• No results found

Forecasting in a Windstorm. The Forecasting in a Windstorm webinar will begin shortly.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Forecasting in a Windstorm. The Forecasting in a Windstorm webinar will begin shortly."

Copied!
19
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

hsmai.org

If you need technical assistance with the

webcast, contact us at

hsmai@commpartners.com

and we will assist you immediately.

The

The

Forecasting in a Windstorm

Forecasting in a Windstorm

webinar will begin shortly.

webinar will begin shortly.

1

Tuesday, February 3

Tuesday, February 3

rdrd

, 2009

, 2009

2:00

2:00

3:00 PM EST

3:00 PM EST

Hospitality Sales and Marketing

Association International (HSMAI)

Forecasting in a Windstorm

(2)

hsmai.org hsmai.org 3

Overview of Format and Topic

Overview of Format and Topic



Moderator

Barb Taylor Carpender, CMM, CHSC

Managing Director, HSMAI University

hsmai.org hsmai.org

4 hsmai.org

HSMAI University Alliance Partner

(3)

hsmai.org hsmai.org 5

HSMAI University Alliance Partner

HSMAI University Alliance Partner

POLL QUESTION #1

POLL QUESTION #1

How many people are participating in this webinar at your location today?

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8 or more

(4)

hsmai.org

Jan D. Freitag

Vice President, Global Development

SMITH TRAVEL RESEARCH

jan@smithtravelresearch.com www.smithtravelresearch.com

R. Mark Woodworth

President PKF International mark.woodworth@pkfc.com www.pkfc.com

Today

Today

s Presenters

s Presenters

7

hsmai.org

US LODGING INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

Jan D. Freitag Vice President

(5)

Thoughts about ALIS

“Fear and Loathing in San Diego”

JP Morgan

“…transient demand, (is) a

‘downward death spiral’…”

JP Morgan

“…miserable 2009 management guidance …”

Baird

“…RevPAR still a ‘falling knife’ “

Deutsche Bank 9 85.6 93.1 102.9 112.1 103.5 102.6 105.3 113.7 122.7 133.4 139.4 17.0 20.9 22.1 22.5 16.2 14.2 12.8 16.7 22.6 26.6 28.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Revenue Income

Total United States

Estimated Revenue and Profitability Years 1997 - 2007

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

(6)

85.22 83.99 86.24 90.90 103.91 97.31 82.86 82.75 87.64 89.03 91.06 93.48 96.65 99.77 85.22 102.76 80 90 100 110 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Nominal ADR Yr 2000, Grown by CPI

If year 2000 ADR had increased by CPI each year…

It took 6 years to recover from Rate Reductions in 2001

Total US Room Rates

Actual vs Inflation Adjusted

2000 - 2007

11

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

Total US Overview

(7)

-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 Supply % Change Demand % Change

Total United States

Room Supply/Demand Percent Change

Twelve Month Moving Average – 1989 to December 2008

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

13

Building Into The Downturn

-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 ADR % Chg Demand % Change Occ % Chg

Total United States

Room Demand/Occ/ADR Percent Change

Twelve Month Moving Average – 1989 to December 2008

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

2.4%

-1.6%

-4.2%

(8)

-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 1988q1 1991q1 1994q1 1997q1 2000q1 2003q1 2006q1 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 Demand % Chg ADR % CHG

Total United States

Hotel Rooms Sold vs. ADR Change Quarterly Change – 1988 to Q4 2008

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

15

Yield Management Amplifies The Pain

2.4 6.2 0.9 -0.4 5.8 1.3 2.7 -4.2 -1.6 -1.9 -5 0 5 10

Supply Demand Occupancy ADR RevPAR 2007 2008

Total United States

Key Performance Indicators Percent Change December YTD

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

16

(9)

