• No results found

OrganisationalBehaviourVisualised.pdf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "OrganisationalBehaviourVisualised.pdf"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Eg. Identify core concepts

Define key terms

Interactions of concepts & terms Interactions of concepts & terms Managerial implications

Example from life

Organisational Behaviour

Organisational Behaviour

Visualised by James Kapron

Ottawa, Canada

(2)

Eg.

Overview & Module Interaction

* People as a competitive advantage

Understand motivation theories Apply concepts to solve problems Emphasise work system design

Attend to group behaviour as a knowledge pathway to strengthen competitive advantage The best answers:

•are well-organised and structured

•link concept(s) with explanations of key concepts

•have a brief but effective analysis of contemporary relevance •Bolstered at key points with relevant, contemporary and sensible examples

Mod 1: Introduction

Job Satisfaction

Mod 2: Stress

Mod 3: Motivation

Mod 4: Control

& Reward

Mod 5: Job

Design

Mod 6: Work

Group Dynamics

Mod 7: Influence,

Power, Authority

Mod 8:

Organisational

Design

M d 9

(3)

Eg.

Module 1: Introduction & Job Satisfaction

SOBC: Stimulus on Organisation gives Behaviour which results in a Consequence

SOBC: Stimulus on Organisation gives Behaviour which results in a Consequence

OB: Behaviour & Attitudes of PPL

Mgmt: Process to Achieve

Mgmt

Technical

(production, work flow)

• HR (jobs skills)

Values: Instrumental & Terminal

LOC, Intro/Extro, Mach-V, SAN (Nach, Naff, Npow)

Personalised

Socialised

HR (jobs, skills)

Conceptual (creative

problem solving)

J Sat

Work clarity, challenge

Org Commitment • Shared Values

Acceptance of

delegated authority

Participation

Indiv contrib:

Years in job Expectancy

Organisational Contributors:

J-Sat

R

Promotions

Perceived Equity

$

Intrinsic

• Membership • Effort

g

y

Motivation to

contribute

R

J-Involvement

Mod 5

Mod 3

q y

P ti

Extrinsic

ID

Self-worth

J

o e e t

Perception

R = Reward

(4)

Eg.

Module 2: Stress & Well-Being

Selye GAS (General Adaptation Syndrome)

Alarm

Resistance

Eustress

Distress

Perception

Manage via wellness programme

Resistance

(Adaptation, Inertia)

Exhaustion

Cope

Overloads:

Job

Role

J-Exp

LOC

Type A

Physical

Work (Temporary)

Env

Job Hindrance

Stress

Econ, Polit, Techn

O

Psychological

-sleep, J Sat -depression

l

Indiv

Task demands

Role demands

Interpersonal demands Org Structure

Org Leadership

-memory loss

Behavioural

-Production -Attendance -Accidents

Fam $

Org Lifecycle

Fam, $

(5)

Eg.

Module 3: Motivation

Sat Self-Efficacy

Role ambiguity Job Design

(Mod 5) Neut

Dis

Herzberg

LOC NAch Self-Esteem Self-Efficacy

Indiv O

Role ambiguity Role conflict PA (Mod 4) R (Mod 4)

J-Design (Mod 5) (Mod 5)

Content

Maslow

Need

Effort

Ability

Mod

Reward Self Esteem

Motivation

Process

Effort

Behaviour Performance

Expectancy

1st Level Outcome

2nd Level Outcome

4

Reward

Instrumentality

2

Env

Valence Rewards

Equity

$$

1 6 BMOD Contingency Schedules

4

3 5

Entitled Sensitive Benevolent

Consequences

X

Good? Y Get Something? +ve

N

Y N

Benevolent

Get Something?

Punishment

Extinction

-ve

Y

N Interval Ratio √

(6)

Eg.

Module 4: Reward & Control

Extrinsic Group-based Rewards

• Intrinsic Reward System: PA

Prerequisites: -Profitable -Stable

SDTs operational -Gain-sharing (May even work in bad times)

-Scanlon (Labour costs, Committees) -Rucker (Sales income minus prod’n & delivery cost)

-Line of sight, VALUE ADDED, Low on hierarchy

Profit sharing (Only works in good times: -SDTs operational -Co. not for sale -Outsourcing completed -Market-based customer satisfaction measurements -Profit-sharing (Only works in good times:

price increases or market share)

Profits: repair your own work instead of earning the bonus, supervisor merit, cost-saving suggestions

PA Methods: Direct Indirect

R

Non-FinancialPhone, party

Jets

Intrinsic Extrinsic Absolute Standards,

Graphic Scales BARS, MBO

MBO:

Indirect (non-performance

unless you make it so!)

