• No results found

trans Bis{2 [3 (cyclo­hexyl­amino)­propyl­imino­methyl]­phenolato}nickel(II) dinitrate

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "trans Bis{2 [3 (cyclo­hexyl­amino)­propyl­imino­methyl]­phenolato}nickel(II) dinitrate"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Acta Cryst.(2004). E60, m887±m889 DOI: 10.1107/S1600536804012851 You, Lin, Zhu and Liu [Ni(C16H24N2O)2](NO3)2

m887

metal-organic papers

Acta Crystallographica Section E Structure Reports Online

ISSN 1600-5368

trans

-Bis{2-[3-(cyclohexylamino)propylimino-methyl]phenolato}nickel(II) dinitrate

Zhong-Lu You,a,bYong-Shan Lin,bHai-Liang Zhua,b* and Wei-Sheng Liua

aDepartment of Chemistry, Fuyang Normal College, Fuyang Anhui 236041, People's Republic of China, andbDepartment of Chem-istry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, People's Republic of China

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study

T= 293 K

Mean(C±C) = 0.006 AÊ

Rfactor = 0.063

wRfactor = 0.148

Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.1

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2004 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain ± all rights reserved

The title compound, [Ni(C16H24N2O)2](NO3)2, is a

mono-nuclear nickel(II) compound. The NiIIatom is coordinated by

two N atoms and two O atoms from the Schiff base ligands. The four atoms around the metal are coplanar, constituting a slightly distorted square-planar geometry. The complex is located on an inversion center. All of the nitrate O atoms and all amine N atoms in the Schiff base ligands contribute to hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation of a three-dimensional network.

Comment

Recently, we have reported a few Schiff base complexes (You, Linet al., 2003; You, Quet al., 2003; You, Xionget al., 2004; You, Zhu & Liu, 2004). As an extension of our work on the structural characterization of Schiff base complexes, a mono-nuclear nickel(II) complex, (I), is reported here.

The structure of the title compound, (I) (Fig. 1), consists of a mononuclear [Ni(C16H24N2O)2]2+ cation and two nitrate

anions. The Ni atom, on an inversion center, is in a square-planar geometry and is four-coordinated by two N atoms and two O atoms from the Schiff base ligands. The four

coordi-Received 7 May 2004 Accepted 26 May 2004 Online 29 May 2004

Figure 1

(2)

metal-organic papers

m888

You, Lin, Zhu and Liu [Ni(C16H24N2O)2](NO3)2 Acta Cryst.(2004). E60, m887±m889 nating atoms around the central metal are coplanar, forming a

square-planar geometry around the Ni atom. The two trans

angles at the nickel(II) center are 180, by symmetry (Table 1),

and all other angles are close to 90, viz. 87.15 (12) and

92.85 (12), thus indicating a slightly distorted square-planar

geometry. The Ni1ÐO1 bond length [1.827 (3) AÊ] is compar-able to that observed in another Schiff base complex [1.833 (3) AÊ; Zhu et al., 2004]. The Ni1ÐN1 bond distance [1.919 (3) AÊ] is a little longer than the value [1.876 (3) AÊ] observed in the same previously reported complex.

In the crystal structure, all of the nitrate O atoms and all the amine N atoms in the Schiff base ligands contribute to the formation of hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation of a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2 and Table 2). As expected, the cyclohexyl groups in the complex adopt chair conforma-tions to minimize steric effects.

Experimental

N-Cyclohexyl-1,3-diaminopropane and salicylaldehyde were avail-able commercially and were used without further puri®cation. N-Cyclohexyl-1,3-diaminopropane (0.2 mmol, 31.2 mg) and salicyl-aldehyde (0.2 mmol, 24.4 mg) were dissolved in methanol (10 ml). The mixture was stirred for 1 h to obtain a clear orange solution ofL (0.2 mmol), where L is 2-[(3-cyclohexylaminopropylimino)methyl]-phenol. To the solution ofLwas added a solution of Ni(NO3)26H2O (0.1 mmol, 29.1 mg) in methanol (10 ml), with stirring. After keeping the resulting solution in air for 9 d, green block-shaped crystals were formed at the bottom of the vessel on slow evaporation of the

solvents. The crystals were isolated, washed three times with methanol and dried in a vacuum desiccator using anhydrous CaCl2 (yield 70.1%). Analysis found: C 54.6, H 6.9, N 11.9%; calculated for C32H48N6NiO8: C 54.8, H 7.1, N 11.8%.

