• No results found

Internet Service Providers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Internet Service Providers"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Internet Service Providers

Laura Jeanne Knapp IBM Networking 1-919-254-8801 Laura@lauraknapp.com www.lauraknapp.com Thomas M. Hadley IBM Networking 1-919-301-3052 tmhadley@us.ibm.com

(2)

Internet

Service ISP AOL, MSN Consumer ISP Mindspring, Earthlink Business ISP PSINet, C&W AT&T, Uunet

Connecting to the Internet

Infrastructure ISP QWEST, Worldcom, Level3 Content ISP Exodus, Frontier, IBM

(3)

International ISPs National ISPs

Long Distance Carriers On-Line Services

Regional Phone Companies Regional ISPs

Local ISPs

Cable Companies . . .

Internet

First Tier Service Providers (National or International)

Regional ISP Networks

Local ISP Networks Packet Exchange Sites

Corporate and user connection occur at any level of ISP network

levels

(4)

Global Internet Backbone

Backbone ISP

Provide connections across long distances National and international

Carry traffic for smaller ISPs

High bandwidth packet exchange points Interconnection sites

Network Access Points (NAPs) Commercial Internet Exchanges (CIXs)

Metropolitan Area Exchanges (MAEs) Ameritech AOL Earthlink MSN PSINet PSINet Uunet C&W Digex Flash SBC AT&T SAVIS Concentric LDDS Mindspring Sprint AT&T UUNET UUNET NAP NAP NAP Peer Peer

(5)
(6)

Packet Exchange Points

North America

MAE East (MFS) MAE West (MFS)

MAE Chicago (Ameritec) MAE Houston

MAE Dallas MAE LA (PacBell) MAE New York (Sprint)

Commercial Internet Exchange (CIX) Boston Exchange

Boston MIX

Philadelphia Internet Exchange Baltimore Internet Exchange Atlanta NAP

Atlanta Internet Exchange PaloAlto Exchange

Oregon Internet Exchange

Puget Sound Regional Interconnect Northwest Internet Exchange Phoenix Internet Exchange Tucson Interconnect Nashville NAP Zions Hill The Arch Canada NAP Montreal Exchange Europe MAE Paris MAE Frankfurt

Amsterdam Internet Exchange (AMS-IX) French (GIX)

Belgian IP Interconnection Point (X-router) Stockholm Exchange (DGIX)

London Internet Exchange (LINX) Finnish CIX (fiCIX)

Danish CIX (DIX) Deutsch CIX (deCIX)

Nordic exchange (dGIX)

Irish Data Internet Neutral Exchange CERN exchange (CIXP)

Swiss exchange (SIX) Slovak Interexchange

Czech Republic Internet Exchange Vienna Internet Exhcnage (VIX) Milan Inernet Exchange (MIXTRA) Roman NAP

Spanish Neutral Interconnect Exchange Moscow (M9-IX)

StPetersburg (SPB-IX)

PAC Rim

New Zealand Internet Exchange (NSIX) Hong Kong Internet Exchange (HKIX) Japanese Internet Exchange (NSPIXP) Imnet

Neutral new Zealand (NZIX) Metro Manila (MM-MAP) Western OX Internet Exchange Sydney Internet Exchange Perth Internet Exchange Brisbane Internet Exchange Africa/MidEast

Israeli IIX

Uniforums SA Internet Exchange ISPA SA Internet Exchange Telkom SA Internet Exchange Latin America

InteRED Panama LNCC PIR Embratel PIR GT-ER PIR

New Brazilian PIR

(7)

MAE-East Packet Exchange

See www.nlanr.net/ www.mfsdatanet.com giga1/29 192.41.177.243+198.32.186.243 gip-mae-e-fddi1-0.gip.net Giga1/29 192.41.177.95 mae-east.ziplink.net Giga1/31 192.41.177.115+198.32.186.115 mae-east.digex.net Giga1/32 192.41.177.114+198.32.186.114 mae-east.wdc.compuserve.net giga1/35 192.41.177.16 mae-east1.ans.net giga1/36 192.41.177.127 mae-east3.cw.net giga2/12 192.41.177.122 mae-east.telia.net Giga2/14 192.41.177.147+198 .32.186.147 f6.peer1.wdc1.genuity.net Giga2/15 192.41.177.3+198.32.186.3 mae-east.att.net Giga2/16 192.41.177.13+198.32.186.13 core1.mae-east.teleglobe.net

