• No results found

Asset Life Cycle Management. Case Studies on Asset Life Cycle Cost Modelling

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Asset Life Cycle Management. Case Studies on Asset Life Cycle Cost Modelling"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Asset Life Cycle Management

Case Studies on

(2)

Contents

The Basics

The Process

Different Models

(3)

Asset Life Cycle Cost Basics

Total Cost

Time

Replacement

Life Span (Assessment Period)

Life Cycle (Asset Estimated Life)

Financial Year

(4)

Step 1:

Define the Scope of the Analysis

Step 2:

Develop or adjust the LCC Model

Step 3:

Define Team. Collect Information

Step 4:

Populate the Model

Step 5:

Review and Optimise the Model

Step 7:

Maintain the Model

Step 6:

Decision and Implement the Solution

Life Cycle Cost Modelling Process

• Stakeholder involvement • Project plan review • Scope of analysis

• Data requirements analysis • Model selection

• Depreciation policies and rates • Governing accounting practices • Categorisation of cost contributors • Validation of the model by Accounting

• Data verification

• Audit trail for data entries • Consensus discussion • Base results demonstration • Team identification

• Responsibility allocation

• Data collection and configuration

• Reality checks • Sensitivity analysis • Variations

• Presentation to Stakeholders • Consensus

• Budget alignment and Project Team appointment • Implementation project definition and activation • Populate actual data

(5)

Different Models

Optimum Replacement Age

Repair / Replacement

Alternative Decision Making

Maintenance Strategy Selection

Other Uses

(6)

Optimum Replacement Age Models

Optimal Asset Life? Replace every Year

Life Cycle Cost

LCC 1

LCC 2

LCC 3

LCC 4

LCC X

Replace Every 2 Years Replace Every 3 Years Replace Every 4 Years Etc.

(7)

Cost Summations across Life Span (Example)

Replacement  Interval Y0 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 LCC Every Year 9.00 8.40 7.80 7.45 7.05 6.80 6.65 6.35 6.25 6.20 6.00 $77.95M Every 2 Years 3.20 8.40 1.00 7.45 1.35 6.80 3.65 6.35 1.60 6.20 1.95 $47.95M Every 3 Years 3.30 3.70 7.80 0.85 1.05 6.80 1.40 3.50 6.25 1.30 1.55 $37.5M Every 2 Years 3.70 4.20 4.05 7.45 0.85 1.00 1.05 6.35 3.30 1.25 1.25 $34.45M Every 6 Years 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.50 3.45 3.30 6.65 0.65 0.80 0.85 1.25 $32.5M Every 7 Years 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.50 3.60 3.75 3.90 6.35 0.50 0.70 0.85 $35.2M Every 8 Years 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.50 3.60 3.65 4.40 4.25 6.25 0.45 0.75 $38.9M Every 9 Years 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.50 3.60 3.75 4.65 3.75 3.80 6.20 0.40 $41.7M Every 4 Years 3.85 4.50 3.60 3.55 7.05 0.80 0.90 0.95 1.15 6.20 1.10 $33.65M Every 5 Years 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.45 3.50 6.80 0.70 0.85 0.95 1.20 3.05 $32.55M Every 10 Years 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.50 3.60 3.75 4.75 3.55 3.75 4.10 6.00 $45.05M

Costs [

$M]

Time

Y10

Y9

Y8

Y7

Y6

Y5

Y4

Y3

Y2

Y1

Y0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)

Repair or Replace?

Old Truck?

(12)

Repair / Replacement Models

Maintain or Replace? Replace After 1 Year

Life Cycle Cost

LCC 1

LCC 2

LCC 3

LCC 4

LCC X

Replace After 2 Years Replace After 3 Years Replace After 4 Years Etc.

(13)

Cost Summations across Life Span (Example)

Replacement  Year Y0 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 LCC Replace Y0 9.00 1.00 1.25 1.45 1.75 3.75 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.30 $27.30M Replace Y1 3.20 8.40 1.00 1.20 1.35 1.65 3.65 1.30 1.60 1.75 1.95 $27.05M Replace Y2 3.30 3.70 7.80 0.85 1.05 1.15 1.40 3.50 1.20 1.30 1.55 $26.80M Replace Y3 3.70 4.20 4.05 7.45 0.85 1.00 1.05 1.35 3.30 1.25 1.25 $29.45M Replace Y6 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.50 3.45 3.30 6.65 0.65 0.80 0.85 1.25 $32.50M Replace Y7 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.50 3.60 3.75 3.90 6.35 0.50 0.70 0.85 $35.20M Replace Y8 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.50 3.60 3.65 4.40 4.25 6.25 0.45 0.75 $38.90M Replace Y9 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.50 3.60 3.75 4.65 3.75 3.80 6.20 0.40 $41.70M Replace Y4 3.85 4.50 3.60 3.55 7.05 0.80 0.90 0.95 1.15 3.20 1.10 $30.65M Replace Y5 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.45 3.50 6.80 0.70 0.85 0.95 1.20 3.05 $32.45M Replace Y10 3.90 4.50 3.65 3.50 3.60 3.75 4.75 3.55 3.75 4.10 6.00 $45.05M

Costs [

$M]

Time

Y10

Y9

Y8

Y7

Y6

Y5

Y4

Y3

Y2

Y1

Y0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 10 20 30 40 [$M] Replacement Capital Maintenance Costs Lost Productivity Disposal Process Costs