Crystal data

[Ni(C16H24N2O)2](NO3)2

Mr= 703.47 Monoclinic,P21=c

a= 6.444 (2) AÊ b= 22.946 (5) AÊ c= 11.961 (2) AÊ

= 102.02 (3)

V= 1729.9 (6) AÊ3

Z= 2

Dx= 1.351 Mg mÿ3 MoKradiation Cell parameters from 1144

re¯ections

= 2.5±19.9

= 0.62 mmÿ1

T= 293 (2) K Block, green

0.180.150.13 mm

Data collection

Siemens SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

'and!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Blessing, 1995) Tmin= 0.897,Tmax= 0.924

7948 measured re¯ections

3573 independent re¯ections 1985 re¯ections withI> 2(I) Rint= 0.063

max= 26.5

h=ÿ8!4 k=ÿ28!27 l=ÿ14!15

Re®nement

Re®nement onF2

R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.063

wR(F2) = 0.148

S= 0.95 3573 re¯ections 222 parameters

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained re®nement

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0601P)2] whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3 (/)max< 0.001

max= 0.48 e AÊÿ3

min=ÿ0.24 e AÊÿ3

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (AÊ,).

Ni1ÐO1 1.827 (3) Ni1ÐN1 1.919 (3)

O1iÐNi1ÐO1 180

O1iÐNi1ÐN1 87.15 (12) O1ÐNi1ÐN1N1ÐNi1ÐN1i 18092.85 (12)

Symmetry code: (i) 1ÿx;1ÿy;1ÿz.

Table 2

Hydrogen-bonding geometry (AÊ,).

DÐH A DÐH H A D A DÐH A

N2ÐH2B N3ii 0.932 (10) 2.542 (12) 3.458 (6) 168 (3)

N2ÐH2B O3ii 0.932 (10) 2.36 (2) 3.125 (5) 139 (3)

N2ÐH2B O4ii 0.932 (10) 1.980 (15) 2.887 (5) 164 (3)

N2ÐH2A N3 0.926 (10) 2.558 (15) 3.462 (6) 165 (3) N2ÐH2A O2 0.926 (10) 2.26 (2) 3.105 (5) 150 (3) N2ÐH2A O3 0.926 (10) 2.234 (17) 3.076 (5) 151 (3)

Symmetry codes: (ii)x;3 2ÿy;12‡z.

All H atoms, except H2A and H2B, were placed in idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with CÐH distances of 0.93±0.98 AÊ, and withUiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). Atoms H2A and H2Bwere located in a difference Fourier map and were re®ned isotropically.

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996); cell re®nement: SMART; data reduction:SAINT(Siemens, 1996); program(s) used to solve structure:SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to re®ne structure:SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics:

Figure 2

(3)

SHELXTL(Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXTL.

The authors thank the Education Of®ce of Anhui Province, People's Republic of China, for research grant No. 2004kj300zd.

References

Blessing, R. H. (1995).Acta Cryst.A51, 33±38.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997a). SHELXL97 and SHELXS97. University of GoÈttingen, Germany.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997b).SHELXTL.Version 5.1. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Siemens (1996).SMARTandSAINT. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

You, Z.-L., Lin, Y.-S., Liu, W.-S., Tan, M.-Y. & Zhu, H.-L. (2003).Acta Cryst. E59, m1025±m1027.

You, Z.-L., Qu, Y., Liu, W.-S., Tan, M.-Y. & Zhu, H.-L. (2003).Acta Cryst.E59, m1038±m1040.

You, Z.-L., Xiong, Z.-D., Liu, W.-S., Tan, M.-Y. & Zhu, H.-L. (2004).Acta Cryst.E60, m79±m81.

You, Z.-L., Zhu, H.-L. & Liu, W.-S. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, m560± m562.

Zhu, B., Ruang, W. & Zhu, Z. (2004).Acta Cryst.E60, m634±m636.

