R E S E A R C H
Open Access
On sequences of large homoclinic
solutions for a difference equations on the
integers
Robert Stegli ´nski
**Correspondence:
robert.steglinski@p.lodz.pl Institute of Mathematics, Technical University of Lodz, Wolczanska 215, Lodz, 90-924, Poland
Abstract
In this paper, we determine a concrete interval of positive parameters
λ
, for which we prove the existence of infinitely many homoclinic solutions for a discrete problem–
φ
p(
u(k– 1))
+a(k)φ
p(
u(k))
=λ
f(
k,u(k))
, k∈Z,where the nonlinear termf:Z×R→Rhas an appropriate behavior at infinity, without any symmetry assumptions. The approach is based on critical point theory.
MSC: 39A10; 47J30; 35B38
Keywords: difference equations; discretep-Laplacian; variational methods; infinitely many solutions
1 Introduction
In the present paper we deal with the following nonlinear second-order difference equa-tion:
–φp(u(k– )) +a(k)φp(u(k)) =λf(k,u(k)) for allk∈Z,
u(k)→ as|k| → ∞. ()
Herep> is a real number,λis a positive real parameter,φp(t) =|t|p–t for allt∈R,
a:Z→Ris a positive weight function, while f :Z×R→Ris a continuous function. Moreover, the forward difference operator is defined asu(k– ) =u(k) –u(k– ). We say that a solutionu={u(k)}of () is homoclinic iflim|k|→∞u(k) = .
Difference equations represent the discrete counterpart of ordinary differential equa-tions and are usually studies in connection with numerical analysis. We may regard () as being a discrete analog of the following second-order differential equation:
–φp
x(t)+a(t)φp
x(t)=ft,x(t), t∈R.
However, the relations between discretization and its continuous counterpart are not as direct as it may seem; see for example []. The casep= in () has been motivated in part
by searching standing waves for the nonlinear Schrodinger equation
iψ˙k+ψk–νkψk+f(k,ψk) = , k∈Z
(for details see [, ]).
Most of the classical methods used in the case of differential equations lead to exis-tence results for the solutions of a difference equation. Variational methods for difference equations consist in seeking solutions as critical points for a suitable associated energy functional defined on a convenient Banach space. In the first approaches to the issue, the variational methods are applied to boundary value problems on bounded discrete in-tervals, which leads to the study of an energy functional defined on a finite-dimensional Banach space (see [–]). In the case of difference equations on unbounded discrete in-tervals (typically, on the whole set of integersZ) solutions are sought in a subspace of the sequence spacelpwhich is still infinite-dimensional but compactly embedded intolp(see
[–]).
Our idea here is to investigate the existence of infinitely many solutions to problem () by using a critical point theorem obtained in []; see Theorem . This theorem was used in a continuous case in [] and in discrete but finite-dimensional analog of problem () in [–]. In analogy with the cited papers, in our approach we do not require any symmetry hypothesis.
A special case of our contributions reads as follows. Fora:Z→Rand the continuous mappingf:Z×R→Rdefine the following conditions:
(A) a(k)≥α> for allk∈Z,a(k)→+∞as|k| →+∞; (F) limt→ft(pk–,t)= uniformly for allk∈Z;
(F) lim inft→+∞
k∈Zmax|ξ|≤tF(k,ξ)
tp = ; (F) lim sup(k,t)→(+∞,+∞)(+Fa((kk,))|t)t|p= +∞; (F) supk∈Z(lim supt→+∞(+Fa((kk,))|t)t|p) = +∞,
whereF(k,t) is the primitive function off(k,t), that is,F(k,t) =tf(k,s)dsfor everyt∈R
andk∈Z. The solutions are found in the normed space (X, · ), whereX={u:Z→R:
k∈Za(k)|u(k)|p<∞}andu= [
k∈Za(k)|u(k)|p] p.
Theorem Assume that(A), (F),and(F)are satisfied.Moreover,assume that either(F) or(F)is satisfied.Then for eachλ> ,the problem()admits a sequence of solutions in X whose norms tend to infinity.
The plan of the paper is the following: Section is devoted to our abstract framework, while Section is dedicated to the main results. Finally, we give two examples which illus-trate the independence of conditions (F) and (F) and a third example which corresponds
to the general Theorem .
