• No results found

S A M P L E. Engineers Fees. A Survey of the Fees Charged by Consulting Civil & Structural Engineers edition

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "S A M P L E. Engineers Fees. A Survey of the Fees Charged by Consulting Civil & Structural Engineers edition"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

S A

M P

L E

Engineers Fees

2016 edition

A Survey of the Fees Charged by

(2)

Engineers Fees 2016 edition covered and examples of the layout. Data has

been amended - these are NOT the published tables / charts.

www.feesbureau.co.uk

Page 1

Section 1: Survey Background

Introduction 2

Respondent profi le 2

How fees data is collected 3 How fees data is analysed 3 How to use these statistics 4

Section 2: Engineers Charge-out Rates

Charge-out rates 6

Firm size analysis 7

Regional analysis 8

Section 3: Civil & Structural Engineers Fees

Average fees: Civil & Structural Engineers 10

Fee range 13

Regional variations 14

Sector variations 16

Changes in fee levels, 2014 to 2015 18 Long-term changes in average fee levels 20

Section 4: Civil & Structural Engineers Fees, Market Analyses

Statistical basis & Contents 22

Buildings 23

Civil Engineering 36

Engineers Fees 2016 edition

Contents

Published by The Fees Bureau, a division of Mirza & Nacey Research Ltd

ISBN: 978-1-907819-61-2

The information in this publication is based on a survey of consulting engineers undertaken over the 24 month period ending in July 2015. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information in this publication, Mirza & Nacey Research Ltd can accept no responsibility for any errors of fact, omissions, or opinions expressed. The information supplied should be used as an aid to decision making and not as the sole basis for taking such decisions.

Engineers Fees is copyright Mirza & Nacey

Research Ltd. No extract or quotation may be published or broadcast without prior consent. ‘Engineers Fees’ and ‘The Fees Bureau’ are trademarks of Mirza & Nacey Research Ltd.

© Mirza & Nacey Research Ltd 2015 The Fees Bureau

Mirza & Nacey Research Ltd Southdown House Ford, Arundel West Sussex BN18 0DE Tel: 01243 555302 www.feesbureau.co.uk

Mirza & Nacey Reserach Ltd Southdown House Ford Lane, Ford Arundel West Sussex BN18 0DE United Kingdom Telephone: +44 1243 555302 email: info@mirza-nacey.com www.mirza-nacey.com

(3)

Engineers Fees 2016 edition This sample is intended for illustrative purposes only, to show the type of

information covered and examples of the layout. Data has been amended - these are NOT the published tables / charts.

Worked example

The fees data is presented as a series of tables and charts based on the data collected by a survey of consulting engineers. Fees are expressed as a per cent of total building construction cost. The average fees line on

each chart is an indicative ‘line of best fi t’. Reported fees charged vary around this line; the range of fees charged for jobs is discussed on page 13.

Fees’ relates to the Normal Services provided

by Consulting Civil and Structural Engineers, as defi ned in ACE Agreements 2002. This normal service will include: outline proposals; detailed proposals; production information; tender documentation; construction and completion. Fees exclude expenses and VAT.

Start by gaining an overview of these fi gures with the summary tables and charts on pages 10-13. These show average fees lines for the main types of consultancy work (buildings or civil engineering) split between new build and refurbishment.

Next, fi nd the building sector closest to the job you are seeking from the list on page 25. Once in the appropriate sector, you will fi nd charts

with the average fees line which reports on the data collected. In some cases insuffi cient jobs have been reported to us so it is not possible to include the full range of four charts for all work and contract type combinations.

On the bottom scale (x axis) of this chart fi nd the contract value of your job. Follow this point up until you reach the average fees line. From this point on the average fees line follow across to the left hand scale (y axis) to read off the percentage fees value.

When considering the fees data please bear in mind the following:

Percentage Fee Charts

the ‘line of best fi t’ on each chart is exactly that - a ‘best fi t’ of the individual values reported. Some fee values reported will lie above the line, others below it.

the indicative lines of best fit take no account of the complexity of the work. the scale on each chart may vary. The range of contract values charted refl ects the range of jobs reported to us.

The diagram, below, shows how to estimate the average fees for an offi ce new build job, value £2.5m, where the engineer is Lead consultant. This chart appears on page 32. This sample is NOT the published chart.

For a new build offi ce development with an estimated contract value of £4.8 million, fi rst

find the value £4.8 million on the bottom scale. Follow this point up until you reach the average fees line. The average fees for ‘Lead Consultant’ is the solid line. Then read off the value from the left-hand scale. The average fee in this example is x.x per cent.

