Published Online October 2013 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/jss)
A Study on the Interoperability between 2D Drawings
and BIM-Based 3D Drawings
Myoung Bae Seo, Ki Beom Ju
ICT Convergence and Integration Research Division,Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Goyang-Si, Republic of Korea Email: smb@kict.re.kr, kbju@kict.re.kr
Received September 2013
While it is expected that the introduction of BIM, which recently emerged as a new paradigm in the con- struction industry, will bring about various effects, 2D-based products cannot be easily substituted with BIM. As such, the 2D and 3D works that designers and contractors have to perform at the same time will lead to increased construction costs and tasks. To minimize the overlapping of BMI and 2D drawings so as to reduce the construction costs, this study surveyed the products list based on electronic design draw- ings and on the existing supply guidelines in South Korea, and examined the 2D-based products among them that can be substituted with BIM models if the existing electronic supply system is changed to a BIM ordering system. Based on the results of the survey, this article proposes a BIM-based product sup- ply and future development plan at the current time, when 2D and 3D drawings coexist. It is expected that the results of this article will be used as reference data for considering the interrelation of a BIM-based product supply system to 2D drawings as well as the existence of alternative drawings.
Keywords: BIM; Standard; Civil Engineering; Drawing; Product
Introduction
BIM, which has emerged as a hot issue in the construction industry, is a new technique with which to manage various products that are currently managed as 2D in existing construc- tion projects in 3D, and can be used in interception reviews, energy analyses, constructability reviews, process control, cost management, and facilities maintenance control, among others. Construction and various other licensing processes, however, still use 2D-based products and the related guidelines required for the submission of 2D-based products, for which reason designers and contractors have to perform 2D and 3D works at the same time, leading to increased construction cost and tasks. While this is the first matter that needs to be addressed to pro- mote BIM, due to the domestic circumstances, 2D and 3D BIM products have to coexist until BIM is established.
Therefore, this study surveyed the existing products list based on electronic design drawings and the existing supply guidelines in South Korea, and examined the 2D-based prod- ucts among them that can be substituted with BIM models if the existing electronic supply system is changed to a BIM ordering system. Based on the results of the survey, this article proposes a BIM-based product supply and future development plan at the current time, when 2D and 3D drawings coexist.
Review of Previous Researches
The review of the previous researches, as part of the survey of the interoperability of BIM models and 2D drawings for road construction projects, focused on the researches on the 2D drawing information standards, BIM-ordering-system-based drawing supply plans, and BIM-based drawing methods. Kwon et al. (2008) proposed a direction for standardization, such as
basic categorization systems for drawing elements and BIM objects for using 2D drawings, by producing drawing types through the analysis of the CALS/EC drawing categorization system and actual drawing cases. Seong et al. (2009) pointed out the necessity of substituting 2D drawings in the transitional period with BIM by researching on 2D drawing extraction from BIM models based on the consideration of the existing 2D electronic drawing standards and a method of extracting 2D electronic drawings from a BIM model, using templates. Oh et al. (2013) proposed the scope and expression standards of struc- tural drawings by design stage based on a research on BIM- based structural drawing standards. Chae et al. (2011) analyzed the problems of drawing expressions and completion techniques using the BIM system based on domestic and foreign design firms’ final projects, and described various issues and im- provement plans in relation to the implementation of BIM drawing methods that extract drawings from 3D models, break- ing away from the existing method of extracting 2D drawings.
The review showed that while the past researches examined various problems and improvement plans for the coexistence of 2D and 3D drawings due to the implementation of BIM, the primary focus was on showing the necessity of establishing standards and guidelines and of revising the drawing categori- zation system. What was lacking in the previous researches, however, was an examination of the process of recycling 2D drawings from BIM. This therefore shows that the research on the interoperability of BIM models and 2D drawings, which is presented in this article, is timely and crucial.