2 Abstract framework
Theorem Let(E, · )be a reflexive real Banach space,let ,:E→Rbe two contin-uously differentiable functionals with coercive,i.e.limu→∞ (u) = +∞,and a sequen-tially weakly lower semicontinuous functional anda sequentially weakly upper semicon-tinuous functional.For every r>infE ,let us put
ϕ(r) := inf
u∈ –((–∞,r))
(supv∈ –((–∞,r))(v)) –(u)
r– (u)
and
γ :=lim inf
r→+∞ ϕ(r).
Let Jλ:= (u) –λ(u)for all u∈E.Ifγ < +∞then,for eachλ∈(,γ),the following alter-native holds:
either
(a) Jλpossesses a global minimum,
or
(b) there is a sequence{un}of critical points(local minima)ofJλsuch that
limn→+∞ (un) = +∞.
We begin by defining some Banach spaces. For all ≤p< +∞, we denotepthe set of all functionsu:Z→Rsuch that
upp=
k∈Z
u(k)p< +∞.
Moreover, we denote by∞the set of all functionsu:Z→Rsuch that
u∞=sup
k∈Z
u(k)< +∞.
We set
X= u:Z→R:
k∈Z
a(k)u(k)p<∞
and
u=
k∈Z
a(k)u(k)p
p
.
Clearly we have
u∞≤ up≤α–
pu for allu∈X. ()
As is shown in [], Proposition , (X,·) is a reflexive Banach space and the embedding
X→lpis compact. Let
(u) :=
p
k∈Z
and
(u) :=
k∈Z
Fk,u(k) for allu∈lp,
whereF(k,s) =sf(k,t)dtfors∈Randk∈Z. LetJλ:X→Rbe the functional associated to problem () defined by
Jλ(u) = (u) –λ(u).
Proposition Assume that(A)and(F)are satisfied.Then
(a) ∈C(X);
(b) ∈C(lp)and∈C(X);
(c) Jλ∈C(X)and for allλ> every critical pointu∈XofJλis a homoclinic solution of problem().
For a proof see Propositions , , and in [].
Proposition Assume that(A)and(F)are satisfied.Then is coercive and sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous functional andis sequentially weakly upper semicontinu-ous functional.
Proof We have
(u)≥
pu
p→+∞,
asu →+∞, and so is coercive. Now, letumuweakly inX. By the compactness
of the embeddingX→lp, we may assume that u
m→uin lp. The rest of the
propo-sition follows from the fact that the norm · inX is sequentially weakly lower semi-continuous functional, the functional is continuous onlp, and the functionallp u→
p
k∈Z|u(k– )|p∈Ris continuous onlp.
Proposition Let{um}be a sequence in X such that (um)→+∞.Thenum →+∞.
Proof By the classical Minkowski inequality
n
i=
|xi+yi|p
p ≤
n
i=
|xi|p
p
+
n
i=
|yi|p
p
for alln∈N,x, . . . ,xn,y, . . . ,yn∈R, we have
|k|≤h
u(k– )p
p
≤
|k|≤h
u(k– )p
p
+
|k|≤h u(k)p
p
for allh∈Nandu∈X. Lettingh→+∞we obtain
k∈Z
u(k– )p
p
From this and inequality () we conclude
(u) =
p
k∈Z
u(k– )p+a(k)u(k)p
≤
p
upp+up≤ +α pα u
p,
which proves the proposition.
3 Main theorem
Now we will formulate and prove a stronger form of Theorem . Let
A:=lim inf
t→+∞
k∈Zmax|ξ|≤tF(k,ξ)
tp ,
B±,±:= lim sup (k,t)→(±∞,±∞)
F(k,t) ( +a(k))|t|p,
and
B±:=sup
k∈Z
lim sup
t→±∞
F(k,t) ( +a(k))|t|p
.
SetB:=max{B±,±,B±}. For convenience we put + = +∞and+∞ = .
Theorem Assume that(A)and(F)are satisfied and assume that the following inequal-ity holds:A<α·B.Then,for eachλ∈(
Bp,
α
Ap),problem()admits a sequence of solutions
in X whose norms tend to infinity.
