• No results found

GPS Tracking of Employees: Balancing Employees Right to Privacy with Employers Right to Know

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "GPS Tracking of Employees: Balancing Employees Right to Privacy with Employers Right to Know"

Copied!
36
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

GPS Tracking of Employees:

B l

i

E

l

’ Ri ht t

Balancing Employees’ Right to

Privacy with Employers’ Right to Know

The Law Potential Issues and Best Practices The Law, Potential Issues, and Best Practices. By Brian J. Moore and Ashley C. Pack

(2)

Presenters

B i J M

Brian J. Moore

(304) 357-9905

Brian.Moore@dinsmore.com

Ashley C. Pack

(304) 357-9937

Ashley Pack@dinsmore com Ashley.Pack@dinsmore.com

(3)

We will be covering:

Th f GPS t t t k

-The use of GPS systems to track employees

-GPS tracking laws as they relate to -GPS tracking laws as they relate to employers

-Potential pitfalls of using GPS technology p g gy to track employees

-Current trends in the law

-Best practices for the implementation of GPS tracking by employers

(4)
(5)

What is a “GPS?”

“Global Positioning S stem” - “Global Positioning System”

- Navigation and precise positioning tool.

C i ll GPS i d i ti d

- Commercially, GPS is used as a navigation and positioning tool in airplanes, boats, cars, and for almost all outdoor recreational activities

(6)

How does the GPS system work?

- The GPS navigation system utilizes a system ofThe GPS navigation system utilizes a system of twenty-four (24) satellites orbiting the earth.2

- The GPS satellites orbit the earth twice a day in - The GPS satellites orbit the earth twice a day in

regular patterns transmitting information back to Earth.3

- The GPS satellites receive signals from the ground, triangulate the signal’s location, and then send the location information back to the receiver.4

(7)

Why Track Employees?

Why Track Employees?

Increased Efficiency:5

- Streamlined travelStreamlined travel

- Real-time progress updates

- Customer issues

Compliance with Governmental Regulations:6 - Are workers taking their required breaks?Are workers taking their required breaks?

- Are overtime rules being followed? Compliance with Safety Laws:

(8)

Why Track Employees?

Why Track Employees?

Monitoring of Employees:7

g p y

- Are company policies being followed? - Are timesheets accurate?

- Are employees safe?

- Are other methods of monitoring being subverted?

- Are employees doing personal errands on company time?

company time? - Investigations

(9)

Common Monitoring Techniques

Common Monitoring Techniques

- Placing GPS trackers inside of company-owned g p y vehicles

- Issuing company-owned smart-phones or other l t i d i ith GPS t ki biliti electronic devices with GPS tracking capabilities

- Placing trackers on personally owned vehicles used in work-related activities*

in work related activities

- Applications on smart-phones using GPS technology - “Swipe” cards

(10)
(11)

State Statutes

State Statutes

- While there is no federal statute that directly regulates the use of GPS monitoring for private

employees, a few states have adopted laws aimed directly at regulating the use of electronic tracking in

l 7

general.7

- These states include:These states include: California

Connecticut Connecticut Delaware

(12)

California

California

Law: Cal. Penal Code § 637.7

Contents:

- Forbids the use of electronic tracking devices to determine the location of other individuals

determine the location of other individuals Exceptions:

- Consent

- Law enforcement Penalties:

- Violation of Code Section is a Misdemeanor - Violation of Code Section is a Misdemeanor

- Violations by business and corporations can result in a revocation of business license

(13)

Connecticut

Connecticut

Law: Conn. Gen.Stat. § 31-48d

Contents: Contents:

- Requires Employers to give written notice of electronic monitoring to employees prior to the implementation of the monitoring.

Exceptions: Exceptions:

- Employers are exempt from the notice requirement when they fit two criteria:

1. An employer reasonably believes that an employee is engaging in d t th t (i) i l t th l (ii) i l t th l th th conduct that (i) violates the law (ii) violates the employer or the other employees of the employer’s legal rights or (iii) creates a hostile

workplace AND

2 El t i it i d id f f th b

2. Electronic monitoring may produce evidence of one of the above beliefs.

Penalties: - Civil fine

(14)

Delaware

Delaware

Law: Del. Code Ann tit. 11 §1335(a)(8) Contents:

- “Invasion of Privacy”

- Forbids the installation of electronic tracking devices onForbids the installation of electronic tracking devices on the car of any other individual who is the owner, lessor or lesse of that vehicle without consent from the individual being tracked

Exceptions:

- Law enforcement

- ParentsParents Penalties:

(15)

Texas

Texas

Law: Tex. Penal Code Ann. §16.06 Contents:

- Forbids the placement of “electronic or mechanical tracking devices” on the vehicles of other individuals g without consent.