Distribution:

Power, Performance, Equality Seniority, Effort

Ppl, work, tech linked to STRATEGY;

Plan Goals, Analyse Job

C

Stereotype Halo Recency

Café

Lump $ $

Content, SMART, Agree, Informal, Formal

Halo, Recency Central tendency

Strict/lenient Similarity, Force

Open

(7)

Eg.

Module 5: Job Design & Reactions to Work

Setbacks:

Scientific Management Setbacks:

Global competition Cutbacks

Ignoring employees Resistance

Ve

r

«

E

Choic

e Autonomy Responsibility

Critical Growth Need

Strength

JCM

Externally induced change (Mod 9)

SDTs

:

•8-20ppl, the right ppl

•Plan whole task

T

+ i di

it

$

rtical: Depth

E

nrichment

»

e of

procedure

s

Feedback Social Aspects

Skill Variety Task ID Task Significance Meaningfulness Knowledge States

•Team + indiv merit pay $

•Responsibility for quality and

quantity of discrete work unit

MGR facilitate SDTs Interaction:

s

Horizontal: Range “Enlargement”

Rotation, cross training Wea e tasks together

Skill Variety Task ID Task Significance (A-Z)

Job Content: Perception B4 Performance! To Deepen:

1 Feedback Critical

MGR facilitate SDTs Interaction: •Create

•Coach

•Believe in them

•Participation is a core value! •Teach problem solving

Participation

•Acceptance of delegated authority

•Motivation to contribute

MOD 1

Weave tasks together

1. Feedback 2. $ 4 Training 3. Schedule own work 4. Personalise 5. Control resources 6. Delegate authority

Critical

States

Teach problem solving

•Bonus 4 team + indiv •Psychological Involvement

Limits to Empowerment/Engagement: •High entry barriers •Loyal customers 7. Permit socialising

Sustain via Plan and Do

•Strategy not linked to participation •Low GNS or Unionised

•Patent protection

(8)

Eg.

Module 5: Team Approach to Job Design

Scientific management

Human Needs

Tavistock

Scientific management

– Task specialisation

Human Needs

– Coordination

– Growth

Basis

of Autonomous Work Team

•Whole significant task

STS

TavistockSocio-Technical Systems

Whole, significant task

•Cross-training †

•Select methods, schedules, new members

•Team + individual merit pay $

Principles

:

•8-20ppl

•Work Area Training only

T

+ i di

it

$

•Team + indiv merit pay $

•Responsibility for quality and

quantity of discrete work unit

Self-Directed Team

Outcomes

•High performance norms

•Conflict made useful

Thi i

h t it’

ll b t!

N

Conflict made useful

•Satisfy interpersonal relations

•Integrate technical work into social structure

This is what it’s all about!

M ti ti

Stage 4 Collaboration

CORE

Mod 6

Empower ment

Particip ation

Motivation

For

Autonomy

Relevance of

Participation

Motivation

To

Contribute

Acceptance

Of

Authority

Linked to R

ment ation

(9)

Eg.

Module 6: Workgroup Dynamics & Problem Solving

STS

Downsizing Project Team: short-lived, volunteer,

f f

Performing

SDTs

Upheaval DownsizingO Design (LADS) Reorganisation

Norming Storming

9) Forming l b

Mod 8 Team Development

(Tuckman)

quick selection, swift follow-up to mgmt

B uilding (Mod 9 Str Urgency O roles Stable Hierarchy P P P Trust/collaboration only by leader only by leader only by leader by all Str Expect a History Detecting process losses! Size Cohesion Behaviour Composition Disturbances Effort Mgr SDT Interpersonal attraction T-B Norms Membership stability New member socialisation

ations sto y (HOME) Mod 9 Status 1 P e process losses! 3 O GeneityHetero Mgr R Comply Conform Leadership Style (Mod 7) SDT Change Asymm Dev Homo

Accept delegated authority

Psychological Readiness Leadership Critic Hete r Goo d Clear,+ve Feedback erformance O Alignment Motivation Experience Resources Valid Achievable Valuable

Goals

Self-worth

Accept delegated authority Motivation to contribute R J-Involvement Mod 5&1 ID Int: Invulnerable Leadership Trait: Replace leader Process: Train or develop

leader

al Thinker

Role

roge

neity

d info flow outside

2 Mod 7 Cohesiveness Rationalise Mindguard Inherent morality Ext: Self-censorship Illusion of unanimity

Slag opposition P

Str = Maintenance= Structure

(10)

Eg.

