• No results found

Composition operators from the Bloch space into the spaces QT

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Composition operators from the Bloch space into the spaces QT"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

PII. S0161171203207122 http://ijmms.hindawi.com © Hindawi Publishing Corp.

COMPOSITION OPERATORS FROM THE BLOCH SPACE

INTO THE SPACES

Q

T

PENGCHENG WU and HASI WULAN

Received 10 July 2002

Suppose that ϕ(z)is an analytic self-map of the unit disk∆. We consider the boundedness of the composition operatorfrom Bloch spaceᏮinto the spaces QT(QT ,0) defined by a nonnegative, nondecreasing functionT (r )on 0≤r <∞.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 30D50, 47B38, 46E15.

1. Introduction. Let∆= {z:|z|<1}be the unit disk of complex planeC and letH()be the space of all analytic functions in∆. Fora∈∆, Green’s func-tion with logarithmic singularity ata∈∆is denoted byg(z, a)=log|(1−az)/¯

(a−z)|. For 0< p <∞, the spaceQpconsists of all functionsfanalytic in∆

for which

sup

a∈

f(z)2g(z, a)pdA(z) <∞, (1.1)

wheredA(z)is the Euclidean area element on∆.

Qp-spaces have been investigated by many authors (cf. [1,2,3,9]). We know thatQ1=BMOA, the space of all analytic functions of bounded mean

oscilla-tion (cf. [4]). Further, the spacesQpare the same for eachp∈(1,∞), and each space equals to the Bloch spaceᏮ, which is a Banach space with the norm

fᏮ:=f (0)+fb:=f (0)+sup z∈

1−|z|2f(z). (1.2)

Recently, we introduced a new space QT (cf. [5, 10]) by a nondecreasing functionT (r )on 0≤r <∞as follows.

Definition1.1. LetT (r )0 be a nonnegative, nondecreasing function on

0≤r <∞. A functionf∈H()is said to belong toQT if

f2

QT:=sup

a∈

f(z)2Tg(z, a)dA(z) <∞. (1.3)

If

lim

|a|→1

f(z)2Tg(z, a)dA(z)=0, (1.4)

(2)

For 0< p <∞, if we takeT (r )=rp, the spaceQT coincides with the space Qp. We note thatQT⊂Ꮾfor all nondecreasing functionsT. We have previously shown thatQT=Qpunder certain growth conditions onT (r )(cf. [10]).

In the present paper, first we give some basic properties ofQTspaces, some of which are also new for the special caseQT=Qp. For example,QTis a Banach space with the normfT defined by

fT:=f (0)+fQT. (1.5)

Then we investigate the boundedness of the composition operators from the Bloch spaceᏮintoQT orQT ,0. These results extend some previously known

results (cf. [6,8]).

2. Basic properties ofQT spaces. We give the following propositions.

Proposition2.1. The spaceQT is a subspace of the Bloch spaceᏮ.

The proof ofProposition 2.1can be found in [10].

Proposition2.2. The spaceQT is a Banach space with the norm defined

in (1.5).

Proof. Forf∈QT anda∈∆, define

I2(f , a):=

f(z)2Tg(z, a)dA(z). (2.1)

Letf1, f2∈QT. It follows from Schwarz’s inequality that

f

1(z)f2(z)T

g(z, a)dA(z)≤If1, aIf2, a, (2.2)

and then

I2f1+f2, a

≤I2f1, a

+2If1, a

If2, a

+I2f2, a

=If1, a+If2, a2.

(2.3)

Thus,I(f1+f2, a)≤I(f1, a)+I(f2, a)for alla∈∆. Hence

f1+f2QT ≤f1QT+f2QT. (2.4)

Therefore,

f1+f22T=

f1(0)+f2(0)+f1+f2QT 2

≤f1(0)+f2(0)+f1QT+f2QT 2

=f1T+f2T

2

,

(3)

that is,f1+f2T≤ f1T+f2T. On the other hand, it is obvious thatfT≥

0 for eachf ∈QT and thatfT =0 if and only iff≡0. It is obvious that cfT= |c|ffor any constantc. Thus,QT is a normed space.

Letf∈QT and letφa(w)=(a−w)/(1−aw)¯ ,a∈∆. Then by changing a variablew=φa(z), we obtain

f2

QT

f(z)2Tg(z, a)dA(z)

=

f◦φa(w)2T

log 1

|w| dA(w) ≥T

log1

r |w|<r

f◦φa(w)2dA(w)

≥π r2T

log1

r 1−|a|

22f(a)2

.

