• No results found

Quality and cross-border collaboration: Priority areas for action

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Quality and cross-border collaboration: Priority areas for action"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Quality and cross-border collaboration:

Priority areas for action

Dr Matthias Wismar

(2)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

(3)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Eurohealth on cross-border collaboration

• Regulatory procedures of doctors

• Disease management across borders

• The role of discharge summaries

• Cross-border recognition of medecines prescriptions

• Patient information for hospital choice?

• Intro-European retiremement migrants

• Risk communication for cross-border health threats

• Cross-border hospital collaboration

• Telemedicine solutions

• Cross-border dental care

(4)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Overview

The expert panel

The problem

cross-border cooperation and collaboration

Areas of existing and potential benefits

areas where there is the potential for successful

cooperation

Areas that could benefit from more cooperation and

collaboration

Obstacles

Priority areas for EU

(5)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Expert Panel on Effective Ways of

Investing in Health

Expert Panel’s mission is to provide the Commission with

sound and independent advice in the form of opinions in

response to questions (mandates) submitted by the

Commission on matters related to health care

modernisation, responsiveness, and sustainability. The

advice does not bind the Commission.

Mandate cross-border collaboration

Dec 2014-April 2015, appoved on 29 July 2015

The members of the Working Group are:

Expert Panel members:

Prof Helmut Brand, Prof Lasse Lehtonen

(Chair/Rapporteur) Dr Dorjan Marušič, Prof Martin McKee

External experts:

Dr Luigi Bertinato, Mr Willy Palm, Dr Matthias

Wismar

(6)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

The Expert Panel: Mandate

3. Cross-border cooperation

Can the Expert Panel identify areas which would

benefit from greater formal cross-border

co-operation and collaboration in healthcare

provision, or can they propose a methodology for

such identification to be carried out? This should

have a particular focus on service configuration in

border regions, but could also consider issues

(7)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Problem: Major health and safety risks

in cross-border care

complications requiring follow-up care

discontinuity of medical documentation

uninformed decision-making

There is a clear need to undertake targeted research

to assess how best to achieve the potential

benefits of increased cross-border care and

minimize any problems

(8)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Problem: Large variations across Europe

Terminology

Revalidation

Fitness to practice

Issue of transparency of data concerning

pharmaceuticals and medical devices

consistency of information contained in discharge

summaries

birth registration and citizenship that arose in the

event of a mother giving birth in another MS

(9)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

• Three analytical levels

– System

– Organizations

– Clinical practice

• Limists

– Snapshot in a very dynamic field

– Effects of configurations

– Weighing

Results:

– Vast differences in

• The use of different mechanims

• The start of the policies

• The implementation

Problem: Differences in

(10)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Extend and nature of existing and potential benefits

in cross-border cooperation and collaboration

Poor documentation

on the scale of the phenomenon,

the types of patients involved,

the services and goods that they receive, and

the monetary implications of their movement

At present there are no financial incentives for Member States

to implement the directive

Potential benefits

greater choice for patients

improved professional and vocational education and training for the

personnel,

better mobility for health professionals, and

quicker response to medical emergencies in geographical proximity.

(11)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

areas where there is the potential for successful

cooperation

To ensure that effective policies exist to ensure

the quality of care within each country

Specific measures are needed to strengthen

cross-border care. Patients coming with sufficient

information.

The third step involves measures related to

aftercare, Patients leaving with sufficient

information

(12)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Areas which could potentially benefit from greater

formal cross-border cooperation and collaboration,

especially concerning service configuration in border

regions

bilateral agreements between

Member States or their health

insurance companies

where there are large tourist

inflows, both during the summer

and winter seasons.

(13)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Obstacles to successful cross-border

cooperation in health care

Lack of information is a major barrier.

differences in interpretation of the Directive. This is a particular concern

in relation to prior authorisation

Payment mechanisms are another obstacle

Better communication to all citizens within the EU on their rights to

health care when they have to access health care facilities in another

Member State has to be guaranteed.

Medical tourism is marketed primarily at those who can afford to pay for

it, thereby creating health inequalities in Europe, where universal health

care coverage is the key to the development of a social framework that

benefits all European Citizens.

The EHIC, introduced to facilitate access to care when needed, is not

always working as intended.

These include measures to increase consistency of discharge summaries,

including agreement on core content.

(14)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

Priorties of actions at EU level

systems to provide data on the number of patients

moving, the types of treatment they are receiving,

any problems they are experiencing, and examples of

how these can be overcome.

a need to understand better the implications of

variations in access to certain key diagnostics,

therapies and costly medications among Member

States. Research on this topic is still limited.

questions about the role of equity and solidarity in

health care in Europe. To what extent is it acceptable

that access to life-saving and sustaining treatments

vary between countries?

(15)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

raise awareness and understanding of

entitlements t

• creating an explicit European policy to maximise the benefits of cross-border collaboration;

• implement more effective and targeted communication strategies on the benefits of cross border collaboration with patient and professional

organisations;

• create mechanisms to support sharing of best practice among National Contact Points;

• explore the scope to create a mandate for the commission to fund European Reference Networks;

• create mechanisms to share best practice in areas such as medical records,

prescriptions and e-Health, to improve collaboration between those working in different health systems;

• encourage national and regional authorities to establish mechanisms to strengthen continuity of care across borders; Cross-border Cooperation

• establish mechanisms to understand better the variations that exist in clinical practice and, where they are not supported by evidence, how these can be overcome;

(16)

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies 16

We have come a long way, talking now

about quality in cross-border health care

Kohll and Decker (1998)

Think about the positive repercussions of cross-border healthcare

on health systems in Member States

servatory on Health Systems

References

Related documents

ZOMI BudKufaomfvnf; SRBA (Sihzang) ZBA, (Zo) TTVBA (Thado) wdkYudk CHIN BAPTIST CONVENTION rSmusefao;onf/ 1995 ckESpf. cGgqwf&Gmtpnf;ta0;rSm a&G;cs,frnfhtzGJUcsKyf

Violations of academic integrity include, but are not limited to, the following actions: cheating on an exam, plagiarism, working together on an assignment, paper or project when

Motivated by the research challenges and the above mapping application, the overall objective of this dissertation is to develop an adaptive sampling method using mobile

If breastfeeding by itself doesn’t effectively remove the thickened inspissated milk, then manual expression of the milk, or the use of an efficient breast pump after feeds will

The overall purpose of this study was to examine teacher perceptions of their professional training to teach students with autism spectrum disorder and the relationships

Concur: The peer review process has been strengthened to ensure documentation of corrective action completion is included in the Peer Review Committee minutes. We recommended

The Options Program: Skilled and Intermediate Care Services - If an assessment determines that the older adult needs a nursing home level of care, and he or she can be

In line with previous evidence and conditioning on a host of fixed effects that control for factors such as differences in the price and quantity of imports specific to firms as well