• No results found

Faber polynomial coefficient estimates for a new subclass of meromorphic bi-univalent functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Faber polynomial coefficient estimates for a new subclass of meromorphic bi-univalent functions"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Adv. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016:3 ISSN: 2050-7461

FABER POLYNOMIAL COEFFICIENT ESTIMATES FOR A NEW SUBCLASS OF MEROMORPHIC BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

ADNAN GHAZY ALAMOUSH, MASLINA DARUS∗

School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600 Selangor D. Ehsan, Malaysia

Copyright c2016 Alamoush and Darus. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.In this article, we introduce a new subclass of meromorphic bi-univalent functions and obtain the general coefficient estimates for such functions in this class. For this purpose, we use the Faber polynomial expansions. In certain cases, our estimates improve some of existing coefficient bounds.

Keywords:Meromorphic univalent functions; Meromorphic bi-univalent functions; Faber polynomial expansions.

2010 AMS Subject Classification:30C45.

1. Introduction

LetΣdenote the class of meromorphic univalent functions f of the form

f(z) =z+

n=0 bn

zn (1.1)

defined on the domain4={z:z∈C and 1<|z|<∞}. It is well known that every function

f ∈Σhas an inverse f−1, defined by

f−1(f(z)) =z,(z∈ 4),

Corresponding author Received August 30, 2015

(2)

and

f(f−1(w)) =w,(M<|w|<∞, M>0).

For f ∈Σgiven by (1.1), the inverse mapg= f−1 has the following Faber polynomial expan-sion:

f−1(w) =g(w) =w+

n=0 Bn

wn =w−b0−

b1 w −

b1b0+b2

w2 −

b21+b1b20+2b0b2+b3

w3 +...

=w−b0− ∞

n≥1

1

nK

n n+1

1

wn, (w∈ 4), (1.2)

where

Knn+1=nbn0−1b1+n(n−1)bn0−2b2+

1

2n(n−1)(n−2)b n−3

0 (b3+b 2 1)

+n(n−1)(n−2)(n−3)

3! b

n−4

0 (b4+3b1b2) +

k≥5

bn0−kVk,

(1.3)

andVk with 5≤k≤nis a homogeneous polynomial of degreek in the variablesb1,b2, ...,bn. (See [1], [2], and [3]).

Analogous to the bi-univalent analytic functions, a function f ∈Σis said to be meromorphic and bi-univalent if f−1∈Σ. The class of all meromorphic and bi-univalent functions is denoted byΣM.

The coefficient problem was investigated for various subclasses of the meromorphic univalent functions, for example, Schiffer [4] obtained the estimate |b2| ≤ 2

3 for meromorphic univalent

functions f ∈Σwithb0=0. In 1983, Duren [5] obtained the inequality|bn| ≤ n+12 for f ∈Σ withbk=0, 1≤k< n2. For the coefficient of the inverse of meromorphic univalent functions

g∈ΣM, Springer [6] proved that

|B3| ≤1 and |B3+

1 2B

2 1| ≤

1 2, and conjectured that

|B2n−1| ≤

(2n−1)!

n!(n−1)! (n=1,2, ...).

(3)

inverses of starlike univalent functions of orderα(0≤α <1)having m-fold gap series

repre-sentation. The interests in this direction is increasing. Recently, Hamidi et al. [11] introduced the following class of meromorphic bi-univalent functions f ∈Σ and used the Faber polyno-mial expansions to obtain bounds for the general coefficients|bn|of meromorphic bi-univalent functions in the classBΣ(α,λ).

2. Preliminaries

Definition 2.1. [11] For 0≤α <1 and λ ≥1, let BΣ(α,λ) be the class of meromorphic

bi-univalent functions f ∈Σso that:

(1−λ)f(z) z +λf

0(z)>

α, z∈ 4

and

(1−λ)g(w) w +λg

0(w)>

α, w∈ 4,

where the functiongis given by (1.2).

Theorem 2.1. [11]Let f be given by (1.1). For 0≤α <1 andλ ≥1 if f ∈BΣ(α;λ) and bk=0; 0≤k≤n−1,then:

|bn| ≤

2(1−α)

λ(n+1)−1; n≥1,

|b0| ≤

2(1−α)

λ−1 , |b1| ≤

2(1−α)

2λ−1 ,

|b2| ≤

2(1−α)

3λ−1 ,

and |b2+b0b1| ≤

2(1−α)

3λ−1 .

