetusestocausetesticulardamage (Rich
&deKretser,
1979).
Our
previous
studies(Kerr
etai,
1979b;
de Kretser etai,
1979)
have demonstrated aparadox
between the in-vivohypo-responsiveness
of theLeydig
celltohCG stimulation and thehyper-responsiveness
invitro,
a difference attributed to the reduced blood flow to thecryptorchid
testis(Damber, Bergh
&Janson,
1978)
andsupported by
the fact thatatlow doses the control rats demonstrated a greater responseto hCG in vivo than did thecryptorchid
rats.However,
athigh
doses of hCG thecryptorchid
rats showed a greater testosteroneproduction
than controls and it is
possible
that thelarge
doses ofhCG havecompensated
for the reduced blood flow to thecryptorchid
testis and overcome the decreasedsensitivity resulting
from theloss of
LH/hCG
receptors, both of which contribute to thehyporesponsiveness
of thecryptorchid
testis atlower doses of hCG.Theenhancedin-vitro
production
oftestosteroneinresponsetohCGby
cryptorchid
testesis difficultto reconcile witha decreasedactivity
ofthecholesterol side-chaincleavage
enzyme and3
ß-hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase,
and diminishedandrogen
production
asdemonstratedby
theconversion ofprecursorsteroids
(Inano
&Tamaoki, 1968;
Le Vier &Spaziani,
1968;
Wisner &Gomes,
1978).
However,
we have demonstrated asignificant
stimulation ofpregnenolone,
androstenedione and oestradiol
production
by
cryptorchid
testesduring
in-vitro stimulation(de
Kretser etai,
1979).
Itispossible
that thein-vitrostudiesusing
precursorconversiontechniques
do notaccurately
reflect thecapacity
for steroidproduction
fromendogenous
unlabelled precursors.Furthermore,
thehypertrophy
oftheLeydig
cellsand the increasein theorgandíes
involved in steroidbiosynthesis
(Kerr
etai,
1979b)
support the observations in thisstudy
of increasedsteroidogenic
capacity
of these cells.Other models of
spermatogenic damage
(i.e.
rats treatedby
fetalirradiation,
prolonged
administration of
hydroxyurea
or chronicfeeding
ofa vitamin A deficientdiet)
also result inelevated LH
levels,
hyporesponsiveness
to hCG invivo,
Leydig
cellhypertrophy
andhyperresponsiveness
tohCGin vitro and loss ofLHreceptors(Rich,
Kerr &deKretser, 1979;
Rich & deKretser,
1979).
Itis thereforeunlikely
thatthechanges
inLeydig
cell functionareduesolely
toincreasedintra-abdominaltemperature,andacontrol mechanismoperating
betweenthetubule and intertubularcompartmentsofthetestis could be involved.
Aoki & Fawcett
(1978)
proposed
a local control mechanism toexplain
thehypertrophie
appearance ofLeydig
cells which surrounded localized areas of tubuledamage
inducedby
anti-fertility
agents.They suggested
that thedamaged
portions
ofthe seminferous tubulesmight
elaborate aproduct
which resultsin thestimulation ofLeydig
cells,
orthattheLeydig
cellsmight
be releasedfromthe
inhibitory
effects ofan agentsecretedduring
normal testicular function.Itiswell established that
cryptorchidsim
causes a severedisruption
ofspermatogenesis (Nelson,
1951)
andalso alters the structureandfunction of the Sertoli cells asdemonstratedby
decreasedandrogen-binding
protein production (Kerr
etai,
1979a).
Eithercomponentcould be involved in thepostulated
control mechanism. Our present results show that thehypertrophy
andhyperresponsiveness
of theLeydig
cellsprecede
the rise in serumLH,
and it is thereforelikely
that other factors suchaslocal mechanismsmay beinvolved.
References Aoki, . & Fawcett, D.W. (1978) Is there a local
feedback from the seminiferous tubules affecting activity of theLeydigcells? Biol. Reprod. 19,
144-158.
Clegg,E. J. (1963) Studieson artificial cryptorchidism: degenerative and regenerative changes in the ger¬ minal epithelium of the rat testis. J. Endocr. 27,
241-251.