(4)

supporting information

sup-1

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, m887–m889

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, m887–m889 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536804012851]

trans

-Bis{2-[3-(cyclohexylamino)propyliminomethyl]phenolato}nickel(II)

dinitrate

Zhong-Lu You, Yong-Shan Lin, Hai-Liang Zhu and Wei-Sheng Liu

trans-Bis{2-[3-(Cyclohexylamino)propyliminomethyl]phenolato}nickel(II) dinitrate

Crystal data

[Ni(C16H24N2O)2](NO3)2

Mr = 703.47

Monoclinic, P21/c a = 6.444 (2) Å

b = 22.946 (5) Å

c = 11.961 (2) Å

β = 102.02 (3)°

V = 1729.9 (6) Å3

Z = 2

F(000) = 748

Dx = 1.351 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 1144 reflections

θ = 2.5–19.9°

µ = 0.62 mm−1

T = 293 K Block, green

0.18 × 0.15 × 0.13 mm

Data collection

Siemens SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

φ and ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan sadabs, (Blessing, 1995)

Tmin = 0.897, Tmax = 0.924

7948 measured reflections 3573 independent reflections 1985 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.063

θmax = 26.5°, θmin = 1.8°

h = −8→4

k = −28→27

l = −14→15

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.063

wR(F2) = 0.148

S = 0.95 3573 reflections 222 parameters 3 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0601P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001

(5)

supporting information

sup-2

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, m887–m889 Special details

Experimental. C, H and N elemental analyses were performed on a Perkin-Elmer elemental analyzer.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

(6)

supporting information

sup-3

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, m887–m889

C13 0.4350 (8) 0.91869 (17) 0.4896 (5) 0.0883 (16) H13A 0.3119 0.9438 0.4689 0.106* H13B 0.5153 0.9311 0.5635 0.106* C14 0.5700 (9) 0.92435 (18) 0.4022 (4) 0.0930 (17) H14A 0.6189 0.9643 0.4005 0.112* H14B 0.4863 0.9150 0.3272 0.112* C15 0.7582 (8) 0.88403 (18) 0.4298 (4) 0.0835 (14) H15A 0.8486 0.8961 0.5014 0.100* H15B 0.8397 0.8872 0.3705 0.100* C16 0.6934 (6) 0.82061 (16) 0.4397 (3) 0.0604 (11) H16A 0.6205 0.8065 0.3654 0.072* H16B 0.8191 0.7969 0.4649 0.072* H2A 0.389 (5) 0.7438 (17) 0.4528 (13) 0.085 (16)* H2B 0.374 (4) 0.7525 (16) 0.575 (2) 0.073 (13)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

Ni1 0.0538 (4) 0.0331 (3) 0.0583 (4) −0.0014 (3) 0.0157 (3) 0.0036 (3) O1 0.083 (2) 0.0426 (15) 0.099 (2) 0.0021 (14) 0.0417 (18) 0.0067 (14) O2 0.144 (4) 0.128 (3) 0.114 (3) −0.003 (2) 0.076 (3) −0.019 (2) O3 0.078 (2) 0.101 (2) 0.089 (2) −0.008 (2) 0.003 (2) 0.0032 (19) O4 0.082 (3) 0.243 (5) 0.077 (3) 0.039 (3) 0.012 (2) 0.026 (3) N1 0.0503 (19) 0.0414 (17) 0.0526 (19) −0.0048 (14) 0.0112 (16) −0.0001 (14) N2 0.057 (2) 0.0416 (18) 0.064 (2) −0.0021 (16) 0.018 (2) 0.0049 (16) N3 0.081 (3) 0.080 (3) 0.069 (3) −0.014 (2) 0.020 (3) −0.010 (2) C1 0.058 (2) 0.048 (2) 0.049 (2) −0.0071 (19) 0.0076 (19) −0.0030 (19) C2 0.057 (2) 0.053 (2) 0.051 (2) −0.0073 (19) 0.016 (2) −0.0006 (19) C3 0.082 (3) 0.051 (2) 0.066 (3) −0.003 (2) 0.022 (3) 0.005 (2) C4 0.088 (3) 0.070 (3) 0.064 (3) −0.023 (3) 0.025 (3) 0.011 (2) C5 0.078 (3) 0.096 (4) 0.076 (3) −0.007 (3) 0.040 (3) −0.001 (3) C6 0.082 (3) 0.067 (3) 0.073 (3) 0.006 (2) 0.028 (3) −0.009 (2) C7 0.063 (3) 0.045 (2) 0.054 (2) 0.0020 (19) 0.009 (2) −0.0046 (18) C8 0.059 (3) 0.0361 (19) 0.058 (2) 0.0033 (17) 0.010 (2) 0.0065 (17) C9 0.074 (3) 0.036 (2) 0.066 (3) −0.0049 (19) 0.000 (2) 0.0067 (18) C10 0.054 (3) 0.051 (2) 0.085 (3) 0.0008 (19) −0.002 (2) 0.005 (2) C11 0.072 (3) 0.0337 (19) 0.060 (3) −0.0069 (18) 0.018 (2) −0.0025 (17) C12 0.088 (4) 0.043 (2) 0.113 (4) 0.006 (2) 0.042 (3) 0.002 (2) C13 0.121 (4) 0.042 (2) 0.107 (4) 0.012 (2) 0.033 (4) 0.000 (3) C14 0.150 (5) 0.036 (2) 0.095 (4) −0.004 (3) 0.030 (4) 0.009 (2) C15 0.105 (4) 0.061 (3) 0.088 (4) −0.022 (3) 0.027 (3) 0.014 (2) C16 0.070 (3) 0.050 (2) 0.064 (3) −0.0047 (19) 0.019 (2) 0.0059 (19)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