For functions f ∈Σin the form (1.1), we define the following new linear operator

D0λf(z) = f(z)

D1f(z) =D f(z) =z f0(z)

=z+

n=0

[−n]bn

zn, and

D2f(z) =D[D f(z)] =z+

n=0

[−n]2bn

(4)

hence, it can be easily seen that

Dkf(z) =D[Dk−1f(z)] =z+

n=0

[−n]kbn

zn, (k∈N0). (3.1)

For 0≤α <1, λ ≥0 and k∈N0, let BΣ(k,α,λ) be the class of meromorphic bi-univalent functions f ∈Σso that

(1−λ)Dkf(z) +λDk+1f(z) z

and

(1−λ)Dkg(w) +λDk+1g(w) w

where z,w∈ 4and the function g= f−1is given by (1.2).

In this paper, motivated by the previous works, we shall use the differential linear operator

Dkf(z)given above to obtain our results. Similar to the work done by [11], we use the Faber polynomial expansions to obtain bounds for the general coefficients |bn| of meromorphic bi-univalent functions inBΣ(k,α,λ).

3. Main results

Our first theorem introduces an upper bound for the coefficients |bn| of meromorphic bi-univalent functions inBΣ(k,α,λ).

Theorem 3.1. For0≤α <1, λ ≥1,and k∈N0, let f be given by (1.1). If f ∈BΣ(α;λ)and bk=0;(n−1≥k≥0), then

|bn| ≤

2(1−α)

[(n+1)λ−1]k

; n≥1. (3.1)

Proof.For meromorphic functions f ∈BΣ(k,α,λ)of the form (1.1), we have

(1−λ)Dkf(z) +λDk+1f(z)

z =1+

n=0

[1−λ(n+1)]k bn

zn+1, (3.2)

and for its inverse map,g= f−1,we have

(1−λ)Dkg(w) +λDk+1g(w)

w =1+

n=0

(5)

=1−(1−λ)kb0 w −

n=1

[1−λ(n+1)]k1 nK

n

n+1(b0,b2, ...,bn) 1

wn+1. (3.3)

On the other hand, since f ∈BΣ(k,α,λ)andg= f−1∈BΣ(k,α,λ), by definition, there exist

two positive real part functions

p(z) =1+

n=1

cnz−n∈Σ

and

q(w) =1+

n=1

dnw−n∈Σ,

whereℜ{p(z)}>0 andℜ{q(w)}>0 in4so that

(1−λ)Dkf(z) +λDk+1f(z)

z =α+ (1−α)p(z) =1+ (1−α) ∞

n=1

Kn1(c1,c2, ...,cn)z−n,

(3.4) and

(1−λ)Dkg(w) +λDk+1g(w)

w =α+ (1−α)q(w) =1+ (1−α) ∞

n=1

Kn1(d1,d2, ...,dn)w−n.

(3.5) Note that, by the Caratheodory Lemma (e.g., [5]),

|cn| ≤2 and |dn| ≤2 (n∈N).

Comparing the corresponding coefficients of (3.2) and (3.4), for anyn≥2, yields

(1−λ(n+1))kbn= (1−α)Kn1+1(c1,c2, ...,cn+1), (3.6)

and similarly, from (3.3) and (3.5) we find

(1−λ(n+1))kBn= (1−α)Kn1+1(d1,d2, ...,dn+1). (3.7)

Note that forbk=0; (0≤k≤n−1), we haveBn=−bnand so

(1−λ(n+1))kbn= (1−α)cn+1, (3.8)

and

(6)

Now taking the absolute values of the above equalities and applying the Caratheodory lemma, we obtain

|bn|=

(1−α)|cn+1| |[1−λ(n+1)]k|=

(1−α)|dn+1| |[1−λ(n+1)]k|≤

2(1−α)

[λ(n+1)−1]k.

which completes the proof of Theorem 3.1.

Remark 3.1.Let k=1, we have f ∈BΣ(1,α,λ) =BΣ(α,λ), Theorem 3.1 reduced to Theorem 1.1 in[11].