Corker, C.S. & Davidson, D.W. (1978) The radio¬ immunoassay of testosterone in various biological fluids withoutchromatography.J. Steroid Biochem.
9,373-374.
Damber, J.E., Bergh, A. & Janson, P.O. (1978) Testicular blood flow and testosterone concen¬
trations in the spermatic venous blood in rats with experimental cryptorchidism. Acta endocr., Copenh. 88,611-618.
Dawson, R.M.C., Elliot, D.C., Elliot, W.H. & Jones,
K.M. (Eds) (1969)DataforBiochemicalResearch, 2ndedn,p. 507.OxfordUniversityPress,London. deKretser,D.M.,Sharpe,R.M.&Swanston,A.(1979)
Alterations in steroidogenesis and hCG binding in the cryptorchid rat testis. Endocrinology 105,
135-138.
Dufau, M.L., Catt, K.J. & Tsuruhara, T. (1971) Gonadotrophin stimulation of testosterone produc¬
tionbytherattestisin vitro.Biochim.Biophys.Acta
252,574-579.
Finney, D. (1964) Statistical Method in Biological Assay.CharlesGriffin&Co.,London.
Greenwood, F.C., Hunter,W.M.&Glover, J.S.(1963)
The preparation of U1l-labelled growth hormone of high specific radioactivity.Biochem. J.89, 114-123.
Haour, F. & Saez, J.M. (1978) Leydig cell respon¬ siveness to LH-hCG stimulation: mechanisms of hCG and steroid induced refractoriness.InStructure and Function ofthe Gonadotropins, pp. 497-516. Ed.K. W.McKerns. PlenumPress,NewYork.
Inano, H. & Tamaoki, B.-I. (1968) Effect of experi¬ mental bilateral cryptorchidism on testicular en¬
zymes related to androgen function. Endocrinology
83,1074-1082.
Kerr,J.B.& deKretser,D.M.(1975) Cyclicvariations in Sertoli cell lipid content throughout the spermato-genic cyclein therat.J.Reprod.Fert.43,1-8.
Kerr,J.B., Rich,K.A. & deKretser,D.M.(1979a)The
effectsofexperimental cryptorchidism onthe ultra-structure and function of the Sertoli cell and peritubular tissue of rat testis. Biol. Reprod. 21, 823-838.
Kerr, J.B., Rich, K.A. & de Kretser, D.M. (1979b) Alterations of the fine structure and androgen secretion of the interstitial cells in theexperimentally cryptorchidrattestis. Biol.Reprod.20,409-422.
Lee, V.W.K.,deKretser,D.M.,Hudson,B.&Wang,C. (1975) Variations in serum FSH, LH and testo¬ sterone levels in male rats from birth to sexual maturity.J.Reprod.Fert.42,121-126.
Le Vier, R.P. & Spaziani, E. (1968) The influence of
temperature on steroidogenesis in the rat testis. J.
exp. Zool.169, 113-120.
Mendelson, C, Dufau, M.L. & Catt, KJ. (1975) Dependence of gonadotropin-induced steroido¬ genesis upon RNA and protein synthesis in the interstitial cell of the rat testis. Biochem. Biophys. Acta411,222-226.
Nelson, W.O. (1951) Mammalian spermatogenesis: effect ofexperimentalcryptorchidismin the ratand non-descended testis in man. Recent Prog. Horm.
Res.6,29-62.
Rich, K.A. & de Kretser, D.M. (1979) Effect of fetal irradiation on testicular receptors and testosterone
response to gonadotrophin stimulation. Int. J. An¬ drol.2,343-352.
Rich, K.A., Kerr, J.B. & de Kretser, D.M. (1979) Evidence for Leydig cell dysfunction in rats with seminiferous tubuledamage.Molec. cell. Endocr.13, 123-135.
Tsuruhara,T., Dufau, M.L.,Cigorraga,S.&Catt,KJ. (1977) Hormonal regulationof testicular luteinizing hormone receptors. Effects on cyclic AMP and testosteroneresponsesin isolatedLeydigcells. J. biol. Chem.252,9002-9009.
Wisner, J.R. & Gomes, W.R. (1978) Influence of experimental cryptorchidism on cholesterol
side-chain cleavage enzymes and 5-3ß hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity in rat testes. Steroids 31,
189-203.
Received 15January 1981