Module 6: Workgroup Dynamics & Problem Solving

Coord

Team worker Managing Groups

Group Roles Ppl ppl

Finish

Team worker

Plant Resource

g g p

Tasks (initiating struct) • Technical

th d

Maintenance (consideration) • Emotional

satisfaction (Behavioural Leadership Mod 7)

Action

Monitor Finish

Implement

Shape Specialist

Trust

N G T

• methods • schedules

• quality assessment

• satisfaction • well-being • cohesiveness

Chi f N

Clarity Timed Recorded No evaluation

N G T

Clarify Clear aims

Ideas Evaluation

Chief Norms: • Creativity

• Problem solving

R

Reproduce

Distribute Isolated

Ppl Dominance

Self-censor Unclear aimsN

Comment Compile

Consensus Idea

Hindrances Complacency No balance

Timidity Status R

o V

alidation

(11)

Eg.

Module 6: Workgroup Dynamics & Problem Solving

Intergroup Collab-orating Normative Decisions: Use the best method

Intergroup

I D

ASCII A t/Q l/Ti i Freq/Qual « Interdependence»

Ve

rtic

al

when to involve the group (Vroom, Yetton, Jago)

OR: need Quality, A1 Sole Decision

Information exchange Integration Inter-de pen den ce orating ASCII Amt/Qual/Timing

∫dx

Collab/Unify l Coordination ( Security U Process Control (Mod 8) Subordinate commitment, Info unavailable N Y

A2 (seek info)

requirements Uncertainty Distinct

Groups

(Mod 8) Urgency

Task Force ≡ Liaison

Decouple Rules

(Mod 8) C1 (explain)

C2 (explain) G2

(communal)

Important unstructured problems

A = Alone C = Collaborate G = Group

R Equity Laggards: Effort Equity 1 2 3 Shrug p p Managing Conflict

Collaboration

/ Fear

∫(all needs)dx

Why compr

o

don’t want t

o Opponent h a mutually exc avoid hards h expediency . 2 4 g Responsibility Coord Complexity BMOD Compromising (win/win) Avoidance ccomodating (you win)

Forcing (I win)

risis opular

omise? Goals

im

o be more

asse

as equal powe

r lusive goals. C hip. T ime press Collaboration f a

Solutions: Best Tasks

360° review

R +

Avoidance (no one wins)

A

c

$

Cr Unpo
(12)

Eg.

Module 7: Power & Leadership

Authority (Ri ht) Influence

Init Str Consideration

P&L Pervades OB

X

(Right) Influence

(Process) Zone of

Indifference (Acceptance)

Resistance Charisma

SC

Logic

Persistance Empower Self control

Tr

ait Behavioural

Situational

Power (ability to alter without being altered)

Personal

O

(positional) R

Coercion Legitimate Referent Expert

Position Power Low LPC High

Task Relation

Fiedler’s Contingency: Effectiveness = f (behaviour, situation favourableness)

Expert

Conditions

Scarcity

Techniques Insurgency

Gain via

Resistance from

PC (Mod 9) Quality of

Relations (60%) Task Str (30%)

Power Task Relation

High Low

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FAVOURABLENESS

House’s Path-Goal (Expectancy)

Ability Participative (prob solv) •Scarcity

Absence of substitutes •Centrality •Uncertainty

• Insurgency • Whistle Blowing • Coalititions

• / & conquer With hold info

Npow Mod 1

Ability + NAch

Achievement-oriented (delegate)

Directive (plan, instruct)

Supportive (empathy)

Clarity

Challenge

R

m

ent

w

Political Results

Unacceptable Acceptable

Approved Productive work Whistle blowing Means and Ends:

Manage

m

Vi

ew Approved Productive work Whistle-blowing

Disapproved Degrading

a co-worker Ignoring SOPs for

(13)

Eg.