(14)
(15)

Repair/Replace Model

-4.00 -2.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 Repl ace Y0 (200 6) Replac e Y1 (200 7) Repl ace Y 2 (2 008) Rep lace Y3 (200 9) Repl ace Y4 (201 0) Repl ace Y5 (201 1) Repl ace Y6 (201 2) Repl ace Y7 (201 3) Rep lace Y 8 (2 014) Repl ace Y9 (2 015) Repl ace Y 10 (201 6) Repl ace Y11 ( 2017 ) Repl ace Y 12 (2 018) Repl ace Y1 3 (2 019) Repl ace Y 14 (202 0) Rep lace Y15 (202 1) Rep lace Y16 (202 2) Repla ce Y1 7 (2 023) Repl ace Y18 (202 4) Repl ace Y 19 (2 025) Rep lace Y20 (202 6) Repl ace Y21 (2 027) Repl ace Y2 2 (2 028) Repl ace Y2 3 (2 029) Repl ace Y24 (20 30) Repl ace Y 25 (203 1) Replacement Year N e t Pr e s e n t Va lu e s [ M il li o n s ]

Current Machine Depreciation Disposal

Shutdown Lost Productivity Lost Productivity

Lump Sum Capital Lump Sum OPEX Routine Process Routine Maintenance Replacement Capital

(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)

Alrode L9 Pasteuriser IQMS Results

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Apr-00 May-00 Jun-00 Jul-00 Aug-00 Sep-00 Oct-00 Nov-00 Dec-00 Jan-01 Feb-01 Mar-01 Apr-01 May-01 Jun-01 Month IQMS Results [%]

Pasteuriser Performance Improvement

(24)
(25)

Cyclic fatigue cracking

Maintenance Strategy Selection

Reinforcing

Reinforcing

Reinforcing webs

(26)

Maintenance Strategy Selection

Risk Based Maintenance Task LCC Comparison

0 1000000 2000000 3000000 4000000 5000000 6000000 7000000 8000000 RBM: Condition Based Maintenance RBM: Usage Based Maintenance RBM: Run to failure Maintenance RBM: Design Improvement Maintenance Non-RBM Maintenance

Maintenance Types of Work

T L C C NP V [ A UD]

Alternative Risk Based Maintenance Solutions

(Mitigated Risk)

Current Risk

(27)
(28)

Life Cycle Cost Modelling

(29)

Life Cycle Cost Management

Time $

Life Cycle Costs

Replacement Year Scenarios

10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 30

Replacement Scenario Costs

Rolling Years X?)

Assets

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fleet Total LCC $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Fleet Plan

22

(30)
(31)

Machine Benchmarking

Cumulat

ive Costs

Usage

Target (Model)

Machine 1

Machine 2

(32)
(33)

Modelling Software Tools

Excel

APT Lifespan (Woodhouse Partnership)

AssetLife (Hansen Corporation)

(34)

References

Standards:

• Australian Federal Income Tax Legislation • AS 15288: 2003  Systems Engineering – System Life Cycle Processes • AS/NZS 4356: Life cycle costing ‐ An application guide • Australian Accounting Standard AAS 4 Depreciation • Australian Accounting Standard AAS 116 Property, Plant and Equipment • International Financial Reporting Standards (lFRS) IAS 16 and IAS 36 Standards  • Australian Government Depreciation Guidelines • Australian Master Tax Guide • TR 2009/4: Taxation Ruling ‐ Income tax: effective life of depreciating assets • GAAP (Generally Acceptable Accounting Practices) • Life cycle costing Better Practice Guide – Australian National Audit Office

Books:

• Maintenance, Replacement and Reliability, A.K.S. Jardine • Life‐Cycle Cost and Economic Analysis, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ • Life Cycle Cost, Reliability, Maintainability, and Supportability Guidebook, Warrendale, PA • Life Cycle Costing: Techniques, Models and Applications, B. S. Dhillon • Life‐Cycle Cost and Economic Analysis, Benjamin S. Blanchard, Fabrycky, Wolter J

Websites:

• APT Lifespan: www.reliability.com.au • LCC Ware 3: www.aptools.co.uk

References

Related documents

BLOOD CELL DEFICIENCY PROMACTA 75 MG TABLET eltrombopag olamine 4/1/2017. ENDOCRINE DISORDER BYNFEZIA 2,500 MCG/ML PEN octreotide

composite sector, which is spontaneously broken by the strong physics. The radion is dual to the goldstone boson from dilatation symmetry in 4D [ 55 – 57 ], the dilaton. The

Southern Irish nationalism, pre-1916, is a mirror image o f common or garden European top-down nationalism; the nationalism o f Republican and Loyalist elements,

engineering, chemical & process engineering, and electrical engineering. With the arrival of a new Professor with an international reputation in energy storage, the University

In hypotheses 3a and 5 it was proved that perceived control and job satisfaction had positive effects on organizational commitment, which was supported by the regression

A key problem in improving Africa’s healthcare providers is that small- and medium-sized private clinics, the vast majority of the facilities in the health sector, do not have

The impact of ST on the reduction of drug related risk behaviours (e.g., sharing of injecting equip- ment) in penal institutions is looked at as well as the effects of