• No results found

Overweight and Obesity in Nevada. Overweight and Obesity in Nevada. Public Health Issue. Overview. Background BRFSS. Objective 9/5/2013

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Overweight and Obesity in Nevada. Overweight and Obesity in Nevada. Public Health Issue. Overview. Background BRFSS. Objective 9/5/2013"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Overweight and Obesity

in Nevada

Department of Health and Human Services Division of Public and Behavioral Health Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

and

Office of Public Health Informatics and Epidemiology

A Comparison of Behavioral Risk Factor

Surveillance System and Department of Motor

Vehicles Data

Brian Sandoval, Governor State of Nevada

Aug 2013 1.0

Richard Whitley, MS, Administrator Division of Public and Behavioral Health Michael J Willden, Director

Department of Health and Human Services

Tracey Green, MD, Medical Health Officer Division of Public and Behavioral Health

Overweight and Obesity

in Nevada

Adel Mburia-Mwalili, MPH

Office of Public Health Informatics and Epidemiology

John Whitehill, Jr., MPH

Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

A Comparison of Behavioral Risk Factor

Surveillance System and Department of Motor

Vehicles Data

Overview

Problem statement

Objective

Background

Analysis

Results

Conclusion

Questions

3

Public Health Issue

Obesity is a major public health issue

affecting adults and children.

Being overweight or obese increases

the risk of various health conditions.

In 2012, 62.5% Nevada adults were

overweight or obese compared to 64.2%

nationwide.

1

4

Objective

To explore whether body mass index

(BMI) computed from DMV data is

comparable to BMI from BRFSS data.

5

Background

BRFSS

Established in 1984 by CDC

Largest health survey system in the

world

Cross-sectional, state-based survey

Used widely to monitor public health

(2)

Background

BRFSS

Core and optional modules and

state-added questions

Gathers information on:

Chronic diseases and conditions

Health-risk behaviors

Emerging health problem

Preventive services

7

Background

DMV

Nevada’s DMV records release to third parties

is governed by NRS 481.063.

Some entities that can access DMV data

include:

Government agencies

Researchers

Car insurance companies

Dealers of motor vehicles

Employers

Private investigators

Reporters

8

Background

DMV

Information available on DMV data

include:

Name

Date of Birth

Height

Weight

Mailing and physical address

Date of issuance

Sex

9

BRFSS and DMV Data

Inaccurate height and weight

Under reporting for weight and BMI

3,5,6

Over reporting of height

3,5,6

Underestimating overweight and obesity

6

10

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Body mass index =

Example:

Weight = 68 kg, Height = 165 cm (1.65m)

BMI calculation: 68 ÷ (1.65)

2

= 24.98

11

BMI Interpretation

CDC’s standard weight status categories

2

BMI

Weight Status

Below 18.5

Underweight

18.5 – 24.9

Healthy Weight

25.0 – 29.9

Overweight

30.0 and Above

Obese

(3)

DMV Data Analysis

2,154,289 2,141,540 1,852,583 1,843,801

In 2012, 2,154,289 total records

The following records were

excluded:

• Issue years 1976-2007

• Duplicates

• No Nevada physical address

Ages 10-19 years

Biologically implausible values

for height and BMI

13

Results

Overall, BRFSS and DMV BMI

estimates appear similar.

BMI differences by sex

DMV male estimates are within

BRFSS confidence intervals (CIs)

Only overweight DMV female estimate

is within the BRFSS CIs

14

2.6%

37.2%

35.7%

24.5%

1.8%

39.0%

36.9%

22.3%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Underweight

Healthy

 

Weight

Overweight

Obese

BRFSS

DMV

Nevada: BRFSS 2011 vs. DMV

2008-2012

15

Nevada: BRFSS 2011 vs. DMV

2008-2012 (by Sex)

30.1%

42.8%

25.5%

0.6%

28.3%

46.0%

25.2%

3.7%

45.1%

27.9%

23.4%

3.1%

49.9%

27.7%

19.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Underweight Healthy Weight

Overweight Obese Underweight Healthy Weight Overweight Obese BRFSS DMV Male Female 16