Module 7: Power and Leadership (Fiedler’s Contingency Theory in depth)

LPC T OL

R OL

P&L Pervades OB

LPC: T-OL or R-OL

SF: Situation favourableness

Position Power Strong Position Power Strong

Tr

a

Behavioural (Ohio State)

Initiating Structure Consideration

S

tructured

SF

Mod

SF

Mod

V

SF

Hi

SF

Hi

I

T-OL

ait

Pendulum of Situation

Change gthen the ng with g-term view

Structure

S

Position Power Weak Position Power Weak

Mod

VI

Hi

II

erlap

R-OL

LPC

Task Relation Task

High Low

FAVOURABLENESS

Change

Len

g

stri

n

lon

g

Ta

sk

tured

Position Power Strong Position Power Strong

SF

SF

Low

VII

SF

SF

Mod

III

Ov

e

T-OL

FAVOURABLENESS Stable Crisis

Low LPC (T-OL) people respond more quickly & with greater behavioural complexity to task-originating cues. Vice versa for High LPC (R-OL).

Unstruc

t

Position Power Weak Position Power Weak

SF

Low

VIII

VII

SF

Mod

IV

III

R-OL

LPC correlates with work dimensions and interplay among individuals in work situations. LPC does not affect group performance depending on situational favourableness

Quality of Relations

Poor Good

depending on situational favourableness

(14)

Eg.

Module 7: Power & Leadership

Entrepreneur: $ via Risk

P&L Pervades OB

$ via Risk

Idea Champ Sponsor Godfather

G H

Green House Intrapreneur

Interpersonal Leader

Chief Interpersonal Mintzberg1973 Chief

Liaison

Informational Decisional

Crisis M di ti

Role analysis & sequence

1973

Monitor Distribute Advocate Create

Crisis

BudgetMediation

Power ∞ Group ∞

Effectiveness

Mod 6 Mod 8

O Effectiveness

Leadership Neutralisers -expertise

Leadership Substitutes

t k & b di t T-OL

Person

Firm

Mod 6 Mod 8 -task & subordinate

characteristics -decision making

Neutralisers

(15)

Eg.

Module 8: Org Design & Service Driven Org

O Design

L b di i i Link subunits f i t t Boundaryless Firm

-Labour division -Authority delegation -Departmentalisation

-Functional -Territorial -Product Mechanisti c Organic V : Decision cycle time Supervise SOPs SO Outputs PA LIMS for consistent output Mgr contact Liaison Permanent grp Task force Task Authority Political Accounting Value-added 2 Views of Costs Knowledge trumps hierarchy

R 4↓decision

Product -Matrix -Span of control Sys 1(X) Sys 4(Y)

c

H: Workflow CO-ORDINATION:

Reduce uncertainty

CONTROL: Predetermined limits

Process Ext (defects) O Structure

Political

Identity Knowledge Xfer for

customer benefit R 4 ↓ decision cycle time

C i l R i

Decentralis

e

Centralise Decentralis

e

Rest of

Process – Ext (defects) – Int (SDTs) Results – MbO linked to strategy:

1 Goals

O Structure Conventional

Divisional Structure V&H Control Forced onto design

Responsive Simplify/delayer Wide span of control

Empowerment Team-based work

-Outsourcing -Inter O

C l t

e e

Marketing Legal Rest of

The Firm 2a Empl:

set methods

2b Mgr: give resources

3 Evaluate •WeaknessesProcess losses Intended

Strategic Outcomes Opportunities to protect market segments Threats Superior Products -Conglomerate -Strat. alliance -Strat. Bus. units

Off-shoring 3 Evaluate 4 Rewards Control Short cuts Paperwork Punishment overload •Strengths Employees Flexible Resourceful Committed Process losses Realised Core Competencies Excellent Service overload Keiretsu profit

World market price

(16)

Eg.

Module 8: Org Design & Service Driven Org

Competitive Advantage CUST

Factory Product Manager Tech Support Front

Line Ppl Participation Customer Translate

Tech to Fn’al Disturbance

Competitive Advantage CUST.

FRIENDLY SYSTEMS

Coord with Fn’al Mgr

s

?

Roles CUST BUSINESS MODEL

1. Point of Use 2. No Supervision 3. Labour Intensive 4. Tough to Measure 5. Cust. Participationp Svc prodn

efficiency

Cost, freq & complexity of customer interactions

pportunities

Service Principles 1) Classify Svcs

Outcome: Generic Routine Unique

Driven by Svc

1) Audit

interactions

Uncertainty & Skills Required

Sales O

p

Training: Low Medium High

Strategy ≡ Svc Offerings ∞ Skills 2) Organise Svc (CAS)

1) Audit

(Customer Allegiance Score)

3) $ Cust Empl

X

2) O Svc Strategy Customer

Allegiance

Cost

3) E Hi f S i d t t i R

3) $ ∞LoyaltyMoralep

X

4) Svc Improvement Programme + BMOD

Allegiance Score

(17)

Eg.