By imposing coefficient restrictions on Theorem 3.1, we capture the initial Taylor-Maclaurin coefficients of functions f inBΣ(k,α,λ)as well as a bound for the coefficient combination of

(b2+b0b1)in the following theorem:

Theorem 3.2.For0≤α<1, λ ≥1,and k∈N0, let f ∈BΣ(k,λ,α)be given by (1.1), then

(i)|b0| ≤

2(1−α)

(λ−1)k. (3.10)

(ii)|b1| ≤

2(1−α)

(2λ−1)k. (3.11)

(iii)|b2| ≤

2(1−α)

(3λ−1)k. (3.12)

(iv)|b2+b0b1| ≤

2(1−α)

(3λ−1)k. (3.13) Proof. Comparing Eqs. (3.2) and (3.4) forn=0,1,2,we obtain:

(1−λ)kb0= (1−α)c1, (3.14)

(1−2λ)kb1= (1−α)c2, (3.15)

and

(1−3λ)kb2= (1−α)c3, (3.16)

Also, from (3.3) and (3.5), forn=2 we have:

−(1−3λ)k(b2+b0b1) = (1−α)d3. (3.17)

Solving Eqs. (3.14), (3.15), (3.16) and (3.17) forb0,b1,b2and(b2+b0b1), respectively, taking their absolute values and then applying the Caratheodory Lemma, we obtain:

|b0| ≤(1−α)|c1| |(1−λ)k| ≤

2(1−α)

(7)

|b1| ≤

(1−α)|c2| |(1−2λ)k| ≤

2(1−α)

(2λ−1)k,

|b2| ≤

(1−α)|c3| |(1−3λ)k| ≤

2(1−α)

(3λ−1)k,

and

|b2+b0b1| ≤

(1−α)|d3| |(1−3λ)k| ≤

2(1−α)

(3λ−1)k.

Remark 3.2 From the above discussion it is understood that the estimates of b0,b1,b2 and

(b2+b0b1)in Theorem 3.2 is the same as the corresponding estimates of Theorem 1.2 in[11], when k=1.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge and appreciate the financial support received from MO-HE: FRGSTOPDOWN/2013/ST06/UKM/01/1.

REFERENCES

[1] H. Airault, A. Bouali, Differential calculus on the Faber polynomials, Bull. Sci. Math. 130 (2006), 179-222. [2] H. Airault, J. Ren, An algebra of differential operators and generating functions on the set of univalent

functions, Bull. Sci. Math. 126 (2002), 343-367.

[3] P. G. Todorov, On the Faber polynomials of the univalent functions of class Σ, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 162 (1991), 268-276.

[4] M. Schiffer, Sur un probl `emed,xtr´emum de la repr´esentation conforme, Bull. Soc. Math. France. 66 (1938), 48-55.

[5] P. L. Duren, Univalent functions, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 259, Springer, New York, (1983).

[6] G. Springer, The coefficient problem for schlicht mappings of the exterior of the unit circle, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 70 (1951), 421-450.

[7] Y. Kubota, Coefficients of meromorphic univalent functions, K ¯odai Math. Sem. Rep. 28 (1976), 253-261. [8] G. Schober, Coefficients of inverses of meromorphic univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 67 (1977),

(8)

[9] G. P. Kapoor, A. K. Mishra , Coefficient estimates for inverses of starlike functions of positive order, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 329 (2007), 922-934.

[10] H. M. Srivastava, A. K. Mishra, S. N. Kund, Coefficient estimates for the inverses of starlike functions represented by symmetric gap series, Panamer. Math. J. 21 (2011), 105-123.

References

Related documents

(The texts of Stravinsky’s Cantata [1952] were selected from vol. 1 of the same anthology. See Craft, “Selected Source Material from ‘A Catalogue of Books and Music Inscribed

In the period from 2005 to 2012, phoma stem canker was found on winter or spring oilseed rape crops in 14 out of 16 provinces sampled, including Anhui, Guizhou, Henan, Hubei,

The purpose of this paper is to investigate relationships between individual depositor behaviors, as to whether they will withdraw all of their deposits, and

cryptorchidism, the testicular pathology caused by hormonal imbalance was bilateral; a total of 71% of scrotal testes had a reduced number of germ cells and 75% showed

: Oral and written language abilities of XXY boys: Implications for anticipatory guidance.. Abstract: Pediatric

Work activities and tasks of healthcare workers including repetition, contact stress, forceful contraction, awkward postures, and sustained position were associated

Introduction: Bone marrow (BM) is a known source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that are used for cell therapy.. This study attempts to identify if the Wharton’s Jelly (WJ) is