IT-Symposium

(1)

SharePoint Integration

1C05

IT-Symposium 2007

April 17th, 2007 CongressCenter Nürnberg, Germany

SharePoint Integration

Jan-Jürgen Eden

Solution Architect

16

th

_{April 2007}

(2)

Agenda

Introduction

Internal HP Systems

Solutions for the People Ready Business

Manufacturing

Financial Services

Questions & Answers

Introduction

HP

Largest implementation of SPS 2003 outside of Microsoft

Member of MOSS 2007 TAP programme

Heterogeneous Environment

(3)

How we use SPS 2003

Secure Extranet partner collaboration

Intranet Presence

Professions (Business departments) Team sites (internal collaboration)

Internal collaboration

Team site on demand to all employees IT Control

260,000 users 80,000 concurrent

1200 web sites created a month 900 deleted/removed a month 80 TB of data

Strategic replacement for other solutions

Challenges and Benefits

Benefits

Reduced e-mail

Reduced time for projects

Faster response

Knowledge Management

On-demand

Challenges

Deleted data?

Site design

English only (except

Japan – Japanese only)

IT Control

(4)

HP Team spaces roadmap

SharePoint V2

FY05

FY06

FY07

SharePoint 2001 LiveLink eRoom Groove (limited) Groove SharePoint 2007 SharePoint (non-KIM) eRoom (external) Domino

SharePoint

Current deployments

NA2 (Houston, USA)

• Largest deployment • Company wide portals • Local workspaces NA (Houston, USA) • part of NA2 • Local workspaces JPN (Tokyo) •Deployed in Japanese •Localized Workspaces •Bus. Specific Portals

(in progress)

SNO (Australia)

•Local Workspaces

•Bus. Specific Portals (in progress)

EMEA 1 UK

•Local Workspaces •Bus. Specific Portals

Owned by HP In partnership 2 Custom solutions Bangalore, STSD India, GDIC India EMEA2 France Custom solutions (w orldw ide IPG, migration ongoing)

- Singapore, - Israel - Barcelona, SP - Vancouver, CAN

(5)

SharePoint Future deployments

NA2 (Houston, USA, KIM)

• Largest deployment (6 TB) • Local workspaces • Global enterprise wide portals • Local bus. specific Portal

SGP (Singapore, KIM)

Localized Workspaces Bus. Specif ic Portals

• local Workspaces • Bus. Specific Portals • with WSS Japanese language pack

EMEA (Sw indon, UK, KIM)

•Local Workspaces •Bus. Specific Portals

Owned by HP

Migration target for

• Houston NA farm • eroom • LiveLink (KMS) • IPG farm in Canada • etc

• LiveLink (KMS)

• IPG farm in Israel and Barcelona • etc

• KIM Japan • KIM Sydney • LiveLink (KMS) • LiveLink (Konnect) • Eroom

• IPG farm in Singapore • etc

DC Austin DC Austin

Lotus Notes, Domino, Public Folder)

Details:

Austin f arm (lef t):

• local Workspaces • Bus. Specific Portals • HA and BC • 4 front ends • multiple search and index • dedicated crawl box • 16TB initial storage

Details:

Austin f arm (right):

• internal mission critical Workspaces and Portals • External Customer and partner Workspaces

• HA, BC and DRP • 2 front end each • 2x8 TB initial storage

Upgrade

to new SharePoint version

Move

from legacy to central data centers

Improve

the service

Improve manage-ability by segmenting the service

Improve reliability by reducing customizations

Eliminate junk sites

Re-factor some portals and large sites

(6)

Move to SharePoint 2007 (MOSS 2007)

The product team has four main goals

Upgrade over time – not forced to do an all-at-once

Don’t require the complete shutdown of SharePoint

Ability to write-your-own upgrade code

Consistent set of experiences

There are three main upgrade approaches

in-place (Small farms)

gradual (Medium Large)

content DB (To build a new farm)

Upgrade approaches

In-place upgrade

Updates existing databases and servers

Easiest approach, environment offline while it runs

Gradual upgrade – upgrade site collections

Granular control: one to many site collections at a time

Run old and new versions side-by-side; rollback to SPS supported

More complex and resource intensive

Content DB migration – upgrade into separate farm

Attach SPS content database to MOSS farm and upgrade runs

SPS stays available and untouched by upgrade

(7)

Summary of tradeoffs

Upgrade

Approach

In-Place

Gradual

DB Migration

PROs

• Simple

• Upgrade smaller sets of data at a time

• SPS & MOSS stay live

• Can revert to original

• Uses existing HW

• Upgrade & move to new farm

• SPS is a separate farm, not affected

CONs

• Entire farm offline during upgrade

• No revert ability

• Hardware intensive: memory & SQL storage

• Redirects for SPS URLs during upgrade

• Many complex manual steps required, higher risk of error

• Requires new farm, double the SQL storage

HP Hosting Service

HP hosting service – Launch April 2007

Takes advantage of MOSS 2007 features

(8)

HP & Microsoft Solutions for the

People-Ready Business

Collaboration & Content Management Messaging & Unified

Communications Business Intelligence Business Process Integration Core Infrastructure The Enterprise HP Services M ic ro s o ft T e c h n o lo g y H P T e c h n o lo g y