Module 9: Managing Culture, Transitions & Change

O Culture: Beliefs & Values Understood by Employees Shared Expectations O Culture: Beliefs & Values Understood by Employees, Shared Expectations

Mfg OLD Purpose

Svc NEW (2)

Merger (1)

Fit

Contributors: • Strength • Adaptability Culture

Philosophy Tradition

Culture Strategy Success

X

(3) Politics ↓

CEO

Socialisation (transmission mechanism) Respect

M d 7 Approachable role models

Open to improvement from ppl Strong

Adaptive

Culture

Goals

Financial (ROI)

Strategic (market share)

Makes a cohesive organisation Social

Mod 7

History

Exchange

Makes a cohesive organisation Shared values → Customer service Collaboration →process innovation

(employees & team members)

Coordination→reduced cycle time Change

Shifting

O Change

Fashion Advertising

Regulatory Agencies

Interest Groups

Computers Telecom

History

Oneness

Membership

Exchange

Coordination reduced cycle time

(empl, suppliers, distributors, customers)

Startup Rapid Growth

Steady Growth

Consolidation & Decline O Lifecycle

Job Design Support ppl

E

nvironmenta

l C

table

Firm

Legal Svcs Govt

Utilities g

Suppliers Customers

Competitors Control systems (PA)

Intrapreneur (Mod 7)

Formalised, complex, differentiated → → Environmental Complexity

E

Simple Complex

(18)

Eg.

Module 9: Managing Culture, Transitions & Change

O Development Planned Change (a process):

Holistic System-wide

Strategies Structures Processes Reinforcement

Development

Competitive Advantage Science

-Holistic -Detailed -Integrated -Wide spread

-Driven by data & measurement

Jick: Track Changes

+ Theory Y

=

δ

Trust

Respect

Authority (delegate)

Ppl change

T-group T-Building

1 Create dissatisfaction 2 ID process losses “Emo”

1 Create frustration 2 Vent

Maslow’s

Higher Thrive Change

Authority (delegate)

Communicate

Goals Strategy

Introduce New Technology

Redesign O

System-wide Process δ Steering Cmtee

1 Survey (Validity –

Grid OD Concern for Ppl &

1) Communicate

• Diagnose 2) Set Goals• ID top goals

Strategy Technology O

Induced Change Externally

1 Survey (Validity removes “Emo”) 2 Action Plan 3 Eval Diagnose

• Introduce groups • Intergroup

9,9 Team Mgmt 1,9Country

Club

• ID top goals • Plan to close gap • Measure &

critique process

Redesign Jobs

Retention

Programme BMOD via R

Internally Ppl

9,1 Authority-Obedience “Sci-Mgmt” 1,1 Impoverished

5,5 O Man

Mgmt •Time commitment

•One size fits all

Jobs Programme

(19)

Eg.

Module 9: Managing Culture, Transitions & Change

•Holistic

E t

C

Prerequisites:

Lewin Dailey

I t

l l

d ti it

JCM/PA f

b h i

Unfreeze

•Expert •Vision

•Behavioural science •Well-managed

Competitive

Advantage

q

Recognise need (dissatisfied) Vision (CEO)

Well-managed process • Diagnosis

• Resistance

• Select method

Internal: low productivity

External: competition

JCM/PA for behaviour

OD/Strategy

PC

Change

R f (action plan)

• Carry over •Evaluate

• Institutionalise Address unrealistic expectations Re-freeze

Institutionalise • Diffuse

Evaluation

Beware of Crises!

Grid OD Customer

measures (CAS)

Steering Committee

Action Plan (Measures)

Anecdotal (attitudes)

Knowledge & Skills

Depth

T-Building

System-wide (Surveys)

Firm measures -Productivity -Failure rate

Quality of PC -Cost -Time

(Measures) & Skills

OTJ Problem-Solving Skills

Personal Process O

T-Group

g

Failure rate -Costs -Absenteeism -Decision cycle time

-Process satisfaction

(20)

Eg.

Organisational Behaviour Visualised by James Kapron Visualised by James Kapron

Ottawa, Canada

while studying at Edinburgh Business School Donate & Share™

Visual learners register, store and recall by images. If you are a visual learner and this document facilitated your understanding, donate a minimum $20 Canadian by email to [email protected] contribution will

further develop and improve future versions. Request a printed and bound copy by email. Share this document. Enable visual learners.

References

Related documents