Knee complaints and consequences on work status; a 10 year follow up survey among floor layers and graphic designers

(1)

Open Access

Research article

Knee complaints and consequences on work status; a 10-year

follow-up survey among floor layers and graphic designers

Søren Rytter*

1

_{, Lilli Kirkeskov Jensen}

2

_{and Jens Peter Bonde}

3

Address: 1_{Department of Occupational Medicine and Orthopaedics, Region Hospital Skive, Viborg, Denmark,}2_{Department of Occupational} Medicine, Region Hospital Skive, Denmark and 3_{Department of Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark}

Email: Søren Rytter* - soeren.rytter@sygehusviborg.dk; Lilli Kirkeskov Jensen - lilli.kirkeskov.jensen@sygehusviborg.dk; Jens Peter Bonde - jpbon@as.aaa.dk

* Corresponding author

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study was to examine if knee complaints among floor layers predict exclusion from the trade.

Methods: In 1994/95 self-reported data were obtained from a cohort of floor layers and graphic designers with and without knee straining work activities, respectively. At follow-up in 2005 the questionnaire survey was repeated. The study population consisted of 81 floor layers and 173 graphic designers who were presently working in their trades at baseline (1995). All participants were men aged 36–70 years in 2005.

We computed the risk of losing gainful employment in the trade according to occurrence of knee complaints at baseline, using Cox proportional hazard regression adjusted for a number of potential confounding variables. Moreover, the crude and adjusted odds risk ratio for knee complaints according to status of employment in the trade were computed, using graphic designers as reference.

Results: A positive but non-significant association between knee complaints lasting more than 30 days the past 12 months and exclusion from the trade was found among floor layers (Hazard Ratio = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.6–3.5).

The frequency of self-reported knee complaints was lower among floor layers presently at work in the trade in year 2005 (26.3%) compared with baseline in 1995 (41.1%), while the opposite tendency was seen among graphic designers (20.7% vs. 10.7%).

Conclusion: The study suggests that knee complaints are a risk factor for premature exclusion from a knee demanding trade. However, low power of the study precludes strong conclusions. The study also indicates a healthy worker effect among floor layers and a survivor effect among graphic designers.

Background

Musculoskeletal disorders are very common in the general population and are the predominant cause of disability

among construction workers [1]. Previous studies have shown an increased frequency of self-reported and clini-cally diagnosed knee disorders and radiological

diag-Published: 18 September 2007

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007, 8:93 doi:10.1186/1471-2474-8-93

Received: 11 December 2006 Accepted: 18 September 2007

This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/8/93

(2)

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007, 8:93 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/8/93

Page 2 of 7 (page number not for citation purposes)

nosed knee osteoarthritis among workers within certain trades in the construction industry [2-8].

There are about 900 skilled floor layers in Denmark and they spend on average more than half of their daily work-ing time in knellwork-ing, knee supportwork-ing or squattwork-ing work positions. Floor layers are highly exposed to various knee-stressing work positions in their work tasks, defined as work in kneeling positions, completely on both or partly on one knee using the other as support, and as squatting work positions. They install linoleum, carpet and vinyl floorings and their work tasks involve removal of old floorings, grinding, filling, installing underlay, measuring and cutting materials, gluing, welding and installing skirt-ing board (plastic). Graphic designers handle the layout of text and use visual display units. Their work tasks did not include any knee-demanding work positions.

Compared with other skilled construction workers, floor layers have a high frequency of musculoskeletal com-plaints, particularly anterior knee pain. This has been observed among Danish, as well as American, Finnish and Swedish floor layers [8-12]. Two earlier studies have shown that floor layers have an increased risk of pro-longed sick leave and premature retirement from the trade [9,13]. This might be due to the high prevalence of knee disorders in this trade.

Therefore the primary aim of the current study was to ana-lyse whether knee complaints cause subsequent exclusion from the trade. Furthermore self-reported knee com-plaints and status of employment through a 10-year fol-low-up period were analysed.

Methods

The study is a follow-up of a cohort of 129 floor layers and 302 graphic designers that in 1994/95 responded to a questionnaire survey at an age less than 60 years and who were alive in 2005 (Figure 1) [4,9]. Graphic designers were included as references due to the fact that their work does not include any knee demanding work tasks. Non-respondents at the follow-up survey constituted 20 floor layers and 61 graphic designers, whereas 8 floor layers and 4 graphic designers had deceased (Figure 1). This leaves 109 and 241 respondents among floor layers and graphic designers, respectively. Among those 81 floor layers and 173 graphic designers were presently at work in their trades in year 1995. All participants were men, living in the area of Copenhagen.