(8)

Packet Exchange Peering Agreements

Internet

International ISP Networks

Regional ISP Networks

Local ISP Networks Network Access Point

ISP 1 ISP 2 ISP3

No peering defined between 1 and 3

Transit agreement between 2 and 3

All traffic between 1 and 3 goes

through NAP

Settlements process still in development

(9)

Hot and Cold Potato Routing

Cold Potato Routing (Best Exit Routing) First network carries packet as far as possible

Hot Potato Routing (First Exit Routing)

Packets are sent to destination network as soon as possible

Connected to IGN

www.lauraknapp.com Alternate interconnection

site for IGN and Mindspring IGN connection is 622 Mbps

Mindspring connection is 150 Mbps Peering site for IGN and Mindspring through

(10)

How can ISP’s Control Traffic Flow

Border system: Separately administered Limited information exchanged Uses exterior routing protocols

like BGP4

Autonomous system:

Single administration control Extensive information eschange Uses interior routing protocols

BGP routers send out periodic updates on networks it can reach both owned and through peering and transit agreements

ISP can control BGP advertisements and path selection

CIDR (classless Interdomain Routing) reduces number of routes that an ISP advertises by grouping IP addresses into groups

Uunet

Mindspring IGN

(11)

Internet Service Providers

Come in all sizes

Prices vary widely

Many won't succeed

Mergers and acquisitions

Access provider list

http://www.tagsys.com http://www.isinc.com http://www.thelist.internet.com http://www.herbison.com http://www.ispfinder.com http://www.thedirectory.org http://www.cybertoday.com http://www.celestin.com

NAP NAP NAP

GOODNET AOL AT&T Earthlink MSN

UUNET DIGEX

PSINet MFS IGN MCI Level3

Concentric ANS C&W Frontier Sprint

(12)

Some Things to Understand About an ISP

Longevity Focus

Infrastructure

Speed (150 Mbps, 622 Mbps, Gigabit) Technologies (ATM, Frame, Sonet)

How many nodes

How many dial POPs

How many NAP connections Who do they peer with

With whom do they have transit agreements Backup, high availability

Services

Web hosting DNS

Blocking

SPAM prevention

24x7 help desk and network operations Web Servers/personal domain name Security services

Daily list of network outages Guaranteed service level

Driving high speed to homes/businesses

(13)

ISPs and Top Web Servers

Percentage of Web Sites

Uunet

C&W

Exodus

GTE

AT&T

Sprint

Frontier

Qwest

Other

(14)

ISP Latency and Packet Loss

America Online

AT&T

Cable and Wireless

Concentric Network

Digex

Exocus

Frontier Globalcenter

Uunet

Latency Packet Loss

Latency less than 25 ms

Packet loss less than 3% Latency 125 ms to 250 msPacket loss 3% to 6%

Latency greater than 250 ms Packet loss greater than 6%

(15)

ISP : Caching and Load Balancing Capability

Distributing public WEB servers is very popular

‘Distributor’ products receive request to access WEB server and

direct request to closest or least busy server: local and remote distribution Mirroring techniques can keep server information synchronized

Investigate option of keeping WEB servers on ISP

www.mycom.com www.mycom.com www.mycom.com www.mycom.com Director Http://www.mycom.com

(16)

High Level Overview of ISP

Strengths Weaknesses

Telephone Companies

On-line Service Providers

National ISPs

Local and Regional ISPs

Cable Companies

Money, name recognition infrastructure, experts in network services, have

sophisticated billing, business units in place

Many POPs, understand content and consumer dara services, consumer support structure, use whats available

Name recognition, focus, experience in large-scale networking, fairly well funded, increasing POPs

Close proximity to customers, local content, adapt to local

conditions, lean with low overhead Many POPs in place, home access, healthy budgets, billing and support infrastructures

Inexperience with data networks, internet knowledge, internal decision on internet importance

Perception as not being ‘real’ internet providers, not focused on business access

Limited budgets,

acquisitions and mergers

Acquisitions and mergers, heavy competition, little capital for growth, small staff

Infrastructure challenge, IP and data networking inexperience, reputations as unresponsive

(17)