Current Status of the 2D-Based Electronic
Drawing Creation and Supply System
and whether those drawings can substitute for the existing drawings, it is necessary to examine the existing roadwork product supply and drawing system. As such, this article sur- veys the current status of the 2D-based product supply system of the Ministry of Land and Transportation, which is currently conducting a large-scale national SOC civil engineering project [Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs (2012)]. This guideline presents 20 products, including the master in- formation, design reports, and structural calculation reports, and the owner also describes the design and completion drawings and task orders as well as the products on the contract docu- ments so that the contractor can submit these documents as part of the electronic supply products. In the products list, it is the drawings that are expected to see the most frequent changes when the BIM supply system is implemented. As shown in Table 1, the roadwork products under the electronic design drawing creation and supply guidelines are supplied by 11 pri- mary categories (general connection, common use, earthwork, slope safety work, structural work, etc.), 40 secondary catego- ries (general connection plan, sitemap, etc.), and 83 subcatego- ries. As the types of drawings supplied difference based on the types and characteristics of the river and road construction pro- jects, not all of the 83 subcategories are supplied, and in some cases, some drawings may not be included in the supply list.
Interoperability of 2D and 3D Drawings
Overview
To examine the possibility of substituting the 2D drawings when creating BIM-based drawings, the article selected as its target zone the Okdong-Nongso zone, in which the enforcement plan is to be completed by the Regional Construction and Management Office under the Ministry of Land and Transpor- tation. This 4.73-km-long zone has a total of nine structures, including six bridges, two tunnels, and one underground road, making it optimal for testing. Based on the supplied 2D draw- ing, the article conducted 3D modeling using Civil 3D for the lines, and BIM-related S/W for the Revit structures, and exam- ined the alternative for the existing 2D drawings based on the list of roadworks among the civil engineering drawing list from the electronic design drawing creation and supply guidelines of the Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs. Shown in Figure 1 is the modeling result of the Okdong-Nongso zone with Civil 3D tools.
Review of Drawing Interoperability
Based on the 3D modeling of the Okdong-Nongso zone, the article surveyed the applicability of the 2D drawing. Due to the importance of acquiring objectivity, the article selected those who have five or more years of experience in BIM-related S/W and who have supplied BIM products in the past, and asked them to conduct modeling and applicability review. In the review, the results were divided into four items based on the relation of the product and the task difficulty. The items deemed inappli- cable were categorized as negative while those deemed highly applicable were categorized as positive. Shown in Table 2 are the detailed results.
Shown in Table 3 is an example of a review of the applica- bility of some parts of the drawing that was supplied as the standard cross-section. Consisting of a total of five drawing items, the shown drawing is divided into the fill-up part and
Table 1.
Four-point criteria for reviewing the applicability of a BIM product’s 2D drawings.
Main Category
Mid-Level Category
Primary Secondary
C: Civil Engineering
000: General Connection
01: General connection plan
02: General connection map
001: Common work
01: General
02: Standard plan
03: Coordinates map
04: Nose (details)
99: Others
002: Earthwork
01: Main line
10: IC or JCT*
20: Business office*
30: Rest area*
40: National road*
50: Access road*
90: Mass curve road
99: Others
003: Slope safety work
01: Slope safety facilities
99: Others
004: Drainage
01: Drainage plan
02: Drainage structure
90: Drainage standard plan
99: Others
005: Structural work
01: Common issues
02: Bridge name*
90: Retaining wall
99: Others
006: Tunnel work
01: Common issues
02: Tunnel name*
99: Others
007: Paving work
01: Paving plan
02: Bridge connection
99: Others
008: Transportation safety facilities work
01: Transportation safety facilities
99: Other drawings
009: Amenities work
01: Amenities
90: Amenities work standard plan
99: Others
010: Site work
01: Land for incorporation
02: Obstacles
99: Others
099: Other works 99: Others
Note: *Extensible Code.
Figure 1.
[image:3.595.51.542.475.560.2]Linear modeling using Civil 3D.
Table 2.
Drawing list of electronic design document creation and supply guideline (road and river) of ministry of land, transport, and maritime affairs.
Applicability 4-Point Score Related No.