(7)

supporting information

sup-4

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, m887–m889

Ni1—N1i 1.919 (3) C9—C10 1.508 (5) O1—C2 1.305 (4) C9—H9A 0.9700 O2—N3 1.208 (5) C9—H9B 0.9700 O3—N3 1.223 (5) C10—H10A 0.9700 O4—N3 1.228 (5) C10—H10B 0.9700 N1—C7 1.268 (5) C11—C16 1.491 (5) N1—C8 1.492 (4) C11—C12 1.515 (5) N2—C10 1.477 (5) C11—H11 0.9800 N2—C11 1.516 (4) C12—C13 1.522 (5) N2—H2A 0.926 (10) C12—H12A 0.9700 N2—H2B 0.932 (10) C12—H12B 0.9700 C1—C6 1.399 (5) C13—C14 1.498 (6) C1—C2 1.403 (5) C13—H13A 0.9700 C1—C7 1.435 (5) C13—H13B 0.9700 C2—C3 1.402 (5) C14—C15 1.506 (6) C3—C4 1.339 (6) C14—H14A 0.9700 C3—H3 0.9300 C14—H14B 0.9700 C4—C5 1.367 (6) C15—C16 1.525 (5) C4—H4 0.9300 C15—H15A 0.9700 C5—C6 1.376 (6) C15—H15B 0.9700 C5—H5 0.9300 C16—H16A 0.9700 C6—H6 0.9300 C16—H16B 0.9700 C7—H7 0.9300

(8)

supporting information

sup-5

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, m887–m889

C3—C2—C1 118.2 (4) C14—C13—H13A 109.5 C4—C3—C2 121.3 (4) C12—C13—H13A 109.5 C4—C3—H3 119.3 C14—C13—H13B 109.5 C2—C3—H3 119.3 C12—C13—H13B 109.5 C3—C4—C5 122.0 (4) H13A—C13—H13B 108.1 C3—C4—H4 119.0 C13—C14—C15 110.6 (4) C5—C4—H4 119.0 C13—C14—H14A 109.5 C4—C5—C6 118.1 (4) C15—C14—H14A 109.5 C4—C5—H5 120.9 C13—C14—H14B 109.5 C6—C5—H5 120.9 C15—C14—H14B 109.5 C5—C6—C1 122.1 (4) H14A—C14—H14B 108.1 C5—C6—H6 119.0 C14—C15—C16 112.5 (4) C1—C6—H6 119.0 C14—C15—H15A 109.1 N1—C7—C1 127.1 (4) C16—C15—H15A 109.1 N1—C7—H7 116.4 C14—C15—H15B 109.1 C1—C7—H7 116.4 C16—C15—H15B 109.1 N1—C8—C9 109.4 (3) H15A—C15—H15B 107.8 N1—C8—H8A 109.8 C11—C16—C15 110.4 (3) C9—C8—H8A 109.8 C11—C16—H16A 109.6 N1—C8—H8B 109.8 C15—C16—H16A 109.6 C9—C8—H8B 109.8 C11—C16—H16B 109.6 H8A—C8—H8B 108.3 C15—C16—H16B 109.6 C10—C9—C8 115.4 (3) H16A—C16—H16B 108.1