Proof It is clear thatA≥. Putλ∈(Bp ,Apα) and put ,,Jλas in the previous section. Our aim is to apply Theorem to the functionJλ. By Lemma , the functional is the locally Lipschitz, coercive and sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous functional and
is the locally Lipschitz, sequentially weakly upper semicontinuous functional. We will show thatγ < +∞. Let{cm} ⊂(, +∞) be a sequence such thatlimm→∞cm= +∞and
lim
m→+∞
k∈Zmax|ξ|≤cmF(k,ξ)
cpm
=A.
Set
rm:=
α pc
p m
for everym∈N. Then, ifv∈Xand (v) <rm, one has v∞≤α–
pv ≤α–pp (v) p <c
m,
which gives
–(–∞,r
m)
⊂v∈X:v∞≤cm
From this and () =() = we have
Now, our conclusion follows provided thatJλdoes not possess a global minimum.
Then there exists a sequence of real numbers{bm}withbm≥ such thatlimm→+∞bm=
+∞and
F(k,bm) >M
+a(k)
bpm
for allm∈N. Thus, take inXa sequence{sm}such that, for everym∈N,sm(k) =bm, and
sm(k) = for everyk∈Z\{k}. Then one has
Jλ(sm) =
p
k∈Z
sm(k– ) p
+a(k)sm(k) p
–λ
k∈Z
Fk,sm(k)
<
pb
p m+
pa(k)b
p m–λM
+a(k)
bpm
=
p–λM
+a(k)
bpm,
which giveslimm→+∞Jλ(sm) = –∞.
Next, assume thatB< +∞. Sinceλ>Bp , we can fixε> such thatε<B–λp. Therefore, there exists an indexk∈Zsuch that
lim sup
t→+∞
F(k,t)
( +a(k))|t|p
>B–ε,
and taking{bm}, a sequence of real numbers withbm≥ such thatlimm→+∞bm= +∞and
F(k,bm) > (B–ε)
+a(k)
bpm
for allm∈N, choosing{sm}inXas above, one has
Jλ(sm) <
p–λ(B–ε)
+a(k)
bpm.
So, also in this case,limm→+∞Jλ(sm) = –∞. Finally, the above facts mean thatJλdoes not
possesses a global minimum. Hence, by Theorem , we obtain a sequence{um}of critical
points (local minima) ofJλsuch thatlimm→+∞ (um) = +∞. Proposition now implies
limm→+∞um= +∞. The proof is complete.
Remark Theorem follows from Theorem since the condition (F) means thatB+,+=
+∞and the condition (F) means thatB+= +∞, soB= +∞. Moreover, (F) impliesA= .
Hence, we obtain the interval of all positive parameters, for which the treated problem admits infinitely many solutions whose norms tend to infinity.
Remark If we replace the condition (F) by
(F+
) limt→+ f(k,t)
tp– = uniformly for allk∈Z
in Theorem , then we can obtain the sequence of positive solutions of the problem (). It can be proved by using Lemmas and in [].
4 Examples
Example Let{a(k)}be a sequence of positive numbers. Putb= . Let{bm},{cm},{hm}
be sequences defined recursively by
⎧ every positive integerkletf(k,·) :R→Rbe any nonnegative continuous function such thatf(k,t) = fort∈R\(bk,ck) and
be sequences defined recursively by
It is easy to see thatbm<cm<bm+ for everym∈Nandlimm→+∞bm=limm→+∞cm= Letα,β be any two strictly positive real numbers. We show that there is a continuous functionf :Z×R→R, such that the numbersAandB, as defined above Theorem , are equal toαandβ, respectively. We can follow one of two strategies given by Example and Example . We choose the first one.
It is easy to see thatbm<cm<bm+for everym≥mandlimm→+∞bm=limm→+∞cm=
+∞. For every integerk<mletf(k,·) :R→Rbe identically the zero function. For
ev-ery integerk≥mletf(k,·) :R→Rbe any nonnegative continuous function such that f(k,t) = fort∈R\(bk,ck) and
ck
bkf(k,t)dt=hk. The condition (F) is now obviously
sat-isfied.