A postal questionnaire was mailed to the cohort. Prior, the Danish Data Protection Agency and the regional ethics committee approved the investigation. In lack of response the questionnaire was filled in by a structured telephone interview, if willing to participate. The method and the

Diagram showing the selection of the final study population Figure 1

Diagram showing the selection of the final study population.

FLOOR LAYERS GRAPHIC DESIGNERS

Respondents to baseline survey in 1995 (n) 161 389

Exclusions:

- Aged >60 in 1995 (n) 24 83

- Died between 1995 and 2005 (n) 8 4

Mailed follow-up survey in 2005 (n) 129 302

Non-respondents (n) 20 61

(3)

applied questionnaire was the same as used in the 1995 study and questions about musculoskeletal complaints were consistent with the Nordic Musculoskeletal Ques-tionnaire [14]. The quesQues-tionnaire asked about present and previous employment and the history of any knee com-plaints or knee traumas. In regard to employment we asked about their seniority (years of employment in the trade) and to describe their work tasks. If no longer engaged in the trade they were asked which year they stopped and if this were due to illness, unemployment, early retirement, old-age pension, disablement pension, rehabilitation or change of occupation. In the question-naire, knee complaints were defined as ache, pain or nui-sance. In case of knee complaints they reported if complaints had been present during the past 12 months or daily or more than 30 days during the past 12 months.

Data was coded in the software package EpiData and sta-tistical analysis conducted with Stata [15,16]. Using Cox proportional hazard regression, we analysed the probabil-ity of surviving in the trade with knee complaints (>30 days during the past 12 months at baseline) during the 10-year follow-up from 1994/95 to 2005. Furthermore, logistic regression was used to analyse patterns of self-reported knee complaints relative to employment in the trade in year 2005. All analysis was conducted on floor layers (N = 81) and graphic designers (N = 173) presently working in their trades in year 1995. Models were adjusted for effects of body mass index (BMI) and earlier knee injuries. Seniority showed a stronger association than age and was used in the model. The continuous cov-ariates, BMI and seniority, were categorized into three

BMI groups (< 25, 25–29 & ≥ 30 kg/m2_{) and two seniority} groups (≤ 20 & > 21 years).

Results

Responses to the mailed follow-up survey were received from 109 floor layers and 241 graphic designers (Figure 1). Among those 36% and 31% had answered the ques-tionnaire by a structured interview. Graphic designers were slightly older and had a higher seniority than floor layers but in respect to body mass index the two groups were comparable (Table 1).

Employment status in 2005 compared to 1995

Of the respondents to the follow-up survey, 81 (74%) floor layers and 173 (72%) graphic designers had been working in their trade at the time of baseline survey in 1995 (and hence "at risk" of leaving the trade during fol-low-up). At the time of the follow-up survey in 2005, only 56 (51%) floor layers and 75 (31%) graphic designers were still working in their respective trades (Table 1).

Knee complaints & survival in the trade 1995–2005

[image:3.612.54.555.498.711.2]

Analysis among floor layers (N = 81) and graphic design-ers (N = 173) "at risk" of leaving the trade during follow-up, indicated that the probability of surviving in the trade was higher among floor layers without knee complaints (> 30 days during the past 12 months) in 1995 than among those with knee complaints, although the differ-ence did not reach statistical significance (Figure 2). Among graphic designers proportions were almost identi-cal in the two groups. The Hazard Ratios adjusted for sen-iority, BMI and earlier knee injuries were 1.4, 95% CI =

Table 1: Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of questionnaire respondents in 2005

Floor layers (N = 109) Graphic designers (N = 241)

1995 2005 1995 2005

Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range

Age (years) 43.5 26–60 53.5 36–70 48.6 30–60 58.6 40–70

Seniority * (years) 22.0 2–40 29.4 3–49 27.6 1–45 34.9 2–54

BMI‡_(kg/m2₎ _25.5 _19.6–40.1 _26.7 _20.0–51.1 _25.0 _16.8–37.3 _26.1 _16.6–42.0

Employment in the trade n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)

Presently at work 81 (74.3%) 56 (51.4%) 173 (71.8%) 75 (31.1%)

Presently off work 28 (25.7%) 53 (48.6%) 68 (28.2%) 166 (68.9%)

- Change of occupation 18 (16.5%) 27 (24.8%) 37 (15.3%) 69 (28.7%)

- Early retirement 2 (1.9%) 9 (8.3%) 27 (11.2%) 68 (28.2%)

- Old-age pension - 5 (4.6%) - 19 (7.9%)

- Disability pension 7 (6.4%) 8 (7.3%) 4 (1.7%) 8 (3.3%)

- Rehabilitated - 1 (0.9%) -

-- Long illness 1 (0.9%) 3 (2.7%) - 2 (0.8%)

*Duration of employment in the trade

(4)

0.6–3.5 for floor layers and 0.8, 95% CI = 0.4–1.9 for graphic designers.