O1i—Ni1—O1—C2 32 (100) C7—C1—C6—C5 178.8 (4) N1—Ni1—O1—C2 −3.7 (4) C8—N1—C7—C1 −177.1 (3) N1i—Ni1—O1—C2 176.3 (4) Ni1—N1—C7—C1 2.0 (5) O1i—Ni1—N1—C7 −179.3 (3) C6—C1—C7—N1 178.9 (4) O1—Ni1—N1—C7 0.7 (3) C2—C1—C7—N1 −2.5 (6) N1i—Ni1—N1—C7 −79 (100) C7—N1—C8—C9 94.6 (4) O1i—Ni1—N1—C8 −0.3 (2) Ni1—N1—C8—C9 −84.6 (3) O1—Ni1—N1—C8 179.7 (2) N1—C8—C9—C10 166.7 (3) N1i—Ni1—N1—C8 100 (100) C11—N2—C10—C9 161.8 (3) Ni1—O1—C2—C3 −177.0 (3) C8—C9—C10—N2 59.0 (5) Ni1—O1—C2—C1 4.1 (6) C10—N2—C11—C16 57.4 (5) C6—C1—C2—O1 178.1 (4) C10—N2—C11—C12 −178.2 (4) C7—C1—C2—O1 −0.5 (6) C16—C11—C12—C13 −54.4 (5) C6—C1—C2—C3 −0.9 (5) N2—C11—C12—C13 −177.8 (4) C7—C1—C2—C3 −179.5 (3) C11—C12—C13—C14 55.8 (5) O1—C2—C3—C4 −178.5 (4) C12—C13—C14—C15 −57.0 (5) C1—C2—C3—C4 0.5 (6) C13—C14—C15—C16 56.4 (5) C2—C3—C4—C5 0.7 (7) C12—C11—C16—C15 52.7 (5) C3—C4—C5—C6 −1.5 (7) N2—C11—C16—C15 174.0 (3) C4—C5—C6—C1 1.0 (7) C14—C15—C16—C11 −53.7 (5) C2—C1—C6—C5 0.1 (6)

(9)

supporting information

sup-6

Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, m887–m889 Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

N2—H2B···N3ii 0.93 (1) 2.54 (1) 3.458 (6) 168 (3) N2—H2B···O3ii 0.93 (1) 2.36 (2) 3.125 (5) 139 (3) N2—H2B···O4ii 0.93 (1) 1.98 (2) 2.887 (5) 164 (3) N2—H2A···N3 0.93 (1) 2.56 (2) 3.462 (6) 165 (3) N2—H2A···O2 0.93 (1) 2.26 (2) 3.105 (5) 150 (3) N2—H2A···O3 0.93 (1) 2.23 (2) 3.076 (5) 151 (3)

References

Related documents

Dynamic Relationships among CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Economic Complexity in France.. Can, Muhlis and

Association between Maxillofacial trauma and Head injury: According to Keenan et al., patients with maxillofacial fractures have a higher risk of intracranial haemorrhage

In experiments about chunk wise selection 4000 pairs of bunsetsus, which are roughly equal to the averaged number of bunsetsus in 500 sentences, are selected at each iteration of

We first develop an entity-aspect model that extends standard LDA to identify clus- ters of words that can represent different aspects of facts that are salient in a given summary

Sunt de parare ca este necesar sa analizam si unele scenarii ( putin mai „exotice” ar spune unii) cum ar fi revizuirea modului de functionare si a modelului

Next section presents the main Romanian literature on emigration, section 3 analyses the regional differentials of emigration outflows, section 4 introduces the methodology

If the buyer and the seller have the same opinion regarding next period’s asset price, then the marginal cost of exchanging. assets and real balances

The present study attempts to provide preliminary data on morphological patterns of intracranial lesions in North Karnataka region and to study clinicopathological