Clark : BRFSS 2011 vs. DMV

2008-2012

2.8%

37.7%

35.5%

24.0%

1.9%

39.2%

36.6%

22.2%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Underweight

Healthy

 

Weight

Overweight

Obese

BRFSS

DMV

17

Washoe : BRFSS 2011 vs. DMV

2008-2012

38.2%

36.5%

23.2%

1.6%

41.2%

37.2%

20.0%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Underweight Healthy

 

Weight

Overweight

Obese

BRFSS

DMV

(4)

Strengths of BRFSS data

Sampling is representative

Data is collected in all 50 states DC,

Guam, and U.S. Virgin Islands

Data is collected annually

Data is readily available

19

Strengths

of DMV data

Overall estimates similar to BRFSS,

however, by sex estimates are different

Provides adequate counts for analysis in

all Nevada counties

Height and weight data for individuals

aged 10 + years

Minimal cost for acquiring data

Street address

20

Limitations

BRFSS

Self-report

Small counts for

counties

Persons without phones

DMV

Self-report

Seasonal residents

Persons without a

license or ID card

21

Conclusion

BRFSS is a good source for health

data.

All self-reported data is subject to

bias.

Nevada DMV renewal form contains

height and weight items.

22

Acknowledgement

Chronic Disease and Prevention Section

for funding this work through the following

grants:

Diabetes Prevention and Control CDC grant

Oral Health CDC grant

Coordinated Chronic Disease Prevention and

Health Promotion CDC grant

23

Thank you!

(5)

Questions?

25

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data.Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at:

http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/display.asp?cat=OB&yr=2012&qkey=8261&state=NV 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About BMI for Adults. Available at; http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/childrens_bmi/about_childrens_bmi.html 3. Li C, Balluz LS, Ford ES, Okoro CA, Zhao G, Pierannunzi C. (2012). A comparison of prevalence

estimates for selected health indicators and chronic diseases or conditions from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the National Health Interview Survey, and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2008.Prev Med.2012 Jun;54(6):381-7.

4. Morris DS, Schubert SS, Ngo DL, Rubado D, Main E, Douglas JP. (2013) DMV records are valuable for monitoring obesity in Oregon. Oregon Health Authority Environmental Public Health Tracking. Available at:

http://public.health.oregon.gov/HealthyEnvironments/TrackingAssessment/EnvironmentalPublicHealthTrack ing/Documents/Reports/EPHT_DMV_obesity_tracking.pdf

5. NIH, NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Available online:

http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/ob_gdlns.pdf

6. Ossiander EM, Emanuel I, O'brien W, Malone K. (2004). Driver's licenses as a source of data on height and weight. Econ Hum Biol. 2004 Jun;2(2):219-27.

7. Yun S, Zhu BP, Black W, Brownson RC. (2006). A comparison of national estimates of obesity prevalence from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Int J Obes(Lond) 30(1):164-70.

26

Contact Information

Adel Mburia-Mwalili

4126 Technology Way Suite 200

Carson City, NV 89706

Telephone: 775-684-4149

Email: amburia@health.nv.gov

References

Related documents

Since this study was grounded in the relationship among opportunity recognition beliefs, perceived entrepreneurial capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation,

We discover and document errors in public use microdata samples ("PUMS files") of the 2000 Census, the 2003-2006 American Community Survey, and the 2004-2009 Current

In the event of a Triggering Event or termination pursuant to this Paragraph, then: (i) within fifteen (15) business days, the Settlement Fund (including accrued interest),

Wie sich hier zeigt, hat sich die Vorschaltung einer Basismessung bewährt: Die Rekrutierung der Befragten für die Basismessung war in der Tat beschwerlich (und die

TMI TEERA-MONGKOL INDUSTRY PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED อัตรา2 หุ้นเดิมต่อ 1 ใบสําคัญแสดงสิทธิ ระยะเวลาการใช้สิทธิ :

Participants were asked once again to review the applicant’s résumé information and biographical information blank responses, and then evaluate the applicant on personality

Rape Trials, Medical Texts and the Threat Of Female Speech: The Perverse Female Rape Complainant..

At the core of our new auction design is a modular price update rule that only relies on samples from the auction- eer’s valuation model, rather than a specific analytic form as used