No relation to BIM Impossible 1
While some forms can be used, they are closer to the existing 2D works. Negative 2
While they can be used for drawing, they require work in various stages. Weak positive 3
2D extraction or measurement work is possible after the accomplishment of relatively simple tasks. Positive 4
details A, B, C, and D. Among the details, detail A is not re- lated to BIM while details B, C, and D are considered closer to the existing 2D works. The fill-up drawing on the top, however, can be used for drawing while requiring tasks in various stages. Based on this, the results showed four negative items and one positive item.
As such, the article analyzed the applicability of 2D drawings based on the BIM model, which showed that 88 of the 3767 drawing items (2%) allow 2D extraction and measurement work using BIM drawings after the accomplishment of rela- tively simple tasks, and 2.461 items (65%), while applicable, require tasks in various steps. When the 2D drawing applicabil- ity of all the items with weak-positive scores based on the BIM products were summed up, 67.67% of all the drawings were shown to be used as alternatives after several task steps (Figure
2).
The analysis of the applicability of drawings by category showed that general connection, earthwork, and amenities work had over 95% applicability, making it easy to extract 2D draw- ings of them from the BIM model, whereas structural work had 72% applicability and paving work had 34% - 35% applicabil- ity. Common work, slope safety work, and drainage work, however, showed very low applicability (Figure 3).
Results
This study examined how many 2D drawings can be extracted from BIM drawings considering the current condition in South Korea, where the number of BIM orders is increasing, resulting in the coexistence of 2D and 3D drawings. The study results
Table 3.
Example of the standard cross-section.
Drawing: Standard Plan/Standard Cross-Section (1) Related No. Check (Quantities)
1 1
2 3
3 1
4 0
[image:4.595.53.544.115.455.2]Total 5
Figure 2.
Number of drawing items by category.
Figure 3.
Applicability review results by drawing category.
showed that only 2% of the drawings can be used immediately. After several work steps, about 67% of the drawings extracted from BIM can be further used. This figure, however, includes items with weak-positive scores and may lead to a higher error rate depending on the project characteristics or type. What is important is that 1218 of the 3767 drawing items (33%) in this study were found not to have any relation to BIM and to neces- sitate 2D work. This means that in constructing a BIM-based product supply system, alternative drawings should be used, or
if alternatives are not available, these drawings should be de- leted or the existing 2D drawings should continue to be re- ceived. Furthermore, BIM modelers should keep this in mind and should extract 2D drawings using the BIM model so that no overlapping work will occur.
In addition, as it was shown by the survey results, it is be- lieved that earthwork, structural work, or amenities work will allow the extraction of 2D drawings, and thus, to minimize the double work of designers and to make drawing management effective, the overlapping drawing items in the order documents or guidelines should be simplified or omitted. If the simplifica- tion or omission of the existing 2D drawings is difficult, it is better to extract 2D drawings from the BIM model. To do this, the information required for 2D drawings should be included in the BIM object data. The more the BIM object data are, the higher the probability of having alternatives to the 2D drawings and related products, but those who perform BIM modeling will feel greater pressure. Therefore, rather than complete sub- stitution, the role of both drawings should be established con- sidering efficiency.
Conclusion
future.
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted as part of the key projects (13 key tasks) of the Development of Infra BIM Standard and Verifica- tion Technology, KICT (Korea Institute of Construction Tech- nology).
REFERENCES
Chae, K. S., & Lee, G. (2011). A study on the problems of and meas- urements needed for improving the representations and drawing me- thods of architectural drawings by adopting BIM. Proceedings of
Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning, 27, 67-74.
Kwon, O. C., & Jo, C. W. (2008). A study on the improvement of 2D digital drawing standards considering the paradigm shift to BIM. Proceedings of Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning, 24, 49-57. Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs (2012). Electronic
design document creation and supply guideline (road and river). South Korea: MLTM Press.
Oh, H. O., Jung, J. H., & Lee, J. C. (2013). A guideline for structural drawings based on BIM. Proceedings of Architectural Institute of Korea, Structure, 29, 39-46.