Page 4

0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 fe es, p er ce nt

total construction cost, £millions

Leisure Refurbishment

Normal Services, Lead and Non-Lead consultant This sample is NOT the published chart.

contract value = £2,500,000 average fees = x.x% Lead Consultant Non-Lead Consultant SAMPLE ONLY

(4)

0 25 50 75 100 125 31 + 11 to 30 6 to 10 3 to 5 2 1

average hourly rate, £s

SAMPLE ONLY 0 25 50 75 100 125 31 + 11 to 30 6 to 10 3 to 5 2

average hourly rate, £s

SAMPLE ONLY 0 25 50 75 100 125 31 + 11 to 30 6 to 10 3 to 5 2

average hourly rate, £s

SAMPLE ONLY Senior Engineers’ average hourly charge-out rates by fi rm size

Principals’ average hourly charge-out rates by fi rm size

Chartered Engineers’ average hourly charge-out rates by fi rm size

Firm size: 2-5 engineering staff

Firm size: 6-10 engineering staff

Firm size: 11-30 engineering staff

Firm size: 1 engineering staff

Firm size: 31+ engineering staff

£ per hour lower quartile MEDIAN upper quartile

Principal, Partner, Director 40 40 40

Associate 40 40 40

Senior Chartered Engineer 40 40 40

Chartered Engineer 40 40 40

Incorporated Engineer 40 40 40

Graduate Engineer 40 40 40

£ per hour lower quartile MEDIAN upper quartile

Principal, Partner, Director 40 40 40

£ per hour lower quartile MEDIAN upper quartile

Principal, Partner, Director 40 40 40

Associate 40 40 40

Senior Chartered Engineer 40 40 40

Chartered Engineer 40 40 40

Incorporated Engineer 40 40 40

Graduate Engineer 40 40 40

£ per hour lower quartile MEDIAN upper quartile

Principal, Partner, Director 40 40 40

Associate 40 40 40

Senior Chartered Engineer 40 40 40

Chartered Engineer 40 40 40

Incorporated Engineer 40 40 40

Graduate Engineer 40 40 40

£ per hour lower quartile MEDIAN upper quartile

Principal, Partner, Director 40 40 40

Associate 40 40 40

Senior Chartered Engineer 40 40 40

Chartered Engineer 40 40 40

Incorporated Engineer 40 40 40

Graduate Engineer 40 40 40

number of engineering staff

number of engineering staff

(5)

Engineers Fees 2016 edition 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 fe es, p er ce nt

total construction cost, £millions

0 2 4 6 8 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 fe es, p er ce nt

total construction cost, £millions

This sample is intended for illustrative purposes only, to show the type of information covered and examples of the layout. Data has been amended - these are NOT the published tables / charts.

SAMPLE ONLY SAMPLE ONLY

SAMPLE ONLY

Offi ce

New Build

Normal Services, Lead and Non-Lead consultant

Offi ce

Refurbishment

Normal Services, Lead and Non-Lead consultant

Offi ces - All Work, Normal Services

Offi

ces

contract value

average fees (per cent of total construction cost)

New Build Refurbishment

Lead Non-Lead Lead Non-Lead

£250,000 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 £500,000 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 £750,000 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 £1,000,000 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 £2,500,000 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 £5,000,000 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 £7,500,000 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 £10,000,000 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5

Page 32

Lead Consultant Non-Lead Consultant Lead Consultant Non-Lead Consultant

References

Related documents

11 In comparison, at only 64 percent of the schools that have Latinos/as on faculty but where most of the Latino/a students do not have a Latino/a faculty mentor did most of

In the current study, optical and SEM imaging-based IC is employed to measure displacement fields at specimen-scale and microstructural-scale in Al-Cu specimens. 1) The

structure” (that is, changes that parallel those for white women); and 2) a part attributable to differential changes in the labor market returns for black women relative to

The electricity liberalisation in the European Union (EU) is the world’s most extensive cross-jurisdiction reform program of the sector and involves liberalisation of

In May 2017, the government of Brazil enacted a new immigration law, replacing a statute introduced in 1980 during the country’s military dictatorship with progressive

The models in this catalogue are currently only available through Forge World Mail Order (not Games Workshop Mail Order), from the Forge World stand at national Games Days and

Thhata (Thhato) was again rebuilt. In the year 1591, forces of King Akbar, invaded Sind as Mirza Jani Beg would not concede to him. Rather then concede defeat, Mirza Jani set torch

If the goal is to understand whether capi- tal account liberalization has real effects, then theory tells us that the right question to ask is the following: Do we see a fall in