Exceptions:

- Law enforcementLaw enforcement

- Licensed private investigators working with consent of the car owner

- Good Samaritan ExceptionGood Samaritan Exception Penalties:

(16)

State Constitutions

Protect the right to privacy through direct g p y g privacy protections as well as general

protections such as incorporation of Fourth Amendment protection

Amendment protection.

Example: Washington State’s Constitution Example: Washington State s Constitution

prohibits the infringement of a person’s “private affairs” without the authority of law.9

(17)

State Tort Law

State Tort Law

Invasion of Privacy Claims -Invasion of Privacy Claims

 appropriating the plaintiff's identity for the defendant's benefit

 placing the plaintiff in a false light in the public eye

 publicly disclosing private facts about the plaintiff

 publicly disclosing private facts about the plaintiff

 unreasonably intruding upon the seclusion or solitude of the plaintiff

(18)

Unreasonable Intrusion

:

11

Unreasonable Intrusion

:

1. An intentional invasion

2 Highly offensive to a reasonable person 2. Highly offensive to a reasonable person 3. Occurring where there is a reasonable

expectation of privacy expectation of privacy

(19)

Publicity Given to a Private Life

:

12

Publicity Given to a Private Life

:

1. Individual created publicity regarding an event that concerned the private life of anotherp

2. The event(s) publicized is the kind that is

(a) highly offensive to a regular person (a) highly offensive to a regular person and

(b)is not of legitimate concern to the (b) s ot o eg t ate co ce to t e public

(20)

III Current Trends in GPS Tracking Laws

III. Current Trends in GPS Tracking Laws

(21)

GPS Tracking by Employers

GPS Tracking by Employers

- Generally, courts have held that there is noGenerally, courts have held that there is no

reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to property owned by the employer…

- Company-owned vehicles - Smart-phones

(22)

GPS Tracking by Employers Continued…

GPS Tracking by Employers Continued…

Elgin v. St. Louis Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28976 (E D M 2005)

LEXIS 28976 (E.D. Mo. 2005)

Facts:

-Coca-Cola placed GPS tracker on distribution van after p cash shortages.

-Employee was cleared of any wrongdoing but was notified that GPS had been used to track him. The

G S

employee sued claiming that the GPS tracking was an invasion of his privacy

Outcome:

-No expectation of privacy in a company owned vehicle and that the GPS tracking had only revealed “highly

(23)

GPS Tracking by Employers Continued…

GPS Tracking by Employers Continued…

Willie Tubbs v. Wynne Transport Servicey , Inc., 2007 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 28920 (S.D. Texas 2007)

Facts:

- GPS was installed on all trucks in transport company’s fleetGPS was installed on all trucks in transport company s fleet.

- Truck driver was involved in an altercation with company that resulted in his arrest

Aft hi t th l d l i i th t th GPS t

- After his arrest, the employee sued claiming that the GPS system represented an invasion of his privacy

Outcome:

-While the case settled on other grounds, the court dismissed the invasion of privacy claim noting that it was not supported by law. as o o p acy c a ot g t at t as ot suppo ted by a

(24)

GPS Tracking by Employers Continued…

GPS Tracking by Employers Continued…

Matter of Cunningham v. New York State Dept. of Labor, 89 A.D.3d 1347 (N.Y. Ap. Div. 2011)

Facts:

- A twenty year state employee was suspected of taking unauthorized time off and falsifying his time records.

- Employer hired an investigator in an attempt to tail the employee, but the employee realized he was being tailed.

- Employer had investigator place a GPS on the employee’s personal vehicle to gather evidence regarding unauthorized absences

vehicle to gather evidence regarding unauthorized absences.

Outcome:

- Court ruled that obtaining such information, via GPS, for one month was

t bl i th t t f i i l di i l i

not unreasonable in the context of a noncriminal proceeding involving a high-level state employee with a history of discipline problems who had recently thwarted efforts to follow him in his nonwork-related ventures

(25)

U S v Jones 565 U S (2012) U.S. v. Jones, 565 U. S. ____ (2012) Facts:

Nightclub owner was suspected of dealing - Nightclub owner was suspected of dealing drugs.

- Without a proper warrant the police placed a - Without a proper warrant, the police placed a GPS tracker on his vehicle and subsequently used this information to convict the owner.

Outcome:

- The warrantless GPS tracking amounted to aThe warrantless GPS tracking amounted to a warrantless search and as such was

(26)

Lessons Learned from Jones…

Lessons Learned from Jones…

- After U.S. v. Jones, Employer usage of GPS

tracking may be back up for debate because of

th t li f i d t d b th C t

the two lines of reasoning adopted by the Court:

Fi t th t GPS t k t i l ti f

- First, that a GPS tracker represents a violation of an individual’s right to privacy (may have implications on private employer’s ability to track using GPS).

