• No results found

Statin-prescribing trends for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Statin-prescribing trends for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

Loading

Figure

table 1. Characteristics of the total patient sample (N = 149 262 [n = 65 620 men; n = 83 642 women]):  A) Primary prevention group; B) secondary prevention group.
Figure 3. Number of patients taking statins for secondary prevention of CVD, by age group
table 3. Comparison of the lipid-screening trends when the differing age cutoffs between the 2012 CCS guidelines and the 2016 CCS guidelines are applied: Eligibility for screening was based on age cutoffs alone.

References

Related documents

Every non-suppressed scan directive in the format description must have a single, corresponding data mapping specifier to indicate into which column of the Log Entries table view

Norcia Studies , vol 15 2007, 14-33; Penelope Hetherington, Settlers, servants & slaves : Aboriginal and European children in nineteenth-century Western Australia , Nedlands:

This study was conducted to estimate the scale and the nature of economic damage due to stroke with the intention that it be used as an evidential source for determining the

This work group will define the most adequate methodology to estimate the number of seriously injured for 2014 and also study the best way to adjust the national road safety

A biomechanical study of lateral translation in lumbar spine with human cadavers was performed in order to explore the direction of the force increasing

Conscience Rules Professional standards Company practices Corporate values Personal values Personal integrity Peer pressure True to Self Work experience Education External

In response to the above criticism and the calls of user groups for higher-quality segmental information, in 1997 the International Accounting Standards Committee issued IAS 14R as

The analysis highlights four approaches to M&A evaluation that vary with combinations of uncertainty and controversy: desktop valuation based on financial analysis,