-0.8 3.9 -0.3 -2.6 1.2 2.4 3.2 -7.5 -4.6 -8.2 -10 -5 0 5 10

Supply Demand Occupancy ADR RevPAR Jan-Aug

Sept-Dec

Total United States

Key Performance Indicators Percent Change 2008 – First 8 Months vs. Last 4 Months

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

17 A Tale of 2 Seasons -1.2 2.1 -4.1 -3.8 -10.0 1.8 -1.6 -0.2 -1.9 -0.8 -5.9 2.4 -3.5 -12.2 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Jan-Aug

Sept-Dec

Total United States

Demand Percent Change – Day of Week

2008 First 8 Months vs. Last 4 Months

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

(10)

2.6 0.3 -1.3 -1.5 3.3 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.1 3.7 -0.1 0.0 0.7 -0.3 -5 0 5

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Jan-Aug

Sept-Dec

Total United States

ADR Percent Change – Day of Week

2008 First 8 Months vs. Last 4 Months

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

19

Weekend Rates Are Deteriorating

Chain Scales

(11)

1.9 -1.6 -0.4 -2.2 -4.7 3.6 1.0 1.6 -6.2 -0.3 -4.6 -3.6 -6.0 -9.3 -10 -5 0 5

Total US Luxury Upper Upscale

Upscale Mid W Mid W/O Economy Jan-Aug

Sept-Dec

Total United States

Demand Percent Change – Chain Scale

2008 First 8 Months vs. Last 4 Months

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

21

High End Demand is Falling

1.7 -1.3 1.7 -0.7 4.2 2.3 2.0 2.6 4.0 3.8 -0.6 -1.5 -4.1 0.9 -5 0 5

Total US Luxury Upper Upscale

Upscale Mid W Mid W/O Economy Jan-Aug

Sept-Dec

Total United States

ADR Percent Change – Chain Scale

2008 First 8 Months vs. Last 4 Months

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

(12)

51.7 48.6 42.1 40.5 35.5 18.6 22.7 23.7 20.6 21.7 19.1 2.8 7.1 10 11.9 12.4 14 38.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Luxury Upper Upscale

Upscale Mid With Mid W/O Economy 2007 YE Q3 2008 Q4 2008

Increasing Occupancy and ADR

Chain Scales – Percent of Properties

Year End 2007 – 3rd & 4th Quarters 2008

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

23

Only 7 Luxury Hotels Increased ADR & OCC

4.1 2.2 6.2 5.5 10.8 28.5 16.4 17.2 23.3 20.6 24.9 60 53.8 42.5 34.7 33.1 31.7 8.1 0 25 50 75 Luxury Upper Upscale

Upscale Mid With Mid W/O Economy 2007 YE Q3 2008 Q4 2008

Declining Occupancy and ADR

Chain Scales – Percent of Properties

Year End 2007 – 3rd& 4th Quarters 2008

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

24

(13)

Major Markets

25 2.0 5.4 2.8 2.1 6.6 7.4 6.4 4.4 -12.1 3.3 2.3 1.6 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 Chicago, IL New York, NY Phoenix, AZ San Diego, CA San Francisco/San Mateo, CA

Top 25 US Markets All Other US Markets

Berlin Hong Kong SAR Dubai London Rio de Janeiro

Key 10 Global Markets

ADR Percent Change (Local Currency) December 2008 YTD

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

(14)

-4.7 -0.1 -3.8 -4.4 -2.1 -3.7 -5.2 -1.6 3.8 -11.2 -1.8 -6.0 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Chicago, IL New York, NY Phoenix, AZ San Diego, CA San Francisco/San Mateo, CA

Top 25 US Markets All Other US Markets

Berlin Hong Kong SAR Dubai London Rio de Janeiro

Key 10 Global Markets

Occupancy Percent Change December 2008 YTD

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

27

Global OCC Declines

-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 2005 2006 2007 2008 Total US Demand Resort Demand

Total US vs. Resort Locations

Demand Percent Change

Twelve Month Moving Average – 2005 to December 2008

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

Resort Demand Drops Faster / More Steeply

(15)