(27)

Lessons Learned from Jones Continued…

Lessons Learned from Jones Continued…

Additionally, Scalia’s opinion in US v. Jones

could open the door to claims against employers could open the door to claims against employers under a common-law trespass theory, where the property is not employer owned.

p p y p y

In Jones, Scalia relied heavily on common law

notions of trespass to disallow the government’s use of a GPS

of a GPS.

Where an employer placed a GPS on an employee’s personal property, similar claims could be made.

p p p y,

Where the property is employer-owned, this issue would be irrelevant.

(28)

IV. Best Practices for GPS Tracking by

Employers

(29)

1. Become Familiar with the Laws That

Aff

t Y

C

Affect Your Company

- Some states have specific laws relating to the use of GPS tracking

- Become familiar with how your state has interpretedBecome familiar with how your state has interpreted the right of privacy

St t d t t t d f d l l l ti t

- Stay up-to-date on state and federal laws relating to the disclosure of employee records.

- Be safe, not sorry: make sure any information collected from GPS tracking is kept secure and confidential.

(30)

2. Give Notice of GPS Tracking to

E

l

Employees

Create a GPS tracking polic - Create a GPS tracking policy

- Include an acknowledgement page.

Include a requirement to leave location services “on ” - Include a requirement to leave location services on.

Include the GPS tracking policy in all - Include the GPS tracking policy in all

employment contracts

(31)

3. Limit the Use of GPS Trackers to

C

O

d P

t

Company-Owned Property

- Based on prior cases, employees probably doBased on prior cases, employees probably do not have an expectation of privacy with relation to employer-owned property.

(32)

4. Use GPS Tracking For A Specific

Purpose

(33)

5. Focus ONLY on Relevant Information

5. Focus ONLY on Relevant Information

-Only collect and store information that: - impacts their job performance

- interferes with their job performance

(34)

Sources:

Sources:

Works Cited:

1 GPS Overview Gps gov (April 12 2012) http://www gps gov/systems/gps/ (last visited

1. GPS Overview, Gps.gov (April 12, 2012), http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/ (last visited June 6, 2012).

2. Id.

3. Id.

4. Tracking Employees Using Technology, Neslon Adrian Blish and Sharon P. Stiller. ACC D k t (J l /A t 2009)

Docket (July/August 2009).

5. Id.

6. Id.

7. Id.

8 Location Surveillance by GPS: Balancing an Employer’s Business Interest with

8. Location Surveillance by GPS: Balancing an Employer s Business Interest with Employee Privacy, Kendra Rosenberg. 6 Wash J.L. Tech. & Arts 143 (2010).

9. Privacy Protections in State Constitutions, National Conference of State legislatures (last visited June 6, 2012), http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/telecom/privacy-protections-in-state-constitutions.aspx (last visited June 6, 2012)

10 Location Surveillance by GPS: Balancing an Employer’s Business Interest with

10. Location Surveillance by GPS: Balancing an Employer s Business Interest with Employee Privacy, Kendra Rosenberg. 6 Wash J.L. Tech. & Arts 143 (2010).

11. Stopping Employees In Their Tracks: GPS Tracking of Employees, David Marshall and Craig Friedman. Mealey’s Litigation Report: Employment Law (Vol. 4, #3 Oct. 2007).

(35)

Questions?

B i J M

Brian J. Moore

(304) 357-9905

Brian.Moore@dinsmore.com

Ashley L. Pack

(304) 357-9937

Ashley Pack@dinsmore com Ashley.Pack@dinsmore.com

(36)

References

Related documents

Develop powerful presentation skills for increased business and personal success L 14 CPD hours Course code 0065 Level Masterclass Duration 2 days. Venues

Vissa av dessa aspekter kanske återspeglar varför tjädern föredrar tall framför gran när den finns tillgänglig, men det ger inte svar på varför tjädern finns

Mukhamadiev, Farkhod (2018) "Some cardinal and topological properties of the n-permutation degree of a topological spaces and locally τ-density of hyperspaces," Bulletin

In order to study the spillover effect of the tail risk, we estimate the daily VaR series using the following non and parametric techniques detailed below and 95% and 99% confidence

Since this publication, GrassPlot data have been intensively used for broad-scale biodiversity analyses, such as species- area relationships (SARs) in continuous vegetation (Dengler

The baseline for this topic was provided by the following three presentations: first by Casey Grant titled “Workshop on Big Data and Fire Protection Systems”; second

After developing a model that illustrates these trade-offs, we argue that increased LNG market liquidity is likely to encourage much greater volume and destination flexibility

4 addresses with programmable alerts per each address which allows one unit to page differently per each address allowing client to distinguish which location is paging