Curriculum Development
of Master’s Degree Program in
Industrial Engineering for Thailand Sustainable Smart Industry
COURSE EVALUATION FORM
Sustainable Supply Chain
Management
syllabus changes - Course Outline
CUT (tested in October 2019-January 2020) - first version
CUT (tested in February 2020-May 2020) - third version
Big Data (BD) in the supply chain
What is BD - different approach to definition
How BD works - key technologies and tools
Where BD is used - a practical approach in industry
Supply Chain Management in sustainability environment
Role of sustainability in supply chain management
Supply chain redesigning and cooperation in a interorganizational network
Application of network solutions in sustainable supply chain management
Digital Factory (DF) in an innovative supply chain
What is DF - different approach to definition
How DF works - leading systems
Cyber-Physical Systems in Supply Chain Management
How the Internet of Things Is Transforming Supply Chain
Management
Supply Chain Modeling
Inventory Management and Risk Pooling
Supply Contracts
Bullwhip Effect and Distribution Strategies
Industry 4.0 in the Integrated Sustainability Supply Chain (ISSC)
Defining concepts - different approaches to definition (Industry 4.0,
sustainable development)
Analyzing the Impacts of Industry 4.0 in Modern Business
Environments
Industry 4.0 enables the digital transformation of sustainability
supply chains
How Industry 4.0 Design Principles are shaping the ISSC
Applications of Supply Chains in Different Industry Sectors in this Disruptive Era
Supply Chain Redesign
Role of Supply Chain in Industry 4.0 - Smart supply chains in industry 4.0
Time Distribution and Study Load:
Lectures: 15 hours
Workshop: 30 hours
Self-study: 75 hours
CUT (October 2019-January 2020)
•
engineering students
(78% of the surveyed population responded)
CUT (February 2020-May 2020)
•
masters students
(18% of the surveyed population responded)
1 The course objectives were explained
2 The course outline provided accurate description of the course
3 Course topics were dealt in sufficient depth for each course objectives 4 The course fulfilled my expectations from raising my competencies
5 The requirements of the course (projects, assignments, exams) were adequately explained 6 The level of difficulty in this course was appropriate
7 The student workload was appropriate 8 The grading policy was clearly explained
9 Assessment methods were appropriate and effective
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0
PART I:
Course Characteristics
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0CUT (October 2019-January 2020)
•
engineering students
(78% of the surveyed population responded)
CUT (February 2020-May 2020)
•
masters students
(18% of the surveyed population responded)
1 The teaching methods were adequate for learning the subject matter 2 Tutorial sessions were well conducted and effective
3 The course materials were up-to-date, well prepared and useful for each topic 4 The course materials were presented in an organized manner
5 The use of information technology teaching resources helped the delivery of course material 6 The assignments were relevant and useful for each Course Learning Outcomes
7 Each learning assessment appropriate for teaching methods
8 The course materials were adequate for learning the subject matter
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0
PART II:
Course Delivery /
Teaching Methods /
Resource Materials
CUT (October 2019-January 2020)
•
engineering students
(78% of the surveyed population responded)
CUT (February 2020-May 2020)
•
masters students
(18% of the surveyed population responded)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 6 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 6 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0
1 The laboratory/workshop sessions were well integrated into the course 2 Help is available
3 Allocated time is adequate
4 Condition of equipment is acceptable/appropriate 5 Equipment is available
6 Laboratory experiment instructions are available
PART III:
Laboratory/Workshop
Sessions (if applicable)
CUT (October 2019-January 2020)
•
engineering students
(78% of the surveyed population responded)
CUT (February 2020-May 2020)
•
masters students
(18% of the surveyed population responded)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0
1 I learned a lot from this course
2 You would recommend the course to other students 3 Overall, I am satisfied with the course
4 The grades issued were objective and fully reflected the learning outcomes
5 The course was conducted in a way that was understandable, interesting, orderly, motivating to learn, and forcing to thinking
OVERALL
ASSESSMENT
CUT (October 2019-January 2020)
•
engineering students
(78% of the surveyed population responded)
CUT (February 2020-May 2020)
•
masters students
(18% of the surveyed population responded)
1 My own work - diligence in preparing for the course? 2 My own work - involvement during the course? 3 My own work - attendance at the course?
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0
STUDENT
SELF-ASSESSMENT
CUT (October 2019-January 2020)
•
engineering students
(78% of the surveyed population responded)
CUT (February 2020-May 2020)
•
masters students
(18% of the surveyed population responded)
0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0 8,0 9,0 10,0 The course objectives were explained
The course outline provided accurate description of the course Course topics were dealt in sufficient depth for each course objectives The course fulfilled my expectations from raising my competencies The requirements of the course (projects, assignments, exams) were adequately explained The level of difficulty in this course was appropriate The student workload was appropriate The grading policy was clearly explained Assessment methods were appropriate and effective The teaching methods were adequate for learning the subject matter Tutorial sessions were well conducted and effective The course materials were up-to-date, well prepared and useful for each topic The course materials were presented in an organized manner The use of information technology teaching resources helped the delivery of course material The assignments were relevant and useful for each Course Learning Outcomes Each learning assessment appropriate for teaching methods The course materials were adequate for learning the subject matter The laboratory/workshop sessions were well integrated into the course Help is available Allocated time is adequate Condition of equipment is acceptable/appropriate Equipment is available Laboratory experiment instructions are available I learned a lot from this course You would recommend the course to other students Overall, I am satisfied with the course The grades issued were objective and fully reflected the learning outcomes The course was conducted in a way that was understandable, interesting, orderly, motivating…
My own work - diligence in preparing for the course? My own work - involvement during the course? My own work - attendance at the course?