U.S. Lodging Industry

Projections

As of January 2009

29

Total US Industry

Consecutive Quarterly Declines

Key Indicators

1990/1991

2001/2002 Current

---

---

---• Room Demand

3

5 4

• Occupancy

7

6

5

• Average Daily Rate

0

5 1

• RevPAR

5

5 2

(16)

Total United States

Active Development Pipeline – Thousand of Rooms Change From Last Year

Source: STR / TWR / Dodge Construction Pipeline

1.7% 740 756 Total 12.4% 124 140 Pre-Planning -0.4% 616 613 Active Pipeline 6.0% 320 339 Planning 5.4% 84 89 Final Planning -12.6% 212 185 In Construction % Change December 2007 December 2008 Phase 31

Under Construction Pipeline Is Shrinking

Total United States

Abandoned Rooms

Year-over-year percent change

56% 75% 34% 70% 31% 17% 16% 10% 30% 50% 70% 90%

Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08

32

Source: STR / TWR / Dodge Construction Pipeline

(17)

1.0 1.2 1.9 1.0 1.4 1.5 2.7 2.4 0.2 1.3 0.4 -0.1 -1.6 2.8 0.5 -1.6 1.3 4.0 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009P 2010P 20 Yr Average Supply % Chg Demand % Chg

Total United States

Supply/Demand Percent Change 2003 – 2010P

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

33 0.4 0.2 0.3 -4.2 -0.2 3.6 2.9 -4.0 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009P 2010P

Total United States

Occupancy Percent Change 2003 – 2010P

20 Year Average: -0.4%

(18)

Total United States

Occupancy Percent 2003 – 2010P 59.2 61.4 63.1 63.3 63.1 60.4 58 58.1 50 60 70 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009P 2010P

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

35 5.5 -2.0 2.4 4.2 6.2 2.4 0.2 7.5 -3 -1 1 3 5 7 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009P 2010P

Total United States

ADR Percent Change 2003 – 2010P

20 Year Average: 3.5%

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

(19)

7.8 2.4 -5.9 5.7 -1.9 8.5 7.9 0.5 -10 -5 0 5 10 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009P 2010P

Total United States

RevPAR Percent Change 2003 – 2010P

20 Year Average: 3.4%

2009 Smith Travel Research, Inc.

37 85.22 83.99 86.24 90.90 103.91 97.31 82.86 82.75 87.64 89.03 91.06 93.48 96.65 99.77 85.22 102.76 80 90 100 110 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Nominal ADR Yr 2000, Grown by CPI

If year 2000 ADR had increased by CPI each year…

It took 6 years to recover from Rate Reductions in 2001

Total US Room Rates

Actual vs Inflation Adjusted

References

Related documents

Based upon the force projection mission definition I offered for NMCI, the legacy applications chosen first for transition into the NMCI environment (from the list of

Lower Division Certificate in Cybersecurity – Network Security (Approved 01-22-13) The certificate programs are designed for students interested in network security. Lower

Our findings on how communication and social identification processes operate in the prediction of TMS suggest potential avenues for developmental training courses aimed at

N/A  NOT  Satisfied  8:00 AM  9:00 AM  186  149  10:00 AM  11:00 AM  50  42  11:00 AM  12:00 PM  73  76  12:00 PM  1:00 PM  134  99  2:00 PM  3:00 PM  75  59 

The representative told him no, United considered the case closed, and there would be no further communication on the matter.”(Broom, 2012, p. 517) In his last correspondence to

The laser scan- ner measurements and the planes of the 3D city model are combined by implicit measurement equations and nonlinear equality constraints within the IEKF. To

Due to lack of product Range, Company cannot earn more profit because consumers have high demand of these products and they say that if  because consumers have high demand of

• 25% instant discount on orders above Rs 1,500 (including taxes) • Timings: 12:00 PM to 3:00 PM and 7:00 PM to 11:00 PM. • Minimum order value of INR 1500