Flash Net, NANDOnet, NetCom, Mindspring, MSN, AOL,

Compuserve, Sky Net, …

MFS, Sprint, PacBell Ameritech, Uunet, PSInet IGN, GoodNet, ATMnet

ISP Financials

Backbone ISPs $$$$

Consumer ISPs $$$$$$$$$$$ Users $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Expect change - many ISPs eliminating flat rate fees ISP’s pay for IP addresses as of 1/1/98

0 - 8,192 =$ 2,500/yr 8,192 - 65,535 =$ 5,000/yr 65,536 - 262,143 =$10,000/yr over 262,144 =$20,000/yr

Backbone ISPs requiring payment for peering Sprint - Lateral Exchange Networking

$6,000 one time setup fee $2,000 monthly maintentance $8,600 to $25,800 monthly fees UUnet

Must connect with 45 Mbps line Peer in at least 4 locations

Have a 24x7 help desk

(18)

ISP Functional Offerings

Access to

public Internet Intranet

Extranet

Private Virtual Networks Server Functions

World Wide Web (WWW)

Domain Name Services (DNS) News groups

Mail Services

eCommerce servers

Streaming video servers Voice servers

Desktop Videoconferencing servers Web hosting

Security

Network management

Certificate of authority management

Advanced functions

Transaction processing Database access

Groupware access Terminal emulation

Roaming internet service VPN services

(19)

ISP Operations

Access links

Capacity (aggregate) Exchange point access

How many? How fast?

Redundancy? Utilization statistics

Guaranteed service levels Support and Services

Education and training Consulting

Implementation

Network management User services

Design and needs assessment

Pricing

Direct access lines Port costs

Dial access lines Traffic costs

Premium services Applications charges User registration

User administration

Service Level Aggreement Availability

Dropped connection Latency

Throughput Time to logon

(20)

ISP Interoperability

Domain Name Servers

Registering your network name

Obtaining IP addresses

Inter-operating with your IP addresses

Router compatibility Network management Internet Router DNS Server WWW Server Corporate Network Secure Firewall Clients

Servers (WWW and others)

Corporate Network Not-secure Public WWW Server Client/Browser Client/Browser Your ISP

(21)

Physical Connection to an ISP

User Analog modem ISDN Cable Modems ADSL V90 Organization Analog modem ISDN LAN connection Dedicated lines Satellite Emerging technologies Cable Modems ADSL V90

(22)

Internet Problems

General slowdown

Power lost to half of MAE-West

Fiber cuts in Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Baltimore Faulty DNS top-level-domains sent out

Syn floods hit several ISPs

Mail server outages by several ISPs Router table errors

Spamming

Internet traffic causing voice network gridlock Rat causes power outage at Mae-West

(23)

ISP Response

IOPS.ORG formed

Implement ways to resolve operational and reliability problems

Have central point of contact for Internet problems

Work with existing industry groups on resolving issues

Work closer with product vendors to produce ‘internet’ ready products

Charter members:

ANS Communications, AT&T, BBN Corporation, Earthlink Network Inc., GTE, MCI, Netcom,

(24)

Internet

ISP

ISP and Intranetworking

Manufacturing Engineering Human Resources Marketing WWW server WWW server Mail server WWW server

References

Related documents

To analyse the situation of Black people in the US as an instance of ontic injustice is to say that within current social reality, as a matter of institutional fact, Black people

This influenced market has been already studied in [13] from the influent informed agent’s point of view, by solving the FBSDE appearing when modeling the hedging problem of the

and institutional index, heterogeneity index, non-farm activities, access to credit and poverty indicators (household size, income levels, farm size, children and

In results not shown, we …nd signi…cant evidence of adverse selection: households that have a member in poor self-reported health, or have a member that has used a public

This option (OAC) allows you to make low monthly payments instead of paying for the entire package upfront. Now you can enjoy all of the benefits of our Flat Fee program

In this study we made an attempt to compare the efficiency of seaweed extracts obtained from seaweeds such as Sargassum wightii (Phaeophyceae) and Grateloupia lithophyla

Finally, the paper reviews the current challenges to the management of infrastructure and concludes by arguing for the need of a more integrated and strategic approach to

for abnormal market reactions surrounding enterprise risk management program adoption, and find evidence that firms adopting prior to 2005 had either no market reaction or