(2.6)

Forr0, 0< r0<1, such thatT (log(1/r0))=0, we have

fb≤

fQT

r0π Tlog 1/r01/2

. (2.7)

Sincef∈QT⊂Ꮾ, we have forz∈∆,

f (z)≤f (0)+fb

2 log 1+|z|

1−|z|

≤f (0)+ fQT

2r0π Tlog1/r01/2

log1+|z| 1−|z|

≤ fT

1+ 1 2r0

π Tlog 1/r0 1/2

log1+|z| 1−|z|.

(2.8)

Suppose{fn}is a Cauchy sequence inQT. Then there is a constantM >0 such that

fnT≤M, n=1,2, . . . . (2.9)

By the estimate (2.8) for a fixedr0∈(0,1), we obtain that

fn(z)≤M

1+ 1

2r0π Tlog 1/r01/2 

log1+|z|

1−|z| (2.10)

holds for all integral numbersn=1,2, . . . .Hence, there exist a subsequence

{fnj(z)}of{fn(z)}and an analytic functionfdefined on the unit disk∆such that both{fnj(z)}and{fnj(z)}converge uniformly tof andf

, respectively.

(4)

compact subsets of∆by inequality (2.10). By Fatou’s lemma, we get that

f(z)2Tg(z, a)dA(z)

=

jlim→∞f

nj(z) 2

Tg(z, a)dA(z)

lim inf

j→∞

f

nj(z) 2

Tg(z, a)dA(z)

lim inf

j→∞ fnj 2

QT ≤M 2

(2.11)

holds for alla∈∆, so thatf∈QT. By a similar reasoning, we can prove that

fn−fT→0 asn→ ∞. The proof ofProposition 2.2is complete.

3. Boundedness of composition operators. Letϕ(z) be an analytic self-map of the unit disk∆. Let the composition operator induced byϕfrom

H()to itself be defined byCϕ(f )=f◦ϕforf∈H(). The boundednesses of composition operators fromᏮto itself and fromᏮtoQphave been studied in [6, 8], respectively. In this paper, we consider the same problems for the general spacesQT.

Theorem 3.1. LetT (r )≡0be a nonnegative, nondecreasing function on

0≤r <∞and letϕbe an analytic self-map of. ThenCϕ:Ꮾ→QTis bounded if and only if

sup

a∈

ϕ(z)2

1−ϕ(z)22

Tg(z, a)dA(z) <∞. (3.1)

Proof. Let (3.1) hold and letK12(K1>0)be the supremum in (3.1). Iff,

then for alla∈∆, we have

Cϕf(z)2Tg(z, a)dA(z)

=

fϕ(z)2ϕ(z)2Tg(z, a)dA(z)

≤ f2

b

ϕ(z)2

1−ϕ(z)22

Tg(z, a)dA(z)

≤K2 1f2b.

(3.2)

Consequently,CϕfQT ≤K1fb. Sincef (z)∈Ꮾ, we obtain

Cϕf2T=f◦ϕ(0)+CϕfQT2

≤f (0)+fb

2 log

1+ϕ(0)

1−ϕ(0)+K1fb

2

≤K2f (0)+fb

2

=K2f2 Ꮾ,

(5)

whereK=max{1, K1+(1/2)log(1+ |ϕ(0)|)/(1− |ϕ(0)|)}. Thus,CϕfT KfᏮ, which shows that:Ꮾ→QT is bounded.

Conversely, assume that :Ꮾ→QT is bounded, there exists a constant

K >0 such that for eachf∈Ꮾ, we have

CϕfT≤Kf. (3.4)

On the other hand, by a result in [7], there existf1, f2Ꮾsuch that

1

1−|z|2≤f

1(z)+f2(z) (3.5)

holds for allz∈∆, so that

ϕ(z)2

1−ϕ(z)22

2f1◦ϕ(z)2+2f2◦ϕ(z)2. (3.6)

Thus, the inequalities

ϕ(z)2

1−ϕ(z)22

Tg(z, a)dA(z)

2

f1◦ϕ (z)2

+f2◦ϕ

(z)2

Tg(z, a)dA(z)

2K2f1 2 Ꮾ+f2

2 Ꮾ

(3.7)

hold for allz, a∈∆, which establishes (3.1). The proof ofTheorem 3.1is com-pleted.