SetF(k,t) :=tf(k,s)dsfor everyt∈Randk∈Z. Since
bpm
cpm ·
k∈Zmax|ξ|≤bmF(k,ξ)
bpm
=
k∈Zmax|ξ|≤cm–F(k,ξ)
cpm
≤ inf
t∈(cm–,cm)
k∈Zmax|ξ|≤tF(k,ξ)
tp
≤
k∈Zmax|ξ|≤bmF(k,ξ)
bpm
is satisfied for allm≥m, we have
lim inf
t→+∞
k∈Zmax|ξ|≤tF(k,ξ)
tp =mlim→+∞
k∈Zmax|ξ|≤bmF(k,ξ)
bpm
and since
F(k,ck)
( +a(k))cpk ≤supt∈R
F(k,t) ( +a(k))|t|p ≤
hk
( +a(k))bpk =
F(k,ck)
( +a(k))cpk · cpk bpk
is satisfied for allk≥m, we have
lim sup (k,t)→(+∞,+∞)
F(k,t)
( +a(k))|t|p =k→+∞lim
F(k,ck)
( +a(k))cpk.
In the same way as has been done in Example , we conclude that
lim inf
t→+∞
k∈Zmax|ξ|≤tF(k,ξ)
tp =α
and
lim sup (k,t)→(+∞,+∞)
F(k,t) ( +a(k))|t|p =β.
Moreover,
sup
k∈Z
lim sup
t→+∞
F(k,t) ( +a(k))|t|p
= .
From this we obtainA=αandB=β.
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Author’s contributions
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by Lodz University of Technology. The author would like to thank the referees for their valuable suggestions and comments.
Received: 18 November 2015 Accepted: 25 January 2016
References
1. Agarwal, RP: On multipoint boundary value problems for discrete equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.96(2), 520-534 (1983) 2. Sun, G: On standing wave solutions for discrete nonlinear Schrodinger equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal.2013, Article ID
436919 (2013)
3. Sun, G, Mai, A: Infinitely many homoclinic solutions for second order nonlinear difference equations withp-Laplacian. Sci. World J.2014, Article ID 276372 (2014)
4. Agarwal, RP, Perera, K, O’Regan, D: Multiple positive solutions of singular and nonsingular discrete problems via variational methods. Nonlinear Anal.58, 69-73 (2004)
5. Cabada, A, Iannizzotto, A, Tersian, S: Multiple solutions for discrete boundary value problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl.356, 418-428 (2009)
6. Candito, P, Molica Bisci, G: Existence of two solutions for a second-order discrete boundary value problem. Adv. Nonlinear Stud.11, 443-453 (2011)
7. Galewski, M, Głab, S: On the discrete boundary value problem for anisotropic equation. Electron. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 386, 956-965 (2012)
8. Mih˘ailescu, M, R ˘adulescu, V, Tersian, S: Eigenvalue problems for anisotropic discrete boundary value problems. J. Differ. Equ. Appl.15(6), 557-567 (2009)
9. Molica Bisci, G, Repovš, D: Existence of solutions forp-Laplacian discrete equations. Appl. Math. Comput.242, 454-461 (2014)
10. Iannizzotto, A, R ˘adulescu, V: Positive homoclinic solutions for the discretep-Laplacian with a coercive weight function. Differ. Integral Equ.27(1-2), 35-44 (2014)
11. Iannizzotto, A, Tersian, S: Multiple homoclinic solutions for the discretep-Laplacian via critical point theory. J. Math. Anal. Appl.403, 173-182 (2013)
12. Ma, M, Guo, Z: Homoclinic orbits for second order self-adjoint difference equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl.323, 513-521 (2005)
13. Ricceri, B: A general variational principle and some of its applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math.133, 401-410 (2000) 14. Bonanno, G, Molica Bisci, G: Infinitely many solutions for a Dirichlet problem involving thep-Laplacian. Proc. R. Soc.
Edinb., Sect. A140, 737-752 (2010)
15. Bonanno, G, Candito, P: Infinitely many solutions for a class of discrete non-linear boundary value problems. Appl. Anal.88, 605-616 (2009)
16. Molica Bisci, G, Repovš, D: On sequences of solutions for discrete anisotropic equations. Expo. Math.32, 284-295 (2014)
17. Stegli ´nski, R: On sequences of large solutions for discrete anisotropic equations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2015, 25 (2015)