Knee complaints & status of employment in 2005

In regard to status of employment there had been a high employment turnover through the follow-up period. A high percentage was engaged in other trades or had been retired prematurely. Among those who reported change of occupation in the period 1995–2005, 18 floor layers had left the trade before 1995 and 9 in the period 1995–2005. Among graphic designers 37 had changed before 1995 and 32 in the period 1995–2005.

Table 2 depicts the odds risk ratio of knee complaints among 81 floor layers compared to 173 graphic designers that were presently working in their trade in 1994/95. Knee complaints, more than 30 days during the past 12 months, among graphic designers presently at work in the trade, were twice as frequent (20.7%) in 2005 compared with results at baseline (1995) (10.7%). On the contrary, knee complaints > 30 days during the past 12 months, were more frequent at baseline (41.1%) compared with results at follow-up (26.3%) among floor layers presently at work in the trade as well as for floor layers pensioned (50.0% compared to 29.0%). Among those who had changed occupation there were minor differences in the frequency of these knee complaints. Floor layers had sig-nificant more knee complaints than graphic designers, if they were no longer engaged in the trade. Among floor layers presently at work in the trade, there were no signif-icant differences for knee complaints > 30 days during the past 12 months compared with graphic designers (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.6–3.3).

Discussion

In the present study we found a positive, although non-significant trend, between knee complaints and prema-ture exclusion from a knee demanding occupation. We did not follow floor layers from their first year in the trade but re-examined a cross-sectional sample including floor layers that had worked in the trade for many years. A bias towards the null because of the well-described healthy worker effect is very likely. The fact that 28 floor layers already had left their trade in year 1994/95 is consistent with this assumption. Questionnaire reports in 1994/95 from these individuals showed that 20% of the floor lay-ers and 4% of graphic designlay-ers had been re-educated in another occupation due to knee troubles. Exclusion from the trade may occur at a lower seniority among many floor layers compared to participants included in this study (seniority (average) in 2005 29.4–34.9 years). Therefore, having knee complaints it may not be easy to survive in a knee demanding trade. In earlier studies physical work strains such as lifting and uncomfortable work postures has been found to be associated with early retirement, which support the results from the current study [17,18].

As demonstrated in this follow-up survey, floor layers have a high frequency of knee complaints compared with workers without knee demanding work activities in their work tasks. Earlier studies among floor layers have shown similar results with high frequencies of musculoskeletal complaints, especially knee complaints [8-12]. However, in spite of the increasing age of the cohort the frequency of self-reported knee complaints was in general lower among floor layers presently at work in the trade in year 2005 compared with the frequency at baseline (1995), while the opposite tendency was seen among graphic

Kaplan-Meier survival curve during a ten years follow-up period (1995–2005) according to self-reported knee com-plaints (> 30 days during the past 12 months) in 1995 among floor layers (N = 81) & graphic designers (N = 173) presently at work in the trade at baseline (1995)

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curve during a ten years follow-up period (1995–2005) according to self-reported knee com-plaints (> 30 days during the past 12 months) in 1995 among floor layers (N = 81) & graphic designers (N = 173) presently at work in the trade at baseline (1995).

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

Sur

v

iv

al in the tr

ade, %

1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 Years

Floor layers

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

Sur

v

iv

al in the tr

ade, %

1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 Years

(5)

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

200

7,

8

:93

http

://www.bio

m

e

dcent

ral.com/147

1-247 Page

(page number not for citation purposes)

N n (%) ORcrude 95% CI ‡ ORadj† 95% CI‡ n (%) ORcrude 95% CI‡ ORadj† 95% CI ‡

Presently at work

- Floor layers 56 39 (69.6%) 8.5 3.8–18.7 9.2 3.8–22.2 32 (56.1%) 2.2 1.1–4.5 2.7 1.2–5.8