Remark3.2. Note that if:, then (3.1) holds for any increasing

functionT satisfyingQT =Ꮾ. Indeed, we know that QT =Ꮾ (see [5]) if and only if

1

0T

log

1

r

1−r22r dr <∞. (3.8)

The Schwarz-Pick lemma guarantees that((1−|z|2)/(1−|ϕ(z)|2))|ϕ(z)| ≤1,

so that (3.8) leads easily to (3.1). It means that:ᏮᏮis always bounded (cf. [6]).

Remark3.3. If one considers the composition operatorfrom the Bloch

space to the Dirichlet space

=f∈H():

f(z)2dA(z) <∞, (3.9)

then:ᏮᏰis bounded if and only if

ϕ(z)2

1−ϕ(z)22

(6)

For the spacesQT ,0, we have the following results.

Theorem3.4. LetT (r )be a nonnegative, nondecreasing function on 0 r <∞and letϕbe an analytic self-map of. ThenCϕ:Ꮾ→QT ,0is bounded if and only if

lim

|a|→1

ϕ(z)2

1−ϕ(z)22

Tg(z, a)dA(z)=0. (3.11)

Proof. Suppose:Ꮾ→QT ,0is bounded. Using a way similar to the proof

ofTheorem 3.1, we choose functionsf1, f2Ꮾsuch that

1

1−|z|2≤f1(z)+f2(z) (3.12)

for allz∈∆. ThenCϕf1andCϕf2belong toQT ,0. Therefore,

lim

|a|→1

ϕ(z)2

1−ϕ(z)22

Tg(z, a)dA(z)

2 lim

|a|→1

f1◦ϕ (z)2

+f2◦ϕ

(z)2

Tg(z, a)dA(z)=0,

(3.13)

which shows that (3.11) holds.

Conversely, byTheorem 3.1, we know that:Ꮾ→QT is bounded since condition (3.11) implies that

sup

a∈

ϕ(z)2

1−ϕ(z)22

Tg(z, a)dA(z) <∞. (3.14)

We need only to prove thatCϕf∈QT ,0for eachf∈Ꮾ, and this follows from

the inequality

f(z)2

Tg(z, a)dA(z)

=

fϕ(z)2

ϕ(z)2Tg(z, a)dA(z)

≤ f2

b

ϕ(z)2

1−ϕ(z)22

Tg(z, a)dA(z).

(3.15)

The proof ofTheorem 3.4is completed.

Acknowledgments. The essential part of this paper was written when the

(7)

References

[1] R. Aulaskari and P. Lappan,Criteria for an analytic function to be Bloch and a harmonic or meromorphic function to be normal, Complex Analysis and Its Applications (Hong Kong, 1993), Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser., vol. 305, Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, 1994, pp. 136–146.

[2] R. Aulaskari, H. Wulan, and R. Zhao,Carleson measures and some classes of mero-morphic functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.128(2000), no. 8, 2329–2335. [3] R. Aulaskari, J. Xiao, and R. H. Zhao,On subspaces and subsets of BMOA and UBC,

Analysis15(1995), no. 2, 101–121.

[4] A. Baernstein II,Analytic functions of bounded mean oscillation, Aspects of Con-temporary Complex Analysis (Proc. NATO Adv. Study Inst., Univ. Durham, Durham, 1979), Academic Press, London, 1980, pp. 3–36.

[5] M. Essén and H. Wulan,On analytic and meromorphic functions and spaces of QK-type, to appear in Illinois J. Math.

[6] K. Madigan and A. Matheson,Compact composition operators on the Bloch space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.347(1995), no. 7, 2679–2687.

[7] W. Ramey and D. Ullrich,Bounded mean oscillation of Bloch pull-backs, Math. Ann. 291(1991), no. 4, 591–606.

[8] W. Smith and R. Zhao,Composition operators mapping into theQpspaces,

Anal-ysis17(1997), no. 2-3, 239–263.

[9] H. Wulan,On some classes of meromorphic functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. Diss. (1998), no. 116, 1–57.

[10] H. Wulan and P. Wu,Characterizations ofQT spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl.254

(2001), no. 2, 484–497.

Pengcheng Wu: Department of Mathematics, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China

E-mail address:[email protected]

Hasi Wulan: Department of Mathematics, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong 515063, China

References

Related documents