- Graphic designers 75 16 (21.3%) 1 - 1 - 28 (36.8%) 1 - 1

-During the past 12 months Presently off work *

- Floor layers 16 10 (62.5%) 5.1 1.6–16.3 7.7 2.1–28.9 7 (43.8%) 1.9 0.6–5.9 2.7 0.8–8.9

-Change of occupation

- Floor layers 9 8 (88.9%) 27.4 2.9–258.4 26.9 2.7–265.0 7 (70.0%) 7.7 1.4–43.9 11.7 1.1–124.8

-Presently at work

- Floor layers 56 23 (41.1%) 5.8 2.3–14.2 5.5 2.2–13.9 15 (26.3%) 1.3 0.6–.2.9 1.4 0.6–3.3

-Daily or > 30 days during the past 12 months

Presently off work *

- Floor layers 16 8 (50.0%) 7.1 2.1–24.3 9.1 2.4–34.4 5 (29.0%) 2.6 0.7–8.9 3.8 1.0–15.0

-Change of occupation

- Floor layers 9 5 (55.6%) 11.7 2.0–68.8 15.3 2.1–113.4 5 (50.0%) 8.8 1.6–47.0 13.8 1.7–115.1

-* Off work due to early retirement, old – age pension, disability pension, rehabilitation or long illness

[image:5.792.79.745.77.424.2]

(6)

designers. This could indicate a healthy worker effect among floor layers and moreover, that graphic designers may have an increased possibility to survive in the trade with knee troubles [19]. Knee complaints may therefore be a risk factor of premature resignation from a trade, which involves knee demands and/or other physical work demands and a surviving factor in trades with few physical demands (graphic designers).

In order to prevent occupational musculoskeletal disor-ders, wearing-down and exclusion from the trade, major efforts have been made during the last ten years to reduce the daily amount of knee straining work activities among Danish floor layers. Among other things, innovations such as the development of tools that can be used in the upright working position have been enhanced and to some extent implemented in the floor layers work tasks [20]. Among those using the equipment, results have shown that particularly severe knee complaints can be reduced and furthermore the effect is greater the longer the equipment have been used [21]. In the light of the reduced frequency of knee complaints observed among floor layers presently at work in the trade in year 2005, this may indicate a certain extent of efficient prevention.

Apart from occupational hazards, it is evident that other aspects also affect the risk of exclusion or early retirement from the labour marked. Previous studies have ruled out the importance of other determinants that may contribute to the disability risk, such as individual factors (physical and psychological health status) and socio-economic con-ditions [17,22].

During the period 1994/95–2005 the graphic subject area has been affected by structural changes, which have caused a high degree of unemployment and forced many graphic designers into other jobs and trades. Among graphic designers, these structural changes had a strong implication on future exclusion from the trade.

The overall response rate to the questionnaire was accept-able but there may be a risk of interview bias among those contacted by phone. To minimize this, a trained inter-viewer made all the interviews using a structured guide closely corresponding to the postal questionnaire. Using self-reported data there may additionally be a risk of infor-mation bias, e.g. subjects with a previous history of knee problems may have a tendency to respond more readily and accurate than those without [2]. By comparing the answers from questionnaire and interview respondents there was a slightly lower frequency of knee complaints among those who were contacted by phone (but not sig-nificant), why the influence of interview bias is consid-ered to be negligible.

In regard to potential confounders we have adjusted the results for some important determinants of self-reported knee complaints, such as seniority, earlier knee injuries and weight (BMI).

We have managed to obtain information's from the majority of the baseline cohort despite a very high occu-pational mobility among study subjects in both trades. However, a limitation of the present study is the small size of the study population, which may affect the precision of the results and confidence intervals. Subjects aged > 70 years in 2005 were excluded from the follow-up study. In Denmark workers can retire at the age of 60 years. Even if possible to stay at work after the age of 60 years it happens very seldom among construction workers and the risk of missing information owing to these reasons may be small.

Conclusion

This follow-up survey confirms a positive, although non-significant trend, between knee complaints and prema-ture exclusion from a knee demanding occupation. The study also indicates a healthy worker effect among floor layers and a survivor effect among graphic designers.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing inter-ests.

Authors' contributions

SR participated in the design of the study, in the acquisi-tion of data, performed the statistical analysis and partici-pated in the interpretation of the data. LKJ and JPB participated in the design of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of data. All authors have been involved in drafting the manuscript and approved the final manu-script.

Acknowledgements

The Danish Rheumatism Association, the County of Viborg, the Danish Working Environment Research Fund, the Danish Medical Research Coun-cil and the Society for the Preservation of Skive Hospital financially sup-ported the study. The authors would like to thank Tine Agerskov, who assisted in the acquisition of data.

References

1. Arndt V, Rothenbacher D, Daniel U, Zschenderlein B, Schuberth S, Brenner H: Construction work and risk of occupational disa-bility: a ten years follow up of 14 474 male workers. Occup Environ Med 2005, 62:559-566.

2. Baker P, Reading I, Cooper C, Coggon D: Knee disorders in the general population and their relation to occupation. Occup Environ Med 2003, 60:794-7.

3. Enderlein G, Kasch J: Modeling of dose-response relations in exposure-related changes of the locomotor system. [Model-lierung von Dosis-wirkungsbeziehungen für expositionsab-hängige veränderungen am bewegungsapparat] [in German]. Z Gesamte Hyg 1989, 35:215-8.

(7)

Publish with BioMed Central and every scientist can read your work free of charge "BioMed Central will be the most significant development for disseminating the results of biomedical researc h in our lifetime."

Sir Paul Nurse, Cancer Research UK

Your research papers will be:

available free of charge to the entire biomedical community

peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance

cited in PubMed and archived on PubMed Central

yours — you keep the copyright

Submit your manuscript here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/publishing_adv.asp

BioMedcentral

5. O'Reilly SC, Muir KR, Doherty M: Occupation and knee pain: a community study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000, 8:78-81. 6. Coggon D, Croft P, Kellingray S, Barrett D, McLaren M, Cooper C:

Occupational physical activities and osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 2000, 43:1443-9.

7. Hunter DJ, March L, Sambrook PN: Knee osteoarthritis: The influence of environmental factors. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2002,

20:93-100.

8. Ekström H, Engholm G, Nyqvist B, Wallenquist A: Knee disorders as a occupational problem. [Knäbesvär som arbetsmedicin-skt problem Stockholm] [in Swedish]. Bygghälsans Forskningss-tiftelse 1983.

9. Jensen LK, Mikkelsen S, Loft IP, Eenberg W: Work-related knee disorders in floor layers and carpenters. J Occup Environ Med 2000, 42:835-42.

10. Kivimäki J, Riihimäki H, Hänninen K: Knee disorders in carpet and floor layers and painters. Scand J Work Environ Health 1992,

18:310-6.

11. Thun M, Tanaka S, Smith AB, Halperin WE, Lee ST, Luggen ME, Hess EV: Morbidity from repetitive knee trauma in carpet and floor layers. Br J Ind Med 1987, 44:611-20.

12. Myllymäki T, Tikkakoski T, Typpö T, Kivimäki J, Suramo I: Carpet-layer's knee. An ultrasonographic study. Acta Radiol 1993,

34:496-9.

13. Brenner H, Ahern W: Sickness absence and early retirement on health grounds in the construction industry in Ireland.

Occup Environ Med 2000, 57:615-20.

14. Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sørensen F, Andersson G, Jorgensen K: Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of muskuloskeletal symptoms. App Ergon 1987,

18:233-7.

15. EpiData Association: EpiData Software V3.1. Odense, DK 2000. 16. StataCorp LP: Statistics/Data Analysis V8.0. College Station, TX 1996. 17. Krause N, Lynch J, Kaplan RD, Goldberg DF, Salonen JT: Predictors

of disability retirement. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997,

23:403-13.

18. Karpansalo M, Manninen P, Lakka TA, Kauhanen J, Rauramaa R, Salo-nen JT: Physical Workload and Risk of Early Retirement: Pro-spective Population-Based Study Among Middle-Aged Men.

J Occup Environ Med 2002, 44:930-9.

19. Siebert U, Rothenbacher D, Daniel U, Brenner H: Demonstration of the healthy worker survivor effect in a cohort of workers in the construction industry. Occup Environ Med 2001, 58:774-9. 20. Jensen LK, Kofoed LB: Musculoskeletal disorders among floor layers: is prevention possible? Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2002,

17:797-806.

21. Jensen LK, Friche C: Effects of training to implement new tools and working methods to reduce knee load in floor layers.

Appl Ergon 2007, 38:655-65.

22. Lissau I, Rasmussen NK, Hesse NM, Hesse U: Social differences and health-related exclusion from the labour market in Den-mark from 1987 to 1994. Scand J Public Health 2